Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

Gates Carbon Drive timing belt eating bottom brackets?

Search
Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Gates Carbon Drive timing belt eating bottom brackets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-21, 06:02 PM
  #26  
jays35
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Clever, Mo
Posts: 121

Bikes: 3 - Bianchis

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Sram bb

Yes, come to find out my BB or reversed. The stokers is common and the captains is opposite. The SRAM BB that I need is discontinued. My bike mechanic suggest flipping the eccentric over 180 degrees and then the SRAM BB’s will be the same. Can that be done? Are eccentric BB reversible?

Thanks in advance!

Dave
jays35 is offline  
Old 07-26-21, 09:07 PM
  #27  
reburns
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The valley of heart’s delight
Posts: 414

Bikes: 2005 Trek T2000; 2005 Co-motion Speedster Co-pilot; various non-tandem road and mountain bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 39 Posts
Originally Posted by Alcanbrad
After all the comments and trying with the belt tension looser, I believe that in addition to having excessive runout, I have been running the belt way too tight which is likely my problem (I never could get a consistent tone out of the belt strumming method). To set the looser tension I choose the limit to be just a bit tighter than the belt being able to climb out of the center track when slowly turning the crank and pushing the belt sideways just ahead of where the belt met the ring. If the belt climbed out of the center track and started to ride on top of the ring, I backed off and adjusted the eccentric just a bit tighter. Riding it over the weekend it performed well, but I still need to replace the BB (or bearings) as these are ruined. I believe the belt tension measures in the low 30lb range and the difference due to runout is fairly small.

I'd be curious of how others determine "loose" as "loose enough" or "too loose".
I bought my first Gates timing kit from https://www.precisiontandems.com. His advice was tension just enough to hear a tone when you pluck the belt.
reburns is offline  
Old 07-27-21, 05:18 AM
  #28  
Alcanbrad
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Alcanbrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 430

Bikes: '14 CoMo Carrera, '11 CoMo Primera co-pilot, '98 Santana Visa, a Plethora of road bikes, A commuter/Gravel beast (and 1 MTB)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by jays35
Yes, come to find out my BB or reversed. The stokers is common and the captains is opposite. The SRAM BB that I need is discontinued. My bike mechanic suggest flipping the eccentric over 180 degrees and then the SRAM BB’s will be the same. Can that be done? Are eccentric BB reversible?

Thanks in advance!

Dave
Are you talking about using the tandem specific BB for the stoker? If so, I think you could flip the eccentric around, however, BB’s (and pedals) are threaded the way they are to prevent the cups natural tendency to unscrew. You will have to stay on top of it to make sure it does not self loosen on you.
Alcanbrad is offline  
Old 05-09-23, 09:50 AM
  #29  
stabaur
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Excellent analysis. Appreciate the comments and your thoroughness. Are you sure the click click is coming from from your bottom bracket. I occasionally get a ticking noise which is caused by the belt. Spray my belt with silicon eliminates the sound.
stabaur is offline  
Old 05-09-23, 03:07 PM
  #30  
TobyGadd
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by joeruge
I also used the method discussed by Sheldon Brown (https://www.sheldonbrown.com/synchain.html) to minimise differences in tension from rotational position.
I'll second Sheldon Brown's approach. While I was a little intimidated at first, it actually works very well, and it's not that hard to do. Highly recommended.
TobyGadd is offline  
Old 05-10-23, 08:47 AM
  #31  
Alcanbrad
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Alcanbrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 430

Bikes: '14 CoMo Carrera, '11 CoMo Primera co-pilot, '98 Santana Visa, a Plethora of road bikes, A commuter/Gravel beast (and 1 MTB)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by TobyGadd
I'll second Sheldon Brown's approach. While I was a little intimidated at first, it actually works very well, and it's not that hard to do. Highly recommended.
I agree this should be tried first. I my case it didn’t work which is why I went down the rabbit hole I did. It should not have to be this way but unfortunately it is in far to many instances.

if the measured runout moves into the acceptable range, terrific. If not try rotating a ring one bolt position at a time until you achieve success.
Alcanbrad is offline  
Old 05-10-23, 11:08 AM
  #32  
TobyGadd
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Alcanbrad
I agree this should be tried first. I my case it didn’t work which is why I went down the rabbit hole I did. It should not have to be this way but unfortunately it is in far to many instances.

if the measured runout moves into the acceptable range, terrific. If not try rotating a ring one bolt position at a time until you achieve success.
Your approach is very thorough and useful. Thanks for sharing it!
TobyGadd is offline  
Old 06-21-23, 02:58 AM
  #33  
mikemelbrooks
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by TobyGadd
Your approach is very thorough and useful. Thanks for sharing it!
Indeed!
I recently removed the stokers chainset to change chainrings. When I refitted the Gates timing belt it would slowly creep of the rear cog untill it rubbed the frame. I removed it and refitted it the other way round, and all was good. Are Gates belt directional?
mikemelbrooks is offline  
Old 08-20-23, 03:40 PM
  #34  
TobyGadd
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Alcanbrad
The stoker bottom bracket develops this incredibly annoying click at a given orientation of the crank set. It will only do this when all 4 of our feet are on the pedals. With any combination of 3 or less feet on the pedals, no click, 4 feet, click. I replace either the entire bottom bracket or just the bearings and the click disappears.... for a few hundred miles, then - click click click.
This has been a great discussion. But I'd love to know if you successfully eliminated the clicking without having to keep replacing the bottom bracket.
TobyGadd is offline  
Old 08-21-23, 01:47 AM
  #35  
Artmo 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,673

Bikes: '06 Bianchi Pista; '57 Maclean; '10 Scott CR1 Pro; 2005 Trek 2000 Tandem; '09 Comotion Macchiato Tandem; 199? Novara Road; '17 Circe Helios e-tandem:1994 Trek 2300

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 93 Times in 61 Posts
Originally Posted by Philly Tandem
I put a Gates belt on our Santana Arriva last year and now you guys have me all stressed out! All this tech-speak hurts my tiny English-major brain...
Well, Philly, if it’s any comfort for you, in the past 12 or so years we have ridden over 30,000 miles with the original Gates belt on our Macchiato with no problems with belt or BBS.
Artmo is offline  
Likes For Artmo:
Old 08-21-23, 05:40 AM
  #36  
Alcanbrad
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Alcanbrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 430

Bikes: '14 CoMo Carrera, '11 CoMo Primera co-pilot, '98 Santana Visa, a Plethora of road bikes, A commuter/Gravel beast (and 1 MTB)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by TobyGadd
This has been a great discussion. But I'd love to know if you successfully eliminated the clicking without having to keep replacing the bottom bracket.
So far so good. The current bottom bracket is surviving longer than before. Fingers continue to be crossed.

Originally Posted by Artmo
Well, Philly, if it’s any comfort for you, in the past 12 or so years we have ridden over 30,000 miles with the original Gates belt on our Macchiato with no problems with belt or BBS.
I believe my issues are due to poor manufacturing of the crank(s). I’ve stated before that this shouldn’t be the case, especially at the price points of these products, however, the evidence is abundant that the bicycle industry is doing a poor job insuring an acceptable level of quality. It could do better.
Alcanbrad is offline  
Likes For Alcanbrad:
Old 08-21-23, 05:42 AM
  #37  
ferengii
Ferengii
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 46

Bikes: Co-Motion tandem; Bilenky tandem; Trek Domane SL6

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 14 Posts
AND we’re now over 45,000 miles on our original Gates belts on our Equator with no problems with belt or BBS.
ferengii is offline  
Likes For ferengii:
Old 08-21-23, 10:17 AM
  #38  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by Alcanbrad
After all the comments and trying with the belt tension looser, I believe that in addition to having excessive runout, I have been running the belt way too tight which is likely my problem (I never could get a consistent tone out of the belt strumming method). To set the looser tension I choose the limit to be just a bit tighter than the belt being able to climb out of the center track when slowly turning the crank and pushing the belt sideways just ahead of where the belt met the ring. If the belt climbed out of the center track and started to ride on top of the ring, I backed off and adjusted the eccentric just a bit tighter. Riding it over the weekend it performed well, but I still need to replace the BB (or bearings) as these are ruined. I believe the belt tension measures in the low 30lb range and the difference due to runout is fairly small.

I'd be curious of how others determine "loose" as "loose enough" or "too loose".
I'm another one who believes that the tone method of judging belt tension results in unnecessary BB friction and wear. One wants it just tight enough that it doesn't jump a tooth when the captain hammers OOS at a low cadence. I go this criterium: Total movement up and down is about 1". I just checked my belt - it's 1.25". Works fine. This tension may only work for the centertrack belts.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.