Bikefit on elderly rimbrake Scott Foil
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Bikefit on elderly rimbrake Scott Foil
Scott Foil RC 2018 | Bikes.Fan
Allow me to ask those who can "read" more out of bike geometry and my own measurements than myself. Will the bike above in size small fit me?
My approximate measurements. Most likely forgot something below so comments welcome.
Total height: 173 cm
Inseam: 83cm
Trunk: 53,4cm
For arm: 33cm
Arm: 64cm
Thigh: 55.5cm
Lower Leg: 56 cm
Sternal Notch: 143cm
Thanks & Regards
hsea17
Allow me to ask those who can "read" more out of bike geometry and my own measurements than myself. Will the bike above in size small fit me?
My approximate measurements. Most likely forgot something below so comments welcome.
Total height: 173 cm
Inseam: 83cm
Trunk: 53,4cm
For arm: 33cm
Arm: 64cm
Thigh: 55.5cm
Lower Leg: 56 cm
Sternal Notch: 143cm
Thanks & Regards
hsea17
#2
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times
in
3,318 Posts
There isn't a lot of difference in the geometry of the 2018 and the current Scott Foil RC. Why don't you go to Scott's website and plug your numbers into their sizing guide. You'd probably do okay on a 54. Perhaps you might prefer a 52. But it really depends on you. On the sizing guide on the site you linked, they say XS or SM would be your size. You might can find a archive on Scotts site to see if that matches what Scott says for that year Foil RC.
Some bikes are designed to give you a very aero or aggressive position. As is the Scott Foil. Other models of bike are made to give you a very relaxed upright position. And many are made to give you a position between the two extremes.
So if you aren't wanting the aggressive race position, which I and other find perfectly comfortable on long rides, then you might should look at a different model of bike. It really isn't a simple matter of raising the bars or moving the saddle.
Some people can be comfortable on a bike in any position. Some can only be comfortable in one position on a bike. Others can't be comfortable in any position. So you have to learn which is you!
Some bikes are designed to give you a very aero or aggressive position. As is the Scott Foil. Other models of bike are made to give you a very relaxed upright position. And many are made to give you a position between the two extremes.
So if you aren't wanting the aggressive race position, which I and other find perfectly comfortable on long rides, then you might should look at a different model of bike. It really isn't a simple matter of raising the bars or moving the saddle.
Some people can be comfortable on a bike in any position. Some can only be comfortable in one position on a bike. Others can't be comfortable in any position. So you have to learn which is you!
Last edited by Iride01; 01-20-24 at 01:22 PM.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
There isn't a lot of difference in the geometry of the 2018 and the current Scott Foil RC. Why don't you go to Scott's website and plug your numbers into their sizing guide. You'd probably do okay on a 54. Perhaps you might prefer a 52. But it really depends on you. On the sizing guide on the site you linked, they say XS or SM would be your size. You might can find a archive on Scotts site to see if that matches what Scott says for that year Foil RC.
Some bikes are designed to give you a very aero or aggressive position. As is the Scott Foil. Other models of bike are made to give you a very relaxed upright position. And many are made to give you a position between the two extremes.
So if you aren't wanting the aggressive race position, which I and other find perfectly comfortable on long rides, then you might should look at a different model of bike. It really isn't a simple matter of raising the bars or moving the saddle.
Some people can be comfortable on a bike in any position. Some can only be comfortable in one position on a bike. Others can't be comfortable in any position. So you have to learn which is you!
Some bikes are designed to give you a very aero or aggressive position. As is the Scott Foil. Other models of bike are made to give you a very relaxed upright position. And many are made to give you a position between the two extremes.
So if you aren't wanting the aggressive race position, which I and other find perfectly comfortable on long rides, then you might should look at a different model of bike. It really isn't a simple matter of raising the bars or moving the saddle.
Some people can be comfortable on a bike in any position. Some can only be comfortable in one position on a bike. Others can't be comfortable in any position. So you have to learn which is you!
hsea17
Last edited by hsea17; 01-20-24 at 10:31 PM.
#4
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times
in
3,318 Posts
Well it works for me when I put your measurements in the sizing tool. This is the page I'm on... https://www.scott-sports.com/us/en/p...oil-rc-20-bike
It puts you on either the M54 or the S52 size bike. Not sure how that works with the letter sizes of the Fan Bikes page that you linked. I don't know if those are Scott's letter sizing they used in 2018 or something Fan Bikes made up for themselves. Although I highly regard Scott bikes and would like to have one, they don't have any dealers near me that stock them. So I haven't kept tabs on how they sized them over the years.
