Lawyer bumps on frame drop outs - pros have them too??
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Lawyer bumps on frame drop outs - pros have them too??
I didn't realize this before, but watching the TDF, I heard Paul talk about how it takes longer for mechanics to change wheels on the road due to the lawyer nibs.
WHY do the pros not file these off? Is it some kind of liability issue with team insurance? Surely they don't worry about forgetting to tighten their QRs, right?
WHY do the pros not file these off? Is it some kind of liability issue with team insurance? Surely they don't worry about forgetting to tighten their QRs, right?
__________________
'11 Time NXR Instinct / '79 Paris Sport by Moulton
'11 Time NXR Instinct / '79 Paris Sport by Moulton
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,982
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Liked 4,377 Times
in
2,402 Posts
I had the same question when I saw that segment on TV.
#3
got the climbing bug
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,215
Bikes: one for everything
Liked 935 Times
in
282 Posts
they used to file them off then the UCI passed a rule last yr or so saying that they needed the tabs on the forks.
It also helps keeps the bikes on the roof rack at 60mph in the mts
It also helps keeps the bikes on the roof rack at 60mph in the mts
__________________
Rule #10 // It never gets easier, you just go faster.
Rule #10 // It never gets easier, you just go faster.
#4
Senior Member
I thought the rule was that if production models had tabs the same bike model as raced could not have the tabs filed off. Is this correct?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,662
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Liked 542 Times
in
407 Posts
Reflectors, spoke protectors, and dust caps on valve stems are not part of the frame, so these can be removed. Someone is bound to ask.
Last edited by oldbobcat; 07-14-13 at 10:45 AM.
#8
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Liked 2,813 Times
in
1,664 Posts
All frames that are used in pro races must be available to the general public and certified by the UCI and raced exactly as they are certified. All bikes that are available to the general public must have fork tabs. Therefore, the fork tab removal or any other modification to the stock frame is prohibited.
Reflectors, spoke protectors, and dust caps on valve stems are not part of the frame, so these can be removed. Someone is bound to ask.
Reflectors, spoke protectors, and dust caps on valve stems are not part of the frame, so these can be removed. Someone is bound to ask.
#10
Senior Member
All frames that are used in pro races must be available to the general public and certified by the UCI and raced exactly as they are certified. All bikes that are available to the general public must have fork tabs. Therefore, the fork tab removal or any other modification to the stock frame is prohibited.
Reflectors, spoke protectors, and dust caps on valve stems are not part of the frame, so these can be removed. Someone is bound to ask.
Reflectors, spoke protectors, and dust caps on valve stems are not part of the frame, so these can be removed. Someone is bound to ask.
2. Define "available to the general public".
It wouldn't surprise me at all to see pro's bicycles without lawyer tabs.
As far as "bound to ask", how many times do UCI officials actually weigh bikes before a race? Not that often - if at all - from what I gather.
#11
Sqrl
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
All those poor lawyers without lips.
#12
Senior Member
^^ thanks for that very weird and disturbing visual.
It's a new rule, and a very un-popular one.
RJM what year did you get your Rivendells? I guess it wouldn't surprise me much if retroGrant delivered bikes without the tabs.
On a side note, I've been in the car when a lawyer-lipless bike came off the rack, and heard of 2 others. My bike had a sudden lip-ectomy in a crash, so now I don't really want to put it on a rack.
It's a new rule, and a very un-popular one.
RJM what year did you get your Rivendells? I guess it wouldn't surprise me much if retroGrant delivered bikes without the tabs.
On a side note, I've been in the car when a lawyer-lipless bike came off the rack, and heard of 2 others. My bike had a sudden lip-ectomy in a crash, so now I don't really want to put it on a rack.
#13
Senior Member
I guess to live without lips would be too bad, might make me sad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1FGaCNN1aw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1FGaCNN1aw
#14
I was in the Alps a few weeks ago and rented a SuperSix....to my surprise, there were no tabs on the fork. I just assumed it was because they weren't required in Europe, but this thread has me even more confused now.
#16
Fresh Garbage
#17
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,901
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Liked 1,016 Times
in
651 Posts
The UCI had a slow day ignoring drug use and decided it was more important to focus it's resources on fork tips so that something that had worked flawlessly for years, would now cause frustration to all the mechanics & riders.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#18
Senior Member
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,662
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Liked 542 Times
in
407 Posts
1. Not true in all jurisdictions
2. Define "available to the general public".
It wouldn't surprise me at all to see pro's bicycles without lawyer tabs.
As far as "bound to ask", how many times do UCI officials actually weigh bikes before a race? Not that often - if at all - from what I gather.
2. Define "available to the general public".
It wouldn't surprise me at all to see pro's bicycles without lawyer tabs.
As far as "bound to ask", how many times do UCI officials actually weigh bikes before a race? Not that often - if at all - from what I gather.
2. I should qualify this. The UCI homologation procedure involves submitting designs, molds, samples, if needed, and fees to the UCI to ensure that the design meets UCI design rules and the completed frame matches the homologated design. In the case of carbon frames, the full approval protocol adds several months to the production cycle of a frame and is limited to 8 frame sizes. Design changes require a new protocol. The protocol for frames built from welded or glued tubes is shorter and less expensive. My source: https://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/...ing-bikes.html. I've heard reports that abbreviated, less expensive protocols for modifications have more recently been added.
The net result is the right of the manufacturer to put a UCI sticker on the approved bike. The UCI sticker is required for the bike to be used in competition. So while the homologation process does not explicitly require "available to the general public," the homologation process makes custom carbon frames impractical for most manufacturers. The Trek "H1" Domane 6s that still appear unavailable to civilians and Specialized S-Woirks Roubaixs made for the Omega Pharma-QuicksStep pros, are the most obvious examples of builds that are not widely available.
Conceivably, manufacturers could provide pro teams with frames with forks that are not CPSC compliant, but that hasn't happened. So for now pro teams have to deal with lawyer tabs.
Given that most top pros are pretty cavalier about bike weight, I doubt many pro bikes weigh in below the UCI-mandated minimum. At a point weight reduction is more of a marketing tool than a means for winning races.
My Masi doesn't have lips either, as did my Bridgestone MB-4. The Masi was made in 1980, the Bridgestone in 1992 or so. I don't know when the CPSC started requiring a passive front wheel retention device, but my guess is sometime after 1992.
#21
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Liked 2,813 Times
in
1,664 Posts
Sam Hillborne was bought in 2010, frame was probably made in 2009. The Roadeo was purchased in March of this year.
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Have there been any quick releases that were put on properly, and failed? Or are the bumps there as a result of users NOT tightening thier QR properly?
__________________
'11 Time NXR Instinct / '79 Paris Sport by Moulton
'11 Time NXR Instinct / '79 Paris Sport by Moulton
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,662
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Liked 542 Times
in
407 Posts
It has nothing to do with boredom or a new found concern for safety. The French federation has been strictly enforcing the UCI's "no modifications" rule, which led to slower wheel changes for French teams. French managers asked for uniform enforcement and this is what we got.
#24
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,901
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Liked 1,016 Times
in
651 Posts
There are people that don't know how to use qr levers, so lawyer lips might be a good idea for them.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Last edited by Homebrew01; 07-14-13 at 07:50 PM.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 549
Bikes: Focus Arriba, Specialized Roubaix Expert, Bianchi Impulso Allroad
Liked 82 Times
in
53 Posts
Being a mountain biker I have seen a QR lever opened due to a collision with another rider, where both kept going. The front wheel loosened, but didn't come off due to the fork tabs. He got stopped using the rear brake.
The same thing could happen in the peleton. I wouldn't file them off.
The same thing could happen in the peleton. I wouldn't file them off.