Strava power data
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
It's a matter of perspective and expectations, I think.
You're right that it doesn't have any value when it comes to actively training. But when it comes to tracking progress of someone new or newly-invested in cycling? I think that the window of error is too wide to put any stock in "analysis" of shorter efforts or even single rides, but, in aggregate and paired with RPE, it may be all that they want or need - some kind of affirmation that they're trending in the right direction.
.
You're right that it doesn't have any value when it comes to actively training. But when it comes to tracking progress of someone new or newly-invested in cycling? I think that the window of error is too wide to put any stock in "analysis" of shorter efforts or even single rides, but, in aggregate and paired with RPE, it may be all that they want or need - some kind of affirmation that they're trending in the right direction.
.
That's what is actually real and what actually matters. And seeing as how Strava is estimating that wattage based solely on that speed, why resort to estimations instead of the actual thing?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
It's definitely a coarse tool and probably not that much better than a stopwatch on a given course but, in theory, I guess it would be the flexibility to change routes and even out things like forced stops/slowdowns that can impact average/moving speed.
#28
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,636
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4733 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
Hey, one thing I was peripherally aware of that Strava added at some point early this year but not clear it's factored into calculated power, is wind direction and speeds, and/or how well this helped or is a non-factor.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I have a power meter and have observed that Strava’s power estimations are worthless. As someone else pointed out, it doesn’t know what the wind is like, whether you’re riding in a group, whether you’re sitting up or in the drops, what you’re wearing, etc.
#30
LR÷P=HR
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,180
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 867 Post(s)
Liked 1,205 Times
in
694 Posts
Strava power estimate
I was using a HRM and Strava to monitor estimated power numbers on my rides. The estimates showed my power as unacceptably low.
So I spent a bunch of money and installed a power meter on my bike. Now I know for sure that my power is unacceptably low.
The Strava/HRM numbers were plenty accurate for the price I paid for them.
Barry
So I spent a bunch of money and installed a power meter on my bike. Now I know for sure that my power is unacceptably low.
The Strava/HRM numbers were plenty accurate for the price I paid for them.
Barry
Likes For Barry2:
#31
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,420
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times
in
494 Posts
[Edited to add] You can buy faster wheels or frames in Zwift. I wish you could buy better tires and tubes.
Last edited by RChung; 12-28-20 at 12:46 PM.
#32
Junior Member
I love having a power meter, I look down at my watts way more than speed. It’s the only metric that is what it is no matter what. Not just for training too, I like looking at it when I’m up front especially with weaker riders I can gauge what they can stay on with.
I’ve had my power meter for almost a year now and understand it a lot better than when I first got it. I can’t see how you could create an algorithm that knows what’s going on during your ride, Drafting, wind, pavement, rolling resistance, etc etc imho it’s a stat I would not look at as an estimate. I also use my watch as a back up during rides if my bike computer battery is low and rarely is the power within 20 watts of my bike computer upload on strava. If you were riding flat with no wind and by yourself and all other variables entered were right, you might get a rough idea. Even in a group ride my average power can be 50 watts or more different then another rider if one of us stayed up front a lot more and also if a significant weight difference.
I’ve had my power meter for almost a year now and understand it a lot better than when I first got it. I can’t see how you could create an algorithm that knows what’s going on during your ride, Drafting, wind, pavement, rolling resistance, etc etc imho it’s a stat I would not look at as an estimate. I also use my watch as a back up during rides if my bike computer battery is low and rarely is the power within 20 watts of my bike computer upload on strava. If you were riding flat with no wind and by yourself and all other variables entered were right, you might get a rough idea. Even in a group ride my average power can be 50 watts or more different then another rider if one of us stayed up front a lot more and also if a significant weight difference.
Likes For Grouperdawg:
#33
Full Member
I would put it this way...and this is from experience with a Quarq power meter on my road bike and now a power meter on my Wahoo Kickr.
Power meters on road bikes themselves i have become less enamored with from a training perspective. Riding outside, unless doing a sustained climb, it almost impossible to really dial in a decent plan and stick to it. Traffic, wind, stop lights, and all sorts of aspects to the unpredictable nature of riding on the road makes training with power difficult. So they are really only useful (from my perspective) analyzing races, long climbs or on a trainer.
Which gets met to the Wahoo Kickr, which my cross bike sit on. Now, I can actually use power to train. I can dial in an intervals, lock in a power setting, (makes 20 minute tests really effective), and nothing gets in the way of my training plan with power.
If you are using Strava as a training tool, it is very rudimentary. And its power feature even more-so.
