Disc Brake Conversion
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Disc Brake Conversion
Hi
I recently converted an old steel frame to front disc to make a steel city bike (rear 3-speed internal hub and roller brake) with a bit of stopping power. I used to have front roller brakes but the nexus hubs internal anti-lock mechanism meant stopping quickly in Dublin traffic was no use.
I low temperature silver brazed an iso disc tab onto the fork and added a metal fin to strengthen the fork against the bending forces that the brake will put on the fork. Ultimately it might not handle the stresses but worth the experiment.
The front rack has thru-hole axle mounts and so this was secure with the quick release (maybe a mistake!).
All good so far until under heavy braking the wheel came out of the fork ends and I went superman through the air and into the stone kerb. Luckily my helmet smashed and saved my head the trouble.
So the question is - is the idea just too faulty or perhaps did I just have something set up wrong?
Some thoughts -
The quick release is allen-key type - was planning to use a pentagon key one for bike theft safety.
The fork ends are totally flat and since the frame was powder coated relatively smooth - maybe this was a contributory factor.
Would safety tab washers work to prevent the wheel ejecting? Would a aerated safety washer do the job as well?
Could I make a safety washer that bolts into the mudguard eyelet to retain the wheel in emergency?
Thanks
Oh - I can't post pictures as I'm a new user
finished bike
crash
I recently converted an old steel frame to front disc to make a steel city bike (rear 3-speed internal hub and roller brake) with a bit of stopping power. I used to have front roller brakes but the nexus hubs internal anti-lock mechanism meant stopping quickly in Dublin traffic was no use.
I low temperature silver brazed an iso disc tab onto the fork and added a metal fin to strengthen the fork against the bending forces that the brake will put on the fork. Ultimately it might not handle the stresses but worth the experiment.
The front rack has thru-hole axle mounts and so this was secure with the quick release (maybe a mistake!).
All good so far until under heavy braking the wheel came out of the fork ends and I went superman through the air and into the stone kerb. Luckily my helmet smashed and saved my head the trouble.
So the question is - is the idea just too faulty or perhaps did I just have something set up wrong?
Some thoughts -
The quick release is allen-key type - was planning to use a pentagon key one for bike theft safety.
The fork ends are totally flat and since the frame was powder coated relatively smooth - maybe this was a contributory factor.
Would safety tab washers work to prevent the wheel ejecting? Would a aerated safety washer do the job as well?
Could I make a safety washer that bolts into the mudguard eyelet to retain the wheel in emergency?
Thanks
Oh - I can't post pictures as I'm a new user
finished bike
crash
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,096
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4210 Post(s)
Liked 3,878 Times
in
2,315 Posts
You can do whatever you like, already did some.
Front axle ejection from a downward facing dropout is a well known possible safety issue. So much so that all kinds of preventative methods are used by those who have big liability insurance costs
Dropouts with axle retention tabs (lawyer lips) is perhaps the most common, as they already are pretty much standard for QR skewered secured front wheels. Axle washers with an "engaging into the dropout" tab in slot is also pretty common, often found on the least expensive bikes for a reason.
What type of QR cam design does your QR have? Open cam riding on a plastic curved "washer"? Or an internal cam with only metal parts? Guess which has a greater clamping ability?
As long as the fork's design (specifically the dropouts) has the dropout slot pointing in the direction that the brake reaction force is acting on the axle the chance of axle slipping within the dropouts and sliding completely out is a real possibility. The best solution is a fork that (among other aspects for hub brakes) has a dropout design/slot direction that points nearly forward. This way that reactive force is applied against the side of the slot, not to the open end. Andy
Front axle ejection from a downward facing dropout is a well known possible safety issue. So much so that all kinds of preventative methods are used by those who have big liability insurance costs
Dropouts with axle retention tabs (lawyer lips) is perhaps the most common, as they already are pretty much standard for QR skewered secured front wheels. Axle washers with an "engaging into the dropout" tab in slot is also pretty common, often found on the least expensive bikes for a reason.
What type of QR cam design does your QR have? Open cam riding on a plastic curved "washer"? Or an internal cam with only metal parts? Guess which has a greater clamping ability?
As long as the fork's design (specifically the dropouts) has the dropout slot pointing in the direction that the brake reaction force is acting on the axle the chance of axle slipping within the dropouts and sliding completely out is a real possibility. The best solution is a fork that (among other aspects for hub brakes) has a dropout design/slot direction that points nearly forward. This way that reactive force is applied against the side of the slot, not to the open end. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,676
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 839 Post(s)
Liked 1,064 Times
in
747 Posts
Generally, a bad idea. To be safe you would need to get a properly made fork with a mount that can handle the extra stress of the disc brake. No matter how much you add bracing to your current fork there are still twisting forces that can overcome just a fin brazed on. The twisting also contributes to your quick release not holding especially when a rack stay is clamped between the quick release nut and fork ends and as Andrew mentioned above, your fork ends are facing the wrong direction for discs. I like to experiment with lots of things too but a crash like yours would have put an end to that experiment for me. Be safe.
Last edited by Crankycrank; 03-28-24 at 07:15 AM.
#4
Senior Member
If you want to use that bike, replace the fork with one that has the mount built in and thru axle. There is a reason for thru axle and you found out the hard way.
And while doing that you'll start to find out why you can't just replace that, then your lever won't be right, and then a matching lever for the rear, then the cable, and on and on and on. I did an upgrade to an old MTB to make it a better city bike and I ended up replacing almost every moving component.
And while doing that you'll start to find out why you can't just replace that, then your lever won't be right, and then a matching lever for the rear, then the cable, and on and on and on. I did an upgrade to an old MTB to make it a better city bike and I ended up replacing almost every moving component.
#5
LR÷P=HR
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,180
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 867 Post(s)
Liked 1,205 Times
in
694 Posts
crashBangWallop ,
Welcome to Bike Forums.
Lots of information available here, hopefully pre-tinkering in future.
Glad you walked away.
Barry
Welcome to Bike Forums.
Lots of information available here, hopefully pre-tinkering in future.
Glad you walked away.
Barry
#6
Junior Member
Hi
I recently converted an old steel frame to front disc to make a steel city bike (rear 3-speed internal hub and roller brake) with a bit of stopping power. I used to have front roller brakes but the nexus hubs internal anti-lock mechanism meant stopping quickly in Dublin traffic was no use.
I low temperature silver brazed an iso disc tab onto the fork and added a metal fin to strengthen the fork against the bending forces that the brake will put on the fork. Ultimately it might not handle the stresses but worth the experiment.
The front rack has thru-hole axle mounts and so this was secure with the quick release (maybe a mistake!).
All good so far until under heavy braking the wheel came out of the fork ends and I went superman through the air and into the stone kerb. Luckily my helmet smashed and saved my head the trouble.
So the question is - is the idea just too faulty or perhaps did I just have something set up wrong?
Some thoughts -
The quick release is allen-key type - was planning to use a pentagon key one for bike theft safety.
The fork ends are totally flat and since the frame was powder coated relatively smooth - maybe this was a contributory factor.
Would safety tab washers work to prevent the wheel ejecting? Would a aerated safety washer do the job as well?
Could I make a safety washer that bolts into the mudguard eyelet to retain the wheel in emergency?
Thanks
Oh - I can't post pictures as I'm a new user
finished bike
crash
I recently converted an old steel frame to front disc to make a steel city bike (rear 3-speed internal hub and roller brake) with a bit of stopping power. I used to have front roller brakes but the nexus hubs internal anti-lock mechanism meant stopping quickly in Dublin traffic was no use.
I low temperature silver brazed an iso disc tab onto the fork and added a metal fin to strengthen the fork against the bending forces that the brake will put on the fork. Ultimately it might not handle the stresses but worth the experiment.
The front rack has thru-hole axle mounts and so this was secure with the quick release (maybe a mistake!).
All good so far until under heavy braking the wheel came out of the fork ends and I went superman through the air and into the stone kerb. Luckily my helmet smashed and saved my head the trouble.
So the question is - is the idea just too faulty or perhaps did I just have something set up wrong?
Some thoughts -
The quick release is allen-key type - was planning to use a pentagon key one for bike theft safety.
The fork ends are totally flat and since the frame was powder coated relatively smooth - maybe this was a contributory factor.
Would safety tab washers work to prevent the wheel ejecting? Would a aerated safety washer do the job as well?
Could I make a safety washer that bolts into the mudguard eyelet to retain the wheel in emergency?
Thanks
Oh - I can't post pictures as I'm a new user
finished bike
crash
Given that the fork already used a roller brake (ie, a hub-based brake), it should be all able to handle the forces exerted by a front disk. Since you're already up with brazing, could you replace the fork ends with something with a more positive retention? FWIW I ran an MTB with QR skewers and disks for years without issue - the hated "lawyer lips" were the key feature
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,096
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4210 Post(s)
Liked 3,878 Times
in
2,315 Posts
Lawer lips and tabbed retention washers are like having an alarm system for your store. It won't stop the problem (axle slipping in the dropout) but just reduce the severity of the results. keeping the axle secured is the best answer and a through axle design does best here. If you must keep a QR skewered axle use the best skewer you can get.
I've only made a few disk braked forks and while my home made dropouts do have a recessed clamping surface (lawyer lips of sort) I use quality QR skewers (enclosed cam, steel) and haven't yet had any slipping axle issues. Andy
I've only made a few disk braked forks and while my home made dropouts do have a recessed clamping surface (lawyer lips of sort) I use quality QR skewers (enclosed cam, steel) and haven't yet had any slipping axle issues. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,483
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1237 Post(s)
Liked 324 Times
in
249 Posts
You just bought a Roller brake 3 speed?? LOL. Who told they were brakes?? They are disgusting BOAT ANCHORS. Biggest mistake in your life. LOL.
Sturmey Archer XL DRUMS are the king of brakes. So strong it broke my fork in Vietnam. Stopping distance from 13 mph is 4 inches. This hub now has 32,000 miles including both tours of 8,200 miles. I've tested this bike from 39 to 0 mph, flawless.
You can get this with a SA 3 speed. The smaller 70 mm drum is far weaker.
Probably needs a lipped fork, both mine have it.
Sturmey Archer XL DRUMS are the king of brakes. So strong it broke my fork in Vietnam. Stopping distance from 13 mph is 4 inches. This hub now has 32,000 miles including both tours of 8,200 miles. I've tested this bike from 39 to 0 mph, flawless.
You can get this with a SA 3 speed. The smaller 70 mm drum is far weaker.
Probably needs a lipped fork, both mine have it.
Last edited by GamblerGORD53; 03-28-24 at 10:27 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,443
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 400 Times
in
276 Posts
zacster Posted: If you want to use that bike, replace the fork with one that has the mount built in and thru axle. There is a reason for thru axle and you found out the hard way.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,096
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4210 Post(s)
Liked 3,878 Times
in
2,315 Posts
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,236
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 436 Times
in
335 Posts
So the question is - is the idea just too faulty or perhaps did I just have something set up wrong?
Some thoughts -
The quick release is allen-key type - was planning to use a pentagon key one for bike theft safety.
The fork ends are totally flat and since the frame was powder coated relatively smooth - maybe this was a contributory factor.
Would safety tab washers work to prevent the wheel ejecting? Would a aerated safety washer do the job as well?
Could I make a safety washer that bolts into the mudguard eyelet to retain the wheel in emergency?
Some thoughts -
The quick release is allen-key type - was planning to use a pentagon key one for bike theft safety.
The fork ends are totally flat and since the frame was powder coated relatively smooth - maybe this was a contributory factor.
Would safety tab washers work to prevent the wheel ejecting? Would a aerated safety washer do the job as well?
Could I make a safety washer that bolts into the mudguard eyelet to retain the wheel in emergency?
#12
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1790 Post(s)
Liked 1,631 Times
in
934 Posts
In addition to lawyer lips, a lot of forks have the drop out pointed forward so that the torque from the brake application at the very least levers the axle into the dropout side. Levering the axle deeper into the drop out is best, like rear brakes.
There is a very famous picture here on bike forums of a pink bike with home made disc tabs such as yours. The fork leg itself is folded back at the upper brake tab.
I've fielded the home made disc adaption question from a variety of bike enthusiasts. For whatever reason people seem to think anyone with a torch can retrofit anything. I admit it is a tempting proposition. In this case, it's best to be well studied in the forces involved. A new fork is always cheaper than dental work.
There is a very famous picture here on bike forums of a pink bike with home made disc tabs such as yours. The fork leg itself is folded back at the upper brake tab.
I've fielded the home made disc adaption question from a variety of bike enthusiasts. For whatever reason people seem to think anyone with a torch can retrofit anything. I admit it is a tempting proposition. In this case, it's best to be well studied in the forces involved. A new fork is always cheaper than dental work.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1562 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times
in
974 Posts
Did you weld the caliper mounts on the rear of the fork? You can try putting the mounts on the front of the fork. That way the torque reaction will be more backwards and less downwards.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,807
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Except for thru axles, most retention systems, lawyer lips, recesses, etc., are QR retention, not axle retention. However, as will be beaten over and over, a steel closed cam QR is important. The skewer rod is basically absorbing all the force if the skewer remains in place. This has not been an issue for many years when a high quality skewer is used properly.
What I have not seen, most likely due to cost, is a slide/rotating mechanism on the hub side of a fork that essentially closes the dropout. With disc brakes it has to be made with enough precision to locate the rotor consistently.
The cost of a thru axle setup has to be so much cheaper that it would be foolish for any company to pursue a true QR axle retention system.
Trek has a Thruskew that is designed to partially mimic a thru axle, but ot is really to help mitigate improper use of a QR skewer.
John
What I have not seen, most likely due to cost, is a slide/rotating mechanism on the hub side of a fork that essentially closes the dropout. With disc brakes it has to be made with enough precision to locate the rotor consistently.
The cost of a thru axle setup has to be so much cheaper that it would be foolish for any company to pursue a true QR axle retention system.
Trek has a Thruskew that is designed to partially mimic a thru axle, but ot is really to help mitigate improper use of a QR skewer.
John
Last edited by 70sSanO; 03-28-24 at 11:09 AM.
#15
Junior Member
Lawer lips and tabbed retention washers are like having an alarm system for your store. It won't stop the problem (axle slipping in the dropout) but just reduce the severity of the results. keeping the axle secured is the best answer and a through axle design does best here. If you must keep a QR skewered axle use the best skewer you can get.
I've only made a few disk braked forks and while my home made dropouts do have a recessed clamping surface (lawyer lips of sort) I use quality QR skewers (enclosed cam, steel) and haven't yet had any slipping axle issues. Andy
I've only made a few disk braked forks and while my home made dropouts do have a recessed clamping surface (lawyer lips of sort) I use quality QR skewers (enclosed cam, steel) and haven't yet had any slipping axle issues. Andy
#16
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,807
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
If you are using a hex skewer, all you would need to do to retain the skewer is close the dropout on the outside with a half round. Like a closed lawyer lip.
You would need to remove the skewer completely to remove the wheel. And you would have to have access to tighten it. But you wouldn’t need to change the dropout direction.
I’m not a frame builder, so I’ll accept any criticism for suggesting this.
John
You would need to remove the skewer completely to remove the wheel. And you would have to have access to tighten it. But you wouldn’t need to change the dropout direction.
I’m not a frame builder, so I’ll accept any criticism for suggesting this.
John
Likes For bboy314:
#20
Really Old Senior Member
For better retention, I'd try a solid axle with good, serrated nuts.
Likes For Bill Kapaun:
#21
Senior Member
Yeah, the disc brake with QR issue is a serious one, especially with wheels that large, that generate a lot more torque for the same braking thrust at the pavement, then say, my 20" wheels. Briefly, as you brake the front disc with the caliper behind the axle, the caliper acts as a "pivot point", so with the wheel being pushed back, it wants to rotate about that pivot point and pull the axle down, and hard, there's a big leverage ratio there.
