Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage > Classic and Vintage Sales
Reload this Page >

FS: 1950 Jo Routens Randonneuse (61x57cm)

Search
Notices
Classic and Vintage Sales Private Sales Only, no online storefronts. All prices must be quoted, we are not an auction site.

FS: 1950 Jo Routens Randonneuse (61x57cm)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-23, 08:16 AM
  #1  
Kilroy1988 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kilroy1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 1,844 Times in 609 Posts
FS: 1950 Jo Routens Randonneuse (61x57cm)

EDITED!

Hello all,

As some of you know I am selling numerous bicycles as I wind down my cycling for a time and enter a new stage of life (parenthood). I have plans to keep a couple of bicycles around and thought this Jo Routens would have to go for sure because of its value. However, a friend of mine wants to provide a favor in exchange for a real estate transaction I facilitated, so he is "buying" the bike in order to let me keep it!

That being said, the Jo Routens is off the market. Cheers!

-Gregory

Last edited by Kilroy1988; 12-14-23 at 10:28 PM.
Kilroy1988 is offline  
Old 08-24-23, 04:07 AM
  #2  
heidelbergensis 
Junior Member
 
heidelbergensis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 113 Times in 46 Posts
absolutely magnificent
heidelbergensis is offline  
Old 08-29-23, 03:19 AM
  #3  
masispecial
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Liked 48 Times in 21 Posts
What is the saddle height in the photos?
masispecial is offline  
Old 08-29-23, 07:40 AM
  #4  
Kilroy1988 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kilroy1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 1,844 Times in 609 Posts
Originally Posted by masispecial
What is the saddle height in the photos?
It's set about 94cm from the top of the pedal. Cheers!

-Gregory
Kilroy1988 is offline  
Old 08-29-23, 10:45 AM
  #5  
Rooney 
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 383

Bikes: '72 Raleigh Super Course; '90 Cannondale ST1000; '98/99 Cannondale T700; 2002 Cannondale CAAD5 R700; 2022 Cannondale Topstone 2L

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Liked 348 Times in 156 Posts


Typically, saddle height is measured as pictured, from the center of the crank to the top of the saddle.

I wish this frame were a little larger. I'm glad I don't have to worry about the temptation.
Rooney is offline  
Old 08-29-23, 11:17 AM
  #6  
Kilroy1988 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kilroy1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 1,844 Times in 609 Posts
Originally Posted by Rooney
Typically, saddle height is measured as pictured, from the center of the crank to the top of the saddle.
Yes, but if you want to keep the original crankset the measurement I gave is more useful. The crank arms could be 165, 170, 175, or even closer to 180 (such as 7" British crank arms) on bikes this old with no other options available at the time. Most of my old British bikes either had 6 1/2" or 7" crank arms - that's a difference of nearly 13mm, which definitely impacts my saddle height.

If I provided the "typical" measurement you suggest above it would be irrelevant without knowing the crank arm length, which I haven't stated. I think it's 175 but I'll have to measure it to confirm.

Last edited by Kilroy1988; 08-29-23 at 11:27 AM.
Kilroy1988 is offline  
Old 09-02-23, 03:26 PM
  #7  
no67el
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Mad River Valley, VT
Posts: 230

Bikes: How many is too many?

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Dang, dang dang.... my size, and beautiful. Wish I could instantly sell about 5 lesser bikes to fund this one... but it deserves a bump for sure.
no67el is offline  
Likes For no67el:
Old 09-05-23, 09:20 AM
  #8  
romperrr 
Pedal to the medal
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Arsenal of Democracy
Posts: 1,229

Bikes: 1991 Team Miyata Track, 1992 Lemond Alpe d'Huez, 19?? Schwinn High Serra, 1982 Trek 614, 198X Raleigh Alyeska

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 205 Times in 131 Posts
If this was local, I'd love to give it a ride. The ST *might* be too tall for me, the TT would fit. On a bike of this pedigree and cost, I'd need to ride it before I buy it. GLWS!
romperrr is offline  
Old 12-07-23, 02:19 PM
  #9  
MyOldBikes
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Kilroy1988
Yes, but if you want to keep the original crankset the measurement I gave is more useful. The crank arms could be 165, 170, 175, or even closer to 180 (such as 7" British crank arms) on bikes this old with no other options available at the time. Most of my old British bikes either had 6 1/2" or 7" crank arms - that's a difference of nearly 13mm, which definitely impacts my saddle height.

If I provided the "typical" measurement you suggest above it would be irrelevant without knowing the crank arm length, which I haven't stated. I think it's 175 but I'll have to measure it to confirm.
Hey, Gregory:

I understand your concern about the effect of crank length on seat position. Personally, however, I would rather have the measurement between the center of the bottom bracket axle and the top of the saddle, measured parallel to the seat tube. It's always better to measure between fixed points and let others accomodate for the difference in crank length. Honestly, we don't know whether the crank was vertical or parallel to the seat tube when you made the measurement. We also don't know if the crank was even exactly where you thought it was when you made the measurement! Seat post adjustment allows for the (small) variation in crank length.
MyOldBikes is offline  
Old 12-07-23, 02:44 PM
  #10  
Kilroy1988 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kilroy1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 1,844 Times in 609 Posts
Originally Posted by MyOldBikes
Hey, Gregory:

I understand your concern about the effect of crank length on seat position. Personally, however, I would rather have the measurement between the center of the bottom bracket axle and the top of the saddle, measured parallel to the seat tube. It's always better to measure between fixed points and let others accomodate for the difference in crank length. Honestly, we don't know whether the crank was vertical or parallel to the seat tube when you made the measurement. We also don't know if the crank was even exactly where you thought it was when you made the measurement! Seat post adjustment allows for the (small) variation in crank length.
Interesting choice of a first post. Regardless of your preferences or mine, requesting any measurement to the top of the saddle should be moot in such a case, because if someone's wondering about saddle height based on a photograph the angle that the photo was taken from could be creating a distortion in what one thinks they're seeing anyway. The only reasonable measurements to base your fit around if you're looking to buy a bicycle are those unchangeable aspects of frame dimensions.

Your last statement regarding seat post adjustments is even more reason to disregard a request for saddle height information - if you're going to have to change it then what's the point of knowing where the saddle is when it's set up for someone else?

-Gregory

Last edited by Kilroy1988; 12-07-23 at 02:54 PM.
Kilroy1988 is offline  
Old 12-07-23, 03:35 PM
  #11  
Sedgemop 
Senior Member
 
Sedgemop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,082

Bikes: '72 Peugeot PX-10 '78 Motobecane Le Champion '83 Motobecane Grand Jubile '85 Trek 830 '88 Merckx Team ADR Corsa Extra

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 1,214 Times in 651 Posts
Congrats on keeping this one. It's a beaut.
__________________
Sedgemop is offline  
Old 12-07-23, 03:44 PM
  #12  
Kilroy1988 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kilroy1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 1,844 Times in 609 Posts
Originally Posted by Sedgemop
Congrats on keeping this one. It's a beaut.
Well, I am currently having a conversation with one discerning buyer, but I am holding off until I complete another build to see which will be the one to go!

-Gregory
Kilroy1988 is offline  
Likes For Kilroy1988:
Old 12-07-23, 04:41 PM
  #13  
Sedgemop 
Senior Member
 
Sedgemop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,082

Bikes: '72 Peugeot PX-10 '78 Motobecane Le Champion '83 Motobecane Grand Jubile '85 Trek 830 '88 Merckx Team ADR Corsa Extra

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 1,214 Times in 651 Posts
Originally Posted by Kilroy1988
Well, I am currently having a conversation with one discerning buyer, but I am holding off until I complete another build to see which will be the one to go!

-Gregory
When I let go of something I really like, I usually request "first refusal" if the buyer winds up selling. Hopefully, you can do something like that with this one of you sell it. Not likely to see another of these in this size.
__________________
Sedgemop is offline  
Likes For Sedgemop:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.