Never seen this crank set up before. What the? How the?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107
Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times
in
422 Posts
Never seen this crank set up before. What the? How the?
#2
WGB
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 2,917
Bikes: Panasonic PT-4500
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1800 Post(s)
Liked 2,334 Times
in
1,378 Posts
Perhaps it doesn't shift to the small ring (or if it does it isn't expected to go back)?
Just don't see it as viable
Just don't see it as viable
#3
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,807
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2439 Post(s)
Liked 3,127 Times
in
1,967 Posts
Note the workmanlike day the Arx goes about in shifting that...it scoffs at a mere 25 tooth shift.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super
Likes For jdawginsc:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,024 Times
in
723 Posts
looks like it says Sugino AT on it, and looks from the back like it should be a half-step triple crankset which seems to be the case for the make/model but a quick image search didn't turn up a version this shiny.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#5
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1176 Post(s)
Liked 2,572 Times
in
1,074 Posts
Correct, they were sold anodized. On this one, someone has stripped the ano and polished it.
I bet the bike had not been ridden at all when this pic was taken, and as soon as they tried shifting it, they realized their mistake.
I bet the bike had not been ridden at all when this pic was taken, and as soon as they tried shifting it, they realized their mistake.
Likes For bulgie:
#6
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,036
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2239 Post(s)
Liked 3,434 Times
in
1,797 Posts
Wall-hanger?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
The Sugino AT is a really nice, versatile crank!
I've got one set up as a compact double, and this bike set up as a half-step-plus-granny...
The shift from the 46T middle ring down to the 26T does require a bit of care to not drop the chain entirely. I can't imagine that this is improved by skipping the middle ring entirely.
Steve in Peoria
I've got one set up as a compact double, and this bike set up as a half-step-plus-granny...
The shift from the 46T middle ring down to the 26T does require a bit of care to not drop the chain entirely. I can't imagine that this is improved by skipping the middle ring entirely.
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,062
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4406 Post(s)
Liked 1,560 Times
in
1,023 Posts
Maybe the mounting points for the missing center ring act as pins to lift the chain?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times
in
1,580 Posts
This is what the back of the right crank looks like...
Steve in Peoria
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times
in
48 Posts
That looks OK to me. Leave it on the big ring and only go to the small one when you meet a steep hill with a heavy load. Not for racing but maybe better for touring than fooling with a triple. Not every drive train has to be perfect to work perfectly well.
em
em
Likes For eddy m:
#11
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,625
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1668 Post(s)
Liked 1,820 Times
in
1,058 Posts
Classic 'wide step'. I saw TAs and Stronglight 99s set up that way back in the day. Yeah, didn't work great.
Likes For tcs:
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107
Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times
in
422 Posts
Seems like a big ring with its own pins might improve the whole exercise.
#13
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times
in
1,679 Posts
I've set up many bikes close to that. Certainly done 46-26 more than once. It requires a light hand shifting but learning how to ride your bike is an important skill that includes shifting!
Likes For 52telecaster:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times
in
48 Posts
em
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,265
Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,205 Times
in
701 Posts
Has the owner done a write up to offer a first person account? I remember someone here has a double Cyclotouriste with a big jump on his yellow Woodrup, but I don't recall who that is.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,479
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 966 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Just takes technique to do the shifts. This is where Friction Shifters Rule!
Kinda like down shifting in a 1957 Chevy Pickup...
Technique...
Kinda like down shifting in a 1957 Chevy Pickup...
Technique...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
Likes For zandoval:
#17
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times
in
1,679 Posts
I have no trouble shifting this.
#18
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,733
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,205 Posts
My Raleigh Gran Tour has an SR Apex 86BCD crankset with 48/28 rings. Pretty much any FD will friction shift it (once used it with a DA 7400 setup) but the Shimano CX70 is my shift-O-weapon of choice.
That is an interesting ring setup in the first post, however. Never thought of trying to workout the spacing using just the big ring and the granny. Some research is required!
That is an interesting ring setup in the first post, however. Never thought of trying to workout the spacing using just the big ring and the granny. Some research is required!
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Likes For rccardr:
#19
Junior Member
My touring double is a 46-26. It's fine going 46 to 26 but is prone to shedding the chain outside the 46 on upshifts if there is any chain tension. Shifts with weight have to be very well timed. I've another bike with 48-36-24. On balance I find the triple better with middle ring most of the time and shifts that are more resilient, but it may just be that I need more practice.
Likes For esasjl:
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107
Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times
in
422 Posts
I'm thinking there's a size range for the 74 bcd ring. The tooth radius needs to be smaller than the 110 bcd spider arms so the chain cant get trapped between the new wider out of spec ring spacing. I'm going to guess 30t would be the largest granny ring useable. Other wrinkle would be a 130/74 bcd triple with the same grannie ring on spacers set up. The ones I've seen have a shelf for the inner chainring, so some modification might be necessary.
Likes For bark_eater:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
Looks like it was supposed to be a triple and someone took the middle ring out and left the big ring on the outside. THere likely also should have been spacers under the granny ring if there were three rings, but removing the spacers might have put the two remaining rings close enough that it might almost shift as it is.
Likes For ClydeClydeson:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manhattan & Woodstock NY
Posts: 2,748
Bikes: 1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, early '70s Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Raleigh International, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mk1
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 938 Post(s)
Liked 2,940 Times
in
981 Posts
Maybe not so much these days...
__________________
1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, 197? Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1971 Raleigh International, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mark I
Curator/Team Mechanic: 2016 Dawes Streetfighter, 1984 Lotus Eclair, 1975 Motobecane Jubile Mixte, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1973 Free Spirit Ted Williams, 1972 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Philips Sport
1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, 197? Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1971 Raleigh International, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mark I
Curator/Team Mechanic: 2016 Dawes Streetfighter, 1984 Lotus Eclair, 1975 Motobecane Jubile Mixte, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1973 Free Spirit Ted Williams, 1972 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Philips Sport
Likes For ascherer:
#23
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1176 Post(s)
Liked 2,572 Times
in
1,074 Posts
I have no problem with the large difference in size between the two rings, what I'm complaining about is the chain gouging up the chainring bolts and the shelf for the missing middle ring. The "correct" way to do this is by putting the big ring in the middle position, leaving the outer position vacant. Or you can mount a pants guard / bash guard where the big ring is supposed to go. I put "correct" in scare-quotes because it's still not fully optimized IMHO, it has all the extra spindle length and Q-factor of a triple.
Yes I know not everyone minds a wide Q, some prefer it, I'm just talking about what I consider inelegant engineering. And nobody should care what I think! When it's your bike, you set it up however you like. Me, if I wanted a compact-double, I'd use a crank made to be that way, like a Stronglight 99, TA Cyclotouriste, many others.
On the other hand, "off-label" uses of parts, for other than how they were intended, often shows creativity and can even work better than the factory spec. I'm all for it,,, sometimes.
Mark B
Yes I know not everyone minds a wide Q, some prefer it, I'm just talking about what I consider inelegant engineering. And nobody should care what I think! When it's your bike, you set it up however you like. Me, if I wanted a compact-double, I'd use a crank made to be that way, like a Stronglight 99, TA Cyclotouriste, many others.
On the other hand, "off-label" uses of parts, for other than how they were intended, often shows creativity and can even work better than the factory spec. I'm all for it,,, sometimes.
Mark B
Likes For bulgie:
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,062
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4406 Post(s)
Liked 1,560 Times
in
1,023 Posts
taking a closer look at the photos, I'm thinking that the owner might have used much thinner spacers to mount the small ring (there aren't any bosses for the small ring on the Sugino AT). Maybe even eliminated the spacers entirely??
This is what the back of the right crank looks like...
Steve in Peoria
This is what the back of the right crank looks like...
Steve in Peoria
I was looking at the '80s Campy Athena catalog the other day and was surprised to see that the front derailleur capacity was 18t chainring differential. So big jumps were built into even racing gear back then, so it isn't so surprising that the ARX double being used is handling the 20t jump.
#25
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times
in
1,679 Posts
I have no problem with the large difference in size between the two rings, what I'm complaining about is the chain gouging up the chainring bolts and the shelf for the missing middle ring. The "correct" way to do this is by putting the big ring in the middle position, leaving the outer position vacant. Or you can mount a pants guard / bash guard where the big ring is supposed to go. I put "correct" in scare-quotes because it's still not fully optimized IMHO, it has all the extra spindle length and Q-factor of a triple.
Yes I know not everyone minds a wide Q, some prefer it, I'm just talking about what I consider inelegant engineering. And nobody should care what I think! When it's your bike, you set it up however you like. Me, if I wanted a compact-double, I'd use a crank made to be that way, like a Stronglight 99, TA Cyclotouriste, many others.
On the other hand, "off-label" uses of parts, for other than how they were intended, often shows creativity and can even work better than the factory spec. I'm all for it,,, sometimes.
Mark B
Yes I know not everyone minds a wide Q, some prefer it, I'm just talking about what I consider inelegant engineering. And nobody should care what I think! When it's your bike, you set it up however you like. Me, if I wanted a compact-double, I'd use a crank made to be that way, like a Stronglight 99, TA Cyclotouriste, many others.
On the other hand, "off-label" uses of parts, for other than how they were intended, often shows creativity and can even work better than the factory spec. I'm all for it,,, sometimes.
Mark B