Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reload this Page >

Calorie Counting

Search
Notices
Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

Calorie Counting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-23, 10:58 AM
  #51  
MinnMan
Senior Member
 
MinnMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,752

Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4393 Post(s)
Liked 3,016 Times in 1,865 Posts
Overheard on my group ride yesterday,

"____, you seem to have lost some weight"

"yeah, 20 lbs."

"Great, how did you do it?"

"Noom"
MinnMan is online now  
Old 09-08-23, 09:05 AM
  #52  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,552

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,585 Times in 2,344 Posts
Originally Posted by MinnMan
1 lb/week is a very good and attainable goal if sustained over the long term. You read about people losing far more/week, but the more drastic it is, the less sustainable.
thank you, yes, that's what I'm hoping for but it's sooooo sloooow ...
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-08-23, 09:11 AM
  #53  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,552

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,585 Times in 2,344 Posts
Originally Posted by MinnMan
"Noom"
funny. my goal is 196 (I started at 229), Noom says my goal should be 136 - 179. well, that's not gonna happen, my HS weight was 175. but they assure me in 6months I'll get there! um, nope

but I like that they highlight motivation. because you gotta have motivation!
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-08-23, 09:25 AM
  #54  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,868 Times in 3,013 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
thank you, yes, that's what I'm hoping for but it's sooooo sloooow ...
You just have to be patient and consistent. It doesn’t matter how long it takes if you intend to remain at a healthy weight for the rest of your life. Yo-yo diets are a waste of time.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 09-08-23, 09:31 AM
  #55  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,868 Times in 3,013 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
funny. my goal is 196 (I started at 229), Noom says my goal should be 136 - 179. well, that's not gonna happen, my HS weight was 175. but they assure me in 6months I'll get there! um, nope

but I like that they highlight motivation. because you gotta have motivation!
There is no reason why you can’t get down to your HS weight. Your body composition will inevitably have a little less muscle and a bit more fat, but overall weight should be roughly the same. If you can lose 30 lbs, then you can lose another 20 lb. It’s all just excess fat at this weight.
PeteHski is offline  
Old 09-08-23, 11:16 AM
  #56  
MinnMan
Senior Member
 
MinnMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,752

Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4393 Post(s)
Liked 3,016 Times in 1,865 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
funny. my goal is 196 (I started at 229), Noom says my goal should be 136 - 179. well, that's not gonna happen, my HS weight was 175. but they assure me in 6months I'll get there! um, nope

but I like that they highlight motivation. because you gotta have motivation!
there's some sense to your expectations, and I wish you luck getting down to 196, but once you get there, you may feel differently about going lower.

One of the BIG challenges to losing weight and keeping it off is actually the keeping it off part. You get down to your target weight and you say, "OK, now I don't have to be quite as careful with my diet because I'm not trying to lose weight". But that's a slippery slope and figuring out the new diet that is weight neutral can be VERY hard. This is why people yo-yo. Have a plan for this.
MinnMan is online now  
Likes For MinnMan:
Old 09-08-23, 11:35 AM
  #57  
MinnMan
Senior Member
 
MinnMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,752

Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4393 Post(s)
Liked 3,016 Times in 1,865 Posts
For many of us, "high school weight" is a pretty nice accomplishment. I guess now that more youth are overweight, this won't always mean to people what it means to most of us older folk.
MinnMan is online now  
Likes For MinnMan:
Old 09-08-23, 12:38 PM
  #58  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,552

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,585 Times in 2,344 Posts
Originally Posted by MinnMan
there's some sense to your expectations, and I wish you luck getting down to 196, but once you get there, you may feel differently about going lower.

One of the BIG challenges to losing weight and keeping it off is actually the keeping it off part. You get down to your target weight and you say, "OK, now I don't have to be quite as careful with my diet because I'm not trying to lose weight". But that's a slippery slope and figuring out the new diet that is weight neutral can be VERY hard. This is why people yo-yo. Have a plan for this.
if I understood my nephew correctly, I stay with my calorie limit. it gets me to my goal weight & keeps me there. meaning, what I'm doing is not not temporary
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-08-23, 12:39 PM
  #59  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,552

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,585 Times in 2,344 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
There is no reason why you can’t get down to your HS weight. Your body composition will inevitably have a little less muscle and a bit more fat, but overall weight should be roughly the same. If you can lose 30 lbs, then you can lose another 20 lb. It’s all just excess fat at this weight.
of course, but my goal was set by a personal trainer who met me, measured me, took a profile, etc
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-08-23, 03:44 PM
  #60  
hopperja
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
If you track calories in and track your weight and adjust calorie intake accordingly then you are more likely to hit your weight target. Knowing your calorie intake with reasonable accuracy is one less guess in the equation. It’s no different to tracking your weight as the output variable. The only reason people don’t count calories is because it takes a little more effort (although modern tech makes that fairly easy). As a bonus, calorie counting also gives you valuable information about your macro and micro nutrient mix.
This is an example of part of the problem here. I speak for myself and what works for me. You are trying to tell me what works for me, but you don't know me. Maybe this works for you, but because it works for you it doesn't mean it will work the same for me or others.

​​​​​​
hopperja is offline  
Old 09-08-23, 04:34 PM
  #61  
genejockey 
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,981

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10436 Post(s)
Liked 11,913 Times in 6,101 Posts
Originally Posted by MinnMan
For many of us, "high school weight" is a pretty nice accomplishment. I guess now that more youth are overweight, this won't always mean to people what it means to most of us older folk.
For me "high school weight" would be a problem, because I grew another inch or so after high school, so I'd be stretching the weight over more length.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is offline  
Old 09-08-23, 05:16 PM
  #62  
MinnMan
Senior Member
 
MinnMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,752

Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4393 Post(s)
Liked 3,016 Times in 1,865 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
if I understood my nephew correctly, I stay with my calorie limit. it gets me to my goal weight & keeps me there. meaning, what I'm doing is not not temporary
Well, weight loss comes down to having a deficit of calories relative to what you burn. If you have a regimen that results in weight loss, your (intake-consumption) energy (calories) is a negative number. So I don't see how your weight loss diet and your weight maintenance diet can be the same, unless, say, you start exercising less.
MinnMan is online now  
Old 09-08-23, 05:21 PM
  #63  
MinnMan
Senior Member
 
MinnMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,752

Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4393 Post(s)
Liked 3,016 Times in 1,865 Posts
Originally Posted by hopperja
This is an example of part of the problem here. I speak for myself and what works for me. You are trying to tell me what works for me, but you don't know me. Maybe this works for you, but because it works for you it doesn't mean it will work the same for me or others.

​​​​​​
You know, I have seen many posts here that are of the flavor that you are describing, but I don't PeteHski 's falls into that category. Calorie counting is a helpful tool for many. You don't have to do it to lose weight, but that isn't the same as "doesn't mean it will work the same for me or others".

Shorter: I think you are being too harsh here.
MinnMan is online now  
Likes For MinnMan:
Old 09-08-23, 05:50 PM
  #64  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,552

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,585 Times in 2,344 Posts
Originally Posted by MinnMan
Well, weight loss comes down to having a deficit of calories relative to what you burn. If you have a regimen that results in weight loss, your (intake-consumption) energy (calories) is a negative number. So I don't see how your weight loss diet and your weight maintenance diet can be the same, unless, say, you start exercising less.
at my current weight, it's a deficit
at my target weight it, will be maintenance
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-08-23, 06:37 PM
  #65  
MinnMan
Senior Member
 
MinnMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,752

Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4393 Post(s)
Liked 3,016 Times in 1,865 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
at my current weight, it's a deficit
at my target weight it, will be maintenance
Yes, I see the point - as you lose weight, your daily homeostatic burn goes down.
MinnMan is online now  
Old 09-09-23, 05:46 AM
  #66  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,868 Times in 3,013 Posts
Originally Posted by hopperja
This is an example of part of the problem here. I speak for myself and what works for me. You are trying to tell me what works for me, but you don't know me. Maybe this works for you, but because it works for you it doesn't mean it will work the same for me or others.

​​​​​​
I'm not trying to tell you anything. I'm just saying that calorie counting is a bit like weighing yourself i.e. an objective, trackable metric. Whether it is helpful or not depends on what you do with the data. I happen to find calorie counting very useful when training to hit a specific target weight, in a specific timeframe. A lot of pro cyclists do it instead of guessing their calorie intake. I realise an objective approach is not for everyone.
PeteHski is offline  
Likes For PeteHski:
Old 09-09-23, 06:57 AM
  #67  
wolfchild
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
I'm not trying to tell you anything. I'm just saying that calorie counting is a bit like weighing yourself i.e. an objective, trackable metric. Whether it is helpful or not depends on what you do with the data. I happen to find calorie counting very useful when training to hit a specific target weight, in a specific timeframe. A lot of pro cyclists do it instead of guessing their calorie intake. I realise an objective approach is not for everyone.

