Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Folding Bikes
Reload this Page >

Project's End?

Search
Notices
Folding Bikes Discuss the unique features and issues of folding bikes. Also a great place to learn what folding bike will work best for your needs.

Project's End?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-23, 09:28 AM
  #1  
BobbyG
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
Project's End?

My quest to rehab a $50 1989 Dahon Getaway V and upgrade it for higher speeds is probably at an end.

As others had mentioned, the severe chain angles caused by the short chain stay length limit the rear derailler to 5 gears. While it's possible to engage more gears, the further inboard or outboard the gears, the more likely the chain will fall off the front ring.

I fitted a 6-speed with a 13 tooth cog vs the original 14, but can only use the 5 highest gears, The lowest gear caused the chain to fall off the front, so I used the derailleur limit screw to block that gear. Yesterday I put the 7-speed 11-32 from my 20" Boardwalk on it, and was able to push the gears far enough inboard so that the chain stayed on the highest gear (the 11), but
then it rubbed against the next highest gear and prevented the chain from staying on the 11 cog. So I will stay with the 6-speed for now. (A front derailleur, or rear internal hub would be better).

The bike had only a slightly adequate rear band brake when I bought it (used) and I believe it came that way as Dahon did sell many like that.. I added a font caliper which makes the bike stop fairly assuredly. I planned on replacing the rear with a caliper brake, especially in light of my anticipated higher speeds, but for now, this will work.

And as far as increasing the speed, which was my initial quest. This almost 35-year old folding frame has a fair amount of flex, although the fold seems secure. But the buttressed mast does not instill confidence, especially since the original push-button latch was absent. My brass plumbing hack seems to work well, better than some of the OEM latches I have tried, but the whole two-part steering mast also allows for some flex.
(https://www.bikeforums.net/folding-b...h-success.html)

Given the frame and mast flex, the 30-lb weight, the complexity of a meaningful drive train overhaul and the need to upgrade the rear brakes, I think I am done with this project. Total cost and investment $125.

It's been a fun project, but it won't be a regular commuter choice for me. Now I'm thinking a tri-fold, or another newer 16-inch bi-fold with an internal hub and and more modern, more easily upgradable components.

BobbyG is offline  
Likes For BobbyG:
Old 10-22-23, 03:34 PM
  #2  
Eyes Roll
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 49 Posts
Folding bikes are not intended for regular commuting of distances exceeding 5 miles at a time. They are well-suited for convenient transportation by easily fitting into the trunk or back seat of a car. They can be used in parks or tourist spots as a short-distance alternative to walking.

Anyway, if your goal is to improve the speed of the folding bike, you may consider replacing the stock folding pedals with wider pedals (eg., Crankbrothers pedals, or some other brand wider pedals). The upside of replacing with wider pedals is that they will increase the speed of your folding bike. The downside is that the wider pedals are not foldable, if you can compromise on that.
Eyes Roll is offline  
Old 11-01-23, 08:20 PM
  #3  
Bleu
Junior Member
 
Bleu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 26 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Eyes Roll
Folding bikes are not intended for regular commuting of distances exceeding 5 miles at a time. They are well-suited for convenient transportation by easily fitting into the trunk or back seat of a car. They can be used in parks or tourist spots as a short-distance alternative to walking.

Anyway, if your goal is to improve the speed of the folding bike, you may consider replacing the stock folding pedals with wider pedals (eg., Crankbrothers pedals, or some other brand wider pedals). The upside of replacing with wider pedals is that they will increase the speed of your folding bike. The downside is that the wider pedals are not foldable, if you can compromise on that.
B.S. my Brompton routinely does 20 mile rides and when I have the time I've ridden 85 mile days without trouble. It's my regular ride because I live in a very small space not because it's some project that I think looks cool (Bromptons look nerdy and I know it). So dont paint all folders with the same brush as it were. As for the original poster, it was interesting, thanks for sharing the project and even showing some of us a model we were completely unaware of.
Bleu is offline  
Likes For Bleu:
Old 11-01-23, 09:01 PM
  #4  
base2 
I am potato.
 
base2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116

Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,630 Times in 934 Posts
It is also super common to use an internal gear hub of some variety. Shimano Nexus 7 can be made to be fairly narrow if you decide to forgo a roller brake. I think the Nexus 8 as well, but not as much so. Sturmy-Archer 3 speed is also a very common option. 135mm disk Alfine won't work for obvious reasons. But low grade carbon steel *could* be nade to fit most any hub if so inclined.

The advantage is getting rid of a problematic risk prone derailleur and failure proof any chain line or chain drop concerns. Set & forget.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.

Car dependency is a tax.
base2 is offline  
Likes For base2:
Old 11-02-23, 04:28 PM
  #5  
tds101 
55+ Club,...
 
tds101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in New York, NY
Posts: 4,326

Bikes: 9+,...

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1115 Post(s)
Liked 849 Times in 593 Posts
Originally Posted by Eyes Roll
Folding bikes are not intended for regular commuting of distances exceeding 5 miles at a time. They are well-suited for convenient transportation by easily fitting into the trunk or back seat of a car. They can be used in parks or tourist spots as a short-distance alternative to walking.

Anyway, if your goal is to improve the speed of the folding bike, you may consider replacing the stock folding pedals with wider pedals (eg., Crankbrothers pedals, or some other brand wider pedals). The upside of replacing with wider pedals is that they will increase the speed of your folding bike. The downside is that the wider pedals are not foldable, if you can compromise on that.
What? Where did you get this ridiculous idea that folding bikes are limited to short range travel? That's got to be the most uneducated "opinion" that I've seen here in quite some time. My usual shortest joyride time out & about is 10 miles minimum. And I have covid related breathing issues and a bum knee! As to your suggestion, apparently, you're not quite familiar with these types of bikes, let alone the Dahon Classic, so your one recommendation is irrelevant.

As to the OP's upgrades, excellent job. I'd also suggest looking into an internally geared hub, since it would be much less prone to shifting issues.
__________________
If it wasn't for you meddling kids,...
tds101 is offline  
Likes For tds101:
Old 11-05-23, 01:18 AM
  #6  
CrimsonEclipse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,098
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Liked 648 Times in 381 Posts
Originally Posted by tds101
What? Where did you get this ridiculous idea that folding bikes are limited to short range travel? That's got to be the most uneducated "opinion" that I've seen here in quite some time. My usual shortest joyride time out & about is 10 miles minimum. And I have covid related breathing issues and a bum knee! As to your suggestion, apparently, you're not quite familiar with these types of bikes, let alone the Dahon Classic, so your one recommendation is irrelevant.

As to the OP's upgrades, excellent job. I'd also suggest looking into an internally geared hub, since it would be much less prone to shifting issues.
75 miles with 50lb in pannier bags and rack on a folder.

Someone should have told it had short range before I departed.
(I had no idea)
CrimsonEclipse is offline  
Old 11-05-23, 03:14 AM
  #7  
tds101 
55+ Club,...
 
tds101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in New York, NY
Posts: 4,326

Bikes: 9+,...

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1115 Post(s)
Liked 849 Times in 593 Posts
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse
75 miles with 50lb in pannier bags and rack on a folder.

Someone should have told it had short range before I departed.
(I had no idea)
You quoted the wrong person... Reread MY comment regarding folding bicycles
__________________
If it wasn't for you meddling kids,...
tds101 is offline  
Old 11-05-23, 09:14 AM
  #8  
BobbyG
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
I took the bike out yesterday. and it shifted flawlessly. The gearing is slightly better than adequate. The biggest hills were doable in 2nd, which is now the lowest gear, and top end with the 13 was slightly better than the 14 I temporarily loosened the rear brake to prevent rub and the bike became more "alive and fun" Average speed was still only 10.2 mph (about 12 on my other bikes for similar runs) but it felt better. The DIY latch stayed secure with no constant tightening needed.

The biggest drawback is the frame. In a straight line on smooth pavement it feels normal. Any moderate turn or bumps induce noticeable "non-linear" handling.

I think I will go ahead and disconnect and replace the band brake with a caliper so I can free the wheel completely. It'll only be $5-$10 bucks for a used unit and I already have cabling and sheathing if necessary.
BobbyG is offline  
Likes For BobbyG:
Old 11-05-23, 11:29 AM
  #9  
CrimsonEclipse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,098
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Liked 648 Times in 381 Posts
Originally Posted by tds101
You quoted the wrong person... Reread MY comment regarding folding bicycles
wrong quote, right idea....
CrimsonEclipse is offline  
Likes For CrimsonEclipse:
Old 11-05-23, 11:39 AM
  #10  
tds101 
55+ Club,...
 
tds101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in New York, NY
Posts: 4,326

Bikes: 9+,...

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1115 Post(s)
Liked 849 Times in 593 Posts
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse
wrong quote, right idea....
You are 100% correct. Folding bikes are "bicycles", more than capable of long range travel. 👍
__________________
If it wasn't for you meddling kids,...
tds101 is offline  
Likes For tds101:
Old 11-05-23, 11:55 AM
  #11  
BobbyG
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
Ok...last thing. After posting this morning I went back out to the bike and read up on the band brake and was able to adjust it to where it worked fairly well surprisingly so. Because of the kludge or bodge involved getting the gears to work the rear wheel is offset slightly to the left so calliper brakes would be very difficult to adjust.

Next, I read up about tightening up the frame. And while the latching mechanism has the classic loose pin syndrome, Simply tightening the latch itself a little more than I thought thought necessary seems to have stiffened up the frame considerably.

So now, I believe I am finished with the bike and if I really get an urge for a small 16 inch folder may buy something used but more modern... Although this original dahon fold and mast assembly really folds down small. Especially with the 2 stage seat post.


Last edited by BobbyG; 11-05-23 at 01:19 PM.
BobbyG is offline  
Old 11-05-23, 01:16 PM
  #12  
Schwinnsta
Schwinnasaur
 
Schwinnsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,567
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 459 Post(s)
Liked 184 Times in 122 Posts
Rear wheel is misaligned with frame.
Schwinnsta is offline  
Likes For Schwinnsta:
Old 11-05-23, 01:19 PM
  #13  
BobbyG
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
Originally Posted by Schwinnsta
Rear wheel is misaligned with frame.
Yes,slightly.
BobbyG is offline  
Old 11-06-23, 04:12 AM
  #14  
Fentuz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 749

Bikes: Dahon Jetstream p8 (sold), customized Dahon Helios x10, customzed Dahon Smooth Hound x11,customized Dahon Hammerhead 8.0 d7, Planet X Free Ranger (mullet setup 1x11), Planet X Giovanissimi 20 (1x9), Frog 52 (1x9) and Frog 48 1s

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked 240 Times in 176 Posts
Originally Posted by BobbyG
Yes,slightly.
Could you remove the spacer by the derailleur? looking a the picture, it seems there is a cylindrical spacer in contact with the derailleur by the frame and then hub locking nut. If it is a spacer, could you move it to the "non- drive" in order to bring the wheel back towards the center of the frame? it would shift both wheel and cassette and improve the chain line.
Fentuz is offline  
Old 11-06-23, 06:23 AM
  #15  
BobbyG
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
Originally Posted by Fentuz
Could you remove the spacer by the derailleur? looking a the picture, it seems there is a cylindrical spacer in contact with the derailleur by the frame and then hub locking nut. If it is a spacer, could you move it to the "non- drive" in order to bring the wheel back towards the center of the frame? it would shift both wheel and cassette and improve the chain line.
Actually, I put the spacer there to improve the chain line. With the original 5-speed gearing no spacer was needed. With the 6-speed I put on the angle to 5th and 6th was too severe and the chain would fall off the front chain ring. As it is, it now falls off in 1st, so I blocked it with the limit screw.

An internal hub would solve all the chain line problems,but the bike is not worth the investment to me at this time.
BobbyG is offline  
Old 11-06-23, 08:02 AM
  #16  
tds101 
55+ Club,...
 
tds101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in New York, NY
Posts: 4,326

Bikes: 9+,...

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1115 Post(s)
Liked 849 Times in 593 Posts
Swap that out for an IGH. You'll have a single speed chainline w/the benefit of gearing. That offset is crazy.
__________________
If it wasn't for you meddling kids,...
tds101 is offline  
Old 12-02-23, 02:32 PM
  #17  
BobbyG
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
...not the end!

