Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Replace Bottom Bracket; Sealed vs Unsealed

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Replace Bottom Bracket; Sealed vs Unsealed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-08, 07:41 PM
  #51  
Barabaika
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 887
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 241 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by purevl
Nicer ones were, i have several. It doesn't take much to add a seal to something. I will grant that it's not the same type of seal some cartridge bb's use but they are sealed nonetheless.

Could you define very often? even the most fastidious bike snobs probably wouldn't do it more than a couple times a year unless they are riding through deep water all the time. Figure it takes 20 minutes each time, so maybe an hour or two a year spent working on the bottom bracket?
So, do you say if I buy a car for $500, any repair exceeding $500 doesn't make sense? Common sense tells me: buy a $500 car, spend $3000 in repairs.
Old bikes are cheap because you have to pour into them more money that they worth; especially, if you have to pay somebody to fix them.

For me, the usual sources of noise are the chain, bottom bracket, front derailleur. If I can improve the maintenance interval for the bb by 50-100% using a cartridge bb, why not? I can buy a cheap bb for $18-20, it's the price of a decent chain.
Barabaika is offline  
Old 02-20-08, 12:37 PM
  #52  
mediccody
affix pistol bayonets!
 
mediccody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 252

Bikes: Early-Mid 80's Peugeot Super Competition, 1981 Basso, Mid-80's Peugeot Course

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You guys think that those plastic inserts which wrap around the spindle on cup and spindle BBs actually do anything to protect from water and filth?
mediccody is offline  
Old 02-20-08, 12:44 PM
  #53  
markjenn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,160
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 154 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by mediccody
You guys think that those plastic inserts which wrap around the spindle on cup and spindle BBs actually do anything to protect from water and filth?
I think the main intrusion problem is from where the spindle exits the cups - the plastic insert just keeps debris in your frame and BB shell from getting into the bearings.

- Mark
markjenn is offline  
Old 02-21-08, 02:22 AM
  #54  
aesmith
Senior Member
 
aesmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 162

Bikes: Dawes road bike and Trek Antelope 850

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If it were me I wouldn't dismiss the cup-and-spindle option. They're not that vulnerable. For example I have just been overhauling a seriously neglected mountain bike. The headset and one of the rear wheel bearings were shot with signs of corrosion and water contamination, and pitted surfaces. The bottom bracket was OK, pretty clean grease and no sign of contamination. All it needed was to be cleaned and inspected then assembled with new grease and adjusted.

That was maybe good luck, but in general I've not found that bottom brackets wear out that quick, and I've never used anything except cup-and-spindle.
aesmith is offline  
Old 02-21-08, 04:04 AM
  #55  
mike-on-da-bike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bearings for bikes are sealed for one very good reasonthey wont drop out, when bearings wear or things come loose caged bearing are very handy,those loose bearings wear just a fracton and you will loose the lot

Last edited by mike-on-da-bike; 02-21-08 at 04:05 AM. Reason: typo
mike-on-da-bike is offline  
Old 02-21-08, 10:36 AM
  #56  
purevl
CroMosexual
 
purevl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Murray, Ky
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by markjenn
so I guess bar tape is unreasonable in cost too.
Yeah, I think so, I'm sure lots of people do. It depends on the tape of course, but i don't really understand why regular cork bar tape costs $20 and is designed to last for only a single season.
Originally Posted by Barabaika
So, do you say if I buy a car for $500, any repair exceeding $500 doesn't make sense? Common sense tells me: buy a $500 car, spend $3000 in repairs.
Old bikes are cheap because you have to pour into them more money that they worth; especially, if you have to pay somebody to fix them.
I think, as I'm sure you know that that depends entirely on the car.

I don't have to pay anyone to fix them and i never put more money into a bike than what I think it is worth. Why would i spend more money than I have to though? That's sorta the crux of my original question: when it comes to cheap cartridge bottom brackets, is there an advantage over cup and spindle other than not requiring[read: allowing] maintenance? What I mean is: if I really don't mind spending minutes a year overhauling my bottom bracket with a dollar's worth of ball bearings what makes a cartridge bottom bracket superior?

Originally Posted by Barabaika
If I can improve the maintenance interval for the bb by 50-100% using a cartridge bb, why not?
Ok, fair enough I asked you to defend your position so I'm glad to defend mine.
1) Cost - In the long run cup and spindle BB's cost me less money. I own a lot of bikes, and it's much more economical to buy grease and bearings that will work on any of them and cost less than a cartridge. It's less an issue of expense vs. bike worth and more an issue of comparative value.
2) Repair-ability - I can fix the darn thing my self. Not so with a cartridge, I can replace it but I can't repair it. In a pinch, even if the spindle or cup is pitted I can get it spinning very satisfactorily while i look for a replacement. Once a cartridge is toast you're out of a ride.
3) Satisfaction - I like to take things apart and put them back together. I have a MAKE magazine shirt that says "If you can't open it, you don't own it." I like to DIY
4) Down time - I've got everything I need to fix a cup and spindle BB right here. The bike is unrideable for 20-30 mins. If I have to order a new cartridge it's at least a few days' wait.
5)Environmental concerns - This is actually the biggest and most important reason to me, more important even than cost. The three R's are in order of importance, naturally I recycle everything I can in my area but in this particular instance: I Reduce my waste by not sending yet another cartridge bottom bracket to the landfill. I Reuse the spindle and cup assuming they are in good shape. All that's left is a handful of bearings and some old grease.

The cons as I see them so far (keep in mind we are comparing apples to apples here, i'm sure phil wood bb's and the like are lovely but i'm talking about cheap shimano cartridges) are:
Availability, the stock of old parts is running out.
Effort, you have to actually learn to do something to reap the benefits listed above.
Penetrability, they may be somewhat more susceptible to dirt.
Fashion, they are out of favor with marketing.

Originally Posted by mediccody
You guys think that those plastic inserts which wrap around the spindle on cup and spindle BBs actually do anything to protect from water and filth?
A little yes, but that's not a seal, that's just a sleeve designed to prevent water or dirt dripping down the seat tube from getting in your bearings. You can make one out of any piece of plastic, a coke bottle for example.

Originally Posted by markjenn
I think the main intrusion problem is from where the spindle exits the cups - the plastic insert just keeps debris in your frame and BB shell from getting into the bearings.
Which is exactly where the seals on a sealed cup and spindle bottom bracket are located.

It occurs to me that if you abuse a cup and spindle bottom bracket, it will fail. If you abuse a cartridge bottom bracket it will fail.

Originally Posted by aesmith
If it were me I wouldn't dismiss the cup-and-spindle option. They're not that vulnerable.
[snip]
That was maybe good luck, but in general I've not found that bottom brackets wear out that quick, and I've never used anything except cup-and-spindle.
Thank you!, i've had both and noticed the same thing.

Originally Posted by mike-on-da-bike
bearings for bikes are sealed for one very good reasonthey wont drop out, when bearings wear or things come loose caged bearing are very handy,those loose bearings wear just a fracton and you will loose the lot
That is a good point, but I've only ever noticed missing bearings on bikes with serious neglect (or maybe really flexy bottom brackets?) It takes a lot of use to wear the materials good bearings and races are made of, even a fraction.
purevl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.