Okay, talk to me about riding 'too small' bikes: a geometry discussion!
#51
Senior Member
I normally use a 54cm or 55 cm frame and once tweaked for my convenience, they work well for me. Long time ago, we bought a 50cm frame bike for one of my children. When I tried to use it even after raising the seat and handle car, it just didn’t feel righ for me. I personally wouldn’t go lower than one or two cm below what I think is my optimum size.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,745
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3231 Post(s)
Liked 3,874 Times
in
1,440 Posts
All my bikes gets set up primarily the same. Saddle height and setback are a set measurement off the BB. Then the reach to the handlebar is also a set distance referenced off the centerline of the saddle. What I don't still too is the same saddle to bar drop or same handlebars.
That still leaves some room for differences in handling and so on based on the bike's geometry and where your weight is relative to the wheels. The fit method above is all about properly distributing your weight over the bottom bracket, but on a smaller frame you'll get more weight over the front wheel. Also, stem length can have a noticeable effect on the steering. Handling is affected by a lot of factors, but I think this is one of the biggest reasons to avoid frames that are way too small. The other reason is aesthetics. I kind of prefer the look of a tall stem and bars near the height of the saddle, but there's definitely a point where it starts to look goofy.
When I moved from modern bikes with compact geometry to vintage bikes with level top tubes I didn't understand how to translate bike size, so I started out buying bikes that were on the small end of what I could ride. Then I gradually went bigger until I hit the upper limit of what I could stand over. Lately I find that my problem is having enough seat post exposed to get my workstand clamp on it. I think I need a smaller clamp.
I've posted the range of what I've used before, but I'll do it again since it's on topic.
My lower limit was this Pinarello Gran Turismo, which was advertised as a 54 but was actually more like 53.
Or this Gitane Gypsy Sport, which was maybe a bit smaller.
Those were both comfortable enough and fun to ride, but they look a bit goofy.
My biggest bike is this Colnago, which I think is about a 59. I can stand over it if I'm wearing shoes, but I can polish the top tube while doing so.
Bringing it back around to the Pinarello above, what I really loved about that was the color. I came to terms with it being too small, and kept an eye out for a replacement in that color that was my size. Eventually one turned up.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
Likes For Andy_K:
#53
Shifting is fun!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,016
Bikes: Yes, please.
Mentioned: 281 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2200 Post(s)
Liked 4,633 Times
in
1,774 Posts
Another data point: Bernard Thévenet, during a 1975 TdF time trial. Not sure if he had a special bike for that.
Likes For non-fixie:
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,691
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2331 Post(s)
Liked 5,027 Times
in
1,788 Posts
That still leaves some room for differences in handling and so on based on the bike's geometry and where your weight is relative to the wheels. The fit method above is all about properly distributing your weight over the bottom bracket, but on a smaller frame you'll get more weight over the front wheel. Also, stem length can have a noticeable effect on the steering. Handling is affected by a lot of factors, but I think this is one of the biggest reasons to avoid frames that are way too small. The other reason is aesthetics. I kind of prefer the look of a tall stem and bars near the height of the saddle, but there's definitely a point where it starts to look goofy.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,691
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2331 Post(s)
Liked 5,027 Times
in
1,788 Posts
Throw out the rules, live dangerously!!!!
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#56
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,349
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 987 Post(s)
Liked 2,393 Times
in
895 Posts
Rode with a 140mm stem for a bit - learned about #1 😅
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
looks visually balanced, impressed on the Campagnolo and Japanese rear mech working well.
Likes For repechage:
#59
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Estonia
Posts: 142
Bikes: HVZ Meteor 1979, HVZ Champion 1962, HVZ SS Moskva80 1981, Dürkopp 1936
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 350 Times
in
70 Posts
I can feel comfortable on a wide range of sizes, as long as the top tube is around 55-56cm. I prefer larger than smaller. I have long legs and short hands. I think my ideal frame would be 57cm c-t ST and 55cm c-c TT so i could have a stem with a decent length to maintain handling. Felt really good on a zero setback seatpost with 56cm TT, but most vintage post sadly have setback so i run them all the way forward.
#60
Garage tetris expert
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 897
Bikes: A few. Ok, a lot
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
Liked 695 Times
in
331 Posts
There’s a window of reasonable fit that spans too-cramped to too-tall, but it narrows as we age and become less flexible.
Another factor might be the length of your femurs relative to your inseam. I have longer femurs so prefer slightly more saddle setback, which reduces the amount of stem length to play with on a given frame. Can place more limits on a too-large frame as opposed to a slightly smaller frame. Ideal tends to come closer to a square dimension frame.
That said, I still prefer slightly too large than too small primarily due to stability of a long wheelbase.
Another factor might be the length of your femurs relative to your inseam. I have longer femurs so prefer slightly more saddle setback, which reduces the amount of stem length to play with on a given frame. Can place more limits on a too-large frame as opposed to a slightly smaller frame. Ideal tends to come closer to a square dimension frame.
That said, I still prefer slightly too large than too small primarily due to stability of a long wheelbase.
