Birdy thread
#2077
Newbie
Thanks for the tip regarding fold and detailed reply BabyCowHK
I didn’t consider that SAINT may make fold wider as front fork screwer screw will not go under it. Birdy’s fold is not entirely small so I’ll need to look into it.
My rear cassette is 11-32 so I assume it’s within range of SAINt/ZEE.
Regarding FD upgrade, my mechanic has a bicycle shop with lot’s of bikes and also is Shimano service center/seller. So he can test any configurations with any setup. I’m not going for 36 small chainring and will be using that what you also recommend 53/39. My mechanic suggested to replace chainring cranks and hub entirely. He says he will make sure chain line is fine. Do you think it will make sense or I better upgrade only Chainrings and leave cranks/hub as is?
I didn’t consider that SAINT may make fold wider as front fork screwer screw will not go under it. Birdy’s fold is not entirely small so I’ll need to look into it.
My rear cassette is 11-32 so I assume it’s within range of SAINt/ZEE.
Regarding FD upgrade, my mechanic has a bicycle shop with lot’s of bikes and also is Shimano service center/seller. So he can test any configurations with any setup. I’m not going for 36 small chainring and will be using that what you also recommend 53/39. My mechanic suggested to replace chainring cranks and hub entirely. He says he will make sure chain line is fine. Do you think it will make sense or I better upgrade only Chainrings and leave cranks/hub as is?
Like I mentioned in the previous reply. Don't use Saint/Zee with a double chainring setup. The total capacity of 35T is too much for the super short RD cage to handle.
Front diff 53-39T=14. Rear diff 32-11T=21T. Total diff 14+21T=35T.
Consider going with R7000/R8000 short cage RD for 35T diff.
#2078
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,544
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 247 Times
in
211 Posts
I have an Ultegra RD-R8000-GS medium cage capacity max 39t, rear max cog 34t (with 9-34t cassette) on my Birdy Touring and its OK, to too close to the ground, not closer to the ground than original RD-T610-SGS.
#2081
Full Member
Sorry I made a mistake of the total capacity of 28T on Saint/Zee Rd. It should be "25T".
Like I mentioned in the previous reply. Don't use Saint/Zee with a double chainring setup. The total capacity of 35T is too much for the super short RD cage to handle.
Front diff 53-39T=14. Rear diff 32-11T=21T. Total diff 14+21T=35T.
Consider going with R7000/R8000 short cage RD for 35T diff.
Like I mentioned in the previous reply. Don't use Saint/Zee with a double chainring setup. The total capacity of 35T is too much for the super short RD cage to handle.
Front diff 53-39T=14. Rear diff 32-11T=21T. Total diff 14+21T=35T.
Consider going with R7000/R8000 short cage RD for 35T diff.
#2082
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,544
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 247 Times
in
211 Posts
Sorry I made a mistake of the total capacity of 28T on Saint/Zee Rd. It should be "25T".
Like I mentioned in the previous reply. Don't use Saint/Zee with a double chainring setup. The total capacity of 35T is too much for the super short RD cage to handle.
Front diff 53-39T=14. Rear diff 32-11T=21T. Total diff 14+21T=35T.
Consider going with R7000/R8000 short cage RD for 35T diff.
Like I mentioned in the previous reply. Don't use Saint/Zee with a double chainring setup. The total capacity of 35T is too much for the super short RD cage to handle.
Front diff 53-39T=14. Rear diff 32-11T=21T. Total diff 14+21T=35T.
Consider going with R7000/R8000 short cage RD for 35T diff.
As said, a Shimano 53-39 crankset is a road crankset with a narrower chainline than the Birdy original crankset and might not work with a front derailleur (same as the Dura-Ace 7800 of 50PlusCycling which doesn't work with a front derailleur). So, again, I advise to at least first try to mount a BCD130 53-39 on the original crankset.
#2083
Full Member
Shimano RD-R8000-SS short cage is limited to 30t for the cassette, it doesn't accept a 32t or 34t biggest cog while RD-R8000-GS goes up to 34t.
As said, a Shimano 53-39 crankset is a road crankset with a narrower chainline than the Birdy original crankset and might not work with a front derailleur (same as the Dura-Ace 7800 of 50PlusCycling which doesn't work with a front derailleur). So, again, I advise to at least first try to mount a BCD130 53-39 on the original crankset.
As said, a Shimano 53-39 crankset is a road crankset with a narrower chainline than the Birdy original crankset and might not work with a front derailleur (same as the Dura-Ace 7800 of 50PlusCycling which doesn't work with a front derailleur). So, again, I advise to at least first try to mount a BCD130 53-39 on the original crankset.
Regarding 53/39 BCD130 do you think this chainrings set can be mounted on stock spider and allow using front derailleur?
#2084
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,544
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 247 Times
in
211 Posts
Yes, it will probably be too close to the frame.
No, you cannot add spacers because the axle of the crankset won't be long enough. This relatively narrow chainline is a standard for road bikes.
The chainline isn't defined by the chainrings but by the crankset, so, yes with the original crankset, it should work with these Litepro chainrings. Personally, I do not like Litepro cheap components, I would choose Stronglite but they are more expensive.
To mount two chanrings, you will also need longer chainring bolts since the one on the Birdy are mrant for a single chainring.
No, you cannot add spacers because the axle of the crankset won't be long enough. This relatively narrow chainline is a standard for road bikes.
The chainline isn't defined by the chainrings but by the crankset, so, yes with the original crankset, it should work with these Litepro chainrings. Personally, I do not like Litepro cheap components, I would choose Stronglite but they are more expensive.
To mount two chanrings, you will also need longer chainring bolts since the one on the Birdy are mrant for a single chainring.
#2085
Full Member
Yes, it will probably be too close to the frame.
No, you cannot add spacers because the axle of the crankset won't be long enough. This relatively narrow chainline is a standard for road bikes.
The chainline isn't defined by the chainrings but by the crankset, so, yes with the original crankset, it should work with these Litepro chainrings. Personally, I do not like Litepro cheap components, I would choose Stronglite but they are more expensive.
To mount two chanrings, you will also need longer chainring bolts since the one on the Birdy are mrant for a single chainring.
No, you cannot add spacers because the axle of the crankset won't be long enough. This relatively narrow chainline is a standard for road bikes.
The chainline isn't defined by the chainrings but by the crankset, so, yes with the original crankset, it should work with these Litepro chainrings. Personally, I do not like Litepro cheap components, I would choose Stronglite but they are more expensive.
To mount two chanrings, you will also need longer chainring bolts since the one on the Birdy are mrant for a single chainring.
Strongline sets you’ve posted link to are not available on stock. What’s wrong with Litepro chainrings? Besides that’s it’s cheap.
Last edited by CEBEP; 08-01-22 at 03:15 AM.
#2086
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,544
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 247 Times
in
211 Posts
MTB crankset for the same BSA 68mm like on the Birdy have a wider chainline due to the shape of their spider. There is no need of a longer axle.
If you begin to add spacers and use a crankset for a wider BSA bottom bracket box (like 73mm) you don't know what chainline you will actually get and if it will fit for the front derailleur.
About the Litepro chainrings, some people mounted them on the Brompton and had problems with the teeth shape.
If you begin to add spacers and use a crankset for a wider BSA bottom bracket box (like 73mm) you don't know what chainline you will actually get and if it will fit for the front derailleur.
About the Litepro chainrings, some people mounted them on the Brompton and had problems with the teeth shape.
#2087
Full Member
MTB crankset for the same BSA 68mm like on the Birdy have a wider chainline due to the shape of their spider. There is no need of a longer axle.
If you begin to add spacers and use a crankset for a wider BSA bottom bracket box (like 73mm) you don't know what chainline you will actually get and if it will fit for the front derailleur.
About the Litepro chainrings, some people mounted them on the Brompton and had problems with the teeth shape.
If you begin to add spacers and use a crankset for a wider BSA bottom bracket box (like 73mm) you don't know what chainline you will actually get and if it will fit for the front derailleur.
About the Litepro chainrings, some people mounted them on the Brompton and had problems with the teeth shape.
#2088
Full Member
MTB crankset for the same BSA 68mm like on the Birdy have a wider chainline due to the shape of their spider. There is no need of a longer axle.
If you begin to add spacers and use a crankset for a wider BSA bottom bracket box (like 73mm) you don't know what chainline you will actually get and if it will fit for the front derailleur.
About the Litepro chainrings, some people mounted them on the Brompton and had problems with the teeth shape.
If you begin to add spacers and use a crankset for a wider BSA bottom bracket box (like 73mm) you don't know what chainline you will actually get and if it will fit for the front derailleur.
About the Litepro chainrings, some people mounted them on the Brompton and had problems with the teeth shape.
#2089
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,544
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 247 Times
in
211 Posts
What is done on the Ti Birdy doesn't give any idea about what can be done on a Birdy III since the frame is totally different with different dimensionning, its not a titanium clone of the Birdy III frame.
The Ti Birdy has a FSA SL-K Light carbon crankset with the proprietary FSA chainrings and the frame has a FD mounting bracket soldered on the frame adapted to the chainline obtained with this crankset (which is a road narrow chainline crankset like a Dura-Ace, Ultergra, 105...), not a FD mounting clamp.
