Road Test/Bike Review (1989) Cannondale SR400
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,991
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 436 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
999 Posts
Road Test/Bike Review (1989) Cannondale SR400
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
Likes For SpeedofLite:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
The 3.0 is a great frame. In 1991 I bought a SR800 the week I came back from the middle east. I remember it came with Vittoria open tubular tires and they were actually my first clinchers. That frame is still as good as anything made today.
#3
Freewheel Medic
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: An Island on the Coast of GA!
Posts: 12,885
Bikes: Snazzy* Schwinns, Classy Cannondales & a Super Pro Aero Lotus (* Ed.)
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1453 Post(s)
Liked 2,196 Times
in
963 Posts
As the owner of a '93 R600 2.8 (aluminum fork) I can attest to review in regard to the ride, especially as a big guy. Stiff, smooth, certain, quick, and unflexing. I've never found mine to be uncomfortable or harsh.
__________________
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!
Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!
Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com
Likes For pastorbobnlnh:
#4
Death fork? Naaaah!!
My '89 SR 500 'Black Lightning' is a rocket.
Top
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
Likes For top506:
#5
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,808
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2440 Post(s)
Liked 3,129 Times
in
1,968 Posts
I prefer the non cantilevered version of the 1986-1988 series...a little less harsh, and with the Tange fork... I am pretty sure mine is the 1987 Crest version...
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,374
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2483 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times
in
1,678 Posts
The myth that frame material contributes perceptibly to the comfort or harshness of the ride has been dying, albeit slowly, for the last 15 years or so. One of the more reliable materials engineers who posts regularly on YouTube created a pie graph showing the relative contributions of various factors to vertical shock absorption. Frame material represented a tiny sliver of the pie, far smaller than, e.g., the slice representing seatpost length.
My favorite long-distance bike is a fixed-gear Specialized Langster: aluminum frame and aluminum straight-bladed fork. If I believed that frame material made a significant difference in ride comfort, on the basis of my own riding experience, I'd rate aluminum as better than steel.
As it happens, though, I've known for years that the biggest factor after tire width and pressure and saddle design is wheelbase. Short wheelbase equals lively or uncomfortable ride (two terms meaning the same thing, depending on your point of view); longer wheelbase equals sluggish or comfortable ride.
As a factor in how your bike rides, frame material is as nothing compared to wheelbase.
My favorite long-distance bike is a fixed-gear Specialized Langster: aluminum frame and aluminum straight-bladed fork. If I believed that frame material made a significant difference in ride comfort, on the basis of my own riding experience, I'd rate aluminum as better than steel.
As it happens, though, I've known for years that the biggest factor after tire width and pressure and saddle design is wheelbase. Short wheelbase equals lively or uncomfortable ride (two terms meaning the same thing, depending on your point of view); longer wheelbase equals sluggish or comfortable ride.
As a factor in how your bike rides, frame material is as nothing compared to wheelbase.