Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Never seen this crank set up before. What the? How the?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Never seen this crank set up before. What the? How the?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-23, 05:54 PM
  #1  
bark_eater 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107

Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times in 422 Posts
Never seen this crank set up before. What the? How the?










https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8vszg5mg8...OiwuirCNa?dl=0
bark_eater is offline  
Old 03-01-23, 06:11 PM
  #2  
WGB 
WGB
 
WGB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 2,917

Bikes: Panasonic PT-4500

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1800 Post(s)
Liked 2,334 Times in 1,378 Posts
Perhaps it doesn't shift to the small ring (or if it does it isn't expected to go back)?

Just don't see it as viable
WGB is offline  
Old 03-01-23, 06:16 PM
  #3  
jdawginsc 
Edumacator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,807

Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2439 Post(s)
Liked 3,127 Times in 1,967 Posts
Note the workmanlike day the Arx goes about in shifting that...it scoffs at a mere 25 tooth shift.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super












jdawginsc is offline  
Likes For jdawginsc:
Old 03-01-23, 10:43 PM
  #4  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,024 Times in 723 Posts
looks like it says Sugino AT on it, and looks from the back like it should be a half-step triple crankset which seems to be the case for the make/model but a quick image search didn't turn up a version this shiny.
Russ Roth is offline  
Likes For Russ Roth:
Old 03-02-23, 12:17 AM
  #5  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1176 Post(s)
Liked 2,572 Times in 1,074 Posts
Originally Posted by Russ Roth
image search didn't turn up a version this shiny.
Correct, they were sold anodized. On this one, someone has stripped the ano and polished it.

I bet the bike had not been ridden at all when this pic was taken, and as soon as they tried shifting it, they realized their mistake.
bulgie is online now  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 03-02-23, 04:45 AM
  #6  
Polaris OBark
ignominious poltroon
 
Polaris OBark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,036
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2239 Post(s)
Liked 3,434 Times in 1,797 Posts
Wall-hanger?
Polaris OBark is offline  
Old 03-02-23, 06:52 AM
  #7  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times in 1,580 Posts
The Sugino AT is a really nice, versatile crank!
I've got one set up as a compact double, and this bike set up as a half-step-plus-granny...



The shift from the 46T middle ring down to the 26T does require a bit of care to not drop the chain entirely. I can't imagine that this is improved by skipping the middle ring entirely.


Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Likes For steelbikeguy:
Old 03-02-23, 08:23 AM
  #8  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,062
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4406 Post(s)
Liked 1,560 Times in 1,023 Posts
Maybe the mounting points for the missing center ring act as pins to lift the chain?
Kontact is offline  
Likes For Kontact:
Old 03-02-23, 08:51 AM
  #9  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,476
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,375 Times in 1,580 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact
Maybe the mounting points for the missing center ring act as pins to lift the chain?
taking a closer look at the photos, I'm thinking that the owner might have used much thinner spacers to mount the small ring (there aren't any bosses for the small ring on the Sugino AT). Maybe even eliminated the spacers entirely??
This is what the back of the right crank looks like...




Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Likes For steelbikeguy:
Old 03-02-23, 08:58 AM
  #10  
eddy m
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times in 48 Posts
That looks OK to me. Leave it on the big ring and only go to the small one when you meet a steep hill with a heavy load. Not for racing but maybe better for touring than fooling with a triple. Not every drive train has to be perfect to work perfectly well.

em
eddy m is offline  
Old 03-02-23, 08:59 AM
  #11  
tcs
Palmer
 
tcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,625

Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl

Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1668 Post(s)
Liked 1,820 Times in 1,058 Posts
Classic 'wide step'. I saw TAs and Stronglight 99s set up that way back in the day. Yeah, didn't work great.
tcs is offline  
Likes For tcs:
Old 03-02-23, 09:59 AM
  #12  
bark_eater 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107

Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times in 422 Posts
Seems like a big ring with its own pins might improve the whole exercise.
bark_eater is offline  
Old 03-02-23, 09:59 AM
  #13  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
I've set up many bikes close to that. Certainly done 46-26 more than once. It requires a light hand shifting but learning how to ride your bike is an important skill that includes shifting!
52telecaster is offline  
Old 03-02-23, 11:45 AM
  #14  
eddy m
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by bark_eater
Seems like a big ring with its own pins might improve the whole exercise.
Trying to make something like shift reliably is a fool's mission. Leave it as it is or better yet ditch the front derailer, ride it like a 1X and just get off the bike to change the front ring. If you want more small ring than that you're gonna need a more modern set up.

em
eddy m is offline  
Old 03-02-23, 12:19 PM
  #15  
noobinsf 
Senior Member
 
noobinsf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,265

Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,205 Times in 701 Posts
Has the owner done a write up to offer a first person account? I remember someone here has a double Cyclotouriste with a big jump on his yellow Woodrup, but I don't recall who that is.
noobinsf is offline  
Old 03-02-23, 12:21 PM
  #16  
zandoval 
Senior Member
 
zandoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,479

Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 966 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times in 1,045 Posts
Just takes technique to do the shifts. This is where Friction Shifters Rule!

Kinda like down shifting in a 1957 Chevy Pickup...

Technique...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
zandoval is offline  
Likes For zandoval:
Old 03-02-23, 12:23 PM
  #17  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts

I have no trouble shifting this.
52telecaster is offline  
Likes For 52telecaster:
Old 03-02-23, 12:40 PM
  #18  
rccardr 
aka: Dr. Cannondale
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,733
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times in 1,205 Posts
My Raleigh Gran Tour has an SR Apex 86BCD crankset with 48/28 rings. Pretty much any FD will friction shift it (once used it with a DA 7400 setup) but the Shimano CX70 is my shift-O-weapon of choice.

That is an interesting ring setup in the first post, however. Never thought of trying to workout the spacing using just the big ring and the granny. Some research is required!
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is offline  
Likes For rccardr:
Old 03-02-23, 12:53 PM
  #19  
esasjl
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 122

Bikes: '84 Chas Roberts, '91 Peugeot Galibier, '94 Gitane Leader, '51 Dayton Elite, '90 Verago ATB, '08 Dawes Sardar

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times in 62 Posts
My touring double is a 46-26. It's fine going 46 to 26 but is prone to shedding the chain outside the 46 on upshifts if there is any chain tension. Shifts with weight have to be very well timed. I've another bike with 48-36-24. On balance I find the triple better with middle ring most of the time and shifts that are more resilient, but it may just be that I need more practice.
esasjl is offline  
Likes For esasjl:
Old 03-02-23, 02:17 PM
  #20  
bark_eater 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107

Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times in 422 Posts
Originally Posted by rccardr

That is an interesting ring setup in the first post, however. Never thought of trying to workout the spacing using just the big ring and the granny. Some research is required!
I'm thinking there's a size range for the 74 bcd ring. The tooth radius needs to be smaller than the 110 bcd spider arms so the chain cant get trapped between the new wider out of spec ring spacing. I'm going to guess 30t would be the largest granny ring useable. Other wrinkle would be a 130/74 bcd triple with the same grannie ring on spacers set up. The ones I've seen have a shelf for the inner chainring, so some modification might be necessary.
bark_eater is offline  
Likes For bark_eater:
Old 03-02-23, 03:28 PM
  #21  
ClydeClydeson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times in 518 Posts
Looks like it was supposed to be a triple and someone took the middle ring out and left the big ring on the outside. THere likely also should have been spacers under the granny ring if there were three rings, but removing the spacers might have put the two remaining rings close enough that it might almost shift as it is.
ClydeClydeson is offline  
Likes For ClydeClydeson:
Old 03-02-23, 03:57 PM
  #22  
ascherer 
Senior Member
 
ascherer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manhattan & Woodstock NY
Posts: 2,748

Bikes: 1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, early '70s Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Raleigh International, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mk1

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 938 Post(s)
Liked 2,940 Times in 981 Posts
Originally Posted by 52telecaster
I've set up many bikes close to that. Certainly done 46-26 more than once. It requires a light hand shifting but learning how to ride your bike is an important skill that includes shifting!
Maybe not so much these days...
__________________
1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, 197? Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1971 Raleigh International, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mark I
Curator/Team Mechanic: 2016 Dawes Streetfighter, 1984 Lotus Eclair, 1975 Motobecane Jubile Mixte, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1973 Free Spirit Ted Williams, 1972 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Philips Sport





ascherer is offline  
Likes For ascherer:
Old 03-02-23, 05:18 PM
  #23  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1176 Post(s)
Liked 2,572 Times in 1,074 Posts
I have no problem with the large difference in size between the two rings, what I'm complaining about is the chain gouging up the chainring bolts and the shelf for the missing middle ring. The "correct" way to do this is by putting the big ring in the middle position, leaving the outer position vacant. Or you can mount a pants guard / bash guard where the big ring is supposed to go. I put "correct" in scare-quotes because it's still not fully optimized IMHO, it has all the extra spindle length and Q-factor of a triple.

Yes I know not everyone minds a wide Q, some prefer it, I'm just talking about what I consider inelegant engineering. And nobody should care what I think! When it's your bike, you set it up however you like. Me, if I wanted a compact-double, I'd use a crank made to be that way, like a Stronglight 99, TA Cyclotouriste, many others.

On the other hand, "off-label" uses of parts, for other than how they were intended, often shows creativity and can even work better than the factory spec. I'm all for it,,, sometimes.

Mark B
bulgie is online now  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 03-02-23, 08:20 PM
  #24  
Kontact 
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,062
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4406 Post(s)
Liked 1,560 Times in 1,023 Posts
Originally Posted by steelbikeguy
taking a closer look at the photos, I'm thinking that the owner might have used much thinner spacers to mount the small ring (there aren't any bosses for the small ring on the Sugino AT). Maybe even eliminated the spacers entirely??
This is what the back of the right crank looks like...




Steve in Peoria
If the troughs of the small ring are larger in diameter than shoulder of the middle ring position, he might not have needed any spacers. Then the small chainring would only be off by 3.7mm.

I was looking at the '80s Campy Athena catalog the other day and was surprised to see that the front derailleur capacity was 18t chainring differential. So big jumps were built into even racing gear back then, so it isn't so surprising that the ARX double being used is handling the 20t jump.
Kontact is offline  
Old 03-03-23, 04:16 AM
  #25  
52telecaster
ambulatory senior
 
52telecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998

Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times in 1,679 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
I have no problem with the large difference in size between the two rings, what I'm complaining about is the chain gouging up the chainring bolts and the shelf for the missing middle ring. The "correct" way to do this is by putting the big ring in the middle position, leaving the outer position vacant. Or you can mount a pants guard / bash guard where the big ring is supposed to go. I put "correct" in scare-quotes because it's still not fully optimized IMHO, it has all the extra spindle length and Q-factor of a triple.

Yes I know not everyone minds a wide Q, some prefer it, I'm just talking about what I consider inelegant engineering. And nobody should care what I think! When it's your bike, you set it up however you like. Me, if I wanted a compact-double, I'd use a crank made to be that way, like a Stronglight 99, TA Cyclotouriste, many others.

On the other hand, "off-label" uses of parts, for other than how they were intended, often shows creativity and can even work better than the factory spec. I'm all for it,,, sometimes.

Mark B
It took me a day to figure out what you were talking about. Now it looks crazy but it might work if the aforementioned spacers were left out. Even then I would think you'd be snagging on the spider on the up shift.
52telecaster is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.