Naming and Scope?
Likes For thinktubes:
Likes For Camilo:
#54
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,213
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2763 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Likes For Kapusta:
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
I love how cromulent is totally a word now.
And I still say HyperGlide is the end of C&V, which slightly predates 130mm. Not sure exactly when the current era starts, but I like the idea of relating it to drivetrains because that's most relevant for technical enquiries - so maybe it should be the advent of 11s, since it obsoleted so many rear wheels?
And I still say HyperGlide is the end of C&V, which slightly predates 130mm. Not sure exactly when the current era starts, but I like the idea of relating it to drivetrains because that's most relevant for technical enquiries - so maybe it should be the advent of 11s, since it obsoleted so many rear wheels?
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,821
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,328 Posts
I love how cromulent is totally a word now.
And I still say HyperGlide is the end of C&V, which slightly predates 130mm. Not sure exactly when the current era starts, but I like the idea of relating it to drivetrains because that's most relevant for technical enquiries - so maybe it should be the advent of 11s, since it obsoleted so many rear wheels?
And I still say HyperGlide is the end of C&V, which slightly predates 130mm. Not sure exactly when the current era starts, but I like the idea of relating it to drivetrains because that's most relevant for technical enquiries - so maybe it should be the advent of 11s, since it obsoleted so many rear wheels?
Freewheel vs freehub has an interesting history. Shimano came out with an EX freehub and cassette in the late 70’s. I think it was not widely accepted until 10 years later because 70’s and early 80’s Shimano was not considered good enough, compared to Campagnolo and Suntour, to be locked into having to use Shimano only cassettes for friction shifting.
Of course all that changed when the Suntour slant parallelogram patent ran out and SIS took over the industry.
John
#57
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,886
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1861 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
507 Posts
That's a totally different category. Indexed shifting predates brifters*, and although indexing is necessary for most forms of brifter, I'd argue that integration had a significantly larger impact on how bikes are ridden.
*By six years if you're talking SIS, about a decade and a half if you're talking about the late-20th-century Japanese derailleur indexing race in general, or considerably longer if you're talking about all forms of indexing in bicycle drivetrains.
They share common characteristics that separate them from non-integrated road shifters in both placement and functional consequence (of particular note being the ability to easily shift while riding out of the saddle), and so it's often useful to have a non-brand-specific term to refer to them in general. Obviously you could also use a descriptive phrase like "integrated brake/shift lever", but these are a mouthful compared with the simple portmanteau "brifter."
Based on what? Can you point me to an example of a discussion where someone is using "brifter" in a manner that clearly excludes Ergo?
I feel like we're speaking different languages.
*By six years if you're talking SIS, about a decade and a half if you're talking about the late-20th-century Japanese derailleur indexing race in general, or considerably longer if you're talking about all forms of indexing in bicycle drivetrains.
They share common characteristics that separate them from non-integrated road shifters in both placement and functional consequence (of particular note being the ability to easily shift while riding out of the saddle), and so it's often useful to have a non-brand-specific term to refer to them in general. Obviously you could also use a descriptive phrase like "integrated brake/shift lever", but these are a mouthful compared with the simple portmanteau "brifter."
Based on what? Can you point me to an example of a discussion where someone is using "brifter" in a manner that clearly excludes Ergo?
I feel like we're speaking different languages.
#58
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,886
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1861 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
507 Posts
So if somebody somehow installs an 9-speed Campy 2x9 on a 1950s Clubman frame or a PX-10, then replaces the Ergopowers and cassettes with 10 sp, what has he got? a C&V, an early 7, 8, 9, or ... well, I guess we can't say it is a Retro Roadie or a resident of Road Forum ... ?
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,821
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,328 Posts
Between early STI’s and their associated hoods, and the difficulty in finding Octalink V1 on the higher end Shimano 9 speed road groups, I’m running a 6503 crankset on one bike, this subforum does have its work cut out for them.
For it to become a viable landing spot for those with 90’s road bikes, there needs to be some solutions the C&V downtube-shifting-square-taper-folks don’t have to worry about, at least not quite as much.
It would be wise to have a couple of sticky’s to guide those riders who want to maintain their 90’s bikes.
Does anyone make a V1?
What era similar cranks are available?
Is anyone offering new silver anodized 7, 8, 9 speed brifters? If not is there a way to get there?
John
For it to become a viable landing spot for those with 90’s road bikes, there needs to be some solutions the C&V downtube-shifting-square-taper-folks don’t have to worry about, at least not quite as much.
It would be wise to have a couple of sticky’s to guide those riders who want to maintain their 90’s bikes.
Does anyone make a V1?
What era similar cranks are available?
Is anyone offering new silver anodized 7, 8, 9 speed brifters? If not is there a way to get there?
John
#60
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
So if somebody somehow installs an 9-speed Campy 2x9 on a 1950s Clubman frame or a PX-10, then replaces the Ergopowers and cassettes with 10 sp, what has he got? a C&V, an early 7, 8, 9, or ... well, I guess we can't say it is a Retro Roadie or a resident of Road Forum ... ?
I'd probably want to see the stages of that evolution.
Is this keeping you up at night?
#61
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,886
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1861 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
507 Posts
#62
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Well, I'm not the guy who already quit this thread as "too repetitive", then came back to post a couple crazy hypothetical bike scenarios to try to prove something(?) about the naming of the forum.
I think you've gotten your answers, "brifter" in the name includes Campy for the purposes of this forum, "early" is going to be in the eyes of the beholder.
I'd probably add that "early brifter" refers to the bike's original equipment or to any equipment that was on the bike at any time, so that later modifications don't take the bike out of the category. The usefulness of this forum is going to be enhanced by discussions of what modifications do and don't work well.
#63
Senior Member
Nothing about this has much to do with authority. This is a discussion on language. Language is, by and large, defined by those who use it: if you can point to examples of "brifter" being used in a manner which excludes Ergo, then your point might look strong. But thus far, those who have weighed in have not backed up your claim. If everybody except you thinks that it includes all integrated road brake-shift levers - as the construction of the word "brifter," and its entire reason for existing, seem to imply - then you're on fairly weak standing. This standing doesn't become stronger if you're Alfredo Binda's grandfather or whatever.
Last edited by HTupolev; 06-24-21 at 01:49 PM.
Likes For HTupolev:
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,921
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2609 Post(s)
Liked 1,946 Times
in
1,221 Posts
Nothing about this has much to do with authority. This is a discussion on language. Language is, by and large, defined by those who use it: if you can point to examples of "brifter" being used in a manner which excludes Ergo, then your point might look strong. But thus far, those who have weighed in have not backed up your claim. If everybody except you thinks that it includes all integrated road brake-shift levers - as the construction of the word "brifter," and its entire reason for existing, seem to imply - then you're on fairly weak standing.
#65
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,886
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1861 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
507 Posts
I was responding to your claim that you had experience with "brifter" excluding Ergo. I was asking what that experience was.
Nothing about this has much to do with authority. This is a discussion on language. Language is, by and large, defined by those who use it: if you can point to examples of "brifter" being used in a manner which excludes Ergo, then your point might look strong. But thus far, those who have weighed in have not backed up your claim. If everybody except you thinks that it includes all integrated road brake-shift levers - as the construction of the word "brifter," and its entire reason for existing, seem to imply - then you're on fairly weak standing. This standing doesn't become stronger if you're Alfredo Binda's grandfather or whatever.
Nothing about this has much to do with authority. This is a discussion on language. Language is, by and large, defined by those who use it: if you can point to examples of "brifter" being used in a manner which excludes Ergo, then your point might look strong. But thus far, those who have weighed in have not backed up your claim. If everybody except you thinks that it includes all integrated road brake-shift levers - as the construction of the word "brifter," and its entire reason for existing, seem to imply - then you're on fairly weak standing. This standing doesn't become stronger if you're Alfredo Binda's grandfather or whatever.
I rode a few buddies bikes briefly, maybe 15 years ago. I read opinions and q&a about them in in RBR, the lists here, RBT, Paceline, Velocipede Salon and a slew of other forums. I don't want a lot of history on Facebook so I try to keep that or family and old school connections. I've seen the term used in a wide range of magazine writing ever since indexing began. I rarely recall seeing the term used comprehensively across the brands.
My opinion on use of the term is also based on users of language - me and the writers I have read. The broad implication I have absorbed is that "brifter" generally does not include Campagnolo.
#66
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I agree there's no such thing as authority on this topic. I don't think I said or suggested my opinion is stronger if my hair is more grey. My exposure to different language in the cycling world is potentially longer.
I rode a few buddies bikes briefly, maybe 15 years ago. I read opinions and q&a about them in in RBR, the lists here, RBT, Paceline, Velocipede Salon and a slew of other forums. I don't want a lot of history on Facebook so I try to keep that or family and old school connections. I've seen the term used in a wide range of magazine writing ever since indexing began. I rarely recall seeing the term used comprehensively across the brands.
My opinion on use of the term is also based on users of language - me and the writers I have read. The broad implication I have absorbed is that "brifter" generally does not include Campagnolo.
I rode a few buddies bikes briefly, maybe 15 years ago. I read opinions and q&a about them in in RBR, the lists here, RBT, Paceline, Velocipede Salon and a slew of other forums. I don't want a lot of history on Facebook so I try to keep that or family and old school connections. I've seen the term used in a wide range of magazine writing ever since indexing began. I rarely recall seeing the term used comprehensively across the brands.
My opinion on use of the term is also based on users of language - me and the writers I have read. The broad implication I have absorbed is that "brifter" generally does not include Campagnolo.
Brifter--A combination brake/shift lever, such as a Campagnolo Ergo or Shimano S.T.I. unit. This term was coined by Bruce Frech.
Likes For livedarklions:
#67
Senior Member
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,821
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,328 Posts
The crazy thing was transplanting the Retro Roadies thread from C&V here. Then you go in see all these post-early brifters on old steel bikes.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#69
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I've just put on 8 speed 105 brifters on my Allez Pro to replace the Sora brifters I had to replace my 8 speed 600 brifters when they died. No question that the 600s were the smoothest of the lot, but the Sora and the 105 are pretty similar. I don't like the thumb shifters on the Sora.
Mainly, the difference between the old and new is esthetic, and obviously the line between the two is going to be somewhat arbitrary. But I'm not intending to pretend that there's a serious difference in kind.
#71
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts