View Poll Results: Do you take total responsibility for your safety when cycling in traffic?
No, I accept the brunt of the responsibilty, but motorists are responsible for my safety too.
56.04%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll
Who is responsible for your safety?
03-10-07, 11:03 PM
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Who is responsible for your safety?
Do you take total responsibility for your safety when cycling in traffic, or do you hold others at least partially responsible?
EDIT:
Since I did not originally specify what I meant by responsibiilty, intentionally allowing each person to use whatever definition works for them, I don't see how Pat can assert this (in post #4).
For what it's worth, the meaning I personally have in mind is that used by Robert Hurst in The Art of Urban Cycling, pp 64-67. The key excerpts from that brilliant section follow:
Perhaps Robert's concept reflects a "very simplistic and naive concept of responsibility", but I, for one, find it to be extraordinarily practical with respect to cycling in traffic.
Robert is not mincing words, his meaning should be crystal clear to anyone. Read it again and again, until you really get it, take it to heart, and make it so.
EDIT:
Originally Posted by patc
This poll assumes a very simplistic and naive concept of responsibility.
For what it's worth, the meaning I personally have in mind is that used by Robert Hurst in The Art of Urban Cycling, pp 64-67. The key excerpts from that brilliant section follow:
Originally Posted by Robert Hurst
Blame Versus
Today's Americans spray blame around in great shotgun blasts to see what they can hit and where it might stick. They aim it everywhere except where it might actually do some good. We would be better off reverting to the original meaning of the word.
The proliferation of blame is rather useless for urban cycling. Blame is what happens when it's already too late. Obsession with blame is good for insurance purposes but not so good for safety purposes. The urban cyclist should cast the twin concepts of blame and legal liability on the scrap heap and forget about them. Thinking in terms of blame while out on the road is a perfect example of self-fulling prophecy. Blame is dangerous.
The most effective way for a cyclist to stay out of trouble on city streets is to forget entirely about the possibility of blaming others, and to take on full responsibility for his or her own safety. This attitude will be fundamentally different from the prima donna mind-set displayed by many humans, drivers and cyclists among them, who put their safety in the hands of others, count on everything working out just right, and have a royal freak-out at the first sign of trouble. The successful urban cyclist counts on nothing but chaos and stupidity.
...
From now on -- if some bastard breaks every law in the book and runs you over in the process, it will be your fault and nobody else's. That is the meaning of true freedom. That is how we will keep such disasters from happening in the first place.
...
The urban cyclist's best chance is to gather all the responsibilty that can be gathered. Hoard it from those around you. Have faith that you will do a better job with it than they will, and make it so. Don't trust your fate to the police, the planners, the pedestrians, or the paramedics. Don't leave your fate to the stars, or to luck. Definitely don't leave your fate to the drivers.
Responsibility
The word "blame" came to the English language by way of the Latin word blasphemare, meaning "to blaspheme". The Old English version of the verb "to blame" has a very negative connotation. It implied dishonesty. Blame had roughly the same meaning as malign or libel. Somewhere along the line, the definition of blame got all twisted up. Blame ceased to be a very bad thing and became quite respectable -- not a proud or useful moment in human history.Today's Americans spray blame around in great shotgun blasts to see what they can hit and where it might stick. They aim it everywhere except where it might actually do some good. We would be better off reverting to the original meaning of the word.
The proliferation of blame is rather useless for urban cycling. Blame is what happens when it's already too late. Obsession with blame is good for insurance purposes but not so good for safety purposes. The urban cyclist should cast the twin concepts of blame and legal liability on the scrap heap and forget about them. Thinking in terms of blame while out on the road is a perfect example of self-fulling prophecy. Blame is dangerous.
The most effective way for a cyclist to stay out of trouble on city streets is to forget entirely about the possibility of blaming others, and to take on full responsibility for his or her own safety. This attitude will be fundamentally different from the prima donna mind-set displayed by many humans, drivers and cyclists among them, who put their safety in the hands of others, count on everything working out just right, and have a royal freak-out at the first sign of trouble. The successful urban cyclist counts on nothing but chaos and stupidity.
...
From now on -- if some bastard breaks every law in the book and runs you over in the process, it will be your fault and nobody else's. That is the meaning of true freedom. That is how we will keep such disasters from happening in the first place.
...
