Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Kurt K power computer with Cycleops Trainer?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Kurt K power computer with Cycleops Trainer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-10, 01:40 PM
  #1  
jroth
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Kurt K power computer with Cycleops Trainer?

Has anyone tried using their KK power computer on a cycleops trainer?

How do you re-program the computer? I don't see any instructions in the owner's manual.

thanks.

joel
jroth is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 01:42 PM
  #2  
Jynx
.....
 
Jynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,816

Bikes: 2006 Cannondale CAAD8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
i do not believe it can be recalibrated. all it does it take the speed read and convert it to watts. it does not actually calculate watts and doesnt show accelerations properly.
__________________
Weight Listing Index (Feel Free to add to it!)

Buy your bike parts here
Jynx is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 01:55 PM
  #3  
khatfull
FBoD Member at Large
 
khatfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
At least the old one could, there is the following reference on the website:

https://www.kurtkinetic.com/calibration_chart.php

Trainer Model A B Corresponding Formula
BlackBurn Fluid 9005 1000 9.00528x + 0.00999636x3
CycleOps Fluid 2 0747 4669 0.74715x + 0.0466912x3
Elite Fluid Alu 7113 0886 7.11346x + 0.00885877x3
Elite Volare 4660 1316 4.65979x + 0.0131627x3
Kinetic AC Pro 5245 1917 5.244820x + 0.01968x3
Kinetic Cyclone 6481 2011 6.48109x + 0.020106x3
Kinetic Standard Fluid 5245 1917 5.244820x + 0.01968x3
Kinetic Road Machine 5245 1917 5.244820x + 0.01968x3
PerformanceTravelTrac Century Fluid 4145 1217 4.145000x + 0.01217x3
Spinervals Super Fluid 4.5 5245 1917 5.244820x + 0.01968x3

I looked in the manual for the current models, doesn't seem to be that A/B setting.

I was going to pick up one of the older models on eBay just to have "watts" displayed, then pull it for non-trainer use.

Call Kurt, they'll tell you.
khatfull is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 02:20 PM
  #4  
silversx80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by khatfull
CycleOps Fluid 2 0747 4669 0.74715x + 0.0466912x^3
Holy cripes, that equation can't be right!

If it's results are in Watts, I should go pro.
silversx80 is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 02:29 PM
  #5  
SalsaPodio
Senior Member
 
SalsaPodio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 965

Bikes: 2012 Parlee Z5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by silversx80
Holy cripes, that equation can't be right!

If it's results are in Watts, I should go pro.
Follow his link. The first two numbers are the "A" and "B" values.
SalsaPodio is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 02:32 PM
  #6  
khatfull
FBoD Member at Large
 
khatfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by SalsaPodio
Follow his link. The first two numbers are the "A" and "B" values.
Yeah, I just dropped that table in unformatted to show what trainers it was possible to use, at least with the old model:

khatfull is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 02:32 PM
  #7  
silversx80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by SalsaPodio
Follow his link. The first two numbers are the "A" and "B" values.

Right, I was referring to 0.74715x + 0.0466912x^3

If that's the case, than my trainer session on Wed evening left me with 105 minutes @ 295 Watts, which came after 3 harder days and was intended to be an easier effort.



Edit: I know I'm a strong rider, but there is no way I'm that strong.
silversx80 is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 02:35 PM
  #8  
Jynx
.....
 
Jynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,816

Bikes: 2006 Cannondale CAAD8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by silversx80
Holy cripes, that equation can't be right!

If it's results are in Watts, I should go pro.
copy this into google if you want:

(0.74715(x)) + (0.0466912(x^3))

and just change the x to your speed. 20mph is about 388 watts.
__________________
Weight Listing Index (Feel Free to add to it!)

Buy your bike parts here
Jynx is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 02:39 PM
  #9  
silversx80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jynx
copy this into google if you want:

(0.74715(x)) + (0.0466912(x^3))

and just change the x to your speed. 20mph is about 388 watts.
Yeah, that's what I did. 388 @ 20mph seems really high, and I know the new fluid 2's have a lighter curve than the old (I have the old), but still...



I averaged 18.2 mph after a 10 min warm up on Wednesday night for 1:45.

https://connect.garmin.com/activity/21842960
silversx80 is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 02:41 PM
  #10  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 372 Posts
Originally Posted by Jynx
copy this into google if you want:

(0.74715(x)) + (0.0466912(x^3))

and just change the x to your speed. 20mph is about 388 watts.
That sound pretty close to what I recall observing. Just for the heck of it, I did a chart for my Cycleops Fluid 2 when I got my PT. Don't know where I put the chart now though.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 02:41 PM
  #11  
Jynx
.....
 
Jynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,816

Bikes: 2006 Cannondale CAAD8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
yea i dont know why the formula is giving such high numbers. Compared to a KK it is much higher.
__________________
Weight Listing Index (Feel Free to add to it!)

Buy your bike parts here
Jynx is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 02:45 PM
  #12  
silversx80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
That sound pretty close to what I recall observing. Just for the heck of it, I did a chart for my Cycleops Fluid 2 when I got my PT. Don't know where I put the chart now though.
If that's the case, I'm a freaking monster...


... Jeez, why did I have to spend so much on an engagement ring to where I blew all my powermeter monies?
silversx80 is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 08:18 PM
  #13  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 372 Posts
Actually went back and dug up the file. 20mph is around 290 watts, and 18 is about 230.

Of course precise results would vary by your particular unit, and thes etup, (i.e. how tight the unit is cranked to the wheel)

If anyone is interested I can email the file.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 09:16 PM
  #14  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by silversx80
If that's the case, than my trainer session on Wed evening left me with 105 minutes @ 295 Watts, which came after 3 harder days and was intended to be an easier effort.
Whether or not 295W is impressive depends entirely on how much you weigh.
umd is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 09:19 PM
  #15  
silversx80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Well that sounds much more reasonable, though I have to admit that I wish KK was right
silversx80 is offline  
Old 01-08-10, 09:23 PM
  #16  
silversx80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by umd
Whether or not 295W is impressive depends entirely on how much you weigh.
Are you saying I'm fat?


silversx80 is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 12:50 PM
  #17  
silversx80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Well, here is something interesting... I found the old power curve for the previous Fluid2's w/ the knob to tighten (the new ones have a heavier flywheel and a few other changes). It's not quite as high as what KK says, but it's not too far off. Perhaps they just picked a point on this curve and formed an x^3 tread line equation. It seems, however, the fluid2 is only a squared equation and not a cubed, like the KK.

silversx80 is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 07:27 PM
  #18  
BoodBianchi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Marin
Posts: 177

Bikes: Bianchi Giro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
Whether or not 295W is impressive depends entirely on how much you weigh.

How much would one have to weigh for that number to be impressive?
BoodBianchi is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 07:38 PM
  #19  
silversx80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by BoodBianchi
How much would one have to weigh for that number to be impressive?
It would really depend on the time someone is able to maintain that number in order to determine the weight. For the type of ride I did, and my weight (80 kg), it's not too shabby, especially considering that with KK's equation my FTP would be around 480-500 Watts.
silversx80 is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 07:41 PM
  #20  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by silversx80
It would really depend on the time someone is able to maintain that number in order to determine the weight. For the type of ride I did, and my weight (80 kg), it's not too shabby, especially considering that with KK's equation my FTP would be around 480-500 Watts.
As long as you realize how unlikely that is...
umd is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 07:42 PM
  #21  
BoodBianchi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Marin
Posts: 177

Bikes: Bianchi Giro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
As long as you realize how unlikely that is...

I weigh 140 pounds, how long on my KK would I have to ride for at 20mph to be impressive? Just curious because I just started riding.

Cam
BoodBianchi is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 07:54 PM
  #22  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Don't look to me as the artiber of what is impressive. My only point was that power by itself is fairly meaningless as weight/size matters as well. Someone who is larger/weighs more is going to require more power to go the same speed. Some people post some very "impressive" power numbers but you have to realize that they are very large as well. Someone who is tiny might actually be faster on much lower power. That is why we generally discuss power as Watts/Kg. However it should be noted that on flat ground it's actually Watts/CdA (coefficient of aerodynamic drag) that matters, it's just that it scales roughly with weight.

Edit: I'm about 65kg. All things being equal, 295W would be "more impressive" for me than silversx80 at 80kg.

And don't get me started about speed on a trainer
umd is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 07:55 PM
  #23  
Jynx
.....
 
Jynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,816

Bikes: 2006 Cannondale CAAD8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by BoodBianchi
I weigh 140 pounds, how long on my KK would I have to ride for at 20mph to be impressive? Just curious because I just started riding.

Cam

20 mph = ((5.244820)(20)) + ((0.01968)(20^3)) = 262 watts.

Look at this chart for watts per kg for specific abilities

https://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/...profile_v4.gif

This is the formula for power on a KK Road machine where x is speed in mph.

((5.244820)(x)) + ((0.01968)(x^3))

Here is the chart made from the formula above for the power levels of a KK Road Machine Trainer. I have a powertap and my power is always within 5 watts of the chart.

https://www.kurtkinetic.com/documents..._Curves419.pdf

Take your weight and convert to kg. find a w/kg at a level you think you might be in the FTP column. find the watts and corresponding speed to get those watts. get on the trainer and see if you can hold it for an hour. if you dont have an hour do it for 20 minutes but your ftp will be 95% of the 20 minute power.
__________________
Weight Listing Index (Feel Free to add to it!)

Buy your bike parts here
Jynx is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 08:00 PM
  #24  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 372 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
. My only point was that power by itself is fairly meaningless as weight/size matters as well. Someone who is larger/weighs more is going to require more power to go the same speed. Some people post some very "impressive"power numbers but you have to realize that they are very large as well.

Case in point, my FTP by my last field test was 331. As for the weight side, lets just say its well north of 80kg
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 01-09-10, 08:06 PM
  #25  
silversx80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by umd
As long as you realize how unlikely that is...
About as likely as winning the lottery...

... though I did win a car once.
silversx80 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.