Air loss in different butyl tubes
#1
Am-a-tour
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NOVA
Posts: 127
Bikes: 2020 New Albion Privateer, 1983 Schwinn Super Sport, 2022 Rivendell Atlantis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times
in
40 Posts
Air loss in different butyl tubes
Hi all, I've noticed (anecdotally, of course) that my front tire with a regular weight butyl tube installed seems to hold pressure slightly better than my rear with a Schwalbe "extra light". Do you all have any experience with this, or am I more likely managing a slow leak back there?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,955
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4846 Post(s)
Liked 3,976 Times
in
2,583 Posts
Sounds quite normal. I think I am pretty safe in saying that all rubbers leak some. Certainly all bike inner tube rubbers commonly used do. The thickest take a long time but if you come back a year later, it will be pretty soft. Latex leaks a lot more but it too varies quite a lot from the thin tubes to the thick.
#3
Am-a-tour
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NOVA
Posts: 127
Bikes: 2020 New Albion Privateer, 1983 Schwinn Super Sport, 2022 Rivendell Atlantis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times
in
40 Posts
Sounds quite normal. I think I am pretty safe in saying that all rubbers leak some. Certainly all bike inner tube rubbers commonly used do. The thickest take a long time but if you come back a year later, it will be pretty soft. Latex leaks a lot more but it too varies quite a lot from the thin tubes to the thick.
#4
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,979
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,045 Times
in
668 Posts
Rubber is a porous material and oxygen and nitrogen molecules are small enough (diameter of about 0.3 nm) to pass through the pores over time. Thinner tubes will allow molecules to escape more quickly. Totally natural and expected.
Otto
Otto
Likes For ofajen:
Likes For nick_a:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,961
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1837 Post(s)
Liked 1,711 Times
in
987 Posts
Another factor is the width and recommended inflation pressure. Narrow high pressure low volume tire/tube combinations lose pressure much faster than low pressure high volume tires and tubes
#9
Am-a-tour
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NOVA
Posts: 127
Bikes: 2020 New Albion Privateer, 1983 Schwinn Super Sport, 2022 Rivendell Atlantis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times
in
40 Posts
I ride mostly on pavement with some gravel, in the mid-40s. That seems to give plenty of squish for my size/weight without bottoming out. If I ride rougher stuff, I'll drop the pressure closer to 40.
#10
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,631
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,572 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Intuitively, thicker tubes should hold air better than the thinner ones. And they probably do. But I've been really impressed by those Schwalbe Extralight/XXLight tubes. As long as they don't have a pinhole (or worse), I can go a long time without pumping, with tires in the ballpark of 50 psi.