The urban cyclist's best chance is to gather all the responsibilty that can be gathered. Hoard it from those around you. Have faith that you will do a better job with it than they will, and make it so. Don't trust your fate to the police, the planners, the pedestrians, or the paramedics. Don't leave your fate to the stars, or to luck. Definitely don't leave your fate to the drivers.
Robert is not mincing words, his meaning should be crystal clear to anyone. Read it again and again, until you really get it, take it to heart, and make it so.
Last edited by Helmet Head; 03-11-07 at 10:53 AM.
03-10-07, 11:18 PM
#2
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: clipped in & pedaling
Posts: 283
Bikes: jamis dakar xlt 1.9, weyless sp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i remember a public service campaign on TV when i was young -- "watch out for the other guy", telling motorists that prudence and due caution on the road would save not only their own lives, but someone else's. after all the years of driving, in all the different parts of the country and abroad, i came to the conclusion that this was one of the wisest points EVER issued to the public, ANYWHERE.
having said that, i am unable to be 100% responsible for my own safety on the road -- i can be as safe as a double condom, but one idiot on a cell phone or some other multitask can render all my efforts vain. we ALL have a reasonable expectation from our fellow road users to conduct their affairs with due caution. just because that idea is eroding under contemporary mores' does not mean it is invalid.
having said that, i am unable to be 100% responsible for my own safety on the road -- i can be as safe as a double condom, but one idiot on a cell phone or some other multitask can render all my efforts vain. we ALL have a reasonable expectation from our fellow road users to conduct their affairs with due caution. just because that idea is eroding under contemporary mores' does not mean it is invalid.
03-10-07, 11:59 PM
#3
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Luckily, my belief in the good book of EC will keep me safe. That, or the clowns in the weekend peloton riding cover will help keep some of us safe...
03-11-07, 04:07 AM
#5
Perineal Pressurized
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by patc
This poll assumes a very simplistic and naive concept of responsibility.
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
03-11-07, 06:03 AM
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ancient Corinth, Greece
Posts: 21
Bikes: 1993 Trek 7000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by patc
This poll assumes a very simplistic and naive concept of responsibility.
It only take a few moments observing traffic in eastern Mediterranean countries to see what it means to relinquish all responsibility for everyone elses safety.
How would you have done it?
Best regards,
James
03-11-07, 06:09 AM
#7
Senior Member
I accept full responsibity, yet so do we all. Someone cuts us off and causes us to crash, that's none of our faults. It's the fault of the lawbreaker. Just as if we were within the confines of a car.
03-11-07, 06:19 AM
#8
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
We share the road. We share the rights. We share the responsibilities.
03-11-07, 07:34 AM
#9
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,978
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
1,047 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Do you take total responsibility for your safety when cycling in traffic, or do you hold others at least partially responsible?
Oh wait, the other two listed negative responses can substitute for the unavailable response in the HH analysis of the results.
As you were, please continue with the quest for truth.
03-11-07, 09:02 AM
#10
Dominatrikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It takes a villiage to raise a child.
03-11-07, 09:14 AM
#11
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
I think helmet head also left out HIS most common safety scenario
" I rely on a cadre of club riders to provide safety for my riding, because riding en masse is certainely safer than solo traffic cycling. Ride in traffic daily? what are you, nuts?"
" I rely on a cadre of club riders to provide safety for my riding, because riding en masse is certainely safer than solo traffic cycling. Ride in traffic daily? what are you, nuts?"
03-11-07, 09:46 AM
#12
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by patc
This poll assumes a very simplistic and naive concept of responsibility.
What I intended, however, has since been clarified in the OP.
Originally Posted by Bekologist
Luckily, my belief in the good book of EC will keep me safe. That, or the clowns in the weekend peloton riding cover will help keep some of us safe...
As for weekend pelotons, the same attitude applies. Many newer club riders do not take full responsibility for their safety when riding in groups. They are easiest to identify as the ones who are usually involved in pileups. Those who take responsibility for their safety apply Robert's dictum to their group riding; that accept that "if some bastard breaks every [rule] in the book and [causes you to lose balance and fall] over in the process, it will be your fault and nobody else's." And they ride accordingly.
Originally Posted by genec
We share the road. We share the rights. We share the responsibilities.
"The urban cyclist's best chance is to gather all the responsibilty that can be gathered. Hoard it from those around you. Have faith that you will do a better job with it than they will, and make it so. Don't trust your fate to the police, the planners, the pedestrians, or the paramedics. Don't leave your fate to the starts, or to luck. Definitely don't leave your fate to the drivers." --Robert Hurst (see OP).
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Oh wait, the other two listed negative responses can substitute for the unavailable response in the HH analysis of the results.
Edit: I didn't expect anyone to ever pick "No, motorists are more responsible for my safety than I am.". But I think it's presence is still useful, just to add clarity to the meaning on of the other two choices. This poll is really about the first 2 choices, and the voting is close.
Last edited by Helmet Head; 03-11-07 at 01:41 PM.
03-11-07, 09:50 AM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not to worry. My belief in the teachings of The Great One (John Forester) will protect me. I have read the Good Book; I know everything and I am invincible.
If I don't have an accident, the VC cultists will claim I was a vehicular cyclist. If I do have an accident, they'll say it was my own fault. That's their idea of scientific evidence that VC is safer.
I take responsibility for whatever I do. I do that, in part, by not putting too much faith in what I might read in a book or what some nutjob on an internet message board thinks.
If I don't have an accident, the VC cultists will claim I was a vehicular cyclist. If I do have an accident, they'll say it was my own fault. That's their idea of scientific evidence that VC is safer.
I take responsibility for whatever I do. I do that, in part, by not putting too much faith in what I might read in a book or what some nutjob on an internet message board thinks.
03-11-07, 09:53 AM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
What I intended, however, has since been clarified in the OP.
You crack me up.
03-11-07, 10:03 AM
#15
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cyclezealot
I accept full responsibity, yet so do we all. Someone cuts us off and causes us to crash, that's none of our faults. It's the fault of the lawbreaker. Just as if we were within the confines of a car.
03-11-07, 10:04 AM
#16
Senior Member
I have slowed down in recent years. I am 40+ years old, and I no longer do "sprints", or try to do the speed limit of 30MPH.
When I look back throught the years, I recall that many times when I tried to go as fast as the traffic, motorists did not apreciate the effort I was making.
Funny, I no longer hear anyone shouting that I'm going too slow. I guess it's the perspective of the motorist. If I was going 27MPH, for example, I was in the center of the lane, blocking cars from behind. The motorist doesn't care that the speed limit is 30MPH, and maybe he can't do the math, but he should only be gaining on me at the 3 miles per hour difference.(30-27=3).
Okay, that was example 1, twenty years ago and I was a hundred pounds lighter.
Today I ride that same stretch of road at 18MPH. I can ride closer to the right edge of the road. I am going slower, but the motorist doesn't yell at me that I'm going too slow, because I'm not blocking the whole lane.
When a driver has a contention with a cyclist, It always seems to be a white male behind the wheel. I've noticed a change in the past twenty years, however. Today it always seems as if he's a teenager, whereas back then there were more "old farts" honking at bicycles. (Maybe the "old farts" who didn't believe in bicycling, died of heart attacks?)
Speed cycling is a paradox; If you pedal fast, you take up the same line as a motorcycle would, and you block cars from passing. The drivers have short tempers and they let you know it. If you pedal slow, you're at the rightmost usable part of the road, so they can pass.
When I look back throught the years, I recall that many times when I tried to go as fast as the traffic, motorists did not apreciate the effort I was making.
Funny, I no longer hear anyone shouting that I'm going too slow. I guess it's the perspective of the motorist. If I was going 27MPH, for example, I was in the center of the lane, blocking cars from behind. The motorist doesn't care that the speed limit is 30MPH, and maybe he can't do the math, but he should only be gaining on me at the 3 miles per hour difference.(30-27=3).
Okay, that was example 1, twenty years ago and I was a hundred pounds lighter.
Today I ride that same stretch of road at 18MPH. I can ride closer to the right edge of the road. I am going slower, but the motorist doesn't yell at me that I'm going too slow, because I'm not blocking the whole lane.
When a driver has a contention with a cyclist, It always seems to be a white male behind the wheel. I've noticed a change in the past twenty years, however. Today it always seems as if he's a teenager, whereas back then there were more "old farts" honking at bicycles. (Maybe the "old farts" who didn't believe in bicycling, died of heart attacks?)
Speed cycling is a paradox; If you pedal fast, you take up the same line as a motorcycle would, and you block cars from passing. The drivers have short tempers and they let you know it. If you pedal slow, you're at the rightmost usable part of the road, so they can pass.
