Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

How to find out fork rake?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

How to find out fork rake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-09, 03:51 PM
  #1  
lbear
just going for a ride...
Thread Starter
 
lbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 584

Bikes: LeMond Sarthe, OCR A1, OCR 2, Cypress DX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
How to find out fork rake?

I need a replacement for a carbon fork for a 2003 LeMond Alpe D'Huez. How do I find the correct rake? There is not much info left on line for Lemonds. Is a the axle to crown measurement for a short reach brake 370mm?
lbear is offline  
Old 12-19-09, 04:02 PM
  #2  
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
It's not easy to measure fork rake offset. If you cannot determine what the offset is for your current fork it's a safe bet that a 43 mm offset fork will work well.
Do you know what the head tube angle is? Changing the fork length will effectively change the HTA. Try to avoid that.
I replaced the 43 mm fork in my Trek with a 40 mm for a bit more stability at high speed. What size is your frame?

Al

Last edited by Al1943; 12-19-09 at 05:23 PM.
Al1943 is offline  
Old 12-19-09, 04:20 PM
  #3  
lbear
just going for a ride...
Thread Starter
 
lbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 584

Bikes: LeMond Sarthe, OCR A1, OCR 2, Cypress DX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The frame is a 55, Lemonds have long tt. Fits like a 57. I would guess the head tube angle is 73-73.5
lbear is offline  
Old 12-19-09, 04:59 PM
  #4  
DaveSSS 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,228

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1098 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
Just to be clear about fork rake, here's a picture.



With the fork off the bike, it's not extremely hard to measure it, once you know the definition. The fork length is also important, since there is not a "standard" length for all forks that use short reach brakes. The length can vary from about 365mm to 374mm and that is enough to change the HTA by about .5 degree.

I have some info from 2002 Lemond frames that is titled Reynolds steel. A 55cm had a HTA of 73.5 and a fork rake of 43mm. All of the smaller sizes used a 47mm rake.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 12-19-09, 07:04 PM
  #5  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
One way to meaure fork rake is to place the steerer tube in a couple of V-blocks (you can cut V-notches is two pieces of wood for this) mounted on a bench.

Rotate the fork around the steerer tube until the dropouts point straight down and measure the distance from the bench top to the center of the dropouts' axle slot (you can mount a hub in the dropouts and the center of the hub axle is an easier reference point) .

Then rotate the fork until the dropouts point straight up and measure from the bench top to the center of the dropouts again.

Rake is half of the difference between these two measurements.
HillRider is offline  
Old 12-19-09, 07:12 PM
  #6  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
Just to be clear about fork rake, here's a picture.



With the fork off the bike, it's not extremely hard to measure it, once you know the definition. The fork length is also important, since there is not a "standard" length for all forks that use short reach brakes. The length can vary from about 365mm to 374mm and that is enough to change the HTA by about .5 degree.

I have some info from 2002 Lemond frames that is titled Reynolds steel. A 55cm had a HTA of 73.5 and a fork rake of 43mm. All of the smaller sizes used a 47mm rake.
That geometry info for the steel LeMond frames should be good for the carbon or carbon-forked ones, too. I recall from the Lemond sites that the geometries of the road bikes were all the same within size.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 12-19-09, 07:21 PM
  #7  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
I measure rake on a flat level surface.

Clamp an unspoked hub in the fork and rest the fork on the surface so it rests on the hub and the end of the steer tube.

Shim up the steer tube with blocks, books, and other stuff until the steer tube is level.

Measure the distance from the bottom of the steer tube to the surface and from the top of the steer tube to teh surface. The average of these two numbers is the height of the steering axis above the surface.

Then measure the diameter of the bare hub and divide by two to get the radius. The height of the wheel axis is this radius.

Subtract the radius from the height of the steering axis to get the trail.

I think this method is very accurate and consistent, as long as your table is level, the steer tube is set level (use a good digital level or something pretty accurate like a FatMax), and the measurements are good. One benefit of this over Hillrider's method is the axle center is located very exactly by the use of the hub. I think the center location is eyeballed in his method. It CAN be done very accurately, but it is a subjective variable.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 12-19-09, 07:30 PM
  #8  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
One benefit of this over Hillrider's method is the axle center is located very exactly by the use of the hub. I think the center location is eyeballed in his method. It CAN be done very accurately, but it is a subjective variable.
You're right that locating the center of an empty dropout slot is pretty subjective. That's why I recommended placing a hub (I should have said "unspoked hub" as you did) in the dropouts. The center of the qr skewer where it protrudes from the nut is pretty easy to locate accurately.

I do like your method and it's the first time I've seen it described. It's very clever.
HillRider is offline  
Old 12-19-09, 08:04 PM
  #9  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,880

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Hill, thanks! I've written it here in the past but never quite so well. It's not always the right thing to recommend because it needs the fork to be removed from the bike. I have a method for that, too, but it's much more subjective. It's on Dave Mann's Bike Geometry Project site. I need to rewrite that whole description of measurement, it's all way too subjective.

I must have read your approach too quickly, I blew right past that you were recommending a hub in the dropouts.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 12-19-09, 10:34 PM
  #10  
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
I can't claim credit for this idea; DannoXYZ suggested it a while back and I sort of refined it. It's still a bit crude, but is extremely accurate. I used a 19mm diameter hardwood dowel (radius is 9.5mm, and that's important). I cut a slot at the bottom of the dowel for the sheet aluminum scale, which is wedged into the slot. The scale edge forms a right angle with the dowel. I use a piece of 3/8" hardwood dowel as the axle since it's a snug friction fit in the dropouts. The scale actually starts at the centerline of the dowel, but the numbered graduations on the aluminum extension start at 9.5mm, the radius of the dowel.

To ensure the dowel is centered in the steerer tube, wrap the dowel with masking tape at both the top of the steerer and down near the fork crown. Also, make sure the dowel isn't warped by twisting it in the steerer and making sure the end of the dowel at the dropouts doesn't move around. The rake (offset) of this Tange 700c chrome plated fork is 45mm.

__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 12-20-09, 02:17 AM
  #11  
lbear
just going for a ride...
Thread Starter
 
lbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 584

Bikes: LeMond Sarthe, OCR A1, OCR 2, Cypress DX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
All great ideas,thanks!
I think road fans method looks easy and precise.I will give it a try. Scooper nice idea but I will be working with a carbon fork I don't think the dowel will work up the head tube (very small hole in the crown)

Thanks guys
lbear is offline  
Old 12-20-09, 08:54 AM
  #12  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Scooper's idea is theoretically quite accurate but has two requirements:

1. You need a fork with the bottom of the steerer tube open. Most carbon forks have this steerer completely closed at the bottom or, at best, have a small drainage hole.

2. The dowel must be very straight. Most of the wood dowels I've seen in hardware and home center stores are less than perfect in this reguard. For routine use, perhaps a length of steel tubing might be more reliable.

If your steerer is open at the bottom and your dowel is straight I guess you could use this to measure the fork rake with the fork still on the bike. Just remove the front wheel and the front brake and stick the dowel into the steerer from the bottom.
HillRider is offline  
Old 12-20-09, 01:28 PM
  #13  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,792

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3591 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times in 1,935 Posts
There's always the VAR method:

JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 12-20-09, 01:47 PM
  #14  
Scooper
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,488

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 57 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
There's always the VAR method:
That's pretty slick.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 12-20-09, 02:29 PM
  #15  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
There's always the VAR method:
Again, a clever technique but it won't work with many modern forks with straight legs where the rake is achieved by angling the legs at their juncture with the crown.

And, how do you use that tool on Pinerello forks with all of their waves?
HillRider is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Piff
Framebuilders
36
12-19-17 09:04 PM
jonnya123
Framebuilders
17
08-09-17 07:15 AM
Team Fab
Tandem Cycling
6
01-15-14 09:30 PM
cazzooo
Bicycle Mechanics
48
12-08-09 09:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.