Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Crank compatibility

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Crank compatibility

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-24, 10:39 PM
  #1  
Space_doodle
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Crank compatibility


Hello, I recently bought new crank arms because I wanted them shorter. Original pair that came with be Ike are pictured on left and new ones the right. They are different in more ways than length. What does the td vs vl mean? I might not care except that the originals (on Giant from lbs) had 3mm spacers on each side but when installed spacers on new cranks the left arm would not go on all the way. I took them out and everything looks good. The Shimano dealer's manual says that some models of cranks don't need spacers but how do I know what I have? M7100, m7120 and m7130 are listed on these arms! As is the this td or vl business that I can't find information on anywhere. Many thanks in advance for your help. P.s. just replaced the arms and not the chainring.
Space_doodle is offline  
Old 04-30-24, 10:56 PM
  #2  
RCMoeur 
Cantilever believer
 
RCMoeur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,623
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Liked 1,922 Times in 863 Posts
TD: manufactured in April 2021.
VL: manufactured in December 2023.

__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
RCMoeur is offline  
Old 05-01-24, 12:57 PM
  #3  
Space_doodle
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That's awesome, thanks for image. Doesn't explain why the 175s came with spacers that won't fit on the 170s, though.
Space_doodle is offline  
Old 05-01-24, 02:13 PM
  #4  
KCT1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 892
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 360 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 242 Posts
Is the picture of the left arm? Is the right arm marked in the same manner, with multiple model numbers?

Shimano sometimes mark crank arms with specific model numbers on the right, but multiple model #s on the left side when the part is common.
KCT1986 is offline  
Likes For KCT1986:
Old 05-01-24, 02:59 PM
  #5  
maddog34
Senior Member
 
maddog34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 2,984

Bikes: !982 Trek 930R Custom, Diamondback ascent with SERIOUS updates, Fuji Team Pro CF and a '09 Comencal Meta 5.5

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1300 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times in 537 Posts
Originally Posted by Space_doodle
That's awesome, thanks for image. Doesn't explain why the 175s came with spacers that won't fit on the 170s, though.
spacers cost money to make. the new arms don't need the spacers and are therefore less expensive to produce, offsetting material cost inflation.
maddog34 is offline  
Likes For maddog34:
Old 05-03-24, 09:19 AM
  #6  
Space_doodle
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks

Thanks everybody, for the version codes and suggestion to look at the right crank arm (duh). Mystery solved. Thanks.
Space_doodle is offline  
Old 05-03-24, 11:01 AM
  #7  
KCT1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 892
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 360 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 242 Posts
Originally Posted by Space_doodle
Thanks everybody, for the version codes and suggestion to look at the right crank arm (duh). Mystery solved. Thanks.
So, did you find that the model # is different between your cranks?

The different models of the crank varies in the length of the spindle and has a small effect on the chainline & thread width (Q factor). This allows options, depending on the frame specification and chainring(s).

The selection is based on the rear dropout spacings, configuration of the chainstay or other factors.
KCT1986 is offline  
Old 05-03-24, 11:58 AM
  #8  
Space_doodle
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My new cranks are m7100 whereas the originals were m7120. My understanding is that the old ones are boost only but the new ones can do either, the downside being tight frame clearance and narrower tire choice. The more inboard chainline might help shifting in lower gears but I don't know yet. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Space_doodle is offline  
Old 05-03-24, 12:35 PM
  #9  
KCT1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 892
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 360 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 242 Posts
Originally Posted by Space_doodle
My new cranks are m7100 whereas the originals were m7120. My understanding is that the old ones are boost only but the new ones can do either, the downside being tight frame clearance and narrower tire choice. The more inboard chainline might help shifting in lower gears but I don't know yet. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Yes, that is exactly what I expected was happening.

The chainline difference would be 3mm, a little less than 1 sprocket inboard, usually not really noticeable. Just something to remember if you change chainrings and currently have tight clearance there. The change in crankarms width is 6mm, only possibly effecting the items you mentioned.
KCT1986 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.