03-11-07, 10:06 AM
#17
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JRA
Way to go, dude. Change the original post, why don't ya.
You crack me up.
You crack me up.
That use of responsibility, by the way, is consistent with everything else I've ever posted on this forum with respect to the topic taking responsibility for your safety.
03-11-07, 10:14 AM
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
I didn't change a single word of the original post. I simply added a few words of clarification, mostly a quote from Robert Hurst.
That use of responsibility, by the way, is consistent with everything else I've ever posted on this forum with respect to the topic taking responsibility for your safety.
That use of responsibility, by the way, is consistent with everything else I've ever posted on this forum with respect to the topic taking responsibility for your safety.
You crack me up.
03-11-07, 10:27 AM
#19
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JRA
Whatever. Adding a bunch of stuff in an attempt to give something validity is not changing it.
You crack me up.
You crack me up.
03-11-07, 10:27 AM
#20
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Do you take total responsibility for your safety when cycling in traffic, or do you hold others at least partially responsible?
EDIT:
Since I did not originally specify what I meant by responsibiilty, intentionally allowing each person to use whatever definition works for them, I don't see how Pat can assert this (in post #4).
For what it's worth, the meaning I personally have in mind is that used by Robert Hurst in The Art of Urban Cycling, pp 64-67. The key excerpts from that brilliant section follow:
Perhaps Robert's concept reflects a "very simplistic and naive concept of responsibility", but I, for one, find it to be extraordinarily practical with respect to cycling in traffic.
Robert is not mincing words, his meaning should be crystal clear to anyone. Read it again and again, until you really get it, take it to heart, and make it so.
EDIT:
Since I did not originally specify what I meant by responsibiilty, intentionally allowing each person to use whatever definition works for them, I don't see how Pat can assert this (in post #4).
For what it's worth, the meaning I personally have in mind is that used by Robert Hurst in The Art of Urban Cycling, pp 64-67. The key excerpts from that brilliant section follow:
Perhaps Robert's concept reflects a "very simplistic and naive concept of responsibility", but I, for one, find it to be extraordinarily practical with respect to cycling in traffic.
Robert is not mincing words, his meaning should be crystal clear to anyone. Read it again and again, until you really get it, take it to heart, and make it so.
I have no qualms with Hurst's definition and intention. What I do have a problem with is others that go out of their way to be a nuisance to me. Motorists that exhibit behaviour above and beyond the ordinary, simply because they encounter me, a cyclist. Those people ARE responsible for their actions and how their actions effect me.
Consider a chain reaction sequence of events... I am riding along, being perfectly legal... a motorist does something extraordinary in some manner to "bypass" me, I react to their extraordinary actions with an escape move, they then react to that move... I attempt a counter reaction; at some point the events spiral down to causing me harm. (mass verses mass). Motorists acting "ordinary" do not require this sort of parry and thrust.
Responsibility of reaction was held by me, but responsibility of normal action in the first place, was held by the motorist. Violation of that latter responsibilty is the problem about which I tend to rant. Motorists not acting in an ordinary manner. Be it power moves leading to potential right hooks, to objects thrown from windows, to threating and bumping. These are extraordinary actions that have no place on the roadway.
03-11-07, 10:35 AM
#21
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
I have no qualms with Hurst's definition and intention. What I do have a problem with is others that go out of their way to be a nuisance to me. Motorists that exhibit behaviour above and beyond the ordinary, simply because they encounter me, a cyclist. Those people ARE responsible for their actions and how their actions effect me.
Consider a chain reaction sequence of events... I am riding along, being perfectly legal... a motorist does something extraordinary in some manner to "bypass" me, I react to their extraordinary actions with an escape move, they then react to that move... I attempt a counter reaction; at some point the events spiral down to causing me harm. (mass verses mass). Motorists acting "ordinary" do not require this sort of parry and thrust.
Responsibility of reaction was held by me, but responsibility of normal action in the first place, was held by the motorist. Violation of that latter responsibilty is the problem about which I tend to rant. Motorists not acting in an ordinary manner. Be it power moves leading to potential right hooks, to objects thrown from windows, to threating and bumping. These are extraordinary actions that have no place on the roadway.
Consider a chain reaction sequence of events... I am riding along, being perfectly legal... a motorist does something extraordinary in some manner to "bypass" me, I react to their extraordinary actions with an escape move, they then react to that move... I attempt a counter reaction; at some point the events spiral down to causing me harm. (mass verses mass). Motorists acting "ordinary" do not require this sort of parry and thrust.
