Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

Suspension Seatpost Failure

Search
Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Suspension Seatpost Failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-09, 11:22 AM
  #1  
swc7916
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
swc7916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Machias, WA
Posts: 718

Bikes: Rodriguez Toucan tandem, Rodriguez Rainer Lite sport/touring

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Suspension Seatpost Failure

This was an unexpected failure: Karen and I had just finished our ride on Saturday and as she was dismounting the bike the stoker's seat fell off! It turns out that the head of the seatpost is just pressed onto the post and it had worked itself off. It's a good thing we were at the end of the ride instead of being stranded in the middle. What scares me most is what could have happened if it occurred while we were riding.

This was a Tamer PivotPlus. We got it with our Rodriguez tandem and it has about 2,500 miles on it. I took the post back to R+E and since they didn't have another Tamer in 25.4mm, Scott gave me a Crane Creek ThudBuster to try. I hope that Karen likes the ThudBuster because it looks more trouble-free to me: The base of the head is a machined part of the post - it is not pressed on - and there are fewer moving parts. I have heard of cases where the elastomer insert ruptured, but I hope that sort of failure would not be catastrophic. The Tamer design is always under spring tension and depends on a friction fit to keep the head on.

Last edited by swc7916; 03-18-09 at 08:42 AM.
swc7916 is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 11:27 AM
  #2  
zonatandem
Senior Member
 
zonatandem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016

Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
While we do not use a suspension seatpost for stoker, we have test ridden several. The Thudbuster (in my stoker's opinion) was the best after the Allsop c/f beam.
Someone can always make something cheaper and the Tamer failure proves that point.
zonatandem is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 11:32 AM
  #3  
swc7916
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
swc7916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Machias, WA
Posts: 718

Bikes: Rodriguez Toucan tandem, Rodriguez Rainer Lite sport/touring

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zonatandem
Someone can always make something cheaper and the Tamer failure proves that point.
I don't know that the Tamer is cheaper - it's just a different design. My concern - now that I know about it - is that the spring inside the seatpost pushes up against the suspension mechanism, which is a press-fit on the seatpost.
swc7916 is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 04:54 PM
  #4  
antiquepedaler
Senior Member
 
antiquepedaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In the airstream above
Posts: 72

Bikes: Santana, Ventana, Rivendell, Giant

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zonatandem
While we do not use a suspension seatpost for stoker, we have test ridden several. The Thudbuster (in my stoker's opinion) was the best after the Allsop c/f beam.
Someone can always make something cheaper and the Tamer failure proves that point.
Interesting! My stoker hated the Thudbuster because it moved down and back, effectively moving her away from from the pedals with each depression, rather than the Tamer which just goes down. So the Tamer is on it's 7th year.
antiquepedaler is offline  
Old 01-19-09, 05:35 PM
  #5  
cornucopia72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't know. The Tamer Pivot plus that we have has a paralelogram shape that moves the seat back once it is depressed as to not to drastically change the distance from the seat to the pedals. Ours failed, collapsed, after 15K miles
cornucopia72 is offline  
Old 01-20-09, 07:29 AM
  #6  
dubbelop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 124

Bikes: Santos Dual Travel touring tandem, MSC Zion MTB-tandem, Santos SCC03 MTB, Santos STR01 trekking bike, Cannondale F500 MTB, Kalkhoff E-bike, Centurion Cross 4000 cyclocross bike (converted to road bike)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by swc7916
I hope that Karen likes the ThudBuster because it looks more trouble-free to me: The base of the head is a machined part of the post - it is not pressed on - and there are fewer moving parts. I have heard of cases where the elastomer insert ruptured, but I hope that sort of failure would not be catastrophic. The Tamer design is always under spring tension and depends on a friction fit to keep the head on.
FWIW: the Thudbuster's head used to be pressed on. Several years back they switched to the machined head because too may Thudbusters lost their head

Friends of us have had a telescopic Tamer fail some years ago: the 'rod' that actually carries the saddle snapped.
dubbelop is offline  
Old 01-20-09, 08:47 AM
  #7  
tandem rider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 400

Bikes: Co-Motion tandem, Serotta, and Specialized mt. bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
We had continual problems with Tamer seatposts and gave up on them. When we contacted Tamer their response was "you are the only ones that have had that problem."