If the caliper were in front of the fork, braking would push the axle up. But that would mean either the brake cable/hydraulic line would exit the caliper on the bottom (unless someone tooled up a new caliper), or if rotated the other way, the disc would need to be on the outside of the fork for the caliper to grab it, impossible. Dahon came up with a brilliant way to solve this without thru-axles on their new Curl D9: They mounted the front caliper on the front of the fork on the RIGHT, and just flipped the wheel around so the disc is on the right too. (And discs are designed to rotate one direction, but the disc can just be reversed to allow this.) This pushes the axle up under braking, and allows use of a standard caliper, and the cable exits up like it should. I've not seen that on any other bike, but a brilliantly simple solution to allow normal (and cheaper) quick-release axles, versus thru-axles.
If the caliper were in front of the fork, braking would push the axle up. But that would mean either the brake cable/hydraulic line would exit the caliper on the bottom (unless someone tooled up a new caliper), or if rotated the other way, the disc would need to be on the outside of the fork for the caliper to grab it, impossible. Dahon came up with a brilliant way to solve this without thru-axles on their new Curl D9: They mounted the front caliper on the front of the fork on the RIGHT, and just flipped the wheel around so the disc is on the right too. (And discs are designed to rotate one direction, but the disc can just be reversed to allow this.) This pushes the axle up under braking, and allows use of a standard caliper, and the cable exits up like it should. I've not seen that on any other bike, but a brilliantly simple solution to allow normal (and cheaper) quick-release axles, versus thru-axles.
#22
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you are using a hex skewer, all you would need to do to retain the skewer is close the dropout on the outside with a half round. Like a closed lawyer lip.
You would need to remove the skewer completely to remove the wheel. And you would have to have access to tighten it. But you wouldn’t need to change the dropout direction.
I’m not a frame builder, so I’ll accept any criticism for suggesting this.
John
You would need to remove the skewer completely to remove the wheel. And you would have to have access to tighten it. But you wouldn’t need to change the dropout direction.
I’m not a frame builder, so I’ll accept any criticism for suggesting this.
John
I could braze a washer or something to the outside of the fork ends. the skwer etc could still go through axially but not come out radially in an emergency.
#23
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,985
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26425 Post(s)
Liked 10,381 Times
in
7,209 Posts
I think the OP's trying to avoid using QRs of any kind - bike theft, and bike part theft, is rampant in Dublin (like most cities, I imagine), so he was going with a screw-on skewer with a 5-sided socket head for security. There are a number of security skewer options out there, but I don't know how good they are compared to an old-fashioned internal-cam QR
If you absolutely have to have a front disc, the suggestion for a new fork with mount and thru axle is appropriate. Here, where I live, it would be easier and probably cheaper to buy a different used bike off Craigslist.
__________________
#24
Bad example
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,072
Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 828 Post(s)
Liked 214 Times
in
97 Posts
I swapped a disk fork into an old Peugeot so I could find out how well a disk would work in Seattle's rain. Braking was excellent, but the handling characteristics were pretty bad with the different fork.
if I were going to modify an existing frame for a disk, I'd add the mount to the rear triangle. It'd be easier to stiffen those tubes to handle the stress of the brake, and the dropout issue would be gone.
if I were going to modify an existing frame for a disk, I'd add the mount to the rear triangle. It'd be easier to stiffen those tubes to handle the stress of the brake, and the dropout issue would be gone.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
#25
Senior Member
If you are using a hex skewer, all you would need to do to retain the skewer is close the dropout on the outside with a half round. Like a closed lawyer lip.
You would need to remove the skewer completely to remove the wheel. And you would have to have access to tighten it. But you wouldn’t need to change the dropout direction.
I’m not a frame builder, so I’ll accept any criticism for suggesting this.
John
You would need to remove the skewer completely to remove the wheel. And you would have to have access to tighten it. But you wouldn’t need to change the dropout direction.
I’m not a frame builder, so I’ll accept any criticism for suggesting this.
John
I think the ThruSkewer on Treks is a smart solution, but does require a decent steel skewer. But I think the best solution I've seen is on the Dahon Curl D9, standard caliper on front right fork blade, with disc also reversed; It also allows them to use a mono-fork, one blade on right, which helps the fold, but also is a brilliant solution to the front disc without thru-axle issue. Rear has long been solved by just putting the caliper inside the rear triangle, or if too tight like on a folder, above the axle, just not aft.