Conversion to indexed; problem shifting when in large chainring.
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Conversion to indexed; problem shifting when in large chainring.
I just put brifters (sorry, but it's a perfect word) on my vintage 7x2 Italian frame that previously had friction shifters.
When I stopped working on it last night I had the rear derailleur shifting perfectly.
Today I hooked up the front derailleur, and got that shifting dialed in. Now the rear derailleur works perfectly when the chain is on the small (36) chainring. But the rear is very reluctant to shift when the chain is on the large (50) chainring.
The primary issue is that the chain doesn't want to shift down from the largest (24) sprocket; it takes to clicks to get it off that sprocket, and then it shifts down two cogs.
Could the chain be too short? It's not according to Lennard Zinn's formula: chain on small rear, large front, the pulley cage is vertical.
I've read that people have had this problem when the derailleur cables are crossed; that's not the case here.
I don't know if I'll ever use (or should use) the large/large combination, but it seems like I should be able to if I want or need to.
I've used the barrel adjusters to try to cure the problem, but that just seems to create other problems.
Thanks for reading; thanks for your help.
When I stopped working on it last night I had the rear derailleur shifting perfectly.
Today I hooked up the front derailleur, and got that shifting dialed in. Now the rear derailleur works perfectly when the chain is on the small (36) chainring. But the rear is very reluctant to shift when the chain is on the large (50) chainring.
The primary issue is that the chain doesn't want to shift down from the largest (24) sprocket; it takes to clicks to get it off that sprocket, and then it shifts down two cogs.
Could the chain be too short? It's not according to Lennard Zinn's formula: chain on small rear, large front, the pulley cage is vertical.
I've read that people have had this problem when the derailleur cables are crossed; that's not the case here.
I don't know if I'll ever use (or should use) the large/large combination, but it seems like I should be able to if I want or need to.
I've used the barrel adjusters to try to cure the problem, but that just seems to create other problems.
Thanks for reading; thanks for your help.
#2
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,734
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,205 Posts
Are you using indexing derailleurs? Most friction derailleurs will not work properly or consistently with indexed shifters.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
#4
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,734
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,205 Posts
Did you align the derailleur hanger? That could be the culprit.
Generally speaking, ‘failure to release’ when the shift cable is in highest tension (largest rear cog) is caused by friction in the cable/housing or the RD itself.
If the RD is new to you, it might require cleaning or lubrication to ensure free movement throughout the full range.
The cable adjuster on the RD should be used to ensure that the chain is running properly between the cogs- not too close to either the next or former cog.
Generally speaking, ‘failure to release’ when the shift cable is in highest tension (largest rear cog) is caused by friction in the cable/housing or the RD itself.
If the RD is new to you, it might require cleaning or lubrication to ensure free movement throughout the full range.
The cable adjuster on the RD should be used to ensure that the chain is running properly between the cogs- not too close to either the next or former cog.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Last edited by rccardr; 08-21-22 at 12:29 PM.
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
I did not align the hanger. I'll look into that, and I'll give the derailleur and clean and lube. Cables and housings are all brand new.
#6
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,515
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
2,056 Posts
#7
Newbie
Thread Starter
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
I don't have a gauge so I screwed an old hub into the hanger. The end of the hub's axle seems parallel to and lines up flush with the small cog of the freewheel, so I think we can say that the hanger is straight. (I also put a level across both flanges and they are off by the same amount as the top of both "cheeks" of the saddle--of course, the bike on the stand isn't level.)
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times
in
315 Posts
Could you take a photo of the RD-6400 while it is in the “big-big” combo? We might be able to evaluate if there are chain length issues or whether the upper pulley is positioned well (or not so well).
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times
in
315 Posts
I don't have a gauge so I screwed an old hub into the hanger. The end of the hub's axle seems parallel to and lines up flush with the small cog of the freewheel, so I think we can say that the hanger is straight. (I also put a level across both flanges and they are off by the same amount as the top of both "cheeks" of the saddle--of course, the bike on the stand isn't level.)
#11
Newbie
Thread Starter
Likes For Jordanmilo:
#12
Newbie
Thread Starter
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times
in
315 Posts
Chain wrap looks pretty good in the big-big. Dura Ace uniglide freewheels have a silky ratchet action of the freewheel body, but cog precision might be not quite as good for the Uniglide cogs compared to modern Hyperglide. I run 7400 uniglide seven speed cassette on my commuter bike and find that the indexing can be a challenge to have perfect click shifting on all gears until I get the derailleur hanger almost perfect in the vertical and horizontal plane. I had the Park Tools DAG-1 and found it helpful but flawed. When Park Tools came out with their new and improved DAG-3 I had to have one. Having now used it on 3 different bikes I can report that the DAG-3 is really great and inspires more confidence that you have dialed in the accuracy of the derailleur hanger in a way that inspires more confidence.
#15
Newbie
Thread Starter
Hmm...Hanger alignment is interesting to me: Why would the bike shift up and down through the freewheel flawlessly on the small chainring but not on the large chainring? That makes me think that the rear derailleur is not capable of dealing with the "new-style" crankset, with its 36/50 chainrings. Shimano's catalog says "Maximum chainwheel difference: under 13t," which I have exceeded. https://www.disraeligears.co.uk/site...re_scan_3.html
Suddenly, I am leaning toward a new rear derailleur; they seem shockingly inexpensive, compared to what we payed back in the day.
Suddenly, I am leaning toward a new rear derailleur; they seem shockingly inexpensive, compared to what we payed back in the day.
#16
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,734
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,205 Posts
Chain length looks fine.
What is chainline?
Assuming no weird chainline, no major friction in the cable/housing and no binding in the RD itself, this is likely an issue with hanger alignment.
What is chainline?
Assuming no weird chainline, no major friction in the cable/housing and no binding in the RD itself, this is likely an issue with hanger alignment.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,837
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Tread, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
430 Posts
Could be a B screw adjustment issue--the top RD pulley rotates away from the rear cog under tension. You can also play around a little with axle position in the horizontal dropout, but not much with that tire size.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I would back out the low limit screw slightly. The non-index side (RD-L) limit screws are not needed with STI shifters. Index side screws (RD-H) start the whole index sequence.
It makes no sense that the shifting works on the inner and not the outer ring, but if the shifter pawl is slightly hanging up due to the stop, I’d at least try it.
John
It makes no sense that the shifting works on the inner and not the outer ring, but if the shifter pawl is slightly hanging up due to the stop, I’d at least try it.
John
Last edited by 70sSanO; 08-22-22 at 10:04 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Little hard to see in your little pics but your axle may be a little further back than Shimano's recommendation. See bottom of the attached.
Not sure how much it matters, haven't been able to test since don't have horizontal dropouts on any of my frames. Worth a try??...
Edit: forgot to mention, the X spec. is what's relevant. Also, note measurement is right angle to chainstay.
Not sure how much it matters, haven't been able to test since don't have horizontal dropouts on any of my frames. Worth a try??...
Edit: forgot to mention, the X spec. is what's relevant. Also, note measurement is right angle to chainstay.
Last edited by KCT1986; 08-22-22 at 11:49 AM. Reason: Addnl. info.