Likes For panzerwagon:
Likes For panzerwagon:
#62
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,671
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1033 Post(s)
Liked 2,549 Times
in
1,066 Posts
I have read that, when Merck was on the Peugeot team 10 or so years earlier, he was on stock PX-10s, He commented a few years later that he did not think highly of their descending characteristics. (He said this as part of an answer of why he had attacked Roger Pingeon on a descent in a race.) So maybe Thevenet was on an actual Peugeot, maybe not. Either way, I'm sure his wins did not hurt Peugeot's sales.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
BITD, it was reported that Thevenet rode a stock PX-10 in 1975 and a stock PY-10 in 1977. This may have been Peugeot sales hype; by 1975, he was more than well-established enough to have his frames built by someone else.
I have read that, when Merck was on the Peugeot team 10 or so years earlier, he was on stock PX-10s, He commented a few years later that he did not think highly of their descending characteristics. (He said this as part of an answer of why he had attacked Roger Pingeon on a descent in a race.) So maybe Thevenet was on an actual Peugeot, maybe not. Either way, I'm sure his wins did not hurt Peugeot's sales.
I have read that, when Merck was on the Peugeot team 10 or so years earlier, he was on stock PX-10s, He commented a few years later that he did not think highly of their descending characteristics. (He said this as part of an answer of why he had attacked Roger Pingeon on a descent in a race.) So maybe Thevenet was on an actual Peugeot, maybe not. Either way, I'm sure his wins did not hurt Peugeot's sales.
This would continue when He moved to Faema. Merckx was pretty smart or well advised, he started riding bikes painted as Eddy Merckx, years before he had any license agreements.
forward thinking.
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,831 Times
in
1,997 Posts
A comment on fit, I have my saddle set basically identical on my bikes. I do have the bar position vary a bit, some days one just does not feel as flexible. Higher and shorter reach is the way to go.
does not take much, 15mm is quite a bit.
does not take much, 15mm is quite a bit.
Likes For repechage:
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,137
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4450 Post(s)
Liked 1,589 Times
in
1,047 Posts
Hmmm...no words of wisdom just what I've liked over the years.
First off I normally go for 55/56cm bikes. That said I won't hesitate to go down to a 53cm if I want the bike. I've also gone up to a 57cm a few times for bikes I really wanted to try. For whatever reason, none of the 57's every felt right and were passed on.
All my bikes gets set up primarily the same. Saddle height and setback are a set measurement off the BB. Then the reach to the handlebar is also a set distance referenced off the centerline of the saddle. What I don't still too is the same saddle to bar drop or same handlebars. So variation there a bit for reach to the hoods and/or reach in the drops.
So bikes pretty much set up the same no matter the frame size. So why have the larger 57cm frames still felt "off" to me while the smaller 53/54cm's on feel fine or even great. Heck the Bianchi Trofea was even smaller and yet felt amazing out on the road under me. That in conflict with my 56cm Giordan XL Super which feels the most perfect of all my rides.
57 CM wanted to love it but it always felt a bit wrong under me.
Small frame, magical ride. Passed on to find a better one
Small frame, great ride. Passed on to find another one one day in my more normal size to see if it can be even better.
Small frame but not enough rides on it to really say. No complaints but really small.
Small frame, one of this year's favorites.
The only small frame bike I break my rule and have the saddle too low on. Absolutely love this one with the magical ride on tubulars but sometimes gave me knee pain.
Latest small frame pickup. Has my normal fit setup but no rides on it yet.
This is my perfect feeling bike as reference.
As I age I do like compact drop handlebars more and usually use them now on any new setups.
I guess my feeling on the subject is that there is no perfect frame size for you, just a range that works. I laugh at the notion that one must ride on set frame size.
First off I normally go for 55/56cm bikes. That said I won't hesitate to go down to a 53cm if I want the bike. I've also gone up to a 57cm a few times for bikes I really wanted to try. For whatever reason, none of the 57's every felt right and were passed on.
All my bikes gets set up primarily the same. Saddle height and setback are a set measurement off the BB. Then the reach to the handlebar is also a set distance referenced off the centerline of the saddle. What I don't still too is the same saddle to bar drop or same handlebars. So variation there a bit for reach to the hoods and/or reach in the drops.
So bikes pretty much set up the same no matter the frame size. So why have the larger 57cm frames still felt "off" to me while the smaller 53/54cm's on feel fine or even great. Heck the Bianchi Trofea was even smaller and yet felt amazing out on the road under me. That in conflict with my 56cm Giordan XL Super which feels the most perfect of all my rides.
57 CM wanted to love it but it always felt a bit wrong under me.
Small frame, magical ride. Passed on to find a better one
Small frame, great ride. Passed on to find another one one day in my more normal size to see if it can be even better.
Small frame but not enough rides on it to really say. No complaints but really small.
Small frame, one of this year's favorites.
The only small frame bike I break my rule and have the saddle too low on. Absolutely love this one with the magical ride on tubulars but sometimes gave me knee pain.
Latest small frame pickup. Has my normal fit setup but no rides on it yet.
This is my perfect feeling bike as reference.
As I age I do like compact drop handlebars more and usually use them now on any new setups.
I guess my feeling on the subject is that there is no perfect frame size for you, just a range that works. I laugh at the notion that one must ride on set frame size.
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,467
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 801 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times
in
411 Posts
Like other long legged and short torso-d people who ride vintage bikes, I'm somewhat forced to ride smaller bikes. Hate it, to be honest, trying to find a road bike with a 59cm seat tube and 55cm top tube is, uh, dang near impossible. I make a ~55cm square frame work with a 80mm stem slightly higher than traditional and a compact handlebar. It is a touch squirrelly compared to when using a 100mm stem and traditional drops, but it works.
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,712
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1954 Post(s)
Liked 2,020 Times
in
1,115 Posts
Lots of old man approaches here. Good motivation. I put extra effort into increasing range of motion today.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Likes For Classtime:
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,854
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2342 Post(s)
Liked 2,842 Times
in
1,548 Posts
Like other long legged and short torso-d people who ride vintage bikes, I'm somewhat forced to ride smaller bikes. Hate it, to be honest, trying to find a road bike with a 59cm seat tube and 55cm top tube is, uh, dang near impossible. I make a ~55cm square frame work with a 80mm stem slightly higher than traditional and a compact handlebar. It is a touch squirrelly compared to when using a 100mm stem and traditional drops, but it works.
and if all else fails Kirk Frameworks | Custom Bicycles
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Likes For squirtdad:
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,467
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 801 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times
in
411 Posts
Look at late 80's miyatas in 89 the team, 1400 and 914 had 58 cm x 55.5 cm .... which is closer to your 59 x 55 https://www.ragandbone.ca/PDFs/Miyat...logue%2089.pdf
and if all else fails Kirk Frameworks | Custom Bicycles
and if all else fails Kirk Frameworks | Custom Bicycles
I've been wanting to try out a STB road bike for a while now!
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,854
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2342 Post(s)
Liked 2,842 Times
in
1,548 Posts
Merry Christmas, happy to help, the link to the catalog will show you a lot of years of models and geometries STB came out in 1986 i am pretty sure.... 84 team was double butted, 85 team was triple butted, but not spine triple butted
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#72
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,650
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11008 Post(s)
Liked 7,536 Times
in
4,214 Posts
So it got me thinking...just what is 'too small'?
This is quite the question for the c&v crowd since so many bikes posted here thru the years are what most would call 'ill fitting' at best.
As someone who rarely fits a mass produced c&v frame without some obvious esthetic concessions, this is not a glass houses sort of observation as I recognize many of my own c&v bikes have been too small.
I am convinced so many of the small bikes exist for one or more of these reasons...
- someone used to fit the bike and they now need an upright position due to age or injury, so they slap a technomic stem on and crank the bars back so the brake levers face the sky.
- they need a lower top tube to feel safe or to easily mount/dismount, but they also don't want to own a new fangled sloping top tube bike.
- it's a grail bike that is in a close to correct size, but clearly not correct size so some goofy adjustments are made in order to enjoy the grail bike.
- some people genuinely don't understand how a bike should fit, and they ride a bike that is too small(or big) out of blissful ignorance.
Very few of my c&v bikes stay with me for more than a year, even when I really like them, because they don't actually fit without modifications and I don't feel like riding bikes that see too small for more than that time before I move em on and try something else that is going to also be too small.
I have 0 interest in technomic stems as a long term solution for a frame that is too small.
But hey- if people want to ride a small frame because it's a bike from their youth they can now afford or whatever, more power to em. An often ridden bike that is too small and has goofy fit concessions is better than a properly sized bike that is rarely ridden.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,691
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2331 Post(s)
Liked 5,027 Times
in
1,788 Posts
I will say sorting out lever placement on the various bikes is something I do consider. A lot of times I'll set the levers and then ride them for some miles to see about the hand comfort. Lot's of difference from old school levers and modern ones in terms of how I like them placed for comfort.
I'll purposely vary saddle to bar height on some bikes according to if they are more purpose built. Like I prefer the bars higher on my main climbing rides, more comfortable to me.
I am curious to see how things go now with both knees replaced. The legs are straighter and I noticed after the first one that the one leg was a lot closer to the top tube on the top of my stroke than the other one.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,467
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 801 Post(s)
Liked 754 Times
in
411 Posts
I'll have to take a trip through the catalogs again, I really had no idea Miyata made some with such short top tubes. I like the geometry of the 718a or the 512 from that year....72 degree heatube, 415mm chainstays, and nearly the same seattube to top tube ratio. Nice sport touring frame.
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,691
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2331 Post(s)
Liked 5,027 Times
in
1,788 Posts
And as another data point we can figure in my silly 19mph game where no matter how the bike fits me I'm still running pretty much the same speed on all of them. How's that for blowing up the theory that " too small bikes are bad"?
Now excuse me as I step away to get on my indoor recumbent bike with it's saddle way too low. Still trying to break up some stubborn scar tissue.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.