The Ti Birdy has a FSA SL-K Light carbon crankset with the proprietary FSA chainrings and the frame has a FD mounting bracket soldered on the frame adapted to the chainline obtained with this crankset (which is a road narrow chainline crankset like a Dura-Ace, Ultergra, 105...), not a FD mounting clamp.
#2090
Full Member
Ridea also have double chainrings for Birdy Lami·Flow R5-ST which are available in BCD130 and round shape as 53/39 and 56/44 which I can mount on my stock spider on R&M Birdy Touring.
Is there any risk that if I buy BCD130 double chainring 53/39 that it will rub or front derailleur will not work? Or is there a risk that I may have issues with shifting in future? Just to remind that I have 10s 11-32 Shimano cassette.
Such chainrings are not available locally, so I can’t try them. And ordering good quality ones abroad will cost good amount of money.
I suppose 56/44 will not be a good idea?
Is there any risk that if I buy BCD130 double chainring 53/39 that it will rub or front derailleur will not work? Or is there a risk that I may have issues with shifting in future? Just to remind that I have 10s 11-32 Shimano cassette.
Such chainrings are not available locally, so I can’t try them. And ordering good quality ones abroad will cost good amount of money.
I suppose 56/44 will not be a good idea?
#2091
Full Member
Sorry that I didn't go through the whole thread, so what's your crankset? It should work just fine if you have the hollow shaft type crankset with a BSA 24 BB. Taper crankset is a no go. It will cause small chainring & big sprocket combo to scratch the rear fork above the fork pivot area. The chain line is too narrow.
This hollow shaft crankset can be directly converted to use a double chainring. The only requirement is to make sure that there is a 2.5mm spacer on the drive side or both sides to balance out the Q factor. And of course the rest of the FD mount and FD itself.
Some crazy mechanics I have seen installed two 2.5mm spacers on the drive side which kind of shifted the chain line too much. Don't make that mistake.
This hollow shaft crankset can be directly converted to use a double chainring. The only requirement is to make sure that there is a 2.5mm spacer on the drive side or both sides to balance out the Q factor. And of course the rest of the FD mount and FD itself.
Some crazy mechanics I have seen installed two 2.5mm spacers on the drive side which kind of shifted the chain line too much. Don't make that mistake.
#2092
Full Member
FWIW, I've used a Litepro chainring ("plain" 1x specific with integrated chain guard, one piece) for about 3500 km, no problems yet.
(Multispeed rings and narrow-wide are more complicated to make so if there are quality differences that may be more apparent for them.)
(Multispeed rings and narrow-wide are more complicated to make so if there are quality differences that may be more apparent for them.)
Likes For glye:
#2093
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,544
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 247 Times
in
211 Posts
Yes Ridea will also fit but usually Ridea components are difficult to find and expensive.
56-44 is out of specification of most front derailleur but should work, its often used by pro cyclist who find that 52 or 53 is too short. I had 58-44 on my Moulton with a Campagnolo Super Record FD and it worked (this chainring set is specially made for Moulton)
The limitation factor for the big chainring on the Birdy is the chain tensionner pin, on the picture you can see that 56t is still OK.
If you increase the chainring size, you will need a new longer chain.
The Red-black KMC DLC chain above is very good but very expensive, THe KMC 11sl gold or 10sl gold Ti-N coating is less expensive and as good.
56-44 is out of specification of most front derailleur but should work, its often used by pro cyclist who find that 52 or 53 is too short. I had 58-44 on my Moulton with a Campagnolo Super Record FD and it worked (this chainring set is specially made for Moulton)
The limitation factor for the big chainring on the Birdy is the chain tensionner pin, on the picture you can see that 56t is still OK.
If you increase the chainring size, you will need a new longer chain.
The Red-black KMC DLC chain above is very good but very expensive, THe KMC 11sl gold or 10sl gold Ti-N coating is less expensive and as good.
#2094
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: The Ring of Fire
Posts: 932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 567 Times
in
356 Posts
Eighth-year old Litepro chainring & crank arms that's seen action in three countries and two bicycles
Shimano 10-speed HG chain works like a charm
What really deserves questioning is the slavish devotion to high ticket, prestige items, not the savvy choice of good value.
Last edited by Ron Damon; 08-01-22 at 10:22 PM.
#2095
Newbie
As long as your Birdy uses standard external BB with a 2mm spacer on the drive side. It is safe to do it with double chainrings.
I was using a Chris King Headset. Last few weeks I switched back to stock Driveline BB and 53/39 setup. Still working fine without any problem. Shifting is even better and faster than the old 56/44 setup.
The combination on the size of large front chainring and largest cassette cog size is another story. We can't do 56T-34T combo. In a cross chain state the chain will rub the bottom side of the rear fork. I can't remember about 53-34T combo but 52-34T works without rubbing.
Last edited by BabyCowHK; 08-01-22 at 11:00 PM.
#2096
Newbie
Shimano RD-R8000-SS short cage is limited to 30t for the cassette, it doesn't accept a 32t or 34t biggest cog while RD-R8000-GS goes up to 34t.
As said, a Shimano 53-39 crankset is a road crankset with a narrower chainline than the Birdy original crankset and might not work with a front derailleur (same as the Dura-Ace 7800 of 50PlusCycling which doesn't work with a front derailleur). So, again, I advise to at least first try to mount a BCD130 53-39 on the original crankset.
As said, a Shimano 53-39 crankset is a road crankset with a narrower chainline than the Birdy original crankset and might not work with a front derailleur (same as the Dura-Ace 7800 of 50PlusCycling which doesn't work with a front derailleur). So, again, I advise to at least first try to mount a BCD130 53-39 on the original crankset.
However, R8000-SS-RD is fully capable of using 34T cassette. The body length of the R8000 SS and GS models are the same. Its the cage length that's making SS officially unsuitable for cassettes larger than 30T. I know that a lot of people don't understand why we need to calculate the capacity on an RD. I normally won't advise people to do large cassette with a SS road RD.
Last edited by BabyCowHK; 08-01-22 at 11:16 PM.
#2097
Newbie
in fact, some MTB cranksets that use center lock mechanism will work with Birdy with a spider adapter. A lot of my friends are using SRAM MTB, Rotor with extended axle and eeWings MTB cranksets. They simply add a spider adapter and get the chainrings of their choice.
#2098
Full Member
Thanks. If I can use stock holllow crankset and spider of my Birdy for double chainring, that’s what my preference would be. Do you/your friends have any experience with Litepro 53/39 chainrings? Or any double Litepro chainrings for that matter. How’s shifting?
#2099
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,544
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 247 Times
in
211 Posts
I have to agree with you on the crankset and testing setup. Just get two cheap chainrings and do a manual shift as I previously mentioned.
However, R8000-SS-RD is fully capable of using 34T cassette. The body length of the R8000 SS and GS models are the same. Its the cage length that's making SS officially unsuitable for cassettes larger than 30T. I know that a lot of people don't understand why we need to calculate the capacity on an RD. I normally won't advise people to do large cassette with a SS road RD.
However, R8000-SS-RD is fully capable of using 34T cassette. The body length of the R8000 SS and GS models are the same. Its the cage length that's making SS officially unsuitable for cassettes larger than 30T. I know that a lot of people don't understand why we need to calculate the capacity on an RD. I normally won't advise people to do large cassette with a SS road RD.
But I have an Ultegra RD-R8000-GS medium cage on my Birdy and its not too close to the ground, its even slightly higher than the R&M factory mounted RD-T610-SGS, so I see no reason to take the risk of using a short cage instead.
For the chainrings, the difference between brands is as Glye says for more sophisticated chainrings like narrow-wide and even more for double chainrings that have grooves and pins to help and speed up the chin going from the small to the big chainring. Each brand has its own patented tricks.
Last edited by Jipe; 08-02-22 at 02:31 AM.
#2100
Newbie
I agree with you, several Shimano rear derailleur accept bigger biggest cog that what Shimano specify. I know the the RD-R8000-GS medium cage that according to Shimano is limited to 34t can work with 36t.
But I have an Ultegra RD-R8000-GS medium cage on my Birdy and its not too close to the ground, its even slightly higher than the R&M factory mounted RD-T610-SGS, so I see no reason to take the risk of using a short cage instead.
For the chainrings, the difference between brands is as Glye says for more sophisticated chainrings like narrow-wide and even more for double chainrings that have grooves and pins to help and speed up the chin going from the small to the big chainring. Each brand has its own patented tricks.
But I have an Ultegra RD-R8000-GS medium cage on my Birdy and its not too close to the ground, its even slightly higher than the R&M factory mounted RD-T610-SGS, so I see no reason to take the risk of using a short cage instead.
For the chainrings, the difference between brands is as Glye says for more sophisticated chainrings like narrow-wide and even more for double chainrings that have grooves and pins to help and speed up the chin going from the small to the big chainring. Each brand has its own patented tricks.
I was worrying about the GS cage length so decided to go with the SS cage. Works ok but the limitation is so real. I had to keep monitoring the shifting. It's quite annoying TBH.