Anyone have the Wheel Fanatyk or NSA spoke tensionometer?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Anyone have the Wheel Fanatyk or NSA spoke tensionometer?
I can't find any real documentation on these, and what I do find is fairly unsuable since alot of it is unitless. I made a copy(ish) of them but working out the final details. I'm pretty sure my spring tension is way too low. I made a test jig for some spokes I'm working with and at 140kgf I was only getting 0.13mm deflection. At an absolute best accuracy of +/- one digit thats an inherent grey area of ~7.6% before you add in any other inaccuracies. I'd like to know what you measure so I can fine tune things. I have a more stout spring that I'm going to try, printing the parts now. I would still like to compare. Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,728
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,593 Times
in
1,437 Posts
Try replacing the spring with elastomer so you'll have more options. Once you find the right constant, you can stay with it or search for a comparable metal spring.
Or approach it analytically. You have a pair of data points. Decide how much deflection you want for your scale to be relevant, then use simple ratios to work back to find the spring constant.
Or approach it analytically. You have a pair of data points. Decide how much deflection you want for your scale to be relevant, then use simple ratios to work back to find the spring constant.
Last edited by FBinNY; 02-24-24 at 08:46 AM.
#3
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,119
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 659 Times
in
372 Posts
My Wheel Fanatyc meter usually registers in the.29 to .35 mm range across a range of spoke types and thicknesses at my target tension which is a far smaller deflection range than my other meters register.
Note that a meter that shows the value of the actual deflection registers a lower number at higher tension as opposed to the more intuitive scale of the Park meter and it's clones that shows a higher number at higher tension.
The spring in the Park type meter is much stronger than the Wheel Fanatyc. I can quantify this in my calibration jig.
Typically, the reading on the scale will increase by about 6% when taking a reading with the Park meter but only about 2% with the Wheel Fanatyc.
This really doesn't matter but it explains why the WF has a narrower deflection range.
AS long as your meter delivers consistent and repeatable readings, all you really need is a reliable means of calibrating it.
Note that a meter that shows the value of the actual deflection registers a lower number at higher tension as opposed to the more intuitive scale of the Park meter and it's clones that shows a higher number at higher tension.
The spring in the Park type meter is much stronger than the Wheel Fanatyc. I can quantify this in my calibration jig.
Typically, the reading on the scale will increase by about 6% when taking a reading with the Park meter but only about 2% with the Wheel Fanatyc.
This really doesn't matter but it explains why the WF has a narrower deflection range.
AS long as your meter delivers consistent and repeatable readings, all you really need is a reliable means of calibrating it.
Last edited by Dan Burkhart; 02-25-24 at 07:30 PM.
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
Thanks! Very useful info. I tried the new spring and it's maybe a touch on the strong side but I think I'll roll with it. It's a little stiff to compress by hand, it's fine for me but might be too much for someone with smaller hands - if anyone else even ever uses it. I did make a calibration jig and the spokes I'm working with now (Pillar 1420) gave me a deflection of ~1mm at 90kgf, mind you the spokes are bladed and I was measuring across the 0.95mm cross section. I'm actually surprised by the repeatability. I tested from 40-140kgf in 5kgf increments, and at each tension I put the tensionometer on and took it off 4 or 5 times. In about 80% of the times I got the exact same number, the other times were only out by one digit. Dont think I can ask for better than that! Cheers!
#5
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,119
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 659 Times
in
372 Posts
Thanks! Very useful info. I tried the new spring and it's maybe a touch on the strong side but I think I'll roll with it. It's a little stiff to compress by hand, it's fine for me but might be too much for someone with smaller hands - if anyone else even ever uses it. I did make a calibration jig and the spokes I'm working with now (Pillar 1420) gave me a deflection of ~1mm at 90kgf, mind you the spokes are bladed and I was measuring across the 0.95mm cross section. I'm actually surprised by the repeatability. I tested from 40-140kgf in 5kgf increments, and at each tension I put the tensionometer on and took it off 4 or 5 times. In about 80% of the times I got the exact same number, the other times were only out by one digit. Dont think I can ask for better than that! Cheers!
Not that it matters if you are properly calibrated but it would be interesting to see the relationship between that and the readings you got previously.
#6
Full Member
Thread Starter
TBH I don't think this particular error matters much. Ok sure I may think I'm tensioning to 118kgf but really only tensioning to 113kgf, can't say I care. What I do think is valuable is the consitency and repeatability in the readings so I can acurately compare tension in one spoke to the next. Caveat, I'm a very novice wheel builder so could very likely be a case of I don't know what I don't know, only expressing my opinion of what makes sense to me... at my current level of ignorance lol!
#7
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,119
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 659 Times
in
372 Posts
The increase in the scale reading with the meter applied wouldn't produce an error because it returns to normal.
I was just interested to see how it compares to the increase I observe on my calibration jig with a meter that registers about a third of the deflection you are measuring.
I was just interested to see how it compares to the increase I observe on my calibration jig with a meter that registers about a third of the deflection you are measuring.
Last edited by Dan Burkhart; 02-25-24 at 07:31 PM.
#8
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,820
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Liked 1,263 Times
in
667 Posts
The spoke tension is determined by measuring the deflection in the spoke when a known force (the spring tension) is applied.
note that spokes of different guages will measure differently, or put another way, will have different tension under the same deflection
It sounds like you have a calibration jig of some sort so you can measure the deflection of spoke with a known load.
There is a process for "zeroing" the WF tensiometer at the start of each measurement run.
/markp
note that spokes of different guages will measure differently, or put another way, will have different tension under the same deflection
It sounds like you have a calibration jig of some sort so you can measure the deflection of spoke with a known load.
There is a process for "zeroing" the WF tensiometer at the start of each measurement run.
/markp
#9
Senior member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Posts: 8,119
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 659 Times
in
372 Posts
I realized I mis spoke when I talked about increased tension with the meter applied.
I meant to say the scale reading increased. I corrected my post in hopes it makes more sense.
I meant to say the scale reading increased. I corrected my post in hopes it makes more sense.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
I can't find any real documentation on these, and what I do find is fairly unsuable since alot of it is unitless. I made a copy(ish) of them but working out the final details. I'm pretty sure my spring tension is way too low. I made a test jig for some spokes I'm working with and at 140kgf I was only getting 0.13mm deflection. At an absolute best accuracy of +/- one digit thats an inherent grey area of ~7.6% before you add in any other inaccuracies. I'd like to know what you measure so I can fine tune things. I have a more stout spring that I'm going to try, printing the parts now. I would still like to compare. Thanks!
My Park tensiometer came with a reference card to let me see how my build might compare to a standard I may have found, but it is very difficult and finnicky for me to match two spokes in a given wheel, due in part to sticktion in the spoke nipple threads, spoke windup, and friction in the nipple to rim interface. I haven't tried building with a lubricant yet.
#11
Full Member
Thread Starter
My Park tensiometer came with a reference card to let me see how my build might compare to a standard I may have found, but it is very difficult and finnicky for me to match two spokes in a given wheel, due in part to sticktion in the spoke nipple threads, spoke windup, and friction in the nipple to rim interface. I haven't tried building with a lubricant yet.
I'm using bladed spokes for this build and I'm really liking them and will probably continue to use them in the future. If there is any wind up it's very apparent, but I use a tool I printed to hold the spoke straight so pretty much a nonissue. I use silver antisieze that I add some drops of generic oil to, to get a nice consistency. I use it on the threads, as well as on the nipple where it seats on the rim and I'm happy with it. There's sooo many opinions out there on what to use, and I'd bet all of them are perfectly valid. I'll keep using what I'm using because I like it and it hasn't spontaneously combusted.... so far. LOL