Sheldon and Martha
tandem rider is offline  
Old 01-20-09, 08:56 AM
  #8  
blamp28
Bikaholic
 
blamp28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Western, Michigan
Posts: 1,461

Bikes: Trek Fuel 90, Giant OCR, Rans Screamer Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
We have a Thudbuster and my stoker loves it. It sure looks like a solid design.
blamp28 is offline  
Old 01-20-09, 12:18 PM
  #9  
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Had a thudbuster on since 2004- and it is an offroad tandem. No problems and I wouldn't use anything else.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Old 01-20-09, 09:54 PM
  #10  
brewer45
Senior Member
 
brewer45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 254

Bikes: Co-Motion Speedster, Giant FCR2, Surly LHT, Surly Crosscheck

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Stoker Malkin says +1 on the Thudbuster. She also uses a much stiffer insert than suggested for her weight so the thing doesn't bounce at all--it just provides firm damping for the hard hits (which, of course never happen because I'm such a competent captain...)

Cheers!
__________________
2008 Red Co-Motion Speedster Co-pilot (Redster)
2009 Surly LHT (captain's commuter)
2009 Surly Crosscheck (stoker's road bike)
2007 Giant FCR2W (stoker's commuter)
1980's NOS Legnano (stoker's toy)
1970's Stella rebuilt as fixed-gear (captain's toy)

Last edited by brewer45; 01-20-09 at 09:55 PM. Reason: Fix typo
brewer45 is offline  
Old 01-21-09, 09:52 AM
  #11  
swc7916
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
swc7916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Machias, WA
Posts: 718

Bikes: Rodriguez Toucan tandem, Rodriguez Rainer Lite sport/touring

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by antiquepedaler
Interesting! My stoker hated the Thudbuster because it moved down and back, effectively moving her away from from the pedals with each depression, rather than the Tamer which just goes down. So the Tamer is on it's 7th year.
The Tamer PivotPlus is a parallogram design similar to the the ThudBuster; it's just that the spring design is different. The Tamer uses a spring and a piston inside the seatpost whereas the Thudbuster uses an elastomer "puck" inside the parallogram mechanism. According to my stoker, the Thudbuster bounces more and is harder on her sitbones; the Tamer "floats" and the bumps don't hit her as hard. I'm guessing that the force required to compress the Thudbuster is non-linear - that is, it gets stiffer the more it's compressed - whereas the spring in the Tamer exerts a more constant force. It also appears to me that the Tamer has more travel.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
pivot_plus.jpg (36.7 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg
thudnew-4g.jpg (27.7 KB, 17 views)
swc7916 is offline  
Old 01-21-09, 10:16 AM
  #12  
cornucopia72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What we like about the Tamer is the ability to set the force required for actuation. Properly set for the weight of the ridder, the seat does not float. It only actuates when a critical force is reached.
cornucopia72 is offline  
Old 01-21-09, 05:27 PM
  #13  
rfutscher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cornucopia72
What we like about the Tamer is the ability to set the force required for actuation. Properly set for the weight of the ridder, the seat does not float. It only actuates when a critical force is reached.
Our Thudbuster LT has an adjustment for pre-loading which sets the activation force. It also came with a selection of inserts that can be mixed or matched for six firmness adjustments. There are even more inserts available for an extra light person.

I understand the Thudbuster ST is much more limited.

Last edited by rfutscher; 01-21-09 at 05:30 PM.
rfutscher is offline  
Old 01-22-09, 05:32 AM
  #14  
thebearnz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 57

Bikes: Trek T2000, Specialized Roubaix Pro, Specialized Ruby Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stoker loves her thudbuster ST.

She used to hate the original suspension post as it kept "bouncing" when we put the power on
thebearnz is offline  
Old 01-27-09, 08:21 PM
  #15  
gobsmacked
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 31

Bikes: Santana Fusion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My stoker has used the PivotPlus for many years and is very happy with it once it is adjusted properly. The pins wear out after a while. I contacted Tamer - they had me ship it back and they replaced the pins for a reasonable charge. It's been working fine ever since (> 1 year).
gobsmacked is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.