Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

How to Ride Rolling Terrain?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

How to Ride Rolling Terrain?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-06, 07:45 AM
  #1  
SlowSpinner
Yes it is a paradox
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 361

Bikes: Trek, Orbea,Specilized

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
How to Ride Rolling Terrain?

What is the best way to ride rolling terrain? I am talking about roads with 5 to 20 degree slopes where you go down one and then immediately start to climb the next hill. The hills have elevation changes of 100 to 500 feet. What is the best way to ride miles of road like this?
SlowSpinner is offline  
Old 09-26-06, 07:46 AM
  #2  
I_bRAD
Call me The Breeze
 
I_bRAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cooper Ontario
Posts: 3,702

Bikes: 2004 Litespeed Siena, 1996 Litespeed Obed, 1992 Miele (unknown model), 1982 Meile Uno LS.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
By bicycle, of course!
I_bRAD is offline  
Old 09-26-06, 08:14 AM
  #3  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 372 Posts
For me as a heavier rider, I always try to bomb the descent, particularly the bottom part of it to carry maximum momentum into the start of the hill. If I'm with a group, or a race, I'll try to let a little space develop in front of me so I can roll into that at the bottom of the hill and up the start of the next to take advantage of the momentum. Then climb out of the saddle in a fairly big gear, until the momentum is gone. If you can, carry it over the top, and recover on the start of the next descent. If it's too long, once the momentum is spent, sit down and spin.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 09-26-06, 08:21 AM
  #4  
San Rensho 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 91 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
For me as a heavier rider, I always try to bomb the descent, particularly the bottom part of it to carry maximum momentum into the start of the hill. If I'm with a group, or a race, I'll try to let a little space develop in front of me so I can roll into that at the bottom of the hill and up the start of the next to take advantage of the momentum. Then climb out of the saddle in a fairly big gear, until the momentum is gone. If you can, carry it over the top, and recover on the start of the next descent. If it's too long, once the momentum is spent, sit down and spin.
Yep, momentum is everything. I would just add, don't kill yourself on the climb, but really push yourself on the descent.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline  
Old 09-26-06, 08:35 AM
  #5  
ImprezaDrvr
Back in the Sooner State
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2,572
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Pushing on the descent is often wasting energy. Use the descent to recover a bit and hit the next climb harder. Very few races are ever won on the downhill, regardless of the size of the hill.
ImprezaDrvr is offline  
Old 09-26-06, 09:05 AM
  #6  
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by ImprezaDrvr
Pushing on the descent is often wasting energy. Use the descent to recover a bit and hit the next climb harder. Very few races are ever won on the downhill, regardless of the size of the hill.
+1

Fighting the wind is inefficient since the power required goes up with the cube of your speed. Power required to go up a hill is more efficient since gravity fights us linearly, and the wind speeds are so much lower.

To pace up a short hill, pick out two landmarks, 1/3 of the way up, and 2/3 of the way up. Ride VERY conservatively at the bottom of the hill (carry your momentum as much as you can, but don't pedal so hard). Just keep an easy pressure on the pedals.

When you get to the first landmark, at the 1/3 point, pick up your effort so that you're actually working. Don't go all out, but keep it steady.

When you get to the 2/3 point, ramp up your effort to a pace that you wouldn't be able to hold for the entire hill. Don't kill yourself, but go much harder than the other two sections of the hill. You'll probably be standing for much of this section.

When you get to the top, keep that effort level going until you get back over your average speed again. Then sit and recover for the next hill.
waterrockets is offline  
Likes For waterrockets:
Old 09-26-06, 09:08 AM
  #7  
msheron
I-M-D bell curve of bikn'
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC mountains
Posts: 2,926

Bikes: 06' Jamis Eclipse in the making.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
On two wheels and pedal! Seriously, everyone has their own way and you need to experiment with what works for you. I usually stay on the saddle for rolling hills but with climbs I use a combo of both.
__________________
Ego Campana Inflectum of Circuitous
msheron is offline  
Old 09-26-06, 09:09 AM
  #8  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 372 Posts
Originally Posted by ImprezaDrvr
Pushing on the descent is often wasting energy. Use the descent to recover a bit and hit the next climb harder. Very few races are ever won on the downhill, regardless of the size of the hill.