I just ordered a bottom bracket adapter, American to euro...$14. If it fits I will buy a used three piece crank (~$20) then I can get a 58 to 62 tooth chainring. A 58 with the 13 tooth 6 speed will put me in the mid 90s gear inches-wise. A 60-62 will let be revert back to the original 14-28 5-speed. Even if I have to buy a used chainring and cranks, I think the whole crank upgrade will cost $50-$60 bucks. THat'll be worth it to me.

Then if I need to upgrade the rear brake to a caliper, I have everything except the caliper and that's an extra 5-bucks.

I'll keep everyone posted...
BobbyG is offline  
Old 12-16-23, 06:23 PM
  #18  
BobbyG
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
Got the crank adapter $14. Went to the bike co-op and picked up a 130 BCD square taper crank plus a square taper narrow-tube sealed cartridge bearing for $10 (!). The largest chainring they had was 53, only one tooth bigger than what I have now. So I found a 130BCD 60T chainring on Ali Express for $18 including shipping.

I'm at 64 gear inches now with the 13-28 gear cluster. So for about $45 bucks I will increase top gear to 79 gear inches. And then I will test it out and see if somehow it will work with the 11-32. And if it does, it would be 92 gear inches which is just under the 95 of the boardwalk. But that would mean another $50 for another cluster since I need the 11-32 for the Boardwalk. And maybe 79 gear inches will be good enough for this bike, since I'm not sure how fast I want to go on it anyway.

I probably won't get to this until after new years, so I hope to have an update by February 2024.
BobbyG is offline  
Likes For BobbyG:
Old 01-15-24, 02:48 AM
  #19  
Duragrouch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,669
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 747 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times in 333 Posts
I'll also add to the choir, I have a folder that is my townie, long exercise ride, and can tour long distances. Didn't start out that way. I had an early Dahon 3 speed with a rack and recyling crate on the back, someone cut the U-lock and stole, I think mostly for the rack, which was a nice one, adjustable height but sturdy. Replaced that with a Dahon Speed 7. Worked great. Found a rear rack that fit far enough aft for heel clearance with panniers, great. But it was always geared a bit too tall for the steep hills here, 52x11-30, and just a smaller single chainring would be too short a top gear. Finally, after 7 years, I got around to fitting a double crank, which I was told couldn't be done, but worked. First tried to fit a triple, 52/42/30, would not work because the low ring was too far inboard (due to the oversize seat tube), needed a wider-than standard BB spindle. Then found a better quality double, 50/34, almost as wide a range, it worked, via a derailleur mounting adaptor, and modification of the front derailleur. Bike was transformed, 21-85 gear inches. Cargo capacity is greater than a large-wheel bike. Center of gravity is low. Loading improves stability of small-wheel bikes. Frame fit for me is perfect (5'8", fixed (tall) Dahon stem, clip-on aero bars for stretched out). The bike is perfect, except for wanting disc brakes for the steeps; For that I would start with a Dahon Launch, which should be nearly identical in geometry (but aluminum instead of 4130 chrome moly steel like the Speed). It bugs me that Dahon discontinued the Formula 18, had disc brakes and double crank, but the latter was 130 BCD and I think 53/39.

I haven't touched my racing bike in many years, nor the hybrid bike I used as a townie after the first Dahon got stolen. I'm not a "frequent folder", but my wagon car got totaled from someone running into it parked, and I just wanted a folder to more easily transport on occasion, and be smaller in my tiny living space. It's vastly exceeded my expectations. For this point in my life, it's the only bike I use. For exercise when traveling, no touring loads, I'd love a Brompton, and would grab one if I see cheap. Don't laugh, Bike Fridays have sold so well, they are common on craigslist at less than half new price (though most have IGHs, which is unnecessary on a 20" so I won't touch). I've seen Brompton copies from China, but wouldn't touch one unless less than half actual Brompton price, and during the pandemic with shipping prices way up, was going to be like 2/3-3/4 Brompton list, no way.

But to sum up, the riding position, balance, speed range difference between an early 16" wheel Dahon and a 20" folder of any brand, is like night and day. Even a Brompton 16" will be better, because the tri-fold frame allows it to be longer in wheelbase and position, both of which cure a lot of ills versus the early Dahon 16".

