Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Folding Bikes
Reload this Page >

My Wife's full titanium Brompton clone

Search
Notices
Folding Bikes Discuss the unique features and issues of folding bikes. Also a great place to learn what folding bike will work best for your needs.

My Wife's full titanium Brompton clone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-21, 09:32 PM
  #51  
pinholecam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by Schwinnsta
While Ti alloys rival steel for strength, its Modulus of Elasticity is about 60% of steel. So it is more flexible for the same size tube. This should allow for more suspension or compliance giving Ti bike a more comfortable ride. I say should because I have never had a Ti bike myself. Ti as a material for bikes seems ideal. Light weight, does not rust, greater comfort. Unfortunately its very expensive and more difficult to weld.

I have ridden bikes built with all the materials, but even then, different bike types, geometries, design won't make it a final say in terms of one vs the other.

I feel that Ti has lost its luster and fallen behind Alu and Steel.
Alu and Steel has improved over the past 15yrs with triple butting, hydroform (for Alu), new alloys and treatments (for steel).
Their economies of scale has also not only pushed improvements but often done it at same/lower cost.
We now get the super light steel and alu bikes while Ti is largely stuck in the 6.8kg - 7.8kg mark.
Ti has largely remained 3/2.5 and 6/4 in terms of alloys for bikes and 6/4 has remained hard to work with (so most bikes are still 3/2.5).
Ti has also remained standard tubing (ie. cylindrical) and double butted save for a few custom makers who lathe down the tubing for triple butting.

That said, it does not rust, prices have come down for one and offers lighter weight for similar compliance to a standard steel bike (ie. not vs a more exotic one )
Personally, Ti is the material of choice and I can even design one to my needs and requirement for a relatively good price.
pinholecam is offline  
Old 06-27-21, 09:33 PM
  #52  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times in 933 Posts
Originally Posted by Schwinnsta
While Ti alloys rival steel for strength, its Modulus of Elasticity is about 60% of steel. So it is more flexible for the same size tube. This should allow for more suspension or compliance giving Ti bike a more comfortable ride. I say should because I have never had a Ti bike myself. Ti as a material for bikes seems ideal. Light weight, does not rust, greater comfort. Unfortunately its very expensive and more difficult to weld.
It seems good on paper.

The problem is a tube of identical dimensions frequently results in riding a spaghetti noodle.

The only way out of this is significantly larger tubes. This makes crankset/tire clearances & other conventional clearances/standards impossible with industry available conventional parts.

The oft employed "other" solution is significantly thicker (& otherwise unnecessarily heavier) tubes.

The result is not as much weight saved as otherwise could be, & difficult, expensive manufacture to do proper. All for not much tangible difference in function besides novelty. Granted, there isn't very many things more beautiful than a highly polished Ti frame...& that alone makes it worthy of owning.
base2 is offline  
Old 06-28-21, 07:01 AM
  #53  
Schwinnsta
Schwinnasaur
 
Schwinnsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,567
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 459 Post(s)
Liked 184 Times in 122 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
It seems good on paper.
The only way out of this is significantly larger tubes. This makes crankset/tire clearances & other conventional clearances/standards impossible with industry available conventional parts.

The oft employed "other" solution is significantly thicker (& otherwise unnecessarily heavier) tubes.
If you want the same flex with Ti, the tube has to have a slightly larger diameter (thou it can be thinner). It is not a problem with clearances and standards. Aluminum has a even lower Modulus of elasticity and there seems to be no problem there. Aluminum would be the material of choice but for it not having a known fatigue limit. Because of that, manufactures have to use larger tubes than they would otherwise.
Schwinnsta is offline  
Old 06-28-21, 07:35 AM
  #54  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times in 933 Posts
Originally Posted by Schwinnsta
If you want the same flex with Ti, the tube has to have a slightly larger diameter (thou it can be thinner). It is not a problem with clearances and standards. Aluminum has a even lower Modulus of elasticity and there seems to be no problem there. Aluminum would be the material of choice but for it not having a known fatigue limit. Because of that, manufactures have to use larger tubes than they would otherwise.
Well, I have been mistaken before.

I seem to remember a Ti mountain bike thread & chainstay/tire/crankarm clearance being an issue. The solution was some rework with thick, & tall rectangular tubes being used in that area, for a few inches of the chainstay, near the bottom bracket. The elasticity of Ti in thin gages of strength equivalent to some other materials made it such that things hit & rubbed in practice.

By extension, I can see other issues in frame design as well regarding harmonic oscillation (speed wobble,) & uninspiring cornering ability being concerns if only necessary strength to do the job were the only consideration to frame design.

Nowadays with 1.5 inch tapered headtubes, thru axles & the occassional 83mm bottom bracket, I have no doubt designs able to take advantage of Ti's unique properties may be ripe for a renaissance.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.

Car dependency is a tax.
base2 is offline  
Old 06-28-21, 06:59 PM
  #55  
pinholecam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by base2
It seems good on paper.

The problem is a tube of identical dimensions frequently results in riding a spaghetti noodle.

The only way out of this is significantly larger tubes. This makes crankset/tire clearances & other conventional clearances/standards impossible with industry available conventional parts.

The oft employed "other" solution is significantly thicker (& otherwise unnecessarily heavier) tubes.

The result is not as much weight saved as otherwise could be, & difficult, expensive manufacture to do proper. All for not much tangible difference in function besides novelty. Granted, there isn't very many things more beautiful than a highly polished Ti frame...& that alone makes it worthy of owning.

Certainly not the case as Ti tubing will still be thinner than the equivalent Alu tubing for the same build (and thicker than the steel one) - aiming for the same strength for the frame.
There are many examples of Ti gravel and MTB builds out there w/o any complaints of clearance issues.

One of the biggest advantages of Ti is the ability to easily find a custom builder and get what the rider is looking for.
Stiff BB area, compliant stays, short seatube to run a flexy carbon seatpost - Done!
Stiff but lighter than the equivalent steel frame - Done
Tire clearance, long wheelbase, bottle cage mounts galore? - No problem.


I designed a custom Ti all road bike to my fit, Ritchey breakaway system, 32mm tires on 700c and 38-42mm on 650b, reasonably lightweight at 7.8kg full build - all in a frame that won't rust as less worry of maintenance. Its not something thats easy to get off the shelf (except for the Ritchey Outback Carbon and steel 2020 ).
pinholecam is offline  
Old 07-26-21, 01:07 PM
  #56  
mlau
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Alameda
Posts: 481

Bikes: Xootr Swift

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Hey Raxel,

Mind doing a write up of how you did this project?

I'd really love to try doing this, but I'm quite intimidated.
It'd be nice to have a "lifetime" brompton style folder.

-Matt

ps. As for my other "lifetime" bike, it's my xootr swift from dental school.
mlau is offline  
Old 07-27-21, 09:14 AM
  #57  
mlau
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Alameda
Posts: 481

Bikes: Xootr Swift

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Sorry, I forgot about Raxel's other thread....that i bumped last night.
mlau is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bugly64
Folding Bikes
6
01-10-19 11:16 AM
gmanella
Classic & Vintage
14
08-09-16 07:11 PM
YoungGPS14
Folding Bikes
70
04-18-16 08:36 PM
keyven
Folding Bikes
7
10-24-14 10:27 PM
Raxel
Folding Bikes
14
04-01-10 08:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.