Eating intuitively has worked for me my whole life and not just me but many other people...I can easily loose weight or gain weight without counting a single calorie. I just know exactly how much to eat without keeping track of calories. Some days I eat more some days I eat less. Some days I may eat 2 - 3 meals per day and on other days I may eat 4 - 5 times per day. It all just balances out and works great for me, no need to keep track of any data.
wolfchild is offline  
Old 09-10-23, 07:17 AM
  #68  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,868 Times in 3,013 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
i just know exactly how much to eat without keeping track of calories.
How can you eat an exact amount of food without measuring it in some way?
PeteHski is offline  
Old 09-10-23, 07:28 AM
  #69  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,868 Times in 3,013 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
Eating intuitively has worked for me my whole life and not just me but many other people...
Well intuition works for me too, but calorie counting makes it more precise when I train for a specific event. As I said it is just data like knowing your weight. I could guess my weight too, but it’s not as precise.
PeteHski is offline  
Old 09-10-23, 08:49 AM
  #70  
wolfchild
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
How can you eat an exact amount of food without measuring it in some way?
Is this even a serious question ?
wolfchild is offline  
Old 09-10-23, 09:16 AM
  #71  
Inusuit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 604

Bikes: 1995 Specialized Rockhopper,1989 Specialized Rock Combo, 2013 Specialized Tarmac Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
Liked 588 Times in 278 Posts
I'm blessed with good genes. I weigh regularly and adjust input accordingly even if it means skipping beer for a few days. I wish everyone the best of luck with whatever method they use to reach loss goals and maintain a healthy weight. We have an epidemic of obesity that raises health care costs for all of us.
Inusuit is offline  
Old 09-10-23, 11:13 AM
  #72  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,536

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,939 Times in 1,384 Posts
A reporter asked LA how he knew how many calories he was consuming. He said, "It's written on the side of the box!"
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is online now  
Old 09-10-23, 12:00 PM
  #73  
wolfchild
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721

Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,286 Posts
Originally Posted by PeteHski
How can you eat an exact amount of food without measuring it in some way?
You take the word exact out of it's context and meaning....I didn't say I eat exactly the same amount of food at every meal every day....I said I just know exactly how much total food to eat every day. Some days it's less, some days it's more, the actual portion of food isn't always exactly the same. I just know what my body needs without having to keep track of any data.
wolfchild is offline  
Old 09-10-23, 01:37 PM
  #74  
MinnMan
Senior Member
 
MinnMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,752

Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4393 Post(s)
Liked 3,016 Times in 1,865 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
You take the word exact out of it's context and meaning....I didn't say I eat exactly the same amount of food at every meal every day....I said I just know exactly how much total food to eat every day. Some days it's less, some days it's more, the actual portion of food isn't always exactly the same. I just know what my body needs without having to keep track of any data.
No, he took the word in the correct context. Exact means exact.

Your posts are consistently strident. If you are feeling sensitive about this kind of criticism, consider moderating your writing style.
MinnMan is online now  
Old 09-10-23, 05:41 PM
  #75  
PeteHski
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,868 Times in 3,013 Posts
Originally Posted by wolfchild
You take the word exact out of it's context and meaning....I didn't say I eat exactly the same amount of food at every meal every day....I said I just know exactly how much total food to eat every day. Some days it's less, some days it's more, the actual portion of food isn't always exactly the same. I just know what my body needs without having to keep track of any data.
Yeah I know what you said. It is impossible to know exactly how much food you ate today if you didn’t keep track of it. Words like “less” and “more” are not exact amounts.

Eating intuitively works for me up to a point, but if I want to lose a specific amount of weight in a specific amount of time then I track my calorie intake and calorie burn. I can lose weight without tracking calories, but it’s never as consistent.

Just to be clear I’m not saying that calorie counting is the only way to lose weight. But it is definitely one way that works for some people and many pro athletes do it routinely.

Last edited by PeteHski; 09-10-23 at 05:53 PM.
PeteHski is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.