Last edited by Duragrouch; 01-15-24 at 02:56 AM.
Duragrouch is offline  
Likes For Duragrouch:
Old 02-24-24, 08:11 PM
  #20  
BobbyG
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
The bottom bracket adapter isn't going to work... the seat tube intrudes just a hair too much for the narrowest sealed cartridge I found. I put the original crank back on and did some digging on the web And found a disk that replaces the single speed changing up front and has mounting holes for a 130 BCD ring which I already bought, a 60 tooth chain ring for upfront so this will take care of that period it's $27. I wish I would have known about this sooner but I Hadn't seen this solution on any folding bike discussion. However it's a common upgrade for bmx bikes apparently. Here's what I ordered stay tuned for more....
BobbyG is offline  
Old 02-24-24, 08:24 PM
  #21  
Duragrouch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,669
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 747 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times in 333 Posts
Originally Posted by BobbyG
The bottom bracket adapter isn't going to work... the seat tube intrudes just a hair too much for the narrowest sealed cartridge I found. I put the original crank back on and did some digging on the web And found a disk that replaces the single speed changing up front and has mounting holes for a 130 BCD ring which I already bought, a 60 tooth chain ring for upfront so this will take care of that period it's $27. I wish I would have known about this sooner but I Hadn't seen this solution on any folding bike discussion. However it's a common upgrade for bmx bikes apparently. Here's what I ordered stay tuned for more....
Another possibility: So I take it, the bottom bracket adaptor (I am unfamiliar with it), would have been an adaptor sleeve inside the BB shell? An alternate solution may be any of the new style cranks that use "external" BB bearings, with a tube BB axle that goes through the shell, that may be small enough to not have interference with the seat tube. My favorite is "hollowtech II" style, now widely available as generic, with "ISO External" bearings on each side. I use a 110mm BCD 50/34 double on my 20" wheel folder, but the same style is available in 130mm BCD as doubles and singles (notably, Litepro), and really low cost. That style has other benefits as well, but your key issue is fit.

Let us know how things turn out.
Duragrouch is offline  
Likes For Duragrouch:
Old 02-24-24, 09:37 PM
  #22  
sweeks
Senior Member
 
sweeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,553

Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times in 399 Posts
Originally Posted by Eyes Roll
Folding bikes are not intended for regular commuting of distances exceeding 5 miles at a time.
Darn it! I wish I had known that before I did a couple of century rides on my folder.
sweeks is online now  
Likes For sweeks:
Old 02-24-24, 10:12 PM
  #23  
Duragrouch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,669
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 747 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times in 333 Posts
Originally Posted by sweeks
Darn it! I wish I had known that before I did a couple of century rides on my folder.
I know, right? First, it's all about the fit; I'm fortunate that my folder fits me perfect. Then about gearing; I had to modify mine for wider range. Then about ride quality, my 20"/406-44 tires are not great, but not terrible. Then, if touring, about cargo capacity and stability with those loads; I gave careful thought to that and it's successful. Future concerns are durability of the folded hinge, but I've made modifications that should improve that.

Originally Posted by Eyes Roll
Folding bikes are not intended for regular commuting of distances exceeding 5 miles at a time.
"Folding bikes were originally intended for regular commuting of distances not exceeding 5 miles at a time, but have now improved to enable far longer rides, including equaling the longest rides on conventional bikes."

FTFY

Last edited by Duragrouch; 02-24-24 at 10:18 PM.
Duragrouch is offline  
Likes For Duragrouch:
Old 02-25-24, 08:57 AM
  #24  
BobbyG
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BobbyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 5,974

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Nishiki Blazer, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1364 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 827 Posts
While this particular folder may never be a long distance champ, my 20" Dahon Boardwalk with upgraded, higher gears does 30 mile rides with ease and comfort.
BobbyG is offline  
Likes For BobbyG:
Old 02-26-24, 12:39 AM
  #25  
Duragrouch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,669
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 747 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times in 333 Posts
Originally Posted by BobbyG
While this particular folder may never be a long distance champ, my 20" Dahon Boardwalk with upgraded, higher gears does 30 mile rides with ease and comfort.
Amen. Higher? Hmm, maybe Boardwalks have freewheels with 13 or 14 high cog. My Speed has a cassette with 11 high, and I needed a lower-low than 52x30. My 50/34 x 11-30 gets me 21-85 gear inches. I might go 34 low cog if I heavy tour on it. 85 is enough for the flats and to pedal down mild grades.
Duragrouch is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.