Power meters on road bikes themselves i have become less enamored with from a training perspective. Riding outside, unless doing a sustained climb, it almost impossible to really dial in a decent plan and stick to it. Traffic, wind, stop lights, and all sorts of aspects to the unpredictable nature of riding on the road makes training with power difficult. So they are really only useful (from my perspective) analyzing races, long climbs or on a trainer.
Which gets met to the Wahoo Kickr, which my cross bike sit on. Now, I can actually use power to train. I can dial in an intervals, lock in a power setting, (makes 20 minute tests really effective), and nothing gets in the way of my training plan with power.
If you are using Strava as a training tool, it is very rudimentary. And its power feature even more-so.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I would put it this way...and this is from experience with a Quarq power meter on my road bike and now a power meter on my Wahoo Kickr.
Power meters on road bikes themselves i have become less enamored with from a training perspective. Riding outside, unless doing a sustained climb, it almost impossible to really dial in a decent plan and stick to it. Traffic, wind, stop lights, and all sorts of aspects to the unpredictable nature of riding on the road makes training with power difficult.
Power meters on road bikes themselves i have become less enamored with from a training perspective. Riding outside, unless doing a sustained climb, it almost impossible to really dial in a decent plan and stick to it. Traffic, wind, stop lights, and all sorts of aspects to the unpredictable nature of riding on the road makes training with power difficult.
It's pretty easy to simply move beyond that, though, and focus on keeping constant pressure on the pedals the entire ride (which is a huge change for many).
Of course, I can understand traffic and lights, but that's where you have to choose routes. Not every ride is a workout, but those that are have to be appropriately planned. Just like with nutrition and freshness, routes with minimal stops have to be used if they are at all available.
Not sure how wind affects anything, though. Everything else you simply have to keep pedaling hard. Only using indoor training to utilize power is a massive waste, in my opinion. Unless you're looking to become a Zwift champion or something, performance happens outside.
Likes For rubiksoval:
#35
Full Member
It sounds like a power meter showed you how much coasting/soft pedaling you may typically do outside, which I believe is a huge boon and an area most riders can really make substantial and effective changes.
It's pretty easy to simply move beyond that, though, and focus on keeping constant pressure on the pedals the entire ride (which is a huge change for many).
Of course, I can understand traffic and lights, but that's where you have to choose routes. Not every ride is a workout, but those that are have to be appropriately planned. Just like with nutrition and freshness, routes with minimal stops have to be used if they are at all available.
Not sure how wind affects anything, though. Everything else you simply have to keep pedaling hard. Only using indoor training to utilize power is a massive waste, in my opinion. Unless you're looking to become a Zwift champion or something, performance happens outside.
It's pretty easy to simply move beyond that, though, and focus on keeping constant pressure on the pedals the entire ride (which is a huge change for many).
Of course, I can understand traffic and lights, but that's where you have to choose routes. Not every ride is a workout, but those that are have to be appropriately planned. Just like with nutrition and freshness, routes with minimal stops have to be used if they are at all available.
Not sure how wind affects anything, though. Everything else you simply have to keep pedaling hard. Only using indoor training to utilize power is a massive waste, in my opinion. Unless you're looking to become a Zwift champion or something, performance happens outside.
#36
Full Member
It sounds like a power meter showed you how much coasting/soft pedaling you may typically do outside, which I believe is a huge boon and an area most riders can really make substantial and effective changes.
It's pretty easy to simply move beyond that, though, and focus on keeping constant pressure on the pedals the entire ride (which is a huge change for many).
Of course, I can understand traffic and lights, but that's where you have to choose routes. Not every ride is a workout, but those that are have to be appropriately planned. Just like with nutrition and freshness, routes with minimal stops have to be used if they are at all available.
Not sure how wind affects anything, though. Everything else you simply have to keep pedaling hard. Only using indoor training to utilize power is a massive waste, in my opinion. Unless you're looking to become a Zwift champion or something, performance happens outside.
It's pretty easy to simply move beyond that, though, and focus on keeping constant pressure on the pedals the entire ride (which is a huge change for many).
Of course, I can understand traffic and lights, but that's where you have to choose routes. Not every ride is a workout, but those that are have to be appropriately planned. Just like with nutrition and freshness, routes with minimal stops have to be used if they are at all available.
Not sure how wind affects anything, though. Everything else you simply have to keep pedaling hard. Only using indoor training to utilize power is a massive waste, in my opinion. Unless you're looking to become a Zwift champion or something, performance happens outside.
I find the power meter while on the road best for post ride analysis or, occasionally to keep me either toned down or a signal to tone it up.
#37
Trying to keep up
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 2,137
Bikes: Pinarello Prince, Orbea Onix, Ridley Fenix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
79 Posts
It sounds like a power meter showed you how much coasting/soft pedaling you may typically do outside, which I believe is a huge boon and an area most riders can really make substantial and effective changes.
It's pretty easy to simply move beyond that, though, and focus on keeping constant pressure on the pedals the entire ride (which is a huge change for many).
Of course, I can understand traffic and lights, but that's where you have to choose routes. Not every ride is a workout, but those that are have to be appropriately planned. Just like with nutrition and freshness, routes with minimal stops have to be used if they are at all available.
Not sure how wind affects anything, though. Everything else you simply have to keep pedaling hard. Only using indoor training to utilize power is a massive waste, in my opinion. Unless you're looking to become a Zwift champion or something, performance happens outside.
It's pretty easy to simply move beyond that, though, and focus on keeping constant pressure on the pedals the entire ride (which is a huge change for many).
Of course, I can understand traffic and lights, but that's where you have to choose routes. Not every ride is a workout, but those that are have to be appropriately planned. Just like with nutrition and freshness, routes with minimal stops have to be used if they are at all available.
Not sure how wind affects anything, though. Everything else you simply have to keep pedaling hard. Only using indoor training to utilize power is a massive waste, in my opinion. Unless you're looking to become a Zwift champion or something, performance happens outside.
Oh, and strava data really doesn't match my pm.
Likes For ericcox:
#38
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,420
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times
in
494 Posts
I ride outside every day I can. But if doing a Zone 2 base period, on the trainer I maximize the training because on the road, it is tough to stay dialed in on one zone. [...] I find the power meter while on the road best for post ride analysis or, occasionally to keep me either toned down or a signal to tone it up.
People trained pretty effectively with just a HRM, and before that with just a speedometer, and before that with just a regular training route and a wristwatch. Training is one of the least demanding things you can do with a power meter. That's especially true if you're only using it for indoor riding -- that's why many training apps can use just a known trainer and a speed sensor.
[Edited to add] So, training is a relatively simple use for power, and training in a controlled environment is even simpler. Much of the semi-arcane stuff underlying the WKO-ecosystem is based on normalized power, not average power, because of the recognition that riding outdoors on real roads in real wind with other real riders is highly variable. NP was devised as a way to normalize or standardize a highly variable ride into something that could be compared to other rides. If all you're doing is riding for a targeted time in a targeted zone on an indoor trainer, I can see why you don't see much value in on-bike power. Nothing wrong with that. Some people prefer it, some have other needs.
Last edited by RChung; 12-29-20 at 05:28 PM.
Likes For RChung:
#39
Full Member
Different riders respond differently to different amounts of structured training. Coggan used to say his book is "Training and Racing *with* a power meter" not "Training and Racing *by* a power meter."
People trained pretty effectively with just a HRM, and before that with just a speedometer, and before that with just a regular training route and a wristwatch. Training is one of the least demanding things you can do with a power meter. That's especially true if you're only using it for indoor riding -- that's why many training apps can use just a known trainer and a speed sensor.
[Edited to add] So, training is a relatively simple use for power, and training in a controlled environment is even simpler. Much of the semi-arcane stuff underlying the WKO-ecosystem is based on normalized power, not average power, because of the recognition that riding outdoors on real roads in real wind with other real riders is highly variable. NP was devised as a way to normalize or standardize a highly variable ride into something that could be compared to other rides. If all you're doing is riding for a targeted time in a targeted zone on an indoor trainer, I can see why you don't see much value in on-bike power. Nothing wrong with that. Some people prefer it, some have other needs.
People trained pretty effectively with just a HRM, and before that with just a speedometer, and before that with just a regular training route and a wristwatch. Training is one of the least demanding things you can do with a power meter. That's especially true if you're only using it for indoor riding -- that's why many training apps can use just a known trainer and a speed sensor.
[Edited to add] So, training is a relatively simple use for power, and training in a controlled environment is even simpler. Much of the semi-arcane stuff underlying the WKO-ecosystem is based on normalized power, not average power, because of the recognition that riding outdoors on real roads in real wind with other real riders is highly variable. NP was devised as a way to normalize or standardize a highly variable ride into something that could be compared to other rides. If all you're doing is riding for a targeted time in a targeted zone on an indoor trainer, I can see why you don't see much value in on-bike power. Nothing wrong with that. Some people prefer it, some have other needs.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I ride outside every day I can. But if doing a Zone 2 base period, on the trainer I maximize the training because on the road, it is tough to stay dialed in on one zone.
I find the power meter while on the road best for post ride analysis or, occasionally to keep me either toned down or a signal to tone it up.
I find the power meter while on the road best for post ride analysis or, occasionally to keep me either toned down or a signal to tone it up.
