Frame Identification
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Frame Identification
New to Bikeforums, but a long time cyclist. Picked up this bike last week for what I considered a more than reasonable price. All I know is that the former owner purchased it from a vintage bike shop in Chicago a few years back. It's a well made frame with some unique details that make me want to try and ID or at least narrow down the builder. Hoping for a longshot that someone might recognize the builder. With the brake mounting, I thought it might be a Harry Havnoonian frame, but I've sent photos to Harry and he has verified that it is not one of his. Smolenski was another that came up in my searches, but the rear stay attachments aren't his style, and it seems like it might be older than the early to mid 80s.
- 130 mm rear spacing
- Nervex lugs
- Aero mount DT shifter boss with fully sleeved internal routing. Slotted BB shell with metal shift cable guides
- Reverse rear brake mounting. Partial housing runs with fully sleeved liner for the inner
- Campagnolo rear dropouts.
- No holes drilled for a headbadge
- Single serial number stamped in the NDS dropout - 20732
Frame is about 5.5 lbs and fork about 1.5 lbs. Fairly close in weight to my mid 70s Paramount frame.
My first post, so of course I'm unable to post an actual URL or photos directly. I've added a URL below. If anyone is afraid to click, I understand. I go by zenbiking on Instagram if you want to investigate me before clicking.
I have put some photos up at https : // bit.ly / mystery_bike
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide
- 130 mm rear spacing
- Nervex lugs
- Aero mount DT shifter boss with fully sleeved internal routing. Slotted BB shell with metal shift cable guides
- Reverse rear brake mounting. Partial housing runs with fully sleeved liner for the inner
- Campagnolo rear dropouts.
- No holes drilled for a headbadge
- Single serial number stamped in the NDS dropout - 20732
Frame is about 5.5 lbs and fork about 1.5 lbs. Fairly close in weight to my mid 70s Paramount frame.
My first post, so of course I'm unable to post an actual URL or photos directly. I've added a URL below. If anyone is afraid to click, I understand. I go by zenbiking on Instagram if you want to investigate me before clicking.
I have put some photos up at https : // bit.ly / mystery_bike
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide
Likes For zenbiking:
#3
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,994
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,076 Posts
My guess is a Paramount, mid-'70s or earlier, where someone replaced the fork and did a major remodel. Including changing the chainstay bridge, and probably the seatstay bridge, tho you don't show a close-up of it.
I don't know about Paramount serials. I'm sure someone here does know them, and that might settle it. My reason to think P'mount is mostly the way the domed stay ends are sort of "faired in" with brass. I don't remember any other brands that did that. I don't love it myself, for purely aesthetic reasons. Nothing wrong with it by any practical measure — it's plenty strong, and it is a style, not generic like everyone else's. I just like my edges crisp on a lugged frame. I can't fault the workmanship.
I don't know about Paramount serials. I'm sure someone here does know them, and that might settle it. My reason to think P'mount is mostly the way the domed stay ends are sort of "faired in" with brass. I don't remember any other brands that did that. I don't love it myself, for purely aesthetic reasons. Nothing wrong with it by any practical measure — it's plenty strong, and it is a style, not generic like everyone else's. I just like my edges crisp on a lugged frame. I can't fault the workmanship.
Likes For bulgie:
#4
Newbie
Thread Starter
Bulgie,
That was one of my thoughts as well, but the serial number format doesn't match anything documented on Waterford's website for the appropriate time period. Everything in that 60s to 70s time period would have used a letter as the first location of the serial. That would have been a hell of a lot of remodeling to add internal routing
That was one of my thoughts as well, but the serial number format doesn't match anything documented on Waterford's website for the appropriate time period. Everything in that 60s to 70s time period would have used a letter as the first location of the serial. That would have been a hell of a lot of remodeling to add internal routing
Likes For zenbiking:
#6
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,994
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,076 Posts
The other possibility, that the frame was built this way to begin with, seems less likely, because the lugs, seatstay attachment, and long dropouts are all of a different era than the internal routing or the fork crown. Of course someone could have made a '72 style frame in '82, it just seems less likely.
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
Good catch. Looking at the frame, both dropouts have been modified in that manner and the length of the slots in the dropout is very similar. If it was broken off, someone took great care in matching them up. The dropouts are square, and there's no indication that the frame has been wrecked.
#9
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,809
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2440 Post(s)
Liked 3,130 Times
in
1,969 Posts
I’ve seen that before. Maybe makes wheel changes quicker?
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
#10
framebuilder
Measure to see if there is any slight slope to the top tube. I'm betting the top tube near the seat lug is bit higher off the ground than close to the head tube. I believe this frame has been modified long after it was built to take modern short reach brakes. I have a hard time believing this was made that way from its beginnings. Old Paramounts (that this looks exactly like) would have used extra long Dia Compe center pull brakes. The rear dropout modification is another clue it was altered long after it was made. No builder I can think of would have used long slot 1010s with that fork crown which is much more modern. What I think a builder/painter like myself did was make a new fork and replace the rear brake bridge. This was common for people like myself to do these kind of modifications in the late 70's and 80's. Cyclery North in Chicago is one possibility for doing the redo as is Ron Boi (RRB Cycles a bit further north) is another. The 130 spacing would indicate another change taking place after 1992.
#13
Newbie
Thread Starter
I looked at both frames next to each other this AM, as they happened to be sitting in the same spot. The resemblance to my 74 Paramount is uncanny, other than the Paramount's head tube has a bit more flare The brakes that came installed on this were short reach Campagnolo. With it being purchased by the previous owner in Chicago, a modification at the places you mention would make sense. The serial number still has me a wondering if it was a Paramount I can't see any indication of a leading letter.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 1,938
Bikes: several Eddy Merz (ride like Eddy, braze like Jim!)
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1083 Post(s)
Liked 1,820 Times
in
662 Posts
The long campy drop outs scream early 70s
the brazed on pump peg says early 80s as they added seat tube bottle brazes then.
(I don’t like pumps up there. They are always to lift frames)
brazed on shifters say 1978
what a weird mix!!
the brazed on pump peg says early 80s as they added seat tube bottle brazes then.
(I don’t like pumps up there. They are always to lift frames)
brazed on shifters say 1978
what a weird mix!!
__________________
"Leave the gun. Take the Colnagos."
"Leave the gun. Take the Colnagos."
#15
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,584
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times
in
788 Posts
how about some pix assist? A mystery is well and good but why hide the clues...
usually see this shifter boss on Italian frames
BB too wide for this shell?
crowsfoot front spoke lacing?
interesting to mix the Nervex Pro lugs with this modern fork crown
it's got a serial number for anyone who can decypher
I have no idea based on these visuals!
usually see this shifter boss on Italian frames
BB too wide for this shell?
crowsfoot front spoke lacing?
interesting to mix the Nervex Pro lugs with this modern fork crown
it's got a serial number for anyone who can decypher
I have no idea based on these visuals!
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,157
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2363 Post(s)
Liked 1,749 Times
in
1,191 Posts
Hmm, gotta wonder if the rear brake is so arranged to accomodate drilling out the aft-facing hole in the brake bridge for the newer recessed nut brake. That, and of course, the cable routing.
An odd duck for sure. Does that top-mount shifter braze-on really date back to the late '70s?
An odd duck for sure. Does that top-mount shifter braze-on really date back to the late '70s?
#17
framebuilder
I'm going to repeat what I said in my earlier post. Framebuilders like myself repainted frames all the time in the 70's and 80's and beyond. Frames would get chips in the paint and they would come in for a repaint. While in the shop, the frame would be checked for alignment and braze-ons removed and others added and then repainted to the customer's choice of color or colors. Often times the decals would be left off because that would be an added expense. The cost of obtaining the decals, and the time spent placing them properly in position and then spaying extra clear over them (probably with sanding in-between) could add simnifically to the cost and some owners did not care if their frame said Schwinn Paramount or not. I would guess when I was doing repaints, more left them off then wanted to pay to have the replaced again.
Now days if one is getting a wet repaint, the customer will likely want to have it restored to its original look. But in the old days a repaint was just keeping the frame alive and looking fresh. It is similar to getting a frame powder coated today. This frame in question looks exactly like it was painted with DuPont Imron (or its PPG equivalent). That is the kind of paint most of us builders/painters used. I'm guessing that owner at the time this frame came back in for a refresh, wanted to change brakes to use what was then cutting edge narrow tires. Centerpull brakes were completely out of fashion. To do that the rear brake bridge had to be taken out and replaced with another one lower down. And the fork would have to be changed so the distance from the brake hole to the center of the axle would match shorter reach brakes.
The dropout to stay and blade treatment and the seat stay caps look exactly like a Paramount to me. In the Midwest here Paramounts were plentiful (they were made in Chicago after all) and made great candidates to buy at a modest cost and get them altered to fit the latest components. That is why it now has 130 spacing. I wouldn't be surprised that if this frame could talk, it would tell us it has been back into a frame builders shop several times in its lifetime. I'm sure I've repainted dozens of them (I'm 100 miles east of Chicago). Although by 2000 I realized I hadn't seen any come in for awhile.
Now days if one is getting a wet repaint, the customer will likely want to have it restored to its original look. But in the old days a repaint was just keeping the frame alive and looking fresh. It is similar to getting a frame powder coated today. This frame in question looks exactly like it was painted with DuPont Imron (or its PPG equivalent). That is the kind of paint most of us builders/painters used. I'm guessing that owner at the time this frame came back in for a refresh, wanted to change brakes to use what was then cutting edge narrow tires. Centerpull brakes were completely out of fashion. To do that the rear brake bridge had to be taken out and replaced with another one lower down. And the fork would have to be changed so the distance from the brake hole to the center of the axle would match shorter reach brakes.
The dropout to stay and blade treatment and the seat stay caps look exactly like a Paramount to me. In the Midwest here Paramounts were plentiful (they were made in Chicago after all) and made great candidates to buy at a modest cost and get them altered to fit the latest components. That is why it now has 130 spacing. I wouldn't be surprised that if this frame could talk, it would tell us it has been back into a frame builders shop several times in its lifetime. I'm sure I've repainted dozens of them (I'm 100 miles east of Chicago). Although by 2000 I realized I hadn't seen any come in for awhile.
Likes For Doug Fattic:
#18
Newbie
Thread Starter
Well some additional information from different group. The serial number appears to be from an 81-83 Schwinn Superior. This would explain the "non-Paramount" serial number but the use of Nervex lugs. Between this, and Doug Fattic 's insight, I think I have a good explanation. Would still be cool to know who did the additional work, but I might just have to continue to wonder about that.
Likes For zenbiking:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,301
Bikes: Cuevas Custom, Cimmaron, 1988 "Pinalized Rockma", 1984 Trek 510, Moulton custom touring, Raleigh Competition GS, Bridgestone Mb-2 & 3, 1980's Peugeot - US, City, & Canyon Express (6)
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1098 Post(s)
Liked 3,747 Times
in
1,841 Posts
this might be relevant:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...servation.html
Edit:
probably this one too:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l#post23157988
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...servation.html
Edit:
probably this one too:
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...l#post23157988
Last edited by SoCaled; 02-15-24 at 06:31 PM. Reason: added thread
Likes For SoCaled: