Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Simplex 303 Adjustment

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Simplex 303 Adjustment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-23, 01:40 PM
  #1  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,272

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times in 490 Posts
Simplex 303 Adjustment

Gear is grinding.
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.

Last edited by 1989Pre; 04-16-23 at 01:13 PM. Reason: Delete Post option is not available.
1989Pre is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 02:24 PM
  #2  
juvela
Senior Member
 
juvela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alta California
Posts: 14,270
Mentioned: 415 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3814 Post(s)
Liked 3,345 Times in 2,182 Posts
-----

​​​​​​

slightly off-topic -

in this image it appears you may have some extra unnecessary friction in the cable path caused by ferrules which are slightly too large to seat in the recesses of the housing stops


-----
juvela is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 02:58 PM
  #3  
Charles Wahl
Disraeli Gears
 
Charles Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,093
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 369 Times in 214 Posts
The braze-on on the chain stay may be sized to require a step-down ferrule.
Also, to me it looks like the cable housing between chain stay and derailleur is too short. Compare the image in the "manual" you posted.
Charles Wahl is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 03:39 PM
  #4  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,994
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times in 1,076 Posts
Actually I think the original way was not step-down ferrules, just regular single-diameter ferrules but much smaller. Maybe not made anymore (I'm way out of touch with the current offerings) but I have some ancient Simplex housing and ferrules and they're tiny by modern standards.
One reasonable way to git 'er done is to use regular spiral-wound housing with no ferrule, just grind the ends nice and flat and de-burr the holes. Maybe not as finished a look as a proper ferrule, but functionally just fine as long as the diameter matches up so the housing is guided in straight.

Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 04-15-23, 05:12 PM
  #5  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times in 866 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
Actually I think the original way was not step-down ferrules, just regular single-diameter ferrules but much smaller. Maybe not made anymore (I'm way out of touch with the current offerings) but I have some ancient Simplex housing and ferrules and they're tiny by modern standards.
One reasonable way to git 'er done is to use regular spiral-wound housing with no ferrule, just grind the ends nice and flat and de-burr the holes. Maybe not as finished a look as a proper ferrule, but functionally just fine as long as the diameter matches up so the housing is guided in straight.

Mark B
For sure the old Simplex mech's do not need ferrules.

With the ferrules removed, the housing might seat sufficiently better so as to make good with that actual piece of housing.
But having a correct step-down ferrule at the chainstay stop might really improve the cable path if it holds the housing in line with the cable.
dddd is offline  
Old 04-15-23, 06:43 PM
  #6  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
Originally Posted by 1989Pre
snip . . .


).
This thread was worth reading just for this one piece of advertisement. Love where it ends: "what is a touring gear?" The term is "meaningless" except that it describes a "gear" used by Cyclists "who want to go places."

It's hard to say it much better than that.
bikemig is offline  
Likes For bikemig:
Old 04-15-23, 08:33 PM
  #7  
obrentharris 
Senior Member
 
obrentharris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Point Reyes Station, California
Posts: 4,528

Bikes: Indeed!

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1507 Post(s)
Liked 3,478 Times in 1,132 Posts
Regarding the grinding noise, I have no experience with this Simplex but it seems to me that chain line would be exceptionally critical with a long pulley arm that is oriented like this, almost pointing at the chainrings. The chain will want to drag the lower pulley sideways until the pulley arm is pointing at the chainring.

My experience with the shorter arm pull-chain Simplex derailleurs is that they are quite finicky about chainline, optimized perhaps for 4 speed freewheels.
Brent
__________________
"I have a tendency to meander sometimes." B.G.

obrentharris is offline  
Likes For obrentharris:
Old 04-16-23, 01:15 PM
  #8  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,272

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times in 490 Posts
Originally Posted by bikemig
This thread was worth reading just for this one piece of advertisement. Love where it ends: "what is a touring gear?" The term is "meaningless" except that it describes a "gear" used by Cyclists "who want to go places."

It's hard to say it much better than that.
Yeah, that's about a simple and obvious as you can get. Maybe they got school-kids to write these.
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
1989Pre is offline  
Old 04-16-23, 01:18 PM
  #9  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,272

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times in 490 Posts
Originally Posted by juvela
-----

​in this image it appears you may have some extra unnecessary friction in the cable path caused by ferrules which are slightly too large to seat in the recesses of the housing stops-----
There is no cable binding. The ferrules have no bearing on the chain chatter.
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
1989Pre is offline  
Old 04-16-23, 01:29 PM
  #10  
juvela
Senior Member
 
juvela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alta California
Posts: 14,270
Mentioned: 415 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3814 Post(s)
Liked 3,345 Times in 2,182 Posts
Originally Posted by 1989Pre
There is no cable binding. The ferrules have no bearing on the chain chatter.
-----



certainly did not intend to suggest that they did

note me message commenced "slightly off-topic"


-----
juvela is offline  
Likes For juvela:
Old 04-16-23, 04:43 PM
  #11  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,272

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times in 490 Posts
Originally Posted by obrentharris
Regarding the grinding noise, I have no experience with this Simplex but it seems to me that chain line would be exceptionally critical with a long pulley arm that is oriented like this, almost pointing at the chainrings. The chain will want to drag the lower pulley sideways until the pulley arm is pointing at the chainring.

My experience with the shorter arm pull-chain Simplex derailleurs is that they are quite finicky about chainline, optimized perhaps for 4 speed freewheels.
Brent
Thanks. I had a torturous day with this thing. I listened to what you said about chain-line, and tried putting a spacer behind the freewheel, trying another (just-as-used) freewheel and moving the front chainring outboard a bit. I tried bending the body of the derailleur to get it more precise and I tested every chain link for a frozen one. It's probably something simple like a worn chain or worn sprocket, or both. Thanks for attempting to answer my question, though. It gave me something to think about. It seems to me that the significant question is: Why just the low sprocket? I looked closely at the chain and it seemed that when I got some chattering, it was when the chain looked like it wanted to jump off the side of the lower (guide) pulley. I made an appointment at my local co-op, who are the only ones who know how to work on older bikes, but that is not till May 12. I think I'm going to try my luck with putting on my Benelux Mk7 after I calm down and relax a bit. I can show you a video if you think that would help.
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
1989Pre is offline  
Old 04-16-23, 04:45 PM
  #12  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,272

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times in 490 Posts
Originally Posted by juvela
-----



certainly did not intend to suggest that they did

note me message commenced "slightly off-topic"


-----
After dealing with this enigma, I am "slightly-off-rocker".
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
1989Pre is offline  
Old 04-16-23, 08:51 PM
  #13  
obrentharris 
Senior Member
 
obrentharris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Point Reyes Station, California
Posts: 4,528

Bikes: Indeed!

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1507 Post(s)
Liked 3,478 Times in 1,132 Posts
Originally Posted by 1989Pre
...Why just the low sprocket? I looked closely at the chain and it seemed that when I got some chattering, it was when the chain looked like it wanted to jump off the side of the lower (guide) pulley...
This is only a hunch, not based on any real experience: When the chain is on the largest sprocket the pulley cage is going to be at it's most horizontal angle. It might be worth trying to add as many links to the chain as the difference in tooth count between largest and second-largest sprocket. This will lower the angle of the pulley cage and just maybe solve your problem.
Brent
__________________
"I have a tendency to meander sometimes." B.G.

obrentharris is offline  
Likes For obrentharris:
Old 04-17-23, 05:36 AM
  #14  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,272

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times in 490 Posts
Originally Posted by obrentharris
This is only a hunch, not based on any real experience: When the chain is on the largest sprocket the pulley cage is going to be at it's most horizontal angle. It might be worth trying to add as many links to the chain as the difference in tooth count between largest and second-largest sprocket. This will lower the angle of the pulley cage and just maybe solve your problem.
Brent
This sounds like a good idea. I'll try it today. Thanks.
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
1989Pre is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.