Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Accuracy of power assessments without a powertap

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Accuracy of power assessments without a powertap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-11, 07:27 PM
  #1  
surgeonstone
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Accuracy of power assessments without a powertap

When I upload my gamin into a variety of web programs ( ridewithgps),
I get the usual data but I noticed that on the ridewithgps it gives an average power in watts for the ride. Now I do not have the power tap and so this must be coming from speed, heart-rate etc. How accurate is this info? Todays ride was an average of 250 watts.
surgeonstone is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 08:10 AM
  #2  
mvnsnd
Senior Member
 
mvnsnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: WNY
Posts: 3,101

Bikes: Factor O2, Caad10, Caad2

Liked 123 Times in 79 Posts
I would say it's optimistic. I don't have a power meter either, but uploaded a trainer ride from a KK trainer. The ridewithgps number was higher than the KK number based on average speed. I already thought the KK numbers were supposed to be a little high.
mvnsnd is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 08:23 AM
  #3  
surgeonstone
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by mvnsnd
I would say it's optimistic. I don't have a power meter either, but uploaded a trainer ride from a KK trainer. The ridewithgps number was higher than the KK number based on average speed. I already thought the KK numbers were supposed to be a little high.
That was my thought as well.
surgeonstone is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 09:29 AM
  #4  
psuaero
Never fear the hills...
 
psuaero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 872

Bikes: 2011 Giant TCR Advanced, 2010 Motobecane Fantom Cross Pro, 2011 Redline Monocog Flight 29r

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Should be easy to see... if I get time in a little bit I'll pick one of my rides or a portion of a ride and upload it to ridewithgps. I'll post results.

Done...

It's pretty optimistic. I put in a fairly hard effort 28 mile ride from March. RidewithGPS says 299W (me likey)... TrainingPeaks Powertap combo says 199W (normalized 233W).

Here are the rest of the stats from both:
RidewithGPS.com
Departed: Mar 08, '11, 11:58AM
Starts in: Elkridge, MD 21075, US
Distance: 27.8 mi
Selection Distance: 27.8 mi
Elevation: + 1722 / - 1713 ft
Max Grade: 13.2 %
Avg. Grade: 0.6 %
Total Duration: 01:34:12
Selection Duration: 01:34:12
Moving Time: 01:31:28
Selection Moving Time: 01:31:35
Stopped Time: 00:02:37
Calories burned: 1690
Avg Watts: 299
Max Speed: 43.1 mph
Average Speed: 18.1 mph
Max Heartrate: 192 bpm
Min Heartrate: 94 bpm
Average Heartrate: 164 bpm

TrainingPeaks
Entire workout (190 watts):
Duration: 1:32:25 (1:35:52)
Work: 1044 kJ
TSS: 201 (intensity factor 1.164)
Norm Power: 233
VI: 1.22
Pw:HR: 2.08%
Pa:HR: 4.52%
Distance: 27.99 mi
Min Max Avg
Power: 0 686 190 watts
Heart Rate: 91 192 165 bpm
Cadence: 32 209 85 rpm
Speed: 0 36.8 18.2 mph

PS: The small difference in ride times are probably due to the GPS data coming from my Garmin Edge 500 and the Power data coming from my wired PowerTap. If anyone things it makes a huge difference I can go back and fine tune the data and re-import into RidewithGPS but I don't think it will make more than a couple watts difference.

Last edited by psuaero; 04-03-11 at 09:57 AM. Reason: clarification
psuaero is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 09:40 AM
  #5  
LowCel 
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Liked 92 Times in 31 Posts
According to power calculators I've used I'm a god. According to my power meter I suck. Unfortunately I think my power meter is right.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 10:57 AM
  #6  
colombo357
Senior Member
 
colombo357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Murica
Posts: 2,284
Liked 30 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by surgeonstone
Todays ride was an average of 250 watts.
Fabian Cancellara won Tour of Flanders last year with an average of 285 watts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_OXoBbKv5c

psuaero's data shows an overestimate of 50%, which seems about right.
colombo357 is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 11:13 AM
  #7  
psuaero
Never fear the hills...
 
psuaero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 872

Bikes: 2011 Giant TCR Advanced, 2010 Motobecane Fantom Cross Pro, 2011 Redline Monocog Flight 29r

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Riding with a group or peleton has very different affect on power. All the coasting and drafting lowers it significantly.

Yesterday I hit the local Saturday morning ride. I hung on to the faster guys for ~30 miles and managed to more or less stay with the lead 7-8 (started with 20+) from beginning to end. At times I was right with them and not pedalling while being sucked along in the draft. At other times (when they turned on the gas) I was yo-yo'ing off the back putting in a TT like effort just to keep them in sight.

I averaged 180W over the entire 28 miles (19.4mph). The middle hour was 19.93 miles, 193W average, and 19.9mph, with an ave. HR was 179bpm which is pretty much my threshold.
psuaero is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 02:19 PM
  #8  
surgeonstone
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by psuaero
Should be easy to see... if I get time in a little bit I'll pick one of my rides or a portion of a ride and upload it to ridewithgps. I'll post results.

Done...

It's pretty optimistic. I put in a fairly hard effort 28 mile ride from March. RidewithGPS says 299W (me likey)... TrainingPeaks Powertap combo says 199W (normalized 233W).

Here are the rest of the stats from both:
RidewithGPS.com
Departed: Mar 08, '11, 11:58AM
Starts in: Elkridge, MD 21075, US
Distance: 27.8 mi
Selection Distance: 27.8 mi
Elevation: + 1722 / - 1713 ft
Max Grade: 13.2 %
Avg. Grade: 0.6 %
Total Duration: 01:34:12
Selection Duration: 01:34:12
Moving Time: 01:31:28
Selection Moving Time: 01:31:35
Stopped Time: 00:02:37
Calories burned: 1690
Avg Watts: 299
Max Speed: 43.1 mph
Average Speed: 18.1 mph
Max Heartrate: 192 bpm
Min Heartrate: 94 bpm
Average Heartrate: 164 bpm

TrainingPeaks
Entire workout (190 watts):
Duration: 1:32:25 (1:35:52)
Work: 1044 kJ
TSS: 201 (intensity factor 1.164)
Norm Power: 233
VI: 1.22
Pw:HR: 2.08%
Pa:HR: 4.52%
Distance: 27.99 mi
Min Max Avg
Power: 0 686 190 watts
Heart Rate: 91 192 165 bpm
Cadence: 32 209 85 rpm
Speed: 0 36.8 18.2 mph

PS: The small difference in ride times are probably due to the GPS data coming from my Garmin Edge 500 and the Power data coming from my wired PowerTap. If anyone things it makes a huge difference I can go back and fine tune the data and re-import into RidewithGPS but I don't think it will make more than a couple watts difference.
Thanks, that helps. What is the difference between the combo (199 w) and the normalized (233 w).
surgeonstone is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 02:20 PM
  #9  
surgeonstone
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by colombo357
Fabian Cancellara won Tour of Flanders last year with an average of 285 watts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_OXoBbKv5c

psuaero's data shows an overestimate of 50%, which seems about right.
Shoot- that means it's not too late for me to join the pro circuit. Wait, I'm 57, maybe...just maybe...nnaaaah.
surgeonstone is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 04:13 PM
  #10  
psuaero
Never fear the hills...
 
psuaero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 872

Bikes: 2011 Giant TCR Advanced, 2010 Motobecane Fantom Cross Pro, 2011 Redline Monocog Flight 29r

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by surgeonstone
Thanks, that helps. What is the difference between the combo (199 w) and the normalized (233 w).
I was going to cut-and-paste the definition in there but it's pretty long. The basic short answer is that 199W is my average including all the light pedaling, coasting (power rolls off to zero in a sample or two), etc. Normalized power is more like if I was to hammer on a flat ride all by my lonesome in the wind. It takes other physiological response into account which is why it's higher.
psuaero is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 05:51 PM
  #11  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,357

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Liked 769 Times in 396 Posts
Originally Posted by colombo357
Fabian Cancellara won Tour of Flanders last year with an average of 285 watts.

[.
that doesn't tell you much. My typical race file is often over 285 watts average power, admittedly for shorter races than the Ronde.

In a 7 hour race, lots of time Sparticus would be tucked in the pack and not working har, particularly before the decisive climbs.

Add in that I'm heavier and less aero, and its not surprising that my averag pwoer is higher for a race.

The interesting data would be Cancellara's peak power in w/kg for 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 20 minutes from a classic. Those are the numbers where you would see a big difference.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 04-03-11, 08:37 PM
  #12  
surgeonstone
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by psuaero
I was going to cut-and-paste the definition in there but it's pretty long. The basic short answer is that 199W is my average including all the light pedaling, coasting (power rolls off to zero in a sample or two), etc. Normalized power is more like if I was to hammer on a flat ride all by my lonesome in the wind. It takes other physiological response into account which is why it's higher.
That would be my ride today, 20 miles at 13 mph into a 30+ mph headwind. Sucked the life right out of me but the return was sweet.
surgeonstone is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jarrett2
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
17
09-27-15 10:42 PM
HornedFrog
Road Cycling
18
08-14-15 09:37 PM
DaveWC
Road Cycling
13
10-19-13 04:29 PM
tallmantim
Road Cycling
34
06-29-10 02:54 PM
Cyclist75354986865
Training & Nutrition
4
03-01-10 12:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.