"Modern Day 105 is as good as..."
#51
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 884
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 570 Post(s)
Liked 773 Times
in
404 Posts
Hold up, are you a witch?! How did you make that bike with 105 cost more than the bike's I posted which have 105?!
Hmm...thinking about this more, I am starting to think not all bikes with the same drivetrain cost the same amount of money. I may need to Google around a bit and find out.
Hmm...thinking about this more, I am starting to think not all bikes with the same drivetrain cost the same amount of money. I may need to Google around a bit and find out.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
#53
Junior Member
I've ridden just about everything Shimano and Sram has put out up to today when I was in shops. Most issues were setup related. Poor internal cable routing can be a big problem as well.
My bikes over the years had 105 10sp, Force 10sp, Ultegra 6800 11 sp. The only issue I ran into was that I had to continue to make minor cable adjustments to the rear derailleur after every few rides. Sometimes I had to add tension, sometimes let tension out. Pulled the groupset off and installed Force 10sp. No more issues, and I prefer Sram shifting over Shimano even though I rode Ultegra 6800 for 8 years without any issues.
My bikes over the years had 105 10sp, Force 10sp, Ultegra 6800 11 sp. The only issue I ran into was that I had to continue to make minor cable adjustments to the rear derailleur after every few rides. Sometimes I had to add tension, sometimes let tension out. Pulled the groupset off and installed Force 10sp. No more issues, and I prefer Sram shifting over Shimano even though I rode Ultegra 6800 for 8 years without any issues.
Likes For frdfandc:
#54
Steel is real
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,966
Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1998KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon,1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 670 Post(s)
Liked 977 Times
in
648 Posts
This is not without reason I buy massively Dura Ace 7800 components, it dwarfs the Dura Ace 7900, 9000, 9100 and 9200 functionnnality, reliability and beauty and even beats SRAM regarding shifting quality.
Likes For georges1:
#55
Junior Member
Dura Ace I think was the pinnacle of Shimano shifting. The newer stuff is nice, but there was something special about 7800. It was like melted butter.
Likes For frdfandc:
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
DA 7700 for me. Modern 105 *may* be functionally superior, but it will never be top of the line.
Likes For smd4:
#57
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
This is the main reason I would prefer new 105 (or even Tiagra) over older anything. It seems like once you start the WD-40 baths, you find yourself having to do it more and more often until it's just a PIA.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#58
Steel is real
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,966
Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1998KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon,1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 670 Post(s)
Liked 977 Times
in
648 Posts
It didn't have cable eating shifters and bonded cranksets that break, that is enough to consider the quality of dura ace 7800. Also in terms of design, the Dura Ace 7800 was much nicer than the newer stuff.
Likes For georges1:
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
The pinnacle of 10-speed, external cable shifting certainly no question. Internal cables were certainly a challenge for shift quality, but they are now history at this level.
Likes For PeteHski:
#60
...
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Whitestone and Rensselaerville, New York
Posts: 1,518
Bikes: Bicycles? Yup.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 482 Post(s)
Liked 1,593 Times
in
739 Posts
Maybe there is something to this 105 bashing. The only brifters that have been hinky for me were 10sp 105. Obviously they work well for some.
I'll throw a dead fish in the punchbowl; the new Sora 9 speed brifters are pretty good! Even has lever pull adjustment. Lots of stamped parts and feels a little loosey-goosey, but very functional..reminds me of com-bloc small arms.
I'll throw a dead fish in the punchbowl; the new Sora 9 speed brifters are pretty good! Even has lever pull adjustment. Lots of stamped parts and feels a little loosey-goosey, but very functional..reminds me of com-bloc small arms.
Likes For BTinNYC:
#62
Newbie
I'll also add the "Campy" is better post...
When I built my Merlin Ti back in '99 I bought a mix of Campy 9 speed carbon Super Record, Record and Chorus parts...what was available, what I liked more and what I could afford. I rode that group for over 21 years until the rear mech failed. I tried to get parts but couldn't find any that were new and I wasn't going to buy 20 year old parts on ebay...already had them lol.
No idea how many miles...likely well over 100k...but until the rear mech failed it was a perfect shifting machine and I loved it. It sucked that the shifters didn't work with any other era derailleurs else I'd still be on it. It was also the first Campy shifters that were made for hands smaller than Paul Bunyon's...the first I could get a finger on the brake levers from the drops...lol I have small hands...
When I built my Merlin Ti back in '99 I bought a mix of Campy 9 speed carbon Super Record, Record and Chorus parts...what was available, what I liked more and what I could afford. I rode that group for over 21 years until the rear mech failed. I tried to get parts but couldn't find any that were new and I wasn't going to buy 20 year old parts on ebay...already had them lol.
No idea how many miles...likely well over 100k...but until the rear mech failed it was a perfect shifting machine and I loved it. It sucked that the shifters didn't work with any other era derailleurs else I'd still be on it. It was also the first Campy shifters that were made for hands smaller than Paul Bunyon's...the first I could get a finger on the brake levers from the drops...lol I have small hands...
btw - new campagnolo 10spd der. on ebay right now
105 is good stuff
nothing ever beat shimano 7400 and campagnolo 9spd Chorus, record and super record though, but i digress •
i only use the 13 and 15 cog where i ride and only need chainrings, pulleys, chains and cassettes, bottom brackets and pads and bearings and hoods and new chamois's and new helmet pads and new tires. i think that's it. Shifting is flawless 👍
Last edited by ChromeChainstay; 11-27-23 at 04:35 PM.
Likes For ChromeChainstay:
Likes For phughes:
#64
Senior Member
I think that the story that current 105s are as good as Ultegra or DurAce of previous generation is made up by those who are selling fully assembled half-way decent bikes for good profit! 😉
I have an old steel frame Le Mond bike that came with Shimano 105 components. Normally, if I like how the bike rides, I upgrade most components but on this bike, other than wheels, I never got around to change anything*. The rear shifter/brake developed a little rattle that I couldn’t stop. But it still shifts well. I have had no serious issues to force me to throw the 105 shifters. Yes, esthetically they are no where as nice as DA 9x on Quantum but they are fully functional.
* Le Mond rides very well and may be it deserves an upgrade to DA!
I have an old steel frame Le Mond bike that came with Shimano 105 components. Normally, if I like how the bike rides, I upgrade most components but on this bike, other than wheels, I never got around to change anything*. The rear shifter/brake developed a little rattle that I couldn’t stop. But it still shifts well. I have had no serious issues to force me to throw the 105 shifters. Yes, esthetically they are no where as nice as DA 9x on Quantum but they are fully functional.
* Le Mond rides very well and may be it deserves an upgrade to DA!
#65
Resident PIA
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: City of Oaks, NC
Posts: 848
Bikes: Gunnar Roadie, Look 765 Optimum, Spesh Aethos
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Liked 356 Times
in
186 Posts
..
__________________
--
Shad
I knew where I was when I wrote this
I don't know where I am now...
05 Gunnar Roadie Chorus/Record
67'er
--
Shad
I knew where I was when I wrote this
I don't know where I am now...
05 Gunnar Roadie Chorus/Record
67'er
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,516
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Just my opinion, but the brake lever as a shifter paddle design of Shimano STIs takes a back seat to all of the other designs.(no matter what level we are talking about)
Also, is when Shimano started routing the cable from the rear what caused the cable eating problems?
Also, is when Shimano started routing the cable from the rear what caused the cable eating problems?
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
I sort of agree and I think SRAM took advantage of it in the electronic age i.e. I prefer their one paddle per side ergonomics.
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
I know people who race on 105 and they have never had any issues.
I have a bike with all 105 components except the rear derailleur is Ultegra, but I bought the bike about 11 years ago and I haven't had one single problem with it, I don't have to adjust it either. Even the original cables are still working great!
I don't find that the 105 is cheap plastic crap, all 105 is, is trickle down Dura Ace, so if 105 is junk than so is Dura Ace because that's where 105 came from.
Shimano 105 Vs Ultegra Vs Dura-Ace: Weight, Cost, Spec Comparison | The Pro's Closet (theproscloset.com)
I have a bike with all 105 components except the rear derailleur is Ultegra, but I bought the bike about 11 years ago and I haven't had one single problem with it, I don't have to adjust it either. Even the original cables are still working great!
I don't find that the 105 is cheap plastic crap, all 105 is, is trickle down Dura Ace, so if 105 is junk than so is Dura Ace because that's where 105 came from.
Shimano 105 Vs Ultegra Vs Dura-Ace: Weight, Cost, Spec Comparison | The Pro's Closet (theproscloset.com)
#69
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,616
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10966 Post(s)
Liked 7,493 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Different materials are used. And it's the same with 9sp Ultegra from 25 years ago vs current 9sp Sora- it is not simply trickledown, no matter how generously you use that term.
It's trickled own AND fundamentally different materials.
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
I see this all the time and wonder if those that claim it don't realize it isn't accurate, or don't care that it isn't accurate.
Different materials are used. And it's the same with 9sp Ultegra from 25 years ago vs current 9sp Sora- it is not simply trickledown, no matter how generously you use that term.
It's trickled own AND fundamentally different materials.
Different materials are used. And it's the same with 9sp Ultegra from 25 years ago vs current 9sp Sora- it is not simply trickledown, no matter how generously you use that term.
It's trickled own AND fundamentally different materials.
#71
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,616
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10966 Post(s)
Liked 7,493 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Pedal design and materials are different. RD materials and design are different. di2 shifter design and materials are different. Crank design and materials are different. Cassette materials are different.
But sure- 105 is trickle down in that DA gets a higher speed system or di2 first, then 105 is eventually increased with those same features. Again though, the actual materials are always different and often times the design is also different.
Maybe I am being obtuse. Or maybe the trickle down claim is used way too frequently without recognizing how much doesnt actually trickle down.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#72
Senior Member
Ever more gears, demand ever tighter tolerances and ever steeper chain-angles, placing not only demands on the individual components, cables, etc. But also on the frame geometry and accuracy. Slight misalignments makes adjusting impossible. So, perceived issues with the 105 stuff may originate in the frame, the not genuine Shimano cables, the complicated cable routing through the stem and frame that impede free cable movement, etc.
I used to own two almost identical tiagra 4700 equipped bikes. One had perfect front shifting, the other has a noticeable heavy pull, for no apparent reason other than slightly different cables and cable-routing. Had I only had one, I might have concluded tiagra 4700 is GB, however its not. Its the bike.
I used to own two almost identical tiagra 4700 equipped bikes. One had perfect front shifting, the other has a noticeable heavy pull, for no apparent reason other than slightly different cables and cable-routing. Had I only had one, I might have concluded tiagra 4700 is GB, however its not. Its the bike.
#73
Senior Member
I know people who race on 105 and they have never had any issues.
I have a bike with all 105 components except the rear derailleur is Ultegra, but I bought the bike about 11 years ago and I haven't had one single problem with it, I don't have to adjust it either. Even the original cables are still working great!
I don't find that the 105 is cheap plastic crap, all 105 is, is trickle down Dura Ace, so if 105 is junk than so is Dura Ace because that's where 105 came from.
Shimano 105 Vs Ultegra Vs Dura-Ace: Weight, Cost, Spec Comparison | The Pro's Closet (theproscloset.com)
I have a bike with all 105 components except the rear derailleur is Ultegra, but I bought the bike about 11 years ago and I haven't had one single problem with it, I don't have to adjust it either. Even the original cables are still working great!
I don't find that the 105 is cheap plastic crap, all 105 is, is trickle down Dura Ace, so if 105 is junk than so is Dura Ace because that's where 105 came from.
Shimano 105 Vs Ultegra Vs Dura-Ace: Weight, Cost, Spec Comparison | The Pro's Closet (theproscloset.com)
Likes For Racing Dan:
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,624
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2976 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times
in
771 Posts
This thread is still going?!
There is something effed with the particular groupset/bike on whatever it is Jughed owns. It's NOT a 105 problem.
There is something effed with the particular groupset/bike on whatever it is Jughed owns. It's NOT a 105 problem.
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
If we are talking only the shift levers, sure the tech is largely the same in that both systems shift when you move the lever and paddle, and both systems stop the bike when you pull the lever. If we are talking 105 vs DA(which are groups and not just the shifters), it is not simply trickle down.
Pedal design and materials are different. RD materials and design are different. di2 shifter design and materials are different. Crank design and materials are different. Cassette materials are different.
But sure- 105 is trickle down in that DA gets a higher speed system or di2 first, then 105 is eventually increased with those same features. Again though, the actual materials are always different and often times the design is also different.
Maybe I am being obtuse. Or maybe the trickle down claim is used way too frequently without recognizing how much doesnt actually trickle down.
Pedal design and materials are different. RD materials and design are different. di2 shifter design and materials are different. Crank design and materials are different. Cassette materials are different.
But sure- 105 is trickle down in that DA gets a higher speed system or di2 first, then 105 is eventually increased with those same features. Again though, the actual materials are always different and often times the design is also different.
Maybe I am being obtuse. Or maybe the trickle down claim is used way too frequently without recognizing how much doesnt actually trickle down.