Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Do down tube shifters offer an advantage over STI/Ergo?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Do down tube shifters offer an advantage over STI/Ergo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-14, 08:57 PM
  #26  
hairnet
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
I think it depends on what kind of riding you're doing.

On short fast rides, especially with a group of riders who will drop you if you can't keep up, STI or Ergo shifters give you an advantage that you may need.

But if you're doing long rides, especially if you're setting your own pace, STIs offer little advantage if any. And somewhere beyond 100km riding, they become a torture device. By 100 miles the advantages of downtube shifters are clear:
1. Constantly moving your hands around from shifters to brakes is a great way to prevent the upper body soreness that comes from maintaining the same position for several hours;
2. You use your whole arm to shift from the downtime, not just your fingers. But your arm is a lot stronger than your fingers. As a result, you can still shift down tube shifters when your arm is tired. With STIs there comes a time when shifting is not worth the pain.

That's my experience, anyway.
I'm familiar with this finger soreness fatigue from brevets I have ridden. It was getting difficult to even work my friction barcons.

Maybe my body is different than others but I hardly have to move my body to reach the DT levers to make a shift. Shifting is easy and really quick since I tried index DT shifters.
hairnet is offline  
Old 11-02-14, 08:59 PM
  #27  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times in 1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by sced
Yes - cost, weight, ease of maintenance, looks.

I ride both and never feel disadvantaged with the DT's.
Down tube shifters, especially of the friction variety, provides similar satisfaction to being able to drive a manual shift automobile.
I have three vehicles, and they are all manuals.
repechage is offline  
Old 11-02-14, 09:10 PM
  #28  
Lamplight
Senior Member
 
Lamplight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 2,768
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
I definitely prefer downtube shifters to any sort of brifter. Aside from things already mentioned, I find that with brifters I end up keeping my hands in one position on the bars much longer, which is more likely to make them numb or cause pain. I also have found that I really don't like the way cable housing feels under my bar tape, no matter how I route it, and this is the main reason I also prefer non-aero brake levers. As far as downtube shifters being hard to reach, since my frame size is 55-56cm the shifters really aren't that far from my handlebars, and since I tend to ride with my elbows bent, reaching down to the shifters barely changes my position, if it does at all. One more thing, with downtube shifters I can shift over numerous cogs in one motion, going up OR down numerous cogs very, very quickly. I realize some brifters allow this, but in my experience it's still not quite as fast in those particular situations. Probably faster for every other situation, though.
Lamplight is offline  
Old 11-02-14, 09:53 PM
  #29  
AZORCH
Senior Member
 
AZORCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Liberty, Missouri
Posts: 3,120

Bikes: 1966 Paramount | 1971 Raleigh International | ca. 1970 Bernard Carre | 1989 Waterford Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2019 Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 77 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by Lamplight
I definitely prefer downtube shifters to any sort of brifter. Aside from things already mentioned, I find that with brifters I end up keeping my hands in one position on the bars much longer, which is more likely to make them numb or cause pain.
I feel the same way. On long rides - heck, on any ride - I like to move my hands around into different positions and grips. My '89 Paramount is the only one I have where I shift from the hoods and Lamplight nails it: my hands never seem to move.
AZORCH is offline  
Old 11-02-14, 10:49 PM
  #30  
DMC707
Senior Member
 
DMC707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395

Bikes: Too many to list

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times in 746 Posts
This is akin to saying - "I have a 25" Curtis MAthis console TV and Love-love its performance over the newer offerings !" ---

No --- there is no advantage to DT shifting ---- I stuck with DT shifting as a racer until 1998 and was one of the last to switch to brifters in my area --- i waited 8 years too long

I told myself some of the same jibberish i hear here

"What if i need neutral support? - A Maillard freewheel wont work with such and such chain/shifters!
Or
I love my Sachs cassette - dont want to switch to Shimano or Campy - besides, i am saving half a pound

-- AND i also used the argument about not having my hands fall asleep too

So now - STI on all the daily drivers ---- a few of the wall hangers still have downtube shifters though
Geez -- the brifters have been around 25 years now - thats a quarter of a century
DMC707 is offline  
Old 11-02-14, 11:52 PM
  #31  
look171
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 909

Bikes: Casati, Look, Torelli, Ridley, and a bunch of steel bikes from the 80s and the 90s..

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I grew racing on Campy friction downtube shifters. The local hot dog training rides were the fastest in the early to mid 90s. I talked to some of the guys that are still riding it today from the old days. they say its still just as fast, no difference no matter what shifters was used. they will find the right gear, if not, it will be a split second, and shift, off you go. Al the quicker or not BS is just a bunch of guys talking. You feel the speed coming up, then drop your hands down to shift. Many times, there is no need to shift even if they are going balls out. That said, I have had every generation of Shimano DA from 8 spd brifters to their 10 speed. have not tried 11 spds yet. When I grow up then I should give it a try. Cable or not, you get use to it. I am one of the very few guys that are still doing that ride we used to do without any of the electronic on the bike or wrist. I go by feel still.
look171 is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 12:07 AM
  #32  
Six jours
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
If I decided to go racing again I would use brifters. Especially if I went criterium racing again.

But for group rides - even group rides where I am hanging on by my teeth - downtube index doesn't seem to be any kind of handicap. DT friction, maybe. I mean, maybe I'm just out of practice, but occasionally I will blow a shift with DT friction - especially when I am totally wasted and I go round a corner to discover the completely unexpected 20% grade.

But I don't race anymore and I almost never go for fast group rides. By myself on the bike trail or with a few good friends out on the road, it truly doesn't matter what kind of shifter I'm using. AFAIC, all the posts about how great brifters are or how DT shifters are more light or reliable or whatever are all nonsense for the great majority of day-to-day bicycle riding.
Six jours is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 12:07 AM
  #33  
look171
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 909

Bikes: Casati, Look, Torelli, Ridley, and a bunch of steel bikes from the 80s and the 90s..

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Oh, I just broke my collarbone on that ride yesterday morning in the rain. I have not had an accident from that ride for over 30 years since I was 16. I finally bought it from a dumb inexperience rider who didn't want to get spray by the rooster tail and cross my wheel and took me down hard. Hey, that's the way it goes. nothing happened to my SRAM shifters but some some scratches.
look171 is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 12:11 AM
  #34  
Six jours
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by look171
Oh, I just broke my collarbone on that ride yesterday morning in the rain. I have not had an accident from that ride for over 30 years since I was 16. I finally bought it from a dumb inexperience rider who didn't want to get spray by the rooster tail and cross my wheel and took me down hard. Hey, that's the way it goes. nothing happened to my SRAM shifters but some some scratches.
Yeah, well, I have a box of Super Record and C-Record brake levers that broke off in crashes. IIRC, replacements were about $30 at the time. What's a Dura-Ace brifter going for at the moment?
Six jours is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 12:12 AM
  #35  
look171
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 909

Bikes: Casati, Look, Torelli, Ridley, and a bunch of steel bikes from the 80s and the 90s..

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Agreed. Most guys that have ridden competitively know that its a none issue just like carbon vs ole steel. That said, it sure its nice to be able to shift off the saddle. I especially like it during those really fast group rides where we have to get going when the light turns green. I am usually shifting into my lower gear before I stop. Once I am off the saddle getting going again, I am usually shifting as I get moving. Sometimes as much as 3 gears just to get back up to speed. Oh yes, they drawl blood when the lights turns green. Bastards.
look171 is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 12:14 AM
  #36  
look171
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 909

Bikes: Casati, Look, Torelli, Ridley, and a bunch of steel bikes from the 80s and the 90s..

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Six jours
Yeah, well, I have a box of Super Record and C-Record brake levers that broke off in crashes. IIRC, replacements were about $30 at the time. What's a Dura-Ace brifter going for at the moment?
I really don't know to tell you the truth. Once I have a bike set up, I am one of those that just ride it until I am tired of it then change them out few years down the road. I am still riding 10 speed and keeping up just fine without that 11th gear.
look171 is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 12:29 AM
  #37  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
No advantages I can think of. I stick with them because I enjoy the added challenge.
and the weight saving in ounces and dollars,
bikemig is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 12:30 AM
  #38  
Six jours
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by look171
Agreed. Most guys that have ridden competitively know that its a none issue just like carbon vs ole steel. That said, it sure its nice to be able to shift off the saddle. I especially like it during those really fast group rides where we have to get going when the light turns green. I am usually shifting into my lower gear before I stop. Once I am off the saddle getting going again, I am usually shifting as I get moving. Sometimes as much as 3 gears just to get back up to speed. Oh yes, they drawl blood when the lights turns green. Bastards.
I rode with LaGrange for a few years and don't recall them stopping for lights.

Honestly, though, when riding DT friction I just don't bother changing gears that much and really haven't found it a handicap with most fast group rides. There is that occasional blown shift when in dire straights, but mostly, I keep up with pretty much the same guys and get dropped by pretty much the same guys regardless of whether I'm using DT, DT friction, or brifters. Yeah, I shift a lot more with brifters, but that doesn't seem to make any actual difference in speed or efficiency or any other measurable metric.

My personal opinion is that the whole thing doesn't really amount to much and is useful only for starting fights on the internet.
Six jours is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 12:51 AM
  #39  
look171
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 909

Bikes: Casati, Look, Torelli, Ridley, and a bunch of steel bikes from the 80s and the 90s..

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Six jours
I rode with LaGrange for a few years and don't recall them stopping for lights.

Honestly, though, when riding DT friction I just don't bother changing gears that much and really haven't found it a handicap with most fast group rides. There is that occasional blown shift when in dire straights, but mostly, I keep up with pretty much the same guys and get dropped by pretty much the same guys regardless of whether I'm using DT, DT friction, or brifters. Yeah, I shift a lot more with brifters, but that doesn't seem to make any actual difference in speed or efficiency or any other measurable metric.

My personal opinion is that the whole thing doesn't really amount to much and is useful only for starting fights on the internet.
Fights in the net is funny. I have to remember that line. I agree with you, downtube shifting isn't a handicap by any means, but a bit of a luxury id you ask me. I happen to like the luxury, heck who doesn't?

I rode for La Grange in 87 just for that one year. all the other years, I rode for Montrose. Did you do that MDR ride much?
look171 is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 01:57 AM
  #40  
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times in 938 Posts
I, truly, dislike down tube shifters! Using them forces one to take his, or her, hands off of the handlebars ever time a shift, up or down, is required. This gobbles up time and effort, while negatively impacting the safety factor. My opinion, of course.

If down tube shifters are so great, why are none being used in serious competition today? If down tube shifters are so great, why is it that not one bicycle manufacturer, today, offers them on a production bike? If down tube shifters are so great, why would any of us vintage bicycle enthusiasts like, or even prefer, Brifters?

The point is, down tube shifters have their place, from a functional point of view. Their place is on a antiquated machine that was competitive in its day, but not because of the down tube shifters. Competitive then only because every other bike, except those sporting stem shifters, were fitted with down tube shifters also.

So, do they offer any practical advantage? Nope, other than the weight saving which probably does not amount to all that much in the long run.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 04:14 AM
  #41  
bradtx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
zeego, Except for perhaps a retro appearance I don't think there's any advantage DT shifters have over integrated shifters.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 04:15 AM
  #42  
chewa
The Flying Scot
 
chewa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Queensferry Scotland and London (and France)
Posts: 1,904

Bikes: Custom (Colin Laing) 531c fast tourer/audax, 1964 Flying Scot Continental, 1995 Cinelli Supercorsa, Holdsworth Mistral single speed, Dahon Speed 6 (folder), Micmo Sirocco and a few more

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I love my ergos on my road bike and on my touring bike. I have a 10 speed rear on the road bike so the gears are very close ratio. Using ergos mean I am constantly selecting the gear to keep my cadence where I want it.

On the touring bike, I've found ergos really help when loaded with luggage, at low speed. Cycling slowly in traffic through Brugges (or similar old cities) on cobbles with panniers means being able to keep both hands on the bars is an advantage.

However, my Campag d/t shifters I bought new in 1978 are still working well on the third bike I've fitted them to, and I've worn out 3 sets of right side ergos in the last 15 years (indexing starts to go_ and had to have repairs done.

If I was going for a long tour - I'd go for D/T just because of the simplicity and serviceability. Elsewhere, I still think the advantages of "brifters" outweigh the disadvantages.
__________________
plus je vois les hommes, plus j'admire les chiens

1985 Sandy Gilchrist-Colin Laing built 531c Audax/fast tourer.
1964 Flying Scot Continental (531)
1995 Cinelli Supercorsa (Columbus SLX)
1980s Holdsworth Mistral fixed (531)
2005 Dahon Speed 6 (folder)
(YES I LIKE STEEL)
2008 Viking Saratoga tandem
2008 Micmo Sirocco Hybrid (aluminium!)
2012 BTwin Rockrider 8.1
chewa is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 06:15 AM
  #43  
Barrettscv 
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
Like most things in life, it depends.

Generally summery: if you shift often, brifters are rapid and convenient. If shifting is infrequent, down tube friction shifters are sufficient, simple and elegant.

Why would a cyclist shift often? Rolling hilly terrain and group rides demand frequent, rapid shifts. However, brifters are expensive, add weight, and compatibility issues limit divetrain choices. Indexed shifters are highly recommend for 9, 10 and 11 speed cassettes, however.



Why are downtube friction shifters elegant? These shifters are lightweight, simple, inexpensive, reliable, and are compatible with all cranksets and most derailleurs. They also shift well with 5, 6, 7, and 8 speed cogsets. Is shifting necessary but not urgent or frequent? Downtube frictions shifters are ideal.



Need to shift quickly without removing your hands from the handlebars but like the freedom of open compatibility when selecting cranksets and derailleurs? Suntour Barcons rule.





__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.

Last edited by Barrettscv; 11-03-14 at 06:36 AM.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 06:42 AM
  #44  
Sir_Name 
Senior Member
 
Sir_Name's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,448

Bikes: are fun!

Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 466 Post(s)
Liked 864 Times in 273 Posts
All of the significant pros/cons of integrated/DT/bar end shifting have been made - I'll add that an advantage of any one system could/would be to add some differentiation among a person's 'collection'. My modern-ish road bike is equipped with STI and I love it. My C&V road bike is equipped with friction DTs and I love it. I've had others with bar-end shifters and I loved those (and have some set aside for the next project). The bikes have different purposes and their builds reflect those purposes. Variety and spice.

One added consideration when using integrated shifting on C&V would be handlebar choice. Integrated levers are designed with a specific bar geometry in mind. They may or may not play nicely with your C&V bars both in terms of geometry/fit/comfort and aesthetics. I'm sure they'll fit just fine on many/most - if not, there are plenty of solutions out there. The retro-roadies STI/Ergo thread has a metric **** ton of eye candy.

Last edited by Sir_Name; 11-03-14 at 06:54 AM.
Sir_Name is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 06:54 AM
  #45  
daf1009
Senior Member
 
daf1009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 2,982

Bikes: LESS than I did a year ago!

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Given a choice (not wanting to stay "true" to a bike's origins)...I will go with Bar End shifters...they have the advantages of both DT and Brifters...

(1) Simple and elegant
(2) Relatively cheap
(3) Accurate shifting
(4) Moves hands around
(5) Lots of compatibility
(6) Light weight

And...

Of course, they are probably one of the BEST items at starting Internet fights!

That being said...I have bikes with Bar End's, Brifters (SRAM, Shimano and Campy) and DT...shucks...I even have one that has a Suicide shifter on the front derailleur (did it once...will NEVER do this shifting again...scared the beejeezus out of me!)...
daf1009 is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 06:57 AM
  #46  
SJX426 
Senior Member
 
SJX426's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579

Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8

Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1608 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times in 1,103 Posts
@zeego looks like you have a lot of opinions to consider. One thing is clear, everyone has their preference based on their riding and experience. I guess you need to create your own. For me that is part of the fun! De Rosa is on my wish list but I did acquire a Pinarello with 8spd Dura Ace. I would have preferred Campagnolo to keep with the Italian theme but in '91 DA was the preferred choice for many. Mine happens to be DT index. Many have said this is nearly the best ever. One suggested getting brifters for it but I just can't get past the price for some that are equal or better in quality than what I have.

DT shifting is what I know since the mid '60's and I am comfortable with them. Friction can become as good as index once you are tuned into the bike. Everything that has been said about this is true for me. I confess, the DA index DT shifting is very sweet! One of the reasons I don't want to give the bike up as a flipper. So maybe you should seriously consider doing the DA group with DT index then move to brifters when the back pocket gets heavier.
[IMG]P1020128 by superissimo_83, on Flickr[/IMG]
SJX426 is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 07:20 AM
  #47  
Caliper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 990

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 43 Posts
Originally Posted by RoadGuy
In fact, I like the fact that the throws on downtube shifters are so short with index shifting. Barely a flick or movement, and clunk, you're in another gear. The travel movement of the brifter levers is much longer and shufting is slower in comparison to downtube mounted or stem mounted index shifting levers.
Sounds like Shimano shifters? Even moving one cog down on the cassette is a pain there. And moving to the large ring, what a pain!
SRAM doubletap shifters are very short throw however. I dont have to even move my hand unless moving three cogs up on the cassette.

And what about costs. A set of used bifters with unknown service life remaining will cost you more than a complete, nice, used, steel or aluminum bike equipped with downtube shifters.
Depends on your local market I guess. The used bike market here is frankly very sparse. eBay prices vs used bikes on Craigslist here, the price of a used ergo shifter pair ($100-150) would buy you a '70's vintage Schwinn Varsity. Any nice used bike ($300+) is the cost of new shifters on eBay.

Shorter service life, more expensive, less reliable, and more maintenance. Broke a shifter cable, and now the shifter is totaled is a pretty common theme on BF and on the Internet. That's how I view brifters.
No argument here. Very little to go wrong with DT shifters.

Originally Posted by Chrome Molly
On the front derailleur, definitely yes. On the rear derailleur, definitely no.
There's an idea - DT front/ergo shift rear!

Originally Posted by rhm
But if you're doing long rides, especially if you're setting your own pace, STIs offer little advantage if any. And somewhere beyond 100km riding, they become a torture device. By 100 miles the advantages of downtube shifters are clear:
1. Constantly moving your hands around from shifters to brakes is a great way to prevent the upper body soreness that comes from maintaining the same position for several hours;
2. You use your whole arm to shift from the downtime, not just your fingers. But your arm is a lot stronger than your fingers. As a result, you can still shift down tube shifters when your arm is tired. With STIs there comes a time when shifting is not worth the pain.
Nothing stopping you from changing hand position or even stetching with ergo shifters although I see the advantage of preventative rather than reactive solutions. On longer/less aggressive rides, I frequently use hand positions that put ergo shifters out of reach. When the time comes to shift, they're still right there behind the brake lever to tap off a gear change.

On #2 , that's interesting. Obiviously I reach down with my arm, but I always use my finger/hand muscles to do the actual shifting, often bracing a finger against the tube or the shifter boss, rather than move my entire arm to accomplish the shift.
Caliper is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 07:59 AM
  #48  
Lone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 187

Bikes: Pinarello Veneto

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've had STIs, bar end shifters, and currently use downtube shifters. i agree, but i also used to ride fixed for 3 years, so i am anticipating keeping my cadence anyway.
when i rode the other shifters, i had not ridden fixed.
Lone is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 08:26 AM
  #49  
zeego
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
zeego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 284
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Hello everyone. Thanks for all the responses. Many things to think about. Like I said in my original post, I wanted to equip the new De Rosa with some nice DuraAce STI. It seems, sometimes, the only logical way to buy any higher end group is to purchase a whole bike. Price is not too much of an issue for me at this point. I try to budget everything out so I'm not over my head on these things. I'm basically on the hunt for a nice group.

STI offers some clear advantages: safety, speed, ease of use, etc. But they are also more expensive, clunky with all their different parts and boy are they ugly when they get beaten up. DT shifters are simple, attractive, easy to fix, cheaper, more challenging, light, classic and bombproof. And less plastic. Should I compare DT shifters to flying a warbird as opposed to flying a jet? (STI) I can tell you with most certainly that warbirds are definitely more challenging and fun. 8-)

Anyhow, The most important thing I have taken from this thread is to use the shifting system that best fits your riding style and what type of cycling enthusiast you are. For me:
- I ride alone.
- I don't race.
- I take my time...sometimes I don't.
- I love hearing the bike.
- I love the fact that some of the greatest cyclists used DT shifters.
- I do not subscribe to the notion of latest is greatest
- I'm a classic junky
- Love steel
- and others....

So...the hunt is on for the perfect group. I've been offered a nice DA 7400 set. Might have to jump on it. Am I completely set on DT shifters? NO. STI? NO. I think the deciding factor is the set that "speaks to me".
zeego is offline  
Old 11-03-14, 08:39 AM
  #50  
Barrettscv 
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
Originally Posted by zeego
Hello everyone. Thanks for all the responses. Many things to think about. Like I said in my original post, I wanted to equip the new De Rosa with some nice DuraAce STI. It seems, sometimes, the only logical way to buy any higher end group is to purchase a whole bike. Price is not too much of an issue for me at this point. I try to budget everything out so I'm not over my head on these things. I'm basically on the hunt for a nice group.

Anyhow, The most important thing I have taken from this thread is to use the shifting system that best fits your riding style and what type of cycling enthusiast you are. For me:
- I ride alone.
- I don't race.
- I take my time...sometimes I don't.
- I love hearing the bike.
- I love the fact that some of the greatest cyclists used DT shifters.
- I do not subscribe to the notion of latest is greatest
- I'm a classic junky
- Love steel
- and others....

So...the hunt is on for the perfect group. I've been offered a nice DA 7400 set. Might have to jump on it. Am I completely set on DT shifters? NO. STI? NO. I think the deciding factor is the set that "speaks to me".
I'll recommend 8 speed Dura Ace with downtube shifters and a 9 speed Ultegra long cage rear derailleur. Prices are moderate and quality is superb.

You will be able to run any crankset with simple and fast chainring shifting. You can use a compact double or triple without changing anything else on the bike, except the chain length. Friction downtube shifters for the crankset are often better than brifters, with fast shifts and reliable chainring changes while providing trouble-free operation. Dura Ace and 600 series rear downtube shifters can be operated in indexed mode or friction mode. Indexed shifting is a great feature with 8 speed cassettes.

You will also have both a wide gear range and tight cog spacing. You can use a 13-26 for general riding.g, a 12-21 for faster rides and an 11-30 for hilly rides.

Aesthetically, the bike retains the original appearance, while taking advantage of some of the improvements in divetrain performance.



__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.

Last edited by Barrettscv; 11-03-14 at 09:43 AM.
Barrettscv is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.