I don't get what post ride analysis you need for a regular training ride on the road. Do you take notes and stick them to your handlebar for the next training session? If you have the power meter, look at it and adjust your effort accordingly.
Likes For rubiksoval:
#41
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,420
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times
in
494 Posts
#42
Senior Member
I would add that it's worth noting the normalized power algorithm uses a 30 second rolling average because many metabolic processes have a half life of about that duration. That is, fluctuations shorter than that (especially those on the order of a few seconds) have minimal impact on training adaptations so it isn't necessary to try to slavishly ride in a narrow range around a target.
#43
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,420
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times
in
494 Posts
I would add that it's worth noting the normalized power algorithm uses a 30 second rolling average because many metabolic processes have a half life of about that duration. That is, fluctuations shorter than that (especially those on the order of a few seconds) have minimal impact on training adaptations so it isn't necessary to try to slavishly ride in a narrow range around a target.
#44
Full Member
And the "zones" themselves have mostly gray boundaries. Coaches like well-defined boundaries because it simplifies their prescriptions and makes it easy to see if clients meet their assigned targets, but there's no RCT that shows that strict adherence to a workout plan produces the best outcomes. There are a lot of workout plans that address the same thing: if there were only one best surefire way to achieve an outcome, all workouts would look alike. That we can get to roughly the same place via different routes suggests that the destination isn't terribly path dependent.
Your making an argument against power meters and just “ride, ride lots, and ‘fartlek’ intervals”
#45
Beer & Bikes
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 106
Bikes: '20 Specialized Roubaix Expert, '20 Specialized Shiv Elite, '13 Specialized S-Works Epic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 80 Times
in
36 Posts
This a data point of one rider. May of this year I started using a power meter. Here is two attempts from the same Strava segment just days apart, with and without the meter. Similar weather/winds.
4.85 mile circuit
Very close numbers. Other examples of similar segments show similar results. Probably a range of up to 10% for longer, consistent segments. Variation goes higher for shorter segments. However, if it's a sprint or a variation of sit/stand the discrepancy goes wild. I think it's an interesting approximation but not usable for much outside of long, consistent efforts with little variation of speed, cadence or elevation.
4.85 mile circuit
Very close numbers. Other examples of similar segments show similar results. Probably a range of up to 10% for longer, consistent segments. Variation goes higher for shorter segments. However, if it's a sprint or a variation of sit/stand the discrepancy goes wild. I think it's an interesting approximation but not usable for much outside of long, consistent efforts with little variation of speed, cadence or elevation.
Last edited by cybirr; 12-29-20 at 08:29 PM. Reason: typo
#47
Junior Member
This a data point of one rider. May of this year I started using a power meter. Here is two attempts from the same Strava segment just days apart, with and without the meter. Similar weather/winds.
4.85 mile circuit
Very close numbers. Other examples of similar segments show similar results. Probably a range of up to 10% for longer, consistent segments. Variation goes higher for shorter segments. However, if it's a sprint or a variation of sit/stand the discrepancy goes wild. I think it's an interesting approximation but not usable for much outside of long, consistent efforts with little variation of speed, cadence or elevation.
4.85 mile circuit
Very close numbers. Other examples of similar segments show similar results. Probably a range of up to 10% for longer, consistent segments. Variation goes higher for shorter segments. However, if it's a sprint or a variation of sit/stand the discrepancy goes wild. I think it's an interesting approximation but not usable for much outside of long, consistent efforts with little variation of speed, cadence or elevation.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
This a data point of one rider. May of this year I started using a power meter. Here is two attempts from the same Strava segment just days apart, with and without the meter. Similar weather/winds.
4.85 mile circuit
Very close numbers. Other examples of similar segments show similar results. Probably a range of up to 10% for longer, consistent segments. Variation goes higher for shorter segments. However, if it's a sprint or a variation of sit/stand the discrepancy goes wild. I think it's an interesting approximation but not usable for much outside of long, consistent efforts with little variation of speed, cadence or elevation.
4.85 mile circuit
Very close numbers. Other examples of similar segments show similar results. Probably a range of up to 10% for longer, consistent segments. Variation goes higher for shorter segments. However, if it's a sprint or a variation of sit/stand the discrepancy goes wild. I think it's an interesting approximation but not usable for much outside of long, consistent efforts with little variation of speed, cadence or elevation.
Last edited by rubiksoval; 12-30-20 at 08:07 AM.
Likes For rubiksoval:
#50
Junior Member
For example; when I look at KOMs for a segment; I look at the top ten or so that used a power meter and I can get a rough idea of what power is needed to be competitive on that segment.