It puts you on either the M54 or the S52 size bike. Not sure how that works with the letter sizes of the Fan Bikes page that you linked. I don't know if those are Scott's letter sizing they used in 2018 or something Fan Bikes made up for themselves. Although I highly regard Scott bikes and would like to have one, they don't have any dealers near me that stock them. So I haven't kept tabs on how they sized them over the years.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Well it works for me when I put your measurements in the sizing tool. This is the page I'm on... https://www.scott-sports.com/us/en/p...oil-rc-20-bike
It puts you on either the M54 or the S52 size bike. Not sure how that works with the letter sizes of the Fan Bikes page that you linked. I don't know if those are Scott's letter sizing they used in 2018 or something Fan Bikes made up for themselves. Although I highly regard Scott bikes and would like to have one, they don't have any dealers near me that stock them. So I haven't kept tabs on how they sized them over the years.
It puts you on either the M54 or the S52 size bike. Not sure how that works with the letter sizes of the Fan Bikes page that you linked. I don't know if those are Scott's letter sizing they used in 2018 or something Fan Bikes made up for themselves. Although I highly regard Scott bikes and would like to have one, they don't have any dealers near me that stock them. So I haven't kept tabs on how they sized them over the years.
Headset is Scott Foil Carbon fiber.
The Scott Addict RC 20 they still have size Medium.
hsea17
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,397
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 450 Times
in
338 Posts
Accurate arm measurement is difficult, but it's only an issue when length is uncommonly long or short, and then only when deciding if you need a hardcore endurance geometry. You can decide that just by looking in a full-length mirror. For most of us, swapping and adjusting the stem is all we need to accommodate arm length. Your leg length is about average for your height and the standover is about right. You could straddle a Medium but it wouldn't be fun. Get the Small.
I test rode a slightly older version of this bike and the handling was phenomenal, especially after a morning of messing around on endurance bikes.
I test rode a slightly older version of this bike and the handling was phenomenal, especially after a morning of messing around on endurance bikes.
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Accurate arm measurement is difficult, but it's only an issue when length is uncommonly long or short, and then only when deciding if you need a hardcore endurance geometry. You can decide that just by looking in a full-length mirror. For most of us, swapping and adjusting the stem is all we need to accommodate arm length. Your leg length is about average for your height and the standover is about right. You could straddle a Medium but it wouldn't be fun. Get the Small.
I test rode a slightly older version of this bike and the handling was phenomenal, especially after a morning of messing around on endurance bikes.
I test rode a slightly older version of this bike and the handling was phenomenal, especially after a morning of messing around on endurance bikes.
hsea17
Likes For hsea17:
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
2019 Scott Addict RC 20 – Specs, Comparisons, Reviews – 99 Spokes
Only one complete bike left now due to me been travelling for a while. Show model selling for US 1600, - (New was US 3500, -) Is it a good deal or better to look for something new? I have previously asked about bike fitting in this tread and due to differences from my existing bike. The Scott comes with a longer stem (110mm) vs 100mm on existing bike, longer top tube (15mm) and shorter headtube (20mm), I will likely need to purchase a shorter stem and for they with the geometrical knowledge would a 90mm stem compensate for the differences in top tube and headtube length?
Thanks again.
hsea17
Only one complete bike left now due to me been travelling for a while. Show model selling for US 1600, - (New was US 3500, -) Is it a good deal or better to look for something new? I have previously asked about bike fitting in this tread and due to differences from my existing bike. The Scott comes with a longer stem (110mm) vs 100mm on existing bike, longer top tube (15mm) and shorter headtube (20mm), I will likely need to purchase a shorter stem and for they with the geometrical knowledge would a 90mm stem compensate for the differences in top tube and headtube length?
Thanks again.
hsea17
Last edited by hsea17; 02-17-24 at 02:19 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,397
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 450 Times
in
338 Posts
2019 Scott Addict RC 20 – Specs, Comparisons, Reviews – 99 Spokes
in this tread and due to differences from my existing bike. The Scott comes with a longer stem (110mm) vs 100mm on existing bike, longer top tube (15mm) and shorter headtube (20mm), I will likely need to purchase a shorter stem and for they with the geometrical knowledge would a 90mm stem compensate for the differences in top tube and headtube length?
Thanks again.
hsea17
in this tread and due to differences from my existing bike. The Scott comes with a longer stem (110mm) vs 100mm on existing bike, longer top tube (15mm) and shorter headtube (20mm), I will likely need to purchase a shorter stem and for they with the geometrical knowledge would a 90mm stem compensate for the differences in top tube and headtube length?
Thanks again.
hsea17
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
hsea17
Likes For hsea17:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,397
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 450 Times
in
338 Posts
After you've been riding a while you get dialed in. For example, to get my stem length I subtract the virtual top tube length from 69 or 70, depending on the handlebar reach. It's been working for me for 45 years.