Responsibility of reaction was held by me, but responsibility of normal action in the first place, was held by the motorist. Violation of that latter responsibilty is the problem about which I tend to rant. Motorists not acting in an ordinary manner. Be it power moves leading to potential right hooks, to objects thrown from windows, to threating and bumping. These are extraordinary actions that have no place on the roadway.
"From now on -- if some bastard breaks every law in the book and runs you over in the process, it will be your fault and nobody else's. That is the meaning of true freedom. That is how we will keep such disasters from happening in the first place." --Robert Hurst
"Blame is dangerous." --Robert Hurst
Think about it. Read Robert's words again. Read your words again. Do you see the conflict?
03-11-07, 10:52 AM
#22
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Those people ARE responsible for their actions and how their actions effect me.
And regardless of whether they are responsible for their actions or not, YOU are responsible for how they affect you and your safety.
"Hoard [responsibility] from those around you. Have faith that you will do a better job with it than they will, and make it so. Don't trust your fate to the police, the planners, the pedestrians, or the paramedics. Don't leave your fate to the stars, or to luck. Definitely don't leave your fate to the drivers." -- Robert Hurst
Edit: With all due respect, Gene, your posts, including the one above, do not exude the attitude of one who hoards responsibility from those around you. To the contrary, you seem all too eager to leave your fate in the hands of drivers. That's why their poor driving upsets you so much, and causes you so much angst. If you refused to leave your fate in their hands, their behavior would not concern you - beyond the point of simply being aware of it and what you must do as a result to be safe.
Last edited by Helmet Head; 03-11-07 at 11:10 AM.
03-11-07, 11:20 AM
#23
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
This has got to be the silliest poll yet. A person is only responsible for his/her own actions within the realm of what is within their own control. They are NOT responsible for the actions of things that are not within their control.
Hurst is attempting to make the point that a cyclist cannot expect others to act responsibly, especially in the context of YOUR best interests, so we must assume that they will not if we wish to minimize our risk. Planning for Murphy. You are taking his words, some totally out of context, in an effort to support your pet theory that the cyclist is always wrong and that motorists are not responsible for their own actions, which is why you've presented yet another rigged poll.
I hope Robert weighs in, because I believe that he will also take issue with how you are using his words.
Hurst is attempting to make the point that a cyclist cannot expect others to act responsibly, especially in the context of YOUR best interests, so we must assume that they will not if we wish to minimize our risk. Planning for Murphy. You are taking his words, some totally out of context, in an effort to support your pet theory that the cyclist is always wrong and that motorists are not responsible for their own actions, which is why you've presented yet another rigged poll.
I hope Robert weighs in, because I believe that he will also take issue with how you are using his words.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
03-11-07, 11:36 AM
#24
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Read it again.
"From now on -- if some bastard breaks every law in the book and runs you over in the process, it will be your fault and nobody else's. That is the meaning of true freedom. That is how we will keep such disasters from happening in the first place." --Robert Hurst
"Blame is dangerous." --Robert Hurst
Think about it. Read Robert's words again. Read your words again. Do you see the conflict?
"From now on -- if some bastard breaks every law in the book and runs you over in the process, it will be your fault and nobody else's. That is the meaning of true freedom. That is how we will keep such disasters from happening in the first place." --Robert Hurst
"Blame is dangerous." --Robert Hurst
Think about it. Read Robert's words again. Read your words again. Do you see the conflict?
Hurst's point is to do everything you can, but it is a two way street out there, and those that go above and beyond the ordinary in attempts to violate my rights are responsible for their own actions.
Or to put it another way... according to you, Ken Kifer is responsible for the incident where a drunk driver took Ken's life.
03-11-07, 11:39 AM
#25
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Edit: With all due respect, Gene, your posts, including the one above, do not exude the attitude of one who hoards responsibility from those around you. To the contrary, you seem all too eager to leave your fate in the hands of drivers. That's why their poor driving upsets you so much, and causes you so much angst. If you refused to leave your fate in their hands, their behavior would not concern you - beyond the point of simply being aware of it and what you must do as a result to be safe.
Poor drivers I can easily avoid, drivers that do anything and everything in violation of not only my safety, but theirs' are another thing altogether.