Tubular wheel lacing
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 12
Bikes: 1972 Gitane Tour de France
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tubular wheel lacing
I have new Campagnolo Record hubs and old Mavic Monthelery tubular (sewup) rims. I worked through the spoke length calculation shown at Park Tools, but my spokes seem to be 2 or 3 mm (or more?) too short to properly do a 3 cross, 32 hole lace up. Do tubular rims require longer spokes? Do the nipples seat that different than clinchers?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Tubular rims. all else being equal, are shallower so yes, the spokes ore typically longer but a solid ERD measurement should take that into account. Did you do your own ERD check? I don't have any faith in the printed numbers. I also run the check both from valve to seam (vertically) and at right angles (horizontally) to take into account any "egg-shaping" in the rim. I averaged the two numbers.
3X 32 spokes with Monthelery rims and low flange hubs should be around 302 mm for front and left rear and 300 right rear if those Monthelery rims have similar depths to the old, shallow GP4s; (I heard they are shiny GP4s.) The newer GP4s made from a "U" extrusion and a arced "cap" are deeper and require spokes 2 mm shorter. (I just finished building 2 sets of GP4 wheels, one old and one new, Those numbers are solidly planted in my brain.)
A hands on ERD reading will account for nipple seat. I never measure from anywhere on the rim. Just use the spoke lengths and the distance between J-bends. So, whether the nipples sit differently? Who cares?
3X 32 spokes with Monthelery rims and low flange hubs should be around 302 mm for front and left rear and 300 right rear if those Monthelery rims have similar depths to the old, shallow GP4s; (I heard they are shiny GP4s.) The newer GP4s made from a "U" extrusion and a arced "cap" are deeper and require spokes 2 mm shorter. (I just finished building 2 sets of GP4 wheels, one old and one new, Those numbers are solidly planted in my brain.)
A hands on ERD reading will account for nipple seat. I never measure from anywhere on the rim. Just use the spoke lengths and the distance between J-bends. So, whether the nipples sit differently? Who cares?
Likes For 79pmooney:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,084
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4205 Post(s)
Liked 3,865 Times
in
2,312 Posts
How did you determine the rim's ERD? Back when i was riding Monthelerys we used the charts in our Sutherlands Manual. As I recall these charts often placed the spoke end at the rim bed's surface. Not where in the spoke nipple you expect to see it. These days I just measure the ERD directly and in at least 3 locations around the rim and use the average.
While there were sew up rims with very specific nipple seating these were usually the filled ones like the foam filled Ukai (as was OEM on my first two Fuji Finests). The Monthelerys were made offered with or without double nipple hole reinforcing eyelets. At around 400ish grams these rims were on the edge of not needing nipple washers. But this was pretty much the common way back then. Many rim makers offered a common rim in a new bike spec (as low cost as possible) and an aftermarket/upscale version (eyeletted, anodized) based on the same extrusions.
What can and does come into the lacing up is are the spoke holes offset to each other and which way does this happen at the valve hole as the point of reference. If the hub has spoke bedding wear and you want to mimic that with the new spokes but the rim has the opposite nipple hole off set the spokes will cross over the valve hole. When the hub has a wear pattern in it I follow that as my first priority and would live with the valve access as the hub determined.
But the nipple will seat in the rim's nipple hole just like any other rim with the same nipple bed treatment. The Fiamme, Rigida, Weineman, Nisi, Araya, Ukai (foam filled excluded), Mavic and other brands all had the same spoke/nipple/rim design as your Monthelerys. Andy
While there were sew up rims with very specific nipple seating these were usually the filled ones like the foam filled Ukai (as was OEM on my first two Fuji Finests). The Monthelerys were made offered with or without double nipple hole reinforcing eyelets. At around 400ish grams these rims were on the edge of not needing nipple washers. But this was pretty much the common way back then. Many rim makers offered a common rim in a new bike spec (as low cost as possible) and an aftermarket/upscale version (eyeletted, anodized) based on the same extrusions.
What can and does come into the lacing up is are the spoke holes offset to each other and which way does this happen at the valve hole as the point of reference. If the hub has spoke bedding wear and you want to mimic that with the new spokes but the rim has the opposite nipple hole off set the spokes will cross over the valve hole. When the hub has a wear pattern in it I follow that as my first priority and would live with the valve access as the hub determined.
But the nipple will seat in the rim's nipple hole just like any other rim with the same nipple bed treatment. The Fiamme, Rigida, Weineman, Nisi, Araya, Ukai (foam filled excluded), Mavic and other brands all had the same spoke/nipple/rim design as your Monthelerys. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,064
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4408 Post(s)
Liked 1,561 Times
in
1,024 Posts
I have new Campagnolo Record hubs and old Mavic Monthelery tubular (sewup) rims. I worked through the spoke length calculation shown at Park Tools, but my spokes seem to be 2 or 3 mm (or more?) too short to properly do a 3 cross, 32 hole lace up. Do tubular rims require longer spokes? Do the nipples seat that different than clinchers?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,396
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times
in
337 Posts
Here's a suggestion for measuring ERD accurately. Thread a nipple onto an old spoke and cut the spoke off 2-3 inches above the nipple. Now the nipple is your rim depth gauge and the clipped spoke is the handle. Insert the nipple into the spoke hole, with nipple washer if necessary, and mark where the nipple protrudes from the inside of the rim. Remove gauge and measure from the mark to the butt portion of the nipple. Add twice this measurement to the inside diameter of the rim for an accurate ERD.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Here's a suggestion for measuring ERD accurately. Thread a nipple onto an old spoke and cut the spoke off 2-3 inches above the nipple. Now the nipple is your rim depth gauge and the clipped spoke is the handle. Insert the nipple into the spoke hole, with nipple washer if necessary, and mark where the nipple protrudes from the inside of the rim. Remove gauge and measure from the mark to the butt portion of the nipple. Add twice this measurement to the inside diameter of the rim for an accurate ERD.
Advantage of this method is that it reflects where you want the spoke end to be in relation to the nipple top. (The spoke will stretch perhaps a mm depending on both tension and spoke diameter.) I want room on both sides of my target so with variations in spoke length, hub flanges, rim seats ... I do not run out of threads or have a spoke below the nipple head. Yes, I have run out of threads and simply forced the nipples another turn or so but mickey mouse and not doing the next person who needs to true the wheel any favors. Too short = nipple busters. And an excellent chance that nipple top will be lost forever inside that rim to bug someone for years if the rim does not have ferrules.
Oh, and the math is really easy!
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,227
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 434 Times
in
333 Posts
I have new Campagnolo Record hubs and old Mavic Monthelery tubular (sewup) rims. I worked through the spoke length calculation shown at Park Tools, but my spokes seem to be 2 or 3 mm (or more?) too short to properly do a 3 cross, 32 hole lace up. Do tubular rims require longer spokes? Do the nipples seat that different than clinchers?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5788 Post(s)
Liked 2,580 Times
in
1,430 Posts
This brings up anissue I've had and posted (ranted?) about here for years.
The math in spoke calculators is pretty standard, but there's a question about the ERD dimension used, and how it's factored.
Some people measure ERD to the nipple seat, others to where they hope the spokes end, ie. shy of the nipple,'s top.
That makes for 3mm difference.
I NEVER use a published ERD spec. I measure ERD as follows.
1. overall rim diameter to outer edge, measured in 3 directions and averaged.
2. drop a nipple into the hole and use a depth gauge to measure to the top.
3. subtract twice the depth, plus 2mm from the rim diameter to get my ERD for spokes ending 1mm shy of the nipple's top.
Then I use a calculator that reliably has spokes end exactly at my entered ERD.
The math in spoke calculators is pretty standard, but there's a question about the ERD dimension used, and how it's factored.
Some people measure ERD to the nipple seat, others to where they hope the spokes end, ie. shy of the nipple,'s top.
That makes for 3mm difference.
I NEVER use a published ERD spec. I measure ERD as follows.
1. overall rim diameter to outer edge, measured in 3 directions and averaged.
2. drop a nipple into the hole and use a depth gauge to measure to the top.
3. subtract twice the depth, plus 2mm from the rim diameter to get my ERD for spokes ending 1mm shy of the nipple's top.
Then I use a calculator that reliably has spokes end exactly at my entered ERD.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#9
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,626
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3888 Post(s)
Liked 6,485 Times
in
3,209 Posts
Likes For SurferRosa:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,064
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4408 Post(s)
Liked 1,561 Times
in
1,024 Posts
Likes For Kontact: