crossing derailleur cables under the downtube - it's "wrong", correct?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
crossing derailleur cables under the downtube - it's "wrong", correct?
Boy, I'm so bummed. I've been taking my sweet time building up a new Pinarello KOBH frame with Ultegra 6800, (since marketed as the Dogma-K). Got most of it put together and took it to my LBS, and had a specific "kid" who I've worked with in the past do the final cable adjustments and have him cut down the steerer tube and double check the torque on all the bolts. Didn't expect it for about a half a week, but he called the next day to have me come and pick it up. Great! Last night, I started wrapping the bars, the final step before the inaugural ride, (I like my tape "just so").
First thing I did was take off his black electrical tape that he applied to hold the cables. That stuff is just messy! Why did he take my white tape off anyway? Cleaned the gunk off and re-taped the cables in extra places so that they would run exactly where I wanted them to run, and I used white tape. A lot cleaner. Finished one side with cloth bar tape, (I'm "traditional"), and was ready to start on the other side when I noticed something that "wasn't quite right".
Hmmm? Huh! Flipped the frame over on it's "back" and I couldn't believe it! He had crossed the derailleur cables under the downtube! Pinarello carbon frames that do not have internal cabling have their adjustment and cable housing stops on either side of the very top part of the downtube. The bare cable runs down either side of the downtube to the plastic cable guide under the bottom bracket. The front derailleur cable goes up through the frame behind the seat tube to the FD and the RD cable continues back to the RD under the chain stay.
The problem with crossing the cables is that they rub against each other and will prematurely wear and fray. And, probably worse is that they rub against the frame and will wear a groove in the carbon! I can sort of understand why he crossed them because the cable make a more graceful bend if the cable coming from the left shifter looped around the head tube and ran down the right side of the seat tube from there and the cable from the right shifter loop around the head tube to the left. But, that's not the way my other two Pinarellos are "wired".
I just hope there is enough cable to re-run them correctly without having to purchase new cables.
The search for a new mechanic starts today. Looks like a highly-regarded Pinarello shop is located in Irvine, about a three hour drive from where I live.
First thing I did was take off his black electrical tape that he applied to hold the cables. That stuff is just messy! Why did he take my white tape off anyway? Cleaned the gunk off and re-taped the cables in extra places so that they would run exactly where I wanted them to run, and I used white tape. A lot cleaner. Finished one side with cloth bar tape, (I'm "traditional"), and was ready to start on the other side when I noticed something that "wasn't quite right".
Hmmm? Huh! Flipped the frame over on it's "back" and I couldn't believe it! He had crossed the derailleur cables under the downtube! Pinarello carbon frames that do not have internal cabling have their adjustment and cable housing stops on either side of the very top part of the downtube. The bare cable runs down either side of the downtube to the plastic cable guide under the bottom bracket. The front derailleur cable goes up through the frame behind the seat tube to the FD and the RD cable continues back to the RD under the chain stay.
The problem with crossing the cables is that they rub against each other and will prematurely wear and fray. And, probably worse is that they rub against the frame and will wear a groove in the carbon! I can sort of understand why he crossed them because the cable make a more graceful bend if the cable coming from the left shifter looped around the head tube and ran down the right side of the seat tube from there and the cable from the right shifter loop around the head tube to the left. But, that's not the way my other two Pinarellos are "wired".
I just hope there is enough cable to re-run them correctly without having to purchase new cables.
The search for a new mechanic starts today. Looks like a highly-regarded Pinarello shop is located in Irvine, about a three hour drive from where I live.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 3,783
Bikes: Bianchi San Mateo and a few others
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
9 Posts
Crossing cables under the downtube isn't uncommon. Some people prefer it because, as you noticed, it may allow smoother cable bends from the handlebar to downtube. It won't fray your cables. I personally wouldn't do it if crossing caused the cables to rub against the frame, though.
Last edited by SkyDog75; 06-10-14 at 10:30 AM.
#3
incazzare.
Huh, I haven't seen this before. But surely it is not a good idea for the cable to rub against the carbon?
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for the info that it is something that's done and not unheard of. Still, as it currently is, one of the cables is lightly touching/rubbing against the frame. I don't like that at all.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 3,783
Bikes: Bianchi San Mateo and a few others
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
9 Posts
You were replying as I made an edit to note that I personally wouldn't do it if the cable contacted the frame. If it's only barely touching, I'd be surprised if it did anything worse than scuff the paint, but I'd prefer to not even do that.
As for crossing the cables in general, I'm sure you can find references on these forums. Or for another arguably more reputable source, you can read about it on Sheldon Brown's site. It's listed on the following page under '"Criss-Cross" Cables':
Cables
As for crossing the cables in general, I'm sure you can find references on these forums. Or for another arguably more reputable source, you can read about it on Sheldon Brown's site. It's listed on the following page under '"Criss-Cross" Cables':
Cables
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,955
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5910 Post(s)
Liked 2,779 Times
in
1,551 Posts
Most of the times I see crossed cables, it's where the fulcums are on the head tube below the line of the downtube, so the wires can cross in space, rather than wrapping themselves along the tube.
With the fulcrums on the sides of the tubes as described, I wouldn't cross the cables because it unnecessarily add friction. Without seeing the specifics I won't fault the mechanic, since things like this are often a matter of balancing pluses and minuses of the options.
Don't worry about the cables wearing where they cross because you won't live that long, and the cables will fail as they do at the head long before they wear at the cross. As for the frame wear, take a look and see how large the contact/friction area is, and if it's just a short spot under the tube, put a piece of teflon tape there.
OTOH, if the cables are actually rubbing on a large area of the tube as they wrap around it, I'd uncross them, both for cosmetic reasons and to reduce friction.
With the fulcrums on the sides of the tubes as described, I wouldn't cross the cables because it unnecessarily add friction. Without seeing the specifics I won't fault the mechanic, since things like this are often a matter of balancing pluses and minuses of the options.
Don't worry about the cables wearing where they cross because you won't live that long, and the cables will fail as they do at the head long before they wear at the cross. As for the frame wear, take a look and see how large the contact/friction area is, and if it's just a short spot under the tube, put a piece of teflon tape there.
OTOH, if the cables are actually rubbing on a large area of the tube as they wrap around it, I'd uncross them, both for cosmetic reasons and to reduce friction.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
I've happily crossed cables on top of the down tube, where gravity would help them rub. If that gives cleaner entry/exit, I'm all for it. On the down tube, where gravity is pulling them away, it should be even less of an issue.
Still, it's rarely critical either way, and crossing is breaking the norm. If your mechanic is to be critizised, it's for not telling, and not for crossing.
Still, it's rarely critical either way, and crossing is breaking the norm. If your mechanic is to be critizised, it's for not telling, and not for crossing.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,320
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1439 Post(s)
Liked 1,094 Times
in
724 Posts
It should be possible to thread thin Teflon "spaghetti" tubing over the wires to keep them from rubbing the frame or each other. The liner from a lined cable housing may also work for this purpose.
#9
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,800
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3769 Post(s)
Liked 5,721 Times
in
2,888 Posts
I've run crossed cables on several bikes. Generally it's to prevent the housing from rubbing the head tube. They will not wear where they cross.
#10
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,840
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 154 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3617 Post(s)
Liked 3,447 Times
in
1,958 Posts
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Every donut I've seen are designed to protect the head tube. Never seen them on bare cables half-way down the down tube. What's to keep them from sliding all the way down to the bottom bracket?
update: Called the Pinarello shop in Irvine and the mechanic said that derailleur cables on carbon Pinarellos should not be crossed. Scheduled to take the bike in on Friday and he said I could wait until he re-routes the cables and adjusts the FD/RD trim.
update: Called the Pinarello shop in Irvine and the mechanic said that derailleur cables on carbon Pinarellos should not be crossed. Scheduled to take the bike in on Friday and he said I could wait until he re-routes the cables and adjusts the FD/RD trim.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 521
Bikes: Wabi Lightning, fixed 13.6 pounds. Cera steel road bike Campy veloce 9s
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Sure he'll say that, he just wants your business. I don't think there's anything wrong with crossing cables. If anything it reduces friction because of the more natural bend near the head tube. 6700 and 7900 bikes could sure use that cable routing because they have built-in increased cable friction. But yours is 6800.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Potomac, MD
Posts: 776
Bikes: 2012 GT Transeo 3 2014 Cannondale CAAD 10 105
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
... you're obviously going to need new cables, why not do the cabling yourself and have a mechanic adjust them?
It's not rocket science.
It's not rocket science.
#14
Senior Member
There is nothing wrong with cable crossing , it look better and keep the housing from rubbing the headtube .
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,991
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
256 Posts
The cables have been crossed on my wife's Erickson since Glenn E. assembled that bike in 1997. The cables have never worn where they cross. I've been doing that on my own bikes (where it works) since 2003 with no ill effects and the benefit of smoother cable housing past the head tube, notably with no marring of the HT finish. There's no evidence of higher friction while shifting. I do add a small length of clear tape on the underside of the DT where the cables come closest, but there's no actually rubbing there. OTOH, if the cables normally would be in contact with a frame tube, I wouldn't do it on such a frame.
#16
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,642
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 884 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
407 Posts
No problem with crossing cables. In fact, as others said, it probably reduces friction because the housing curve radius is wider.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,589
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 239 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
5/7 of my bikes cross cables
it allows smoother housing curves around the head tube
especially important for us small people with narrow handlebars and controls all tucked in there
fun note, crossing even in places unexpected, like on a mtb toptube routing
or even having rear brake cable cross over (righhand front, lefthand rear)
if you want your LBS to redo it that's fine
but be polite about it,
since he hasn't done anything incorrect, it's just you making a personal preference request
- speaking from perspective of having been the mechanic
it allows smoother housing curves around the head tube
especially important for us small people with narrow handlebars and controls all tucked in there
fun note, crossing even in places unexpected, like on a mtb toptube routing
or even having rear brake cable cross over (righhand front, lefthand rear)
if you want your LBS to redo it that's fine
but be polite about it,
since he hasn't done anything incorrect, it's just you making a personal preference request
- speaking from perspective of having been the mechanic
Last edited by xenologer; 06-10-14 at 09:01 PM.
#19
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 952
Bikes: 2007 Nagasawa with C-Record, 1992 Duell with Croce D'aune/Chorus, three Gazelles, M5 recumbent
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times
in
15 Posts
I cross the cables on my bikes, it looks better and the curve of the cables is smoother. So shifting should be better.
Sheldon Brown even has an article about it:Cables
Sheldon Brown even has an article about it:Cables
#21
Low car diet
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR, USA
Posts: 2,407
Bikes: 2006 Windsor Dover w/105, 2007 GT Avalanche w/XT, 1995 Trek 820 setup for touring, 201? Yeah single-speed folder, 199? Huffy tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
It's possible reversing which cable is over/under the other will pull them both away from the tube. This can be tried easily by detaching, re-routing, and re-attaching just one of the cables.
Along with others, I too will cross when it doesn't lead to rubbing on the frame. I wish my road bike allowed it.
Along with others, I too will cross when it doesn't lead to rubbing on the frame. I wish my road bike allowed it.
#22
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Macedonia
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There's nothing wrong with criss-crossed cables. I do it on every bike whenever it's possible, even on the cheapest bikes. The shifting works much better. As we can read at Sheldon Brown's site Cables
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,040
Bikes: S-Works Tarmac, Nashbar CX, Trek 2200 trainer bike, Salsa Casseroll commuter, old school FS MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Giant frames shipped like this till they all got internal routing. I have my bike set up like this as well.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Crossing cables was useful when the cable housing stops were mounted to the bosses meant for down tube shifters so the housing tended to rub on the head tube when the bars were turned. With frames having the housing stops on the head tube itself or very close to it, the rubbing problem no longer exists. If the bare cables are indeed rubbing on your frame, I'd certainly recable it unless you can put a protective layer at that spot.