Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Different Saddle Shape for Endurance vs Racing Geometry Bikes?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Different Saddle Shape for Endurance vs Racing Geometry Bikes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-19, 01:10 PM
  #1  
UsedToBeFaster
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Different Saddle Shape for Endurance vs Racing Geometry Bikes?

Hi,

I've never seen this discussed before, but it seems like some saddles are designed for racing geometries where the person is more aero with hips tilted more downwards. See first picture below.

But others are designed for a more endurance upright design see second picture below.

The former has more "wing down" design whilst the later more "wing up" desing?

Is that a fair assessment?

Thanks.

Last edited by UsedToBeFaster; 10-27-19 at 02:20 PM.
UsedToBeFaster is offline  
Old 10-27-19, 06:35 PM
  #2  
dmanthree
Senior Member
 
dmanthree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678

Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 191 Posts
I've tried a few, and I've found that the so-called dedicated endurance or racing saddles mean nothing. It all comes down to trial and error. No, it's not cheap, either.
dmanthree is offline  
Old 10-27-19, 07:13 PM
  #3  
wheelreason
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,813
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 501 Post(s)
Liked 628 Times in 371 Posts
Originally Posted by UsedToBeFaster

Is that a fair assessment?
More like ass easement, but yeah...
wheelreason is offline  
Old 10-27-19, 08:01 PM
  #4  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Yup, sorta true. I choose saddles to suit the overall bike fit. My old school steel bike has a more relaxed fit, handlebar a couple of inches below saddle height. But occasionally I use clip-on aero bars for practice in case I ever decide to try time trials again. With my solid top saddles I had to tilt the nose down to relieve perineum pressure. So I got a saddle that's wider (around 140mm) for sitting more upright on most rides, with a generous cutout for perineum relief when I'm on the aero bars. Good compromise.

My other bike with somewhat more aggressive fit -- bar about 4" below saddle height -- I prefer a solid top Selle Italia, 130mm wide, with the nose tipped down very slightly. It's been fine for my usual 20-50 mile rides and occasional longer rides.

Supposedly, at least according to Fizik's fit guides, I should be riding a saddle that flares up at the rear to handle my pelvic angle, lower back, etc. But I can't get along with that type of saddle. I prefer 'em flat or nearly so, without too much padding. But I also work on core flexibility and strengthening so at age 62 I'm not quite ready for an old man saddle. Subject to change any birthday now.
canklecat is offline  
Old 10-28-19, 06:38 AM
  #5  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,228

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1098 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
I'm sold on SMP saddles with their full length cutout. Once you figure out the right width, there are different padding thicknesses to choose from. Anything that works for a racing fit with a large saddle to bar drop should work with a more relaxed fit.

Using their width suggestion for my 30 inch waist, I need a narrow model. The stratos with standard padding works great. I tried a minimal padding blaster model, but it was too hard.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 10-28-19, 07:22 AM
  #6  
WhyFi
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
The distance between your so-called sit bones narrows when you tilt your hips forward, so yeah, your intended position could have an affect on saddle width for appropriate support. That said, I think that any intended marketing distinction between endurance and race saddles is suspect, at best. IOW, don't let your intended position eliminate saddles from your search without first confirming yourself. It can be a long search to find the perfect saddle, but you'll eventually accumulate enough experience to have a decent idea of what kinds of shapes, widths and padding levels work best for you.
WhyFi is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.