To clarify, When I say bomb the descent, I'm not advocating putting out a ton of watts. But on rolling type hills, I can often descend faster than the group without even pedaling, and spining fast at the bottom can help carry momentum into the hill with little energy cost. But I'd agree I wouldn't pedal hard on the descent just to get a tiny speed advantage. The physics of it dictate that you're spending a lot of energy for little return due to the squared function of wind resistance.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 09-26-06, 10:32 AM
  #9  
PhatRoadie
Senior Member
 
PhatRoadie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somewhere hot
Posts: 493
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Go hard when its hard and go easy when its easy. Save a little gas on the upslopes though so you can crest strong and still mark your buddies if they make a move at the crest of the hill.
PhatRoadie is offline  
Old 09-26-06, 10:33 AM
  #10  
Dubbayoo
Senior Member
 
Dubbayoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by ImprezaDrvr
Pushing on the descent is often wasting energy. Use the descent to recover a bit and hit the next climb harder. Very few races are ever won on the downhill, regardless of the size of the hill.
True, although there was that one year when Sean Kelly caught Italian Moreno Argentin during the descent of the Poggio to win Milan San Remo.

I almost always climb seated but if the grades are 150 meters or less I'll just stand and power over them; spin/coast down the other side to recover. I would probably try to stay in the same gear as much as possible; likely a good gear for spinning on the flats.
Dubbayoo is offline  
Old 09-26-06, 10:34 AM
  #11  
JoeOxfordCT
JoeWolcottCT
 
JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 1,656

Bikes: Cannondale

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by existence
im sure a lot will say in the saddle but for me its in the saddle initially but then fairly quickly out of the saddle and hit it hard...spin out quickly at the top, quick suck of water and away you go again on the next
+1

I stand & climb most stuff that isn't too long......then tuck & coast the downhills....
JoeOxfordCT is offline  
Old 09-26-06, 11:11 AM
  #12  
CanyonChaser
LOOK!!
 
CanyonChaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 213

Bikes: Look 586

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This is an awesome thread... But what is the concensus on "dancing on the pedals"? I find that I want to stand up to climb quite frequently to A) ensure circulation to "the boys" and B) becasue I feel like my body weight is helping move me forward.

dp
CanyonChaser is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 06:50 AM
  #13  
waterrockets 
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by CanyonChaser
This is an awesome thread... But what is the concensus on "dancing on the pedals"? I find that I want to stand up to climb quite frequently to A) ensure circulation to "the boys" and B) becasue I feel like my body weight is helping move me forward.

dp
20% of climbing time spent standing seems to work for most people. Maybe stay seated until the steepest portion, then stand instead of downshifting.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 06:58 AM
  #14  
feethanddooth
this one's optimistic...
 
feethanddooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central new jersey
Posts: 723

Bikes: cannondale r400 2006 kona smoke 2005 scott cr1 team

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i tend to ride the descent as if there is no climb coming up, then spin up the hill in the saddle. for me, its all about keeping the same cadence.
feethanddooth is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 07:12 AM
  #15  
EventServices
Announcer
 
EventServices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Detroit's North Side.
Posts: 5,108

Bikes: More than I need, really.

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times in 13 Posts
scoot forward on the saddle, slightly smaller gear, and spin.
EventServices is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 09:03 AM
  #16  
twahl
Tom (ex)Builder
 
twahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,814

Bikes: Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I tend to get my big butt are aero as possible going down, and stroke it out the last 1/3 of the hill or so, and carry as much speed as I can up the hill. Pedal through the top until I'm rolling down again, rinse and repeat.

I'm a recovering clyde (currently 192), and I'm riding DA-16s, so standing becomes a problem. the wheels deflect enough that my magnet starts banging the sensor, which turns it on the spoke, then when I drop back into the saddle and take the pressure off, the computed won't read until I move the sensor. Then of course I straighten everything out later, and it happens again next time I stand to climb. I can stand for a mild sprint if I really think about not throwing the bike side to side, but meh, it's not worth the hassle.
__________________
Tom

"It hurts so good..."
twahl is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 09:45 AM
  #17  
Velo Vol 
VFL For Life
 
Velo Vol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 51,220

Bikes: Velo Volmobile

Mentioned: 780 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28613 Post(s)
Liked 1,857 Times in 1,319 Posts
From a speed/efficiency standpoint, is it better to "push yourself" as you go over the top of the hill (thus generating a faster decent) or at the base of the hill (so you carry more momentum into the next climb)?
__________________
Originally Posted by Velo Vol
People here don't get it.
Velo Vol is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 09:45 AM
  #18  
ImprezaDrvr
Back in the Sooner State
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 2,572
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dial_tone
True, although there was that one year when Sean Kelly caught Italian Moreno Argentin during the descent of the Poggio to win Milan San Remo.

I almost always climb seated but if the grades are 150 meters or less I'll just stand and power over them; spin/coast down the other side to recover. I would probably try to stay in the same gear as much as possible; likely a good gear for spinning on the flats.
You're always going to have the Salvodellis of the world that can descend and make up time. But on rollers this ability isn't used.
ImprezaDrvr is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 09:46 AM
  #19  
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
For me as a heavier rider, I always try to bomb the descent, particularly the bottom part of it to carry maximum momentum into the start of the hill. If I'm with a group, or a race, I'll try to let a little space develop in front of me so I can roll into that at the bottom of the hill and up the start of the next to take advantage of the momentum. Then climb out of the saddle in a fairly big gear, until the momentum is gone. If you can, carry it over the top, and recover on the start of the next descent. If it's too long, once the momentum is spent, sit down and spin.
I'm also big. Here in L.A. decending the Sepulveda pass on the south side there is a small uphill bump in hte lower parts. If I hit it at speed I can maintain at least 25 going up it. That can leave me 1/4 to 1/2 half mile ahead of riders who did not carry speed and pop the hill.
Keith99 is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 11:55 AM
  #20  
hockeyteeth
Senior Member
 
hockeyteeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gnv, FL
Posts: 1,890
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have similar type hills here in Gainesville and I'm trying to build my leg strength, so I try to climb fairly hard up the hill and conserve energy on the descent for the next uphill battle. I don't know what's best for speed, but I should imagine climbing hard would build more endurance. And with more endurance will come faster overall speeds! Does anyone think I am I wrong in this assumption?
hockeyteeth is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 12:05 PM
  #21  
DannoXYZ 
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Velo Vol
From a speed/efficiency standpoint, is it better to "push yourself" as you go over the top of the hill (thus generating a faster decent) or at the base of the hill (so you carry more momentum into the next climb)?
Do both and rest up on the downhill.

On short hills, you can power up them out of the saddle to keep the speed & momentum up. But it's definitely not as efficient as sitting and spinning a lower gear. Which is the strategy for the longer ones. What a lot of people don't realize with the "body weight pushing on pedals" idea is that once your body weight descends on one pedal stroke, you have to pull that body back up against gravity to push it down on the other side. Higher peak muscle-forces with lower degrees of applied force on the crank causes inefficiency when out of the saddle. So you want to balance quick power with oxygen-consumption efficiency with speed on the hills.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 12:05 PM
  #22  
gotgenes
PCR cyclist, road cyclist
 
gotgenes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 17

Bikes: 2006 LeMond Chambery

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hockeyteeth
I have similar type hills here in Gainesville and I'm trying to build my leg strength, so I try to climb fairly hard up the hill and conserve energy on the descent for the next uphill battle. I don't know what's best for speed, but I should imagine climbing hard would build more endurance. And with more endurance will come faster overall speeds! Does anyone think I am I wrong in this assumption?
If you pedal hard and go anearobic, doesn't it become more like strength training and less like (aerobic-based) endurance training? I always associate burst-based excercise with strength training and continuous exercise with endurance. Burning up a hill and then dropping activity to recover sounds more like burst-based.
gotgenes is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 01:46 PM
  #23  
DannoXYZ 
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by hockeyteeth
I have similar type hills here in Gainesville and I'm trying to build my leg strength, so I try to climb fairly hard up the hill and conserve energy on the descent for the next uphill battle. I don't know what's best for speed, but I should imagine climbing hard would build more endurance. And with more endurance will come faster overall speeds! Does anyone think I am I wrong in this assumption?
It's actually the other way around. Doing anaerobic intervals on the hills will build strength and muscle-efficiency. You'll be able to generate more power for the oxygen-consumed at LT than before. That's how you'll get faster.

Endurance is a byproduct or side-effect of increased muscle-efficiency. The same long ride at the same speed will be easier because you'll be pushing your muscles less relative to their max. You'll have less fatigue and feel more comfortable on that same long ride with stronger muscles. Or you can also do that same ride faster. But true endurance-training requires longer rides as the other part of endurance is energy-delivery. Being able to digest food and convert it quickly to glucose for energy and pumping it to your muscles.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 02:10 PM
  #24  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 372 Posts
Danno,
I thought your posts were much more insightful when your icon was the picture of the hot chick on the front of the car.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 09-27-06, 02:15 PM
  #25  
munkyv22
You got Madoned!
 
munkyv22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rio Rancho, NM
Posts: 1,728

Bikes: 2006 Trek Madone 5.2 SL

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I generally pedal.
munkyv22 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.