Comparing two bikes - slower bike wins!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 536
Bikes: Trek FX 7.3, Orbea Terra, Aostimotor S17 ebike, Huffy RedRock (first bike)
Liked 478 Times
in
204 Posts
Comparing two bikes - slower bike wins!
Just completed a 30 mile shakedown run on Orbea Terra. Cyclocross bike with wide Gatorskins. 46/36 chainrings, 11-26 cassette, about 22 lb. 3 weeks ago I had the same route done on Roubaix, same weight, 50/34 chainrings, 11-32 cassette, skinny gp5000. Yet Orbea averaged faster mph. Also, I anticipated walking most of the climbs, and upgrading cassette, yet I managed to completely finish them with less fatigue and out-of-breathness. How could you explain this? I don't think I'd change anything on this drivetrain at this point.
Also, in the event I decide to upgrade, did anyone try running a 11-32 cassette on 105? It does say 30t on rear derailleur cage...
Some data:
Distance - Avg Speed - Duration - Weather
1- 29.71 miles - 13.3 mph - 2:13:39 - no wind
2- 29.83 miles - 13.5 mph - 2:12:40 - medium wind
4- 30.07 miles - 13.6 mph - 2:12.46 - no wind
Upgraded drivetrain: Sram Rival 2x10, 50/34 11-34
5. 29.95 miles - 13.2 mph - 2:16:30 - moderate wind
Also, in the event I decide to upgrade, did anyone try running a 11-32 cassette on 105? It does say 30t on rear derailleur cage...
Some data:
Distance - Avg Speed - Duration - Weather
1- 29.71 miles - 13.3 mph - 2:13:39 - no wind
2- 29.83 miles - 13.5 mph - 2:12:40 - medium wind
3 week break
3- 29.91 miles - 13.4 mph - 2:13.59 - moderate wind4- 30.07 miles - 13.6 mph - 2:12.46 - no wind
Upgraded drivetrain: Sram Rival 2x10, 50/34 11-34
5. 29.95 miles - 13.2 mph - 2:16:30 - moderate wind
Last edited by XxHaimBondxX; 09-07-24 at 07:45 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 6,006
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Liked 2,277 Times
in
1,393 Posts
Different days, different results. Plus there is an interesting phenomenon that sometimes occurs where can is greater than want.
I imagine most people have experienced a climb where they are in the wrong gear and realize it at the top, but they don’t feel any more worn out. Can’t say if it is adrenaline, a strong day, or didn’t mentally succumb to too low a gear.
I do know too low a gear can cause someone to turn the cranks a lot more and just wear out going nowhere. Sometimes the faster you go up, the less you actually work.
John
I imagine most people have experienced a climb where they are in the wrong gear and realize it at the top, but they don’t feel any more worn out. Can’t say if it is adrenaline, a strong day, or didn’t mentally succumb to too low a gear.
I do know too low a gear can cause someone to turn the cranks a lot more and just wear out going nowhere. Sometimes the faster you go up, the less you actually work.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#3
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,964
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Liked 6,629 Times
in
3,350 Posts
Placebo effect disguised in a new ride?
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hollister, CA (not the surf town)
Posts: 1,777
Bikes: 2019 Specialized Roubaix Comp Di2, 2009 Roubaix, early 90's Giant Iguana
Liked 1,655 Times
in
583 Posts
Are you sure you don't have 46-30 chainrings? And did you change out the cassette? Seems like any 2x gravel bike would have at least a 32 cog if not larger. I guess if you're not riding hills steep enough to need them it doesn't matter but seems like odd-gearing.
As far as being faster, I would guess fatter tires, which can be faster on many road surfaces.
As far as being faster, I would guess fatter tires, which can be faster on many road surfaces.
Likes For Ogsarg:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 536
Bikes: Trek FX 7.3, Orbea Terra, Aostimotor S17 ebike, Huffy RedRock (first bike)
Liked 478 Times
in
204 Posts
Are you sure you don't have 46-30 chainrings? And did you change out the cassette? Seems like any 2x gravel bike would have at least a 32 cog if not larger. I guess if you're not riding hills steep enough to need them it doesn't matter but seems like odd-gearing.
As far as being faster, I would guess fatter tires, which can be faster on many road surfaces.
As far as being faster, I would guess fatter tires, which can be faster on many road surfaces.
#6
Just completed a 30 mile shakedown run on Orbea Terra. Cyclocross bike with wide Gatorskins. 46/36 chainrings, 11-26 cassette, about 22 lb. 3 weeks ago I had the same route done on Roubaix, same weight, 50/34 chainrings, 11-32 cassette, skinny gp5000. Yet Orbea averaged faster mph. Also, I anticipated walking most of the climbs, and upgrading cassette, yet I managed to completely finish them with less fatigue and out-of-breathness. How could you explain this? I don't think I'd change anything on this drivetrain at this point.
Also, in the event I decide to upgrade, did anyone try running a 11-32 cassette on 105? It does say 30t on rear derailleur cage...
Also, in the event I decide to upgrade, did anyone try running a 11-32 cassette on 105? It does say 30t on rear derailleur cage...
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 536
Bikes: Trek FX 7.3, Orbea Terra, Aostimotor S17 ebike, Huffy RedRock (first bike)
Liked 478 Times
in
204 Posts
It's only marginal 1 mph faster, however, I am more impressed with the climb difference. On paper those ratios should've been impossible for me.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 536
Bikes: Trek FX 7.3, Orbea Terra, Aostimotor S17 ebike, Huffy RedRock (first bike)
Liked 478 Times
in
204 Posts
So crankset is fsa 110mm bcd, apparently the lowest tooth count is 33. Is it worth upgrading to 33t from 36 vs 11-30 cassette. I'm not a wiz in ratios wizardry so if anyone could chime in which gives you the best bang I would appreciate it.
#9
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,055
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,077 Times
in
4,481 Posts
I rode the same route I rode 28 says ago, with the same bike, yet I was slower today.
How do you explain this? Shouldn't I be the same speed since it's the same course and same bike?
^ for those here that can't pick up on context, the above questions are rhetorical. I know why I was slower today and I asked those questions to help show the OP there are factors beyond what is cited that impact average speed on a ride.
How do you explain this? Shouldn't I be the same speed since it's the same course and same bike?
^ for those here that can't pick up on context, the above questions are rhetorical. I know why I was slower today and I asked those questions to help show the OP there are factors beyond what is cited that impact average speed on a ride.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 536
Bikes: Trek FX 7.3, Orbea Terra, Aostimotor S17 ebike, Huffy RedRock (first bike)
Liked 478 Times
in
204 Posts
I think most are missing the point. Obviously average speed varies due to various conditions. However, hills remain constant and they seemed easier with more difficult gear ratio. I doubt I became Superman in 3 weeks. The only other variable I can think of is the Brooks c17 saddle I was riding today, which much more comfortable than stock Specialized saddle.
#11
Senior Member
I rode the same route I rode 28 says ago, with the same bike, yet I was slower today.
How do you explain this? Shouldn't I be the same speed since it's the same course and same bike?
^ for those here that can't pick up on context, the above questions are rhetorical. I know why I was slower today and I asked those questions to help show the OP there are factors beyond what is cited that impact average speed on a ride.
How do you explain this? Shouldn't I be the same speed since it's the same course and same bike?
^ for those here that can't pick up on context, the above questions are rhetorical. I know why I was slower today and I asked those questions to help show the OP there are factors beyond what is cited that impact average speed on a ride.
#12
Senior Member
I think most are missing the point. Obviously average speed varies due to various conditions. However, hills remain constant and they seemed easier with more difficult gear ratio. I doubt I became Superman in 3 weeks. The only other variable I can think of is the Brooks c17 saddle I was riding today, which much more comfortable than stock Specialized saddle.
Even your thread title is a bit goofy, since there is no such thing as a "slow" bike. They are inanimate objects, neither innately slow or fast.
Likes For Koyote:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,933 Times
in
2,053 Posts
Which specific year and model do you have, and are you using the stock chain rings?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Tucson Az
Posts: 1,778
Bikes: 2015 Ridley Fenix, 1983 Team Fuji, 2019 Marin Nail Trail 6
Liked 351 Times
in
198 Posts
I looked through the Orbea website (the website sucks so hard I would never buy one of their bikes ... ) and I do not see a 46-36 chain set on offer. I might have missed it ... but if you didn't swap out the chain rings, you likely have a 46-30 and this would explain the climbing prowess.
Which specific year and model do you have, and are you using the stock chain rings?
Which specific year and model do you have, and are you using the stock chain rings?
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 536
Bikes: Trek FX 7.3, Orbea Terra, Aostimotor S17 ebike, Huffy RedRock (first bike)
Liked 478 Times
in
204 Posts
I looked through the Orbea website (the website sucks so hard I would never buy one of their bikes ... ) and I do not see a 46-36 chain set on offer. I might have missed it ... but if you didn't swap out the chain rings, you likely have a 46-30 and this would explain the climbing prowess.
Which specific year and model do you have, and are you using the stock chain rings?
Which specific year and model do you have, and are you using the stock chain rings?
#16
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 17,055
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Liked 8,077 Times
in
4,481 Posts
I looked through the Orbea website (the website sucks so hard I would never buy one of their bikes ... ) and I do not see a 46-36 chain set on offer. I might have missed it ... but if you didn't swap out the chain rings, you likely have a 46-30 and this would explain the climbing prowess.
Which specific year and model do you have, and are you using the stock chain rings?
Which specific year and model do you have, and are you using the stock chain rings?
My first gravel crank was a stock Shimano 46/36 that I turned into a 46/34. It eventually became a compact double 50/34 for a road bike, but regardless- it the stock setup was a common and relatively popular combination for CX at a point in time.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#17
I think most are missing the point. Obviously average speed varies due to various conditions. However, hills remain constant and they seemed easier with more difficult gear ratio. I doubt I became Superman in 3 weeks. The only other variable I can think of is the Brooks c17 saddle I was riding today, which much more comfortable than stock Specialized saddle.
Likes For PeteHski:
#18
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,671
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Liked 4,569 Times
in
3,060 Posts
It is hard to get a useful scientific data without using scientific methods. In this case it is hard to control the weather and your body on different days. Now if you did the same tests over and over so you had a swath of maybe 10 per bike same route with the same power (so you would need identical power measuring tools for both bikes) then you could take an average and have better data.
I can step on a scale on day and be a 1 or 2 heavier or lighter and come back a day or two or more later and vice versa.
Though I will say a more comfortable bike for you will generally be faster up to certain points obviously a more aerodynamic road bike will be faster than a big clunky upright cruiser.
I can step on a scale on day and be a 1 or 2 heavier or lighter and come back a day or two or more later and vice versa.
Though I will say a more comfortable bike for you will generally be faster up to certain points obviously a more aerodynamic road bike will be faster than a big clunky upright cruiser.
Likes For veganbikes:
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 536
Bikes: Trek FX 7.3, Orbea Terra, Aostimotor S17 ebike, Huffy RedRock (first bike)
Liked 478 Times
in
204 Posts
It is hard to get a useful scientific data without using scientific methods. In this case it is hard to control the weather and your body on different days. Now if you did the same tests over and over so you had a swath of maybe 10 per bike same route with the same power (so you would need identical power measuring tools for both bikes) then you could take an average and have better data.
I can step on a scale on day and be a 1 or 2 heavier or lighter and come back a day or two or more later and vice versa.
Though I will say a more comfortable bike for you will generally be faster up to certain points obviously a more aerodynamic road bike will be faster than a big clunky upright cruiser.
I can step on a scale on day and be a 1 or 2 heavier or lighter and come back a day or two or more later and vice versa.
Though I will say a more comfortable bike for you will generally be faster up to certain points obviously a more aerodynamic road bike will be faster than a big clunky upright cruiser.
#21
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,671
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Liked 4,569 Times
in
3,060 Posts
It will help if you want more scientific data but really unless you are Team Ineos or a similar team after marginal gains don't worry about it. Ride the bike that is most comfortable for you and enjoy the ride. A second or two here or there on a ride is not really anything unless you are racing.
Likes For veganbikes:
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 536
Bikes: Trek FX 7.3, Orbea Terra, Aostimotor S17 ebike, Huffy RedRock (first bike)
Liked 478 Times
in
204 Posts
It will help if you want more scientific data but really unless you are Team Ineos or a similar team after marginal gains don't worry about it. Ride the bike that is most comfortable for you and enjoy the ride. A second or two here or there on a ride is not really anything unless you are racing.
#23
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,671
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Liked 4,569 Times
in
3,060 Posts
Weird could be a whole lotta things but glad it is fine. Though you shouldn't have to unwrap for minor shifter adjustments like that usually it is just canted inward and needs to be adjusted there.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,933 Times
in
2,053 Posts
Interesting about your gearing, thanks for clarifying .... as for why you climbed better on that day ... everything is weird so i don't know. I assume sometimes weird stuff doesn't happen, but usually it does. Glad you like the bike.
Likes For Maelochs:
#25
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 4,144
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse x2, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata 3
Liked 1,702 Times
in
1,169 Posts
I have read that 33T chain rings are marginal on 110 BCD cranks; 34T seems safer. There does not appear to be a 10-speed 11-30 cassette.
Likes For SoSmellyAir: