Suspension Seatpost Failure
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Machias, WA
Posts: 718
Bikes: Rodriguez Toucan tandem, Rodriguez Rainer Lite sport/touring
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Suspension Seatpost Failure
This was an unexpected failure: Karen and I had just finished our ride on Saturday and as she was dismounting the bike the stoker's seat fell off! It turns out that the head of the seatpost is just pressed onto the post and it had worked itself off. It's a good thing we were at the end of the ride instead of being stranded in the middle. What scares me most is what could have happened if it occurred while we were riding.
This was a Tamer PivotPlus. We got it with our Rodriguez tandem and it has about 2,500 miles on it. I took the post back to R+E and since they didn't have another Tamer in 25.4mm, Scott gave me a Crane Creek ThudBuster to try. I hope that Karen likes the ThudBuster because it looks more trouble-free to me: The base of the head is a machined part of the post - it is not pressed on - and there are fewer moving parts. I have heard of cases where the elastomer insert ruptured, but I hope that sort of failure would not be catastrophic. The Tamer design is always under spring tension and depends on a friction fit to keep the head on.
This was a Tamer PivotPlus. We got it with our Rodriguez tandem and it has about 2,500 miles on it. I took the post back to R+E and since they didn't have another Tamer in 25.4mm, Scott gave me a Crane Creek ThudBuster to try. I hope that Karen likes the ThudBuster because it looks more trouble-free to me: The base of the head is a machined part of the post - it is not pressed on - and there are fewer moving parts. I have heard of cases where the elastomer insert ruptured, but I hope that sort of failure would not be catastrophic. The Tamer design is always under spring tension and depends on a friction fit to keep the head on.
Last edited by swc7916; 03-18-09 at 08:42 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016
Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
11 Posts
While we do not use a suspension seatpost for stoker, we have test ridden several. The Thudbuster (in my stoker's opinion) was the best after the Allsop c/f beam.
Someone can always make something cheaper and the Tamer failure proves that point.
Someone can always make something cheaper and the Tamer failure proves that point.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Machias, WA
Posts: 718
Bikes: Rodriguez Toucan tandem, Rodriguez Rainer Lite sport/touring
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know that the Tamer is cheaper - it's just a different design. My concern - now that I know about it - is that the spring inside the seatpost pushes up against the suspension mechanism, which is a press-fit on the seatpost.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In the airstream above
Posts: 72
Bikes: Santana, Ventana, Rivendell, Giant
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting! My stoker hated the Thudbuster because it moved down and back, effectively moving her away from from the pedals with each depression, rather than the Tamer which just goes down. So the Tamer is on it's 7th year.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know. The Tamer Pivot plus that we have has a paralelogram shape that moves the seat back once it is depressed as to not to drastically change the distance from the seat to the pedals. Ours failed, collapsed, after 15K miles
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 124
Bikes: Santos Dual Travel touring tandem, MSC Zion MTB-tandem, Santos SCC03 MTB, Santos STR01 trekking bike, Cannondale F500 MTB, Kalkhoff E-bike, Centurion Cross 4000 cyclocross bike (converted to road bike)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I hope that Karen likes the ThudBuster because it looks more trouble-free to me: The base of the head is a machined part of the post - it is not pressed on - and there are fewer moving parts. I have heard of cases where the elastomer insert ruptured, but I hope that sort of failure would not be catastrophic. The Tamer design is always under spring tension and depends on a friction fit to keep the head on.
Friends of us have had a telescopic Tamer fail some years ago: the 'rod' that actually carries the saddle snapped.
#7
Senior Member
We had continual problems with Tamer seatposts and gave up on them. When we contacted Tamer their response was "you are the only ones that have had that problem."
Sheldon and Martha
Sheldon and Martha
#8
Bikaholic
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Western, Michigan
Posts: 1,461
Bikes: Trek Fuel 90, Giant OCR, Rans Screamer Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We have a Thudbuster and my stoker loves it. It sure looks like a solid design.
#9
Time for a change.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Had a thudbuster on since 2004- and it is an offroad tandem. No problems and I wouldn't use anything else.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 254
Bikes: Co-Motion Speedster, Giant FCR2, Surly LHT, Surly Crosscheck
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Stoker Malkin says +1 on the Thudbuster. She also uses a much stiffer insert than suggested for her weight so the thing doesn't bounce at all--it just provides firm damping for the hard hits (which, of course never happen because I'm such a competent captain...)
Cheers!
Cheers!
__________________
2008 Red Co-Motion Speedster Co-pilot (Redster)
2009 Surly LHT (captain's commuter)
2009 Surly Crosscheck (stoker's road bike)
2007 Giant FCR2W (stoker's commuter)
1980's NOS Legnano (stoker's toy)
1970's Stella rebuilt as fixed-gear (captain's toy)
2008 Red Co-Motion Speedster Co-pilot (Redster)
2009 Surly LHT (captain's commuter)
2009 Surly Crosscheck (stoker's road bike)
2007 Giant FCR2W (stoker's commuter)
1980's NOS Legnano (stoker's toy)
1970's Stella rebuilt as fixed-gear (captain's toy)
Last edited by brewer45; 01-20-09 at 09:55 PM. Reason: Fix typo
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Machias, WA
Posts: 718
Bikes: Rodriguez Toucan tandem, Rodriguez Rainer Lite sport/touring
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Tamer PivotPlus is a parallogram design similar to the the ThudBuster; it's just that the spring design is different. The Tamer uses a spring and a piston inside the seatpost whereas the Thudbuster uses an elastomer "puck" inside the parallogram mechanism. According to my stoker, the Thudbuster bounces more and is harder on her sitbones; the Tamer "floats" and the bumps don't hit her as hard. I'm guessing that the force required to compress the Thudbuster is non-linear - that is, it gets stiffer the more it's compressed - whereas the spring in the Tamer exerts a more constant force. It also appears to me that the Tamer has more travel.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What we like about the Tamer is the ability to set the force required for actuation. Properly set for the weight of the ridder, the seat does not float. It only actuates when a critical force is reached.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I understand the Thudbuster ST is much more limited.
Last edited by rfutscher; 01-21-09 at 05:30 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 57
Bikes: Trek T2000, Specialized Roubaix Pro, Specialized Ruby Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Stoker loves her thudbuster ST.
She used to hate the original suspension post as it kept "bouncing" when we put the power on
She used to hate the original suspension post as it kept "bouncing" when we put the power on
#15
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 31
Bikes: Santana Fusion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My stoker has used the PivotPlus for many years and is very happy with it once it is adjusted properly. The pins wear out after a while. I contacted Tamer - they had me ship it back and they replaced the pins for a reasonable charge. It's been working fine ever since (> 1 year).