Titanium “super bikes”
#26
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,434
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, Karate Monkey, Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Liked 1,314 Times
in
655 Posts
More than a couple years ago I went from a Colnago Master to a Serotta Legend Ti, that Serotta is the only bike I regret selling it did everything right and comfortably but I was chasing what that bike wasn't. The Ti market is pretty saturated at this point but if were in the market for a Ti bike I think I'd go with the old standby's of Moots or Speedvagen, that's not an accusation that the new Ti builders can't build a bike it's simply me showing my age.
#27
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 14,619
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Liked 4,552 Times
in
3,049 Posts
I understand it is three bikes and that is a lot but I have 3 titanium bikes myself two mountain bikes and a road bike and like you am not aggressive but also not a lightweight rider either and certainly haven't gotten lighter. Zero issues my oldest is from 2015-2016 and it has been a fantastic bike aside from a recent free hub issues that is resolved.
I wouldn't want vintage titanium for actual real riding but modern stuff 100% in fact I am looking at a full suspension titanium enduro bike and have been looking to build a ridiculously high end fixed gear road bike (also in titanium).
A lot of early material usage had issues for some people and developed cracks or lamination issues or some odd stuff and certainly some builders also didn't do a great job with certain materials but you could say that about a lot of stuff. I don't think painting all of titanium into that corner is fair there are tons of builders who make some really excellent stuff and there are a ton of other people here who own lots of titanium bikes who also don't have issues.
This is now my ultimate dream: https://www.sturdycycles.co.uk/shop
It was Firefly bicycles for a long time and I still would love to have one of their frames but Sturdy really takes it up to another level. Yes expensive but a custom built bike and it has all sorts of custom titanium parts which is super neat.
Likes For veganbikes:
#28
Senior Member
I post a picture of my keeper whenever I can. When I read the Bicycle Guide review of the Bianchi Ti Mega Tube in 95 I determined that would be my grail bike vs the EL OS I was lusting after prior to. About 6 month to a year later I found one on eBay. Full Dura Ace Spinergy wheels and a time fork. I immediately dumped the Dura Ace for my preferred Marque, although the Spinergy's looks cool those 2" or wider spokes and 40 mm (?) were just not practical in any cross winds. Slowly but surely the bike evolved to as it is today. The only contestants being the Brooks Swallow, Cinelly Grammo, Eubios and Spinachloi's (?).
#29
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,510
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,055 Times
in
1,999 Posts
If the actual Ti failure rate is 10%, the chance of getting at least 1 failure is:
1 - (0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9) = 27%
Statistics rambling aside, point taken about the way the material is used being the most important factor.
Likes For terrymorse:
#30
I have personal experience with 40 bicycles…16 steel, 20 aluminum, and 3 titanium. I’ve broken 2 steel and 2 aluminum but no titanium. Percentage wise, that a 12% failure rate for steel, 10% failure rate for aluminum, and a 0% failure rate for titanium. I am an aggressive rider and I don’t baby my bikes. One of my titaniums even uses the chainstays for suspension. No cracks.
It ain’t the material that breaks, it’s the way it is used in the frame
It ain’t the material that breaks, it’s the way it is used in the frame
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,053 Posts
#32
Senior Member
Actually considering the amount of bicycles and components that I have used since getting serious about cycling in the mid 70’s it is shocking the reliability I have experienced overall. At a beefy 6’ 3” I have always been in the Clydesdale category and even with this minimal issues overall. I cracked a couple of frames but it’s mostly been wheel issues over the years and even these have been bulletproof for the past decade or so. Premium bikes have been shockingly reliable for decades and these debates are bordering on ridiculous.
#33
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,053 Posts
#35
To be honest, I wondered two things: if people felt the ride-quality attributes of titanium were maybe only particularly relevant for road bikes and less relevant where tire width and road buzz not a factor. And if the attraction of ti bike is strongest when they buy it but it faded over time and folks returned to carbon or steel, as if the ti desire was less about ride quality than they’d thought.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 26,245
Liked 10,155 Times
in
4,935 Posts
To be honest, I wondered two things: if people felt the ride-quality attributes of titanium were maybe only particularly relevant for road bikes and less relevant where tire width and road buzz not a factor. And if the attraction of ti bike is strongest when they buy it but it faded over time and folks returned to carbon or steel, as if the ti desire was less about ride quality than they’d thought.
The whippiest, wet noodle I ever had was a Landshark made from standard diameter Prestige steel. Great bike for someone 50 pounds lighter than me. The stiffest, most bone jarring bridge girder I had was a Tesch s22, made from heavy gauge, oversize True Temper steel.
I have a Seven ti frame. While it's a great bike it doesn't have any "magic" ride quality. It's quite stiff and broken pavement is quite jarring. I rode a friend's Moots Vamoots and it felt like a spring compared to my Seven. I also have a steel Gunnar and it is more compliant than the Seven but it also has a 3 inch longer wheebase and slacker head tube.
Likes For big john:
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,053 Posts
I'd bet that if you really wanted a plush ride on an unsuspended road bike, going custom and asking the builder to aim for compliance would be the route. Slimmer chain- and seat stays, more curve in the fork, and there you are ... and the main triangle can be as rigid as you like ... I'd guess.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,829
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Liked 676 Times
in
463 Posts
I am sensitive to road buzz, etc. having rheumatoid and osteoarthritis in hands, wrists, knees, with too many bikes I try to ride with Selle Anatomica saddles and gel padded bars with anti-vibration gloves. Now 73 no longer an aggressive rider and the Tour De Tucson is only a fond memory. I only ride the vintage frames that take less than 28mm tires short distances other than a Vitus (known to be noodley), one of my customs and my titaniums. In a few words I believe the titaniums have a slight advantage in reducing high frequency road buzz which is important to me on longer rides. I rate my Vamoots smoothest.
#39
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,927
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Liked 1,345 Times
in
715 Posts
my personal opinion is that tire pressure and then frame design, especially head tube angle and tubing guage, have a greater effect on ride quality than the absolute difference between frame materials.
but maybe that's a pointless or self evident observation
/markp
but maybe that's a pointless or self evident observation
/markp
#40
Of course, Ti will have a limited advantage in weight reduction of frame over steel, all else being close to equal but as I have mentioned elsewhere, it’s easier and way cheaper to drop a pound from one’s own weight.
#41
Senior Member
I think it might be even simpler than that---for me, the ride of short-wheelbase bikes is livelier (or more jarring, depending on your perspective) than that of bikes with longer wheelbases, regardless of frame material. For my frame size in a road bike of about 53 c-to-t, pretty much any production road bike designed around my favorite wheelbase measurement would be fine.
Likes For Trakhak:
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 6,006
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Liked 2,277 Times
in
1,393 Posts
Admittedly, I've never ridden a titanium bike. I've pondered one day getting one. If we are talking titanium super bikes, I'd put an Exogrid on the list.
John
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#43
Senior Member
While dreaming idly about all the bike-related stuff I wished Santa might bring me (I got socks and a hug), I got to wondering about some of the Rolls Royce titanium bikes I’ve read about, but never ridden. While I have ridden some snazzy higher-end carbon bikes, I’m just an average cyclist who appreciated the ride but couldn’t really discern any crucial difference between various brands’ offerings. I got to wondering if that same thing might be true of the ti “legends”: would an average cyclist be likely to feel they were generally great but be unable to distinguish one brand’s ride from another, regardless of how exalted it might be. So, my question: Has anybody on the forum had 1st hand experience with a Moots bike, for example, or any of the other much-admired, very expensive titanium bikes? If so, was the ride “worth it/better” or was it more the subtle pleasure of riding something so grand?
Likes For KerryIrons:
#44
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,624
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2022 Trek Supercaliber, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Liked 8,946 Times
in
4,197 Posts
Most people who buy Ti don't sell the bike, so whether or not it was exactly what they had always dreamed of, .... and if they bought more bikes usually they seem to have been bikes for other purposes. I have never heard a story of a person who got a Ti bike expecting some magic-carpet-ride and then went to steel or CF to find it because Ti did not deliver.
__________________
Platypus gravelus.
Platypus gravelus.
Last edited by Eric F; 01-02-24 at 05:40 PM.
#45
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,384
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Liked 7,178 Times
in
3,712 Posts
Really? Judging by your name I would have bet money you had an IF bike. Surely you once had one, right?
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
Likes For BillyD:
#46
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 499
Bikes: Historical: Schwinn Speedster; Schwinn Collegiate; 1981 Ross Gran Tour; 1981 Dawes Atlantis; 1991 Specialized Rockhopper. Current: 1987 Ritchey Ultra; 1987 Centurion Ironman Dave Scott Master; 1992 Specialized Stumpjumper FS
Liked 182 Times
in
115 Posts
Yep, is it worth it?
Is there an element of coveting in such purchases that goes beyond simple rational reasoning?
Do people feel compelled to praise their pricey bikes in an effort to justify to themselves that their expenditure was a sound decision?
Who knows!
I had a friend in college who was convinced that when he washed and waxed his car, it ran better. Human subjectivity is an important aspect of what we do.
Happy New Year everyone!
Is there an element of coveting in such purchases that goes beyond simple rational reasoning?
Do people feel compelled to praise their pricey bikes in an effort to justify to themselves that their expenditure was a sound decision?
Who knows!
I had a friend in college who was convinced that when he washed and waxed his car, it ran better. Human subjectivity is an important aspect of what we do.
Happy New Year everyone!
#47
Senior Member
While dreaming idly about all the bike-related stuff I wished Santa might bring me (I got socks and a hug), I got to wondering about some of the Rolls Royce titanium bikes I’ve read about, but never ridden. While I have ridden some snazzy higher-end carbon bikes, I’m just an average cyclist who appreciated the ride but couldn’t really discern any crucial difference between various brands’ offerings. I got to wondering if that same thing might be true of the ti “legends”: would an average cyclist be likely to feel they were generally great but be unable to distinguish one brand’s ride from another, regardless of how exalted it might be. So, my question: Has anybody on the forum had 1st hand experience with a Moots bike, for example, or any of the other much-admired, very expensive titanium bikes? If so, was the ride “worth it/better” or was it more the subtle pleasure of riding something so grand?
I think your highlighted comment is critical.
I'm not claiming that no one can feel differences in bike materials or the quality of, for example, a fairly affordable brand vs a more custom or boutique-ey brand. Or a top tier model vs. the next rung down. I have absolutely no doubt that differences can be discerned. Some riders are experienced enough, analytical enough and perceptive enough no doubt.
But the "average", even serious "enthusiast" (like me) cyclist? There's lots of placebo effect, imho, but most of us discern two levels: "Very nice bike! It feels great, comfortable, like the handling" vs "I don't like this one, it doesn't handle well, or isn't comfortable."
I'm old enough to not chase that stuff I probably can't feel. I like very nice bikes, but that's about it. For now I have steel, aluminum titanium (2) and carbon fiber bikes. All "very good" framesets, maybe close to top tier, not the ultimate of the manufacturer or among the type of bike, but very, very nice.
To the topic; I have a vintage Litespeed Classic (1996, Lynskey era) and a current Lynskey (GR300) I'm very happy with the comfort and quality of both, and they were much cheaper when i bought them than other brands, like Moots. In fact the frames I have weren't top of the line for Litespeed or Lynskey at the time.
Frankly, among all my bikes, I can't feel any difference that can't be attributed to geometry (quick vs stable for example), fit and tire size. Not materials, not manufacturer. My guess is that any difference in a more expensive Ti frameset would be attributed to these factors as well.
Last edited by Camilo; 01-02-24 at 05:52 PM.
#48
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 291
Bikes: A Blue One and 2 Green One's, then there's the Yellow one. And oh, yeah, a Black One. Did I mention the Red One?
Liked 212 Times
in
92 Posts
No-one here has mentioned any of the Raleigh Ti offerings, these are generally trophy bikes though.
The Dyna-Tech line has 5 years of sought after Ti versions. All were put together as special products which strikes the exclusive bone. Only 500 Ti road bike versions were imported and I've only seen one other in the states besides the one I saved from the scrapper last year.
Of course they aren't full Ti, only the triangle. Lugged with glue to Alum and steel with carbon trimmings.
Mine is still going back together so I cant comment on the ride, but I'm anxious for Spring to compare to other full 531 and alum frames.
The Dyna-Tech line has 5 years of sought after Ti versions. All were put together as special products which strikes the exclusive bone. Only 500 Ti road bike versions were imported and I've only seen one other in the states besides the one I saved from the scrapper last year.
Of course they aren't full Ti, only the triangle. Lugged with glue to Alum and steel with carbon trimmings.
Mine is still going back together so I cant comment on the ride, but I'm anxious for Spring to compare to other full 531 and alum frames.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,829
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Liked 676 Times
in
463 Posts
OK, this might be a prosaic statement but the arthritis in my hands tells me this: My three Ti frames, two Litespeeds, a Tuscany and a Firenze, and a Moots, leaving out the Habanero set up for dirt/gravel with much larger tires, they are similar size with the same gel on the bars and similar bar configuration with the Vamoots I get noticeably fewer hand grip changes per mile, typically two for comfort with the Litespeeds. In a ride the typical 1/2 mile change in hand position on the bars is reduced. The noodly Vitus and the one favored steel custom are not too far behind the Ti frames.
#50
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 426
Bikes: '00 LS Vortex/Chorus 12/Campag Zondas, '98 LS Classic/Chorus 10/Rolf Vector Pros
Liked 365 Times
in
208 Posts
That Bianchi is pure porn. IMO the 90's were the Golden Age of road bike design and this is a beautiful example (and a great pic). Fantastic!