What constitutes a Classic or Vintage bicycle?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Just what determines "Classic &/or Vintage"?
So I've been a "member" of this forum for nearly 2 years but haven't been much of a contributor. I'm hoping for that to change. I have a small stable of bikes in various states of assembly. Most were garage sale pickups or recoveries from dumpsters but some are actual legitimate bike shop purchases and a few (three) were actually "NEW". The most recent of the "new" bikes was bought in 1998 (gosh, that's more that 20 years ago)! My question, as the title states, is just what qualifies a bike for C & V status? I have the feeling that most if not all of my bike fall into that grouping but would just like to know what the standards of this forum are to prevent threads being moved. I gotsta know!
Sovende
Sovende
Likes For sovende:
#2
This thread belongs in the C&V forum.
#3
Member
well i'm definitely not an authority, but when i got into bikes and was interested in fixing em up, my "bike mentor" as i called him told me that any steel bike with downtube shifters that was from the bike boom or before is what made it a vintage classic. i'm sure many would disagree with that definition, but basically any old bike is what i took away from that.
so, according to him (and now me!) that means no crabon or alum, no disk brakes, downtube friction shifters, anything older than the 1990's. so, thatsa lotta bikes.
and now i'm ready to get flamed for this post!!
edit just to add that perhaps some aluminum frames could fall into this category. and also, new bikes that fit the mold are (ime) typically referred to as neo-retro). but whatever, they're all just bikes
so, according to him (and now me!) that means no crabon or alum, no disk brakes, downtube friction shifters, anything older than the 1990's. so, thatsa lotta bikes.
and now i'm ready to get flamed for this post!!
edit just to add that perhaps some aluminum frames could fall into this category. and also, new bikes that fit the mold are (ime) typically referred to as neo-retro). but whatever, they're all just bikes
Last edited by travgott; 05-30-19 at 10:28 AM.
#4
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
If it's old and you like it, it's vintage. If it's old and lots of people like it, it's classic.
If it's old and nobody likes it, it's trash.
If it's old and nobody likes it, it's trash.
Likes For livedarklions:
Likes For mixteup:
Likes For mixteup:
#8
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,049
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,075 Times
in
4,480 Posts
Vintage is old.
Classic is inspired by traditional/old.
Classic is inspired by traditional/old.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#9
Senior Member
#10
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
On Craigslist, "vintage" means "I'm trying to convince you rust is a selling point."
#11
Senior Member
#12
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Liked 9,103 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Well, I did buy an early 80s Peugeot 10 spd POS for $25, but rust wasn't the problem. I forgot how much of a pain down tube shifters were, a problem compounded by it being just a little too big for me. I ended up donating it in very rideable condition to a coop.
I do find some of the pictures of supposedly "vintage" bikes on CL hilarious, though.
I do find some of the pictures of supposedly "vintage" bikes on CL hilarious, though.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 763
Bikes: S-Works Stumpjumper HT Disc, Fuji Absolute, Kona Jake the Snake, '85 Cannondale SR900
Liked 217 Times
in
142 Posts
So I've been a "member" of this forum for nearly 2 years but haven't been much of a contributor. I'm hoping for that to change. I have a small stable of bikes in various states of assembly. Most were garage sale pickups or recoveries from dumpsters but some are actual legitimate bike shop purchases and a few (three) were actually "NEW". The most recent of the "new" bikes was bought in 1998 (gosh, that's more that 20 years ago)! My question, as the title states, is just what qualifies a bike for C & V status? I have the feeling that most if not all of my bike fall into that grouping but would just like to know what the standards of this forum are to prevent threads being moved. I gotsta know!
Sovende
Sovende
Like many here, Ive had bikes from this decade, and bikes nearly a half century old, and I think for where we are now, the advent of the “brifter” is a good line of demarcation. I think .
BUT something with integrated shifting yet made in what most would consider the classic/vintage way, (say, lugged steel or Ti, straight top tube standard geometry) like a Lemond road bike, from around the 1998 timeframe you mentioned, would also be C&V, IMHO
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Sovende
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Good points on all of the above!
Perhaps a moderator could make the "list" a sticky AND sure, put it in the C&V section.
BTW, thanks to all that replied😎. Based on the definitions provided, ALL but one of my bikes fall into the C&V category😉. (And yes, a few belong in the "trash" category).
Sovende
Perhaps a moderator could make the "list" a sticky AND sure, put it in the C&V section.
BTW, thanks to all that replied😎. Based on the definitions provided, ALL but one of my bikes fall into the C&V category😉. (And yes, a few belong in the "trash" category).
Sovende
#16
My 1989 Bottecchia SLX Professional —Vintage (even with the addition of a moderb Campy drive train).
My Colnago Master — A recreation of a Classic.
My Colnago Master — A recreation of a Classic.
Likes For eja_ bottecchia:
#17
52psi
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,034
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Liked 824 Times
in
405 Posts
Good points on all of the above!
Perhaps a moderator could make the "list" a sticky AND sure, put it in the C&V section.
BTW, thanks to all that replied😎. Based on the definitions provided, ALL but one of my bikes fall into the C&V category😉. (And yes, a few belong in the "trash" category).
Sovende
Perhaps a moderator could make the "list" a sticky AND sure, put it in the C&V section.
BTW, thanks to all that replied😎. Based on the definitions provided, ALL but one of my bikes fall into the C&V category😉. (And yes, a few belong in the "trash" category).
Sovende
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
#18
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,820
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Liked 3,658 Times
in
2,204 Posts
#19
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,049
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,075 Times
in
4,480 Posts
#20
Likes For Bill in VA:
Likes For SDReames:
Likes For SDReames:
Likes For SDReames: