Wide v narrow bars with 42 mm and low trail?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Wide v narrow bars with 42 mm and low trail?
I have two low-trail bikes. One is a Terraferma build for long rides and randos, 36 mm trail for 42 mm 650b, and the other is a 1984 Trek 610 with a custom fork giving a 35 mm offset, now using 700x30 mm tires. Arguably that is too much trail, but I like it. The Terra has 44 cm wide VO rando-style bars, and the Trek has 39 cm wide old Ambrosio bars, good old standard road bars - kind of a smaller version of the old Cinelli Model 66. It's pretty comfortable bar, thought better would be a more modern flat-top compact bar, like I have on my Mondonico.
I need to shorten the reach on the Terra, to pull the hoods toward me by about 3 cm. As I ride it, my hands tend to drift that far away from the hoods, so I think the existing reach is too far. I'm tempted to put a narrow compact on it, but ... does a rando-style geometry prefer a wider or narrower bar? I have had a Berthoud bag on the front of the Terra, but it doesn't seem to need the extra leverage of a wide bar. The stability of the bike (tracking straight, holding a curve line, freedom from shimmy) are pretty good, and same for that of the trailed-out Trek 610 with its narrower bars.
I notice older long-distance road bikes, like my 1952 Rudge Aero Special (clone of the Super Lenton so some serious long road time-trialing cred) seem to have been supplied with pretty narrow 38 or 39 cm bars, despite 32 mm tires and trail in the upper 30's and lower 40's. At that time Raleigh had been designing very similar Club-style bikes for long group and solo outings, with presumably similar bars since before WW2.
I need to shorten the reach on the Terra, to pull the hoods toward me by about 3 cm. As I ride it, my hands tend to drift that far away from the hoods, so I think the existing reach is too far. I'm tempted to put a narrow compact on it, but ... does a rando-style geometry prefer a wider or narrower bar? I have had a Berthoud bag on the front of the Terra, but it doesn't seem to need the extra leverage of a wide bar. The stability of the bike (tracking straight, holding a curve line, freedom from shimmy) are pretty good, and same for that of the trailed-out Trek 610 with its narrower bars.
I notice older long-distance road bikes, like my 1952 Rudge Aero Special (clone of the Super Lenton so some serious long road time-trialing cred) seem to have been supplied with pretty narrow 38 or 39 cm bars, despite 32 mm tires and trail in the upper 30's and lower 40's. At that time Raleigh had been designing very similar Club-style bikes for long group and solo outings, with presumably similar bars since before WW2.
#2
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,329
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,837 Times
in
2,230 Posts
To make a short answer of a long question.
I think handlebar width - whether road racer, rando, tourer, etc - is a personal preference. (assuming your bags and electronics fit)
I think handlebar shape for long distance riders can be important. Some very new handlebars allow support for wrists and lower forearms, not sure if they are proprietary designs on new bikes. The UCI's rule on prohibited positions in the Pro peloton is what brought 2 new style handlebars to my attention - I have not seen them in use.
I did a 'short and shallow' handlebar swap that improved the ride on one bike. And I went narrower.
And a new build will feature very narrow bars with a flared drop position.
I think handlebar width - whether road racer, rando, tourer, etc - is a personal preference. (assuming your bags and electronics fit)
I think handlebar shape for long distance riders can be important. Some very new handlebars allow support for wrists and lower forearms, not sure if they are proprietary designs on new bikes. The UCI's rule on prohibited positions in the Pro peloton is what brought 2 new style handlebars to my attention - I have not seen them in use.
I did a 'short and shallow' handlebar swap that improved the ride on one bike. And I went narrower.
And a new build will feature very narrow bars with a flared drop position.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 06-01-22 at 09:53 PM.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,707
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,013 Times
in
1,112 Posts
One thing to consider: Will narrower bars provide room for your hands and a Berthoud bag?
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Likes For Classtime:
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
The other target is either for my Trek 610 which has pretty low trail due to a custom fork, or for my Trek 720 which is nominally a tourer, but is really just going to be (I hope) a comfy long wheelbase cruiser.
I do want a shorter-reach bar for the Terraferma but it does not need to be narrower. I would't complain if I can find a flat top compact in the same wide width.
#5
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts
For your style of riding I can't really say. However I've been use to 38cm wide drops all my cycling life. My previous '91 Paramount re-build I put 42cm bars on and didn't really like them but lived with it for almost 4 years till I got a new bike. My new bike it had 42cm bars too and I still didn't like them. The issue mostly seemed to be that it had me braced too steady. So the natural swaying side to side was absorbed by my arms/shoulders alone. Going back to 38cm bars in combination with a 30mm shorter stem turned out to be the best thing I have so far done for my fit on my new bike. And that bike is the smaller of the split between the two sizes I fell between on the mfr's sizing.
YMMV!
YMMV!
Last edited by Iride01; 06-16-22 at 10:57 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
For your style of riding I can't really say. However I've been use to 38cm wide drops all my cycling life. My previous '91 Paramount re-build I put 42cm bars on and didn't really like them but lived with it for almost 4 years till I got a new bike. My new bike it had 42cm bars too and I still didn't like them. The issue mostly seemed to be that it had me braced too steady. So the natural swaying side to side was absorbed by my arms/shoulders alone. Going back to 38cm bars in combination with a 30mm shorter stem turned out to be the best thing I have so far done for my fit on my new bike. And that bike is the smaller of the split between the two sizes I fell between on the mfr's sizing.
YMMV!
YMMV!
So my Mondonico from 2005 has had its saddle, stem, and bars positioned adjusted per Lemond/Guimard, and my 1952 Rudge is being set up per LeMond, and it will wear its original 38 cm GB "Sylvan Maes" bars it was built with, and my Terraferma has a set of 3t compact and ergonomic bars at 39 cm waiting for it in the Bike Queue, which is in turn waiting for the Broken Lamp, Drippy Toilet Tank, and Squeaky Door Queues. Forgot - the Garage Door Opener and Screen Door Latch Queues as well!
Likes For Road Fan: