Vintage Road Bike Gearing
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Greater Chicago Area
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1987 Schwinn Mirada, 1989 Trek 420, 1995 GT Timberline, 1979 Schwinn Super Le Tour, Co-Op DRT 1.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
49 Posts
Vintage Road Bike Gearing
Still trying to wrap my head around the whole gearing/gear ratios thing. Never was a math guy. Anyway, I recently acquired an old mongrel road bike with a mixed Shimano 105/600 drivetrain. Up front is 52/42, while the rear has 13-25 cogs. What is the advantage of such a narrow gear range, and why would higher end compnents have it?
Thanks
Thanks
#2
Shifting is fun!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,006
Bikes: Yes, please.
Mentioned: 280 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2198 Post(s)
Liked 4,601 Times
in
1,764 Posts
From an old racer's point of view that would be "Alpine gearing".
Seriously, high end components would have been geared more towards professionals and ambitious amateurs, whom are generally in better shape and can handle higher gears and like close ratios.
Seriously, high end components would have been geared more towards professionals and ambitious amateurs, whom are generally in better shape and can handle higher gears and like close ratios.
#3
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Greater Chicago Area
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1987 Schwinn Mirada, 1989 Trek 420, 1995 GT Timberline, 1979 Schwinn Super Le Tour, Co-Op DRT 1.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
49 Posts
So, basically, they're designed for people who simply don't need lower gears? What's the advantage to not having lower gears, even if you dont need them? Weight savings? Reduction in complexity? Seems that gearing designed to tackle mountains would have a much lower ring than 42 up front...
#4
Senior Member
Couple of reasons. With only 6 or 7 cogs, lower total range was used to keep the ratios as close together as possible to avoid gaps and help with shifting. Rear shifting didn't have the quick shift features that the modern cassette/freewheels have.
Crankset in that era had plain flat chainrings. Without the ramps/pins of the newer rings, shifting 14-16 teeth differences between rings wasn't really ideal.
Crankset in that era had plain flat chainrings. Without the ramps/pins of the newer rings, shifting 14-16 teeth differences between rings wasn't really ideal.
Last edited by KCT1986; 06-04-21 at 12:36 PM.
#5
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26419 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times
in
7,208 Posts
So, basically, they're designed for people who simply don't need lower gears? What's the advantage to not having lower gears, even if you dont need them? Weight savings? Reduction in complexity? Seems that gearing designed to tackle mountains would have a much lower ring than 42 up front...
Likes For 3alarmer:
#6
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,807
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2439 Post(s)
Liked 3,128 Times
in
1,967 Posts
Also, I think that they were so in tune with cadence, that significant changes in one shift to another would result in loss of momentum, and lots of double shifts to keep the small changes small in ratios.
They wouldn’t have just gone down to a low gear...i on the other hand, often had to find the holy bejeebus gear on some climbs...
They wouldn’t have just gone down to a low gear...i on the other hand, often had to find the holy bejeebus gear on some climbs...
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
#7
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10425 Post(s)
Liked 11,898 Times
in
6,094 Posts
This has been a fun aspect of diving into vintage bikes for me - trying to make them work with the rather hilly area where I live. IN the last few months I got a 1989 Schwinn Circuit with 52/42x13-24, and a 1982 Lotus Supreme with 52/43x13-23. Both have Uniglide freehubs, 7 and 6 speed respectively, and while you can find 13-18 or 13-21 for cheap, finding 13-26 is a chore AND it costs. I ended up buying individual cogs to make up 13-26 clusters.
Then yesterday I picked up a 1982 Lotus Classique with 52/40x13-32, and just playing with the shifting on the stand, I can see it's WAY trickier to shift. With Uniglide, it seems to work best to overshift and then back off slightly, but with the 13-32, I found shifting to larger cogs it would often overshoot to the next one up. So I can see why racers went with straight blocks, because you can't afford to blow a shift at a crucial moment.
Then yesterday I picked up a 1982 Lotus Classique with 52/40x13-32, and just playing with the shifting on the stand, I can see it's WAY trickier to shift. With Uniglide, it seems to work best to overshift and then back off slightly, but with the 13-32, I found shifting to larger cogs it would often overshoot to the next one up. So I can see why racers went with straight blocks, because you can't afford to blow a shift at a crucial moment.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,536
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 1,292 Times
in
488 Posts
So, basically, they're designed for people who simply don't need lower gears? What's the advantage to not having lower gears, even if you dont need them? Weight savings? Reduction in complexity? Seems that gearing designed to tackle mountains would have a much lower ring than 42 up front...
Likes For davester:
#9
framebuilder
When you're racing, it's important to have your legs spinning the cranks at the most efficient rate (called cadence). With wide gaps between gears the optimum rate may be between two gears and therefore unachievable and uncompetitive. Also, racers typically have 2 to 3 times the power output of regular folksand need to go at maximum speed all the time so don't have any need for low gears.
A lot of racers would stand up so they could stay in the same gear when going up an incline but that didn't work for me because i'd be using up too much of my modest strength to get out of the saddle. At the speeds we went and the cadence we needed to pedal, anything over a 21 was just silly and used for riding with the inexperienced on a casual ride. It wouldn't be possible for me a spinner to spin that fast. There is a big difference in how one rides in a speedy group than out and about by oneself. The constantly changing speeds necessary when coming out of a corner or when someone attacks to try and lose the losers hanging on means (for me anyway) a high cadence. Otherwise I'd be using up too much energy.
Likes For Doug Fattic:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,158
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,699 Times
in
2,611 Posts
People were stronger then. Better looking, too.
Likes For nlerner:
#11
Full Member
I still have my vintage gearing on my bike. When trying to ride with people on club rides.
it means I get dropped fast as I don’t have the strength and they have the gears.
What I did was get a Swytch kit for the bike. As I didn’t want to go thru the process of updating the components . As it has a Campagnolo C record group on it and want it to stay the way I had it years ago. So now I can keep up with the new gearing and still ride the vintage bike.
meant to build up a carbon frame bike but the current shortage of parts is not helping.
it means I get dropped fast as I don’t have the strength and they have the gears.
What I did was get a Swytch kit for the bike. As I didn’t want to go thru the process of updating the components . As it has a Campagnolo C record group on it and want it to stay the way I had it years ago. So now I can keep up with the new gearing and still ride the vintage bike.
meant to build up a carbon frame bike but the current shortage of parts is not helping.
#12
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,656
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1026 Post(s)
Liked 2,528 Times
in
1,058 Posts
@repechage raced a lot in SoCal BITD. He once said here that, in those days, if you couldn't climb in a 42x23, you couldn't hang. (I replied that I couldn't and I didn't. True then, more true now.) That tells you pretty much what you need to know,.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
Likes For bikingshearer:
#13
Senior Member
Even now, as an old fart, I ride with 42/52 chain wheels and a five speed 14-24 freewheel. I stay mostly in 52-18.
When I was living in Albuquerque, I rode the same gearing. It took a few rides to acclimate to the 6,000 foot altitude and to the mountain roads but it did not require a gearing change. After conditioning, I was able to ride some never-ending uphill grades in 42X21 or 42X24.
I also had an Ultra-6 freewheel that is 13-32T and some 42/45T chain wheels. I just didn't need them for the mountains or altitude.
I'm not bragging, just explaining.
When I was living in Albuquerque, I rode the same gearing. It took a few rides to acclimate to the 6,000 foot altitude and to the mountain roads but it did not require a gearing change. After conditioning, I was able to ride some never-ending uphill grades in 42X21 or 42X24.
I also had an Ultra-6 freewheel that is 13-32T and some 42/45T chain wheels. I just didn't need them for the mountains or altitude.
I'm not bragging, just explaining.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,373
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times
in
1,678 Posts
Even now, as an old fart, I ride with 42/52 chain wheels and a five speed 14-24 freewheel. I stay mostly in 52-18.
When I was living in Albuquerque, I rode the same gearing. It took a few rides to acclimate to the 6,000 foot altitude and to the mountain roads but it did not require a gearing change. After conditioning, I was able to ride some never-ending uphill grades in 42X21 or 42X24.
I also had an Ultra-6 freewheel that is 13-32T and some 42/45T chain wheels. I just didn't need them for the mountains or altitude.
I'm not bragging, just explaining.
When I was living in Albuquerque, I rode the same gearing. It took a few rides to acclimate to the 6,000 foot altitude and to the mountain roads but it did not require a gearing change. After conditioning, I was able to ride some never-ending uphill grades in 42X21 or 42X24.
I also had an Ultra-6 freewheel that is 13-32T and some 42/45T chain wheels. I just didn't need them for the mountains or altitude.
I'm not bragging, just explaining.
#15
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,378 Times
in
891 Posts
As I age, going to a 50x39 crank was a revelation. With a 12x23 8-speed, I use the full range of the cassette and still have enough low gear for Southern Wisconsin. The 50T is sweet for riding into a headwind.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,448
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 874 Post(s)
Liked 2,288 Times
in
1,278 Posts
@repechage raced a lot in SoCal BITD. He once said here that, in those days, if you couldn't climb in a 42x23, you couldn't hang. (I replied that I couldn't and I didn't. True then, more true now.) That tells you pretty much what you need to know,.
Likes For Kabuki12:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,448
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 874 Post(s)
Liked 2,288 Times
in
1,278 Posts
Likes For Kabuki12:
#18
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times
in
2,518 Posts
If you watch races from a couple of decades ago, they were really bogged down going up even fairly small hills. There was a stage of this year's Giro that featured very steep hills and most of the racers were spinning, so they must have had fairly low gears. But even now, someone will win a race because they have lower gears than anyone else.
I remember thinking 44-24 was granny gears. The granny gear on my tandem is 36-24.
I remember thinking 44-24 was granny gears. The granny gear on my tandem is 36-24.
#19
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,962
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10425 Post(s)
Liked 11,898 Times
in
6,094 Posts
Then there was the humidity. Yeesh.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#20
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,325 Times
in
837 Posts
Streets are steeper on the east coast? Look up the annual Fargo St. climb in Los Angeles.
I am with genejockey -- I use a lot of freewheels with 26T bottom gears, because that is the capacity of a vintage short cage Campag. or SunTour rear derailleur. I deplore that 26T cogs are so rare.
If you have an older crankset with a 144mm BCD, you are stuck with a 42T minimum chainring size, unless you can find either a very rare 41 or a triplizer and a longer spindle. Thus, two of my road bikes have 42/26 bottom gears, which I still find adequate for most of my riding. I like to limit the gap between gear ratios to 6 or 7 percent, and hence need at least a 2x6 setup to get the range I want. I am not a big fan of tall gears on the top end, so I usually settle for something in the mid-90s, which is perfectly adequate for a spinner like me who doesn't care about being able to pedal at or above 30mph.
People have mentioned 1.5-step, or "Alpine," gearing, which I use a lot, as wel.
Road bikes: 50-42/14-16-18-20-23-26; 46-38/13-15-17-19-22-25; half step: 45-42/13-15-17-20-23-26
Mountain bike: 46-38-28 / 12-13-15-17-19-21-24-28, although I do have a 24T chainring I plan to swap in next time I overhaul the BB (requires pulling the crank)
I am with genejockey -- I use a lot of freewheels with 26T bottom gears, because that is the capacity of a vintage short cage Campag. or SunTour rear derailleur. I deplore that 26T cogs are so rare.
If you have an older crankset with a 144mm BCD, you are stuck with a 42T minimum chainring size, unless you can find either a very rare 41 or a triplizer and a longer spindle. Thus, two of my road bikes have 42/26 bottom gears, which I still find adequate for most of my riding. I like to limit the gap between gear ratios to 6 or 7 percent, and hence need at least a 2x6 setup to get the range I want. I am not a big fan of tall gears on the top end, so I usually settle for something in the mid-90s, which is perfectly adequate for a spinner like me who doesn't care about being able to pedal at or above 30mph.
People have mentioned 1.5-step, or "Alpine," gearing, which I use a lot, as wel.
Road bikes: 50-42/14-16-18-20-23-26; 46-38/13-15-17-19-22-25; half step: 45-42/13-15-17-20-23-26
Mountain bike: 46-38-28 / 12-13-15-17-19-21-24-28, although I do have a 24T chainring I plan to swap in next time I overhaul the BB (requires pulling the crank)
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,373
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times
in
1,678 Posts
I think that the actual slopes in the West are steeper, so to make them passable you have to use switchbacks, while in the East the slopes are gentler, so the roads just go up them. I discovered this when I had been riding for a couple years out here in CA, and was going Back East to visit family. I shipped one of my bikes so I'd be able to ride while I was there. With all the climbing I'd been doing out here I thought I'd fly up any climbs there. Not so much.
Then there was the humidity. Yeesh.
Then there was the humidity. Yeesh.