Best Value Bottom Bracket for BSA, 24mm Hollow Spindle
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 310 Times
in
218 Posts
Best Value Bottom Bracket for BSA 68/73, 24mm Hollow Spindle
I think my Bottom Bracket may be on the way out and whilst I do have a ready made replacement at home for it, thinking long term about this, I was wanting to get people's thoughts and recommendations on what BSA 68/73, 24mm Hollow Spindle External Cup Bottom Brackets, last the longest.
Other than lasting longer, I'm not sure if there is much "performance" difference between various models of such Bottom Brackets, but would be happy to be educated about this too, if I am wrong on this.
With how cheap Shimano XT & XTR bottom brackets are, does it make much sense paying 3x to 10x as much for other brands with their ceramic ball bearings and what ever other goodness is in these very expensive bottom brackets?
My current bottom bracket is the one that came with my M591 crankset by Shimano, so I am sure it won't be hard to improve upon that, but wanted to find out about other people's experiences and choices.
Other than lasting longer, I'm not sure if there is much "performance" difference between various models of such Bottom Brackets, but would be happy to be educated about this too, if I am wrong on this.
With how cheap Shimano XT & XTR bottom brackets are, does it make much sense paying 3x to 10x as much for other brands with their ceramic ball bearings and what ever other goodness is in these very expensive bottom brackets?
My current bottom bracket is the one that came with my M591 crankset by Shimano, so I am sure it won't be hard to improve upon that, but wanted to find out about other people's experiences and choices.
#2
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,117
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times
in
371 Posts
For value, performance and durability, it's hard to improve on Shimano. Are there marginal performance gains to be made with uber expensive ceramic bearing cups? Maybe, but it would never be worth it to me.
The bike shop I work at has a display on the counter, two Hollowtech II cranks, one mounted in Shimano cups, the other in Enduro Ceramic. The point is to demonstrate how much easier the ceramic bearings spin.
The difference is dramatic when spinning the cranks by hand, but how much difference it makes on the bike is hard to say. I'm inclined to think it's fractions of a watt, but someone somewhere has probably done a study to quantify it.
The bike shop I work at has a display on the counter, two Hollowtech II cranks, one mounted in Shimano cups, the other in Enduro Ceramic. The point is to demonstrate how much easier the ceramic bearings spin.
The difference is dramatic when spinning the cranks by hand, but how much difference it makes on the bike is hard to say. I'm inclined to think it's fractions of a watt, but someone somewhere has probably done a study to quantify it.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East Tennessee
Posts: 1,616
Bikes: Basso Luguna, Fuji Nevada
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
This is about as good of a value as you'll.
Shimano 105 5700 Bottom Bracket $9.66
https://www.merlincycles.com/shimano...ket-49200.html
Shimano 105 5700 Bottom Bracket $9.66
https://www.merlincycles.com/shimano...ket-49200.html
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,489
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
Shimano Hollowtech is bang for the buck and strong as can be. Ceramic bearings cost hundreds of dollars for what amounts to infinitesimal gains (great in a turbocharger spinning at x00,000 rpm----wasted on a bicycle spinning at 90.)
#5
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Yeah, +1 to everything above.
I have HT2 BBs on my MTB and gravel bike and they are simple excellent. Simple to install, simple to maintain. I will never be good enough to take advantage of the benefits of a bottom bracket with less drag than the HT2.
I have HT2 BBs on my MTB and gravel bike and they are simple excellent. Simple to install, simple to maintain. I will never be good enough to take advantage of the benefits of a bottom bracket with less drag than the HT2.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,585
Bikes: 2017 Colnago C-RS, 2012 Colnago Ace, 2010 Giant Cypress hybrid
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
85 Posts
Don't know how many of you are high mileage riders but if you're putting in close to or over 1,000 miles a month, you wouldn't care what the BB cost you. The difference in ease of peddling between a Shimano (including DuraAce) and a BB such as Hawk Racing or one with ceramic bearings is very noticeable, especially on climbs and headwinds. I have Hawk Racing on my 2012 Ace and recently purchased a new Colnago CRS. First thing I had the shop do was to replace the Ultegra BB with a Hawk during the assembly. No regrets.
Last edited by John_V; 05-10-17 at 08:36 AM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 174
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As others have said, it's hard to beat the price/performance of Shimano BBs. I've also had good luck with Wheels Manufacturing's BBs. They cost a bit more, but they last longer (especially the 24/22mm versions for SRAM cranks).
#8
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Per HawkRacing literature...
"Our bearings utilize a lighter seal than ceramic bearings, and they will get you to terminal velocity more quickly and easily."
Funny way to describe getting up to speed quicker.
Those who can reap the benefits of a bottom bracket costing 10-12x more than a standard Shimano should absolutely use it. I am not worthy of such a component.
"Our bearings utilize a lighter seal than ceramic bearings, and they will get you to terminal velocity more quickly and easily."
Funny way to describe getting up to speed quicker.
Those who can reap the benefits of a bottom bracket costing 10-12x more than a standard Shimano should absolutely use it. I am not worthy of such a component.
#9
Non omnino gravis
For the money, I don't think it's possible to do better than the Shimano BB-R60. 15 bucks. Lasts for ages.
Beware anyone who recommends ceramic bearings for an application that sees less than 150rpm (that is, anything on a bicycle.) I have plenty of ceramic bearings here... for R/C brushless motors that spin 100,000rpm.
Beware anyone who recommends ceramic bearings for an application that sees less than 150rpm (that is, anything on a bicycle.) I have plenty of ceramic bearings here... for R/C brushless motors that spin 100,000rpm.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,585
Bikes: 2017 Colnago C-RS, 2012 Colnago Ace, 2010 Giant Cypress hybrid
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
85 Posts
For the money, I don't think it's possible to do better than the Shimano BB-R60. 15 bucks. Lasts for ages.
Beware anyone who recommends ceramic bearings for an application that sees less than 150rpm (that is, anything on a bicycle.) I have plenty of ceramic bearings here... for R/C brushless motors that spin 100,000rpm.
Beware anyone who recommends ceramic bearings for an application that sees less than 150rpm (that is, anything on a bicycle.) I have plenty of ceramic bearings here... for R/C brushless motors that spin 100,000rpm.
#11
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
The only thing not to like about Shimano Hollowtech cranks.....is their limited choice of gearings, especially WRT road branded parts.
#12
Non omnino gravis
In January of 2012, I bought my Ultegra Colnago Ace. With the miles I put on the bike, the BB was toast by June of the following year. I replaced it with a Hawk, that cost me $100.00, and have ridden on that BB since. I replaced it last month with another one, not because it needed to be changed, but because I had put over 40,000 miles on it. It's still tight and spins as good as a new one. With the mileage I put on a bike, I wonder how many Shimano BBs I would have gone through in the same time period?
5 Ultegras.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,585
Bikes: 2017 Colnago C-RS, 2012 Colnago Ace, 2010 Giant Cypress hybrid
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
85 Posts
In 2013, when I bought the Hawk BB, the Ultegra BB was $68.00 at several places I went to. Didn't go online for one because I needed to replace it for a ride on the day after the old BB failed. The BB is a BSA, English threaded BB and a DuraAce BB was the same price as the Hawk. I could have picked up a Tiagra BB for around $28.00 but I'm a firm believer in "you get what you pay for."
Also, when I replaced the Hawk with a new one, there was nothing wrong with with the one that got replaced except for the mileage I put on it. So, we really can't say it wouldn't last more than 100,000 miles. I also replaced the chain, cassette and chain rings in the event I decide to sell the bike.
However, riding every day and putting on the mileage I do on a bike, I would rather pay the extra for a BB that makes it easier to pedal because of better bearings and less friction than go cheap and pedal harder with more effort.
Also, when I replaced the Hawk with a new one, there was nothing wrong with with the one that got replaced except for the mileage I put on it. So, we really can't say it wouldn't last more than 100,000 miles. I also replaced the chain, cassette and chain rings in the event I decide to sell the bike.
However, riding every day and putting on the mileage I do on a bike, I would rather pay the extra for a BB that makes it easier to pedal because of better bearings and less friction than go cheap and pedal harder with more effort.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,585
Bikes: 2017 Colnago C-RS, 2012 Colnago Ace, 2010 Giant Cypress hybrid
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 408 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
85 Posts
That's a great price. I wish they were going that cheap back in 2013 when my Ultegra BB went out on me.
__________________
HCFR Cycling Team
Ride Safe ... Ride Hard ... Ride Daily
2017 Colnago C-RS
2012 Colnago Ace
2010 Giant Cypress
HCFR Cycling Team
Ride Safe ... Ride Hard ... Ride Daily
2017 Colnago C-RS
2012 Colnago Ace
2010 Giant Cypress
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,489
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
Pays to shop around. and to stock up. My wife wonders about all the boxes on the shelf, but prices never seem to go down, and sometimes stuff does wear out.