Tubular or Tubeless Wheelset?
#1
Tubular or Tubeless Wheelset?
I have read a number of posts about which is better; but I am curious about my situation specifically.
I have an S-Works Aethos that I have built as my main road bike. I live in the Reno area and ride the mountails around me often; but I also use this bike for long rides 80+ miles. I am not racing.
I currently have a set of Hyperwheels 38mm (1,350g), and a set of Craft Racing Works 50mm/60mm (1,300g); but I want a lighter set of climbing wheels. As good as they are, I am NOT interested in the Roval wheels that are so common with this bike.
I am looking at a set of Light Bicycle AR25 laced with Berd spokes to Extralite HyperSmart hubs. This tubeless wheelset has an internal width of 24mm and should be about 980g. I am also looking at a set of Brisk Tubular Hubs laced with their proprietary carbon-titanium spokes to the same Extralite hubs. This tubular wheelset has a width of 23mm and will weigh about 740g.
My questions is whether I should get the lighter tublar set, or forgo the weight savings for the ease of use of the tubeless? Again- they are climbing wheels as I already have 2 other sets of relatively light tubeless wheels for daily use. I plan on selling either the Hyper Wheels or the Craft wheels one way or the other.
Let me know what you think- or if there are other light options I am not thinking of.
I have an S-Works Aethos that I have built as my main road bike. I live in the Reno area and ride the mountails around me often; but I also use this bike for long rides 80+ miles. I am not racing.
I currently have a set of Hyperwheels 38mm (1,350g), and a set of Craft Racing Works 50mm/60mm (1,300g); but I want a lighter set of climbing wheels. As good as they are, I am NOT interested in the Roval wheels that are so common with this bike.
I am looking at a set of Light Bicycle AR25 laced with Berd spokes to Extralite HyperSmart hubs. This tubeless wheelset has an internal width of 24mm and should be about 980g. I am also looking at a set of Brisk Tubular Hubs laced with their proprietary carbon-titanium spokes to the same Extralite hubs. This tubular wheelset has a width of 23mm and will weigh about 740g.
My questions is whether I should get the lighter tublar set, or forgo the weight savings for the ease of use of the tubeless? Again- they are climbing wheels as I already have 2 other sets of relatively light tubeless wheels for daily use. I plan on selling either the Hyper Wheels or the Craft wheels one way or the other.
Let me know what you think- or if there are other light options I am not thinking of.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,933 Times
in
2,053 Posts
I would look at worst-case scenarios. if you are at the top of a multi-mile mountain climb and get a puncture ... and then a second puncture (say, someone broke some glass or had a car accident and left glass and plastic shards on the roadway) will you have two or three tubulars and a way to glue on and inflate them? Would you be comfortable doing the descent on a flat tubular?
To me, both proposed wheel sets are so ridiculously light, neither would be significantly better or worse .... it isn't like I would fail to make a climb because of 200 grams of wheel weight. Of course, each person has his own standard.
If you are going to spend the kind of money i am sure is involved here .... and if you are willing to take the 1-in-1000 risk of multiple punctures ......
To me, both proposed wheel sets are so ridiculously light, neither would be significantly better or worse .... it isn't like I would fail to make a climb because of 200 grams of wheel weight. Of course, each person has his own standard.
If you are going to spend the kind of money i am sure is involved here .... and if you are willing to take the 1-in-1000 risk of multiple punctures ......
Likes For Maelochs:
#3
Senior Member
Not the tubulars.
Likes For wheelreason:
#4
Senior Member
If I were riding a sub-1000g wheelset, I'd be more worried about the wheels falling apart than about punctures.
Someone will say it, so it might as well be me: I can't imagine why you'd want such wheels if you're not even racing. Actually, I can't even imagine using them for racing.
With all that said: tubeless.
Someone will say it, so it might as well be me: I can't imagine why you'd want such wheels if you're not even racing. Actually, I can't even imagine using them for racing.
With all that said: tubeless.
Likes For Koyote:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,929
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Liked 3,933 Times
in
2,053 Posts
I don't question why he wants them .... if he has the ability, why not? Why not buy a Rolls or a Lamborghini if you can afford one---despite the fact that one doesn't actually get any more comfort with the Rolls, and most will never use the Lambo withing 8/10ths of its potential ... and that only on track days at a local track?
We could all ride Walmart bikes .... but we value some "experience" which only the better bikes will give---we claim. I say it is a matter of choice .... personal preference.
We could all ride Walmart bikes .... but we value some "experience" which only the better bikes will give---we claim. I say it is a matter of choice .... personal preference.
Likes For Maelochs:
#6
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 446
Bikes: '00 LS Vortex/Chorus 12/Campag Zondas, '98 LS Classic/Chorus 10/Rolf Vector Pros
Liked 376 Times
in
216 Posts
I have read a number of posts about which is better; but I am curious about my situation specifically.
I have an S-Works Aethos that I have built as my main road bike. I live in the Reno area and ride the mountails around me often; but I also use this bike for long rides 80+ miles. I am not racing.
I currently have a set of Hyperwheels 38mm (1,350g), and a set of Craft Racing Works 50mm/60mm (1,300g); but I want a lighter set of climbing wheels. As good as they are, I am NOT interested in the Roval wheels that are so common with this bike.
I am looking at a set of Light Bicycle AR25 laced with Berd spokes to Extralite HyperSmart hubs. This tubeless wheelset has an internal width of 24mm and should be about 980g. I am also looking at a set of Brisk Tubular Hubs laced with their proprietary carbon-titanium spokes to the same Extralite hubs. This tubular wheelset has a width of 23mm and will weigh about 740g.
My questions is whether I should get the lighter tublar set, or forgo the weight savings for the ease of use of the tubeless? Again- they are climbing wheels as I already have 2 other sets of relatively light tubeless wheels for daily use. I plan on selling either the Hyper Wheels or the Craft wheels one way or the other.
Let me know what you think- or if there are other light options I am not thinking of.
I have an S-Works Aethos that I have built as my main road bike. I live in the Reno area and ride the mountails around me often; but I also use this bike for long rides 80+ miles. I am not racing.
I currently have a set of Hyperwheels 38mm (1,350g), and a set of Craft Racing Works 50mm/60mm (1,300g); but I want a lighter set of climbing wheels. As good as they are, I am NOT interested in the Roval wheels that are so common with this bike.
I am looking at a set of Light Bicycle AR25 laced with Berd spokes to Extralite HyperSmart hubs. This tubeless wheelset has an internal width of 24mm and should be about 980g. I am also looking at a set of Brisk Tubular Hubs laced with their proprietary carbon-titanium spokes to the same Extralite hubs. This tubular wheelset has a width of 23mm and will weigh about 740g.
My questions is whether I should get the lighter tublar set, or forgo the weight savings for the ease of use of the tubeless? Again- they are climbing wheels as I already have 2 other sets of relatively light tubeless wheels for daily use. I plan on selling either the Hyper Wheels or the Craft wheels one way or the other.
Let me know what you think- or if there are other light options I am not thinking of.
#7
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,179
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Liked 5,413 Times
in
3,736 Posts
You might have more tire choices and width choices with tubeless tires vs tubular. But just like the tubeless users and tubed users, you'll find people that like them and hate them. You won't truly know which one of those you'll be until you have used them both.
#8
Senior Member
I have read a number of posts about which is better; but I am curious about my situation specifically.
I have an S-Works Aethos that I have built as my main road bike. I live in the Reno area and ride the mountails around me often; but I also use this bike for long rides 80+ miles. I am not racing.
I currently have a set of Hyperwheels 38mm (1,350g), and a set of Craft Racing Works 50mm/60mm (1,300g); but I want a lighter set of climbing wheels. As good as they are, I am NOT interested in the Roval wheels that are so common with this bike.
I am looking at a set of Light Bicycle AR25 laced with Berd spokes to Extralite HyperSmart hubs. This tubeless wheelset has an internal width of 24mm and should be about 980g. I am also looking at a set of Brisk Tubular Hubs laced with their proprietary carbon-titanium spokes to the same Extralite hubs. This tubular wheelset has a width of 23mm and will weigh about 740g.
My questions is whether I should get the lighter tublar set, or forgo the weight savings for the ease of use of the tubeless? Again- they are climbing wheels as I already have 2 other sets of relatively light tubeless wheels for daily use. I plan on selling either the Hyper Wheels or the Craft wheels one way or the other.
Let me know what you think- or if there are other light options I am not thinking of.
I have an S-Works Aethos that I have built as my main road bike. I live in the Reno area and ride the mountails around me often; but I also use this bike for long rides 80+ miles. I am not racing.
I currently have a set of Hyperwheels 38mm (1,350g), and a set of Craft Racing Works 50mm/60mm (1,300g); but I want a lighter set of climbing wheels. As good as they are, I am NOT interested in the Roval wheels that are so common with this bike.
I am looking at a set of Light Bicycle AR25 laced with Berd spokes to Extralite HyperSmart hubs. This tubeless wheelset has an internal width of 24mm and should be about 980g. I am also looking at a set of Brisk Tubular Hubs laced with their proprietary carbon-titanium spokes to the same Extralite hubs. This tubular wheelset has a width of 23mm and will weigh about 740g.
My questions is whether I should get the lighter tublar set, or forgo the weight savings for the ease of use of the tubeless? Again- they are climbing wheels as I already have 2 other sets of relatively light tubeless wheels for daily use. I plan on selling either the Hyper Wheels or the Craft wheels one way or the other.
Let me know what you think- or if there are other light options I am not thinking of.
#9
Thread derailleur
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Glendora, CA
Posts: 777
Bikes: Croll '94 & Cannondale Supersix '15
Liked 546 Times
in
311 Posts
The OP already owns and rides tubeless, so why not buy a nice tubular set?
On rides in remote areas, I might carry an extra tubular in addition to sealant.
Thousands of miles and never forced to use the extra tire or inject sealant.
Just always use high-quality tires, like Vittoria or Veloflex.
On rides in remote areas, I might carry an extra tubular in addition to sealant.
Thousands of miles and never forced to use the extra tire or inject sealant.
Just always use high-quality tires, like Vittoria or Veloflex.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Tucson Az
Posts: 1,778
Bikes: 2015 Ridley Fenix, 1983 Team Fuji, 2019 Marin Nail Trail 6
Liked 351 Times
in
198 Posts
I have a pair of Conti gp5000 s tr’s on my roadie, and while I like them, I may go with clinchers and tpu tubes next time around. A quick comparison showed I’d save around 100 or so grams a wheel, and if you’re trying to go light, that is not an insignificant reduction.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,336
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Liked 4,339 Times
in
2,793 Posts
Quality tubulars have the ride described as the "magic carpet". Nowadays it is not hard to get Vittoria Corsa G+/G2.0 tubulars that are that tire and made of better materials than existed years ago and with workmanship that is outstanding. Gluing is still gluing but now there are tapes that are very high quality and make mounting tubulars cleanly and as perfectly as that tire's workmanship allows easily.
I rode tubulars 25 years, took a 25 year break and went back 2 years ago. I'm loving being back. (Now, my life is currently considerably more comfortable than it was back then and riding high quality and not cheap tires is not a big deal for me. I'm also getting fewer flats than I have in ages on the same roads. I do add an ounce of Orange Seal per tire and top off about every 4 months or so. When I have collected enough flatted tires I will send them off to be patched by a pro. Yeah, I used to patch them myself but several of the steps take hand strength these arthritic hands no longer have and as I said above, I simply don't have to.)
Mountain descents and safety - if the tubulars are properly glued or taped, you can hit stuff and do real damage to the old, very light aluminum rims without the tires caring. I've bumped home on inch deep dents a few times without the tire flatting or caring. (Bottomless potholes on Boston's winter streets, hiding in puddles.) Went 2 feet airborne on a frost heave descending Vermont's Smuggler's Notch on 250g front and 290g rear rims at 50+ mph. Those tires/wheels came through unscathed. The tires were 250g Clement Setas. In those days, no one (that I knew) weighed wheels. We went by rim weight. Those wheels were not heavy despite being 36 spoke and regular Campy NR hubs or equivalent.
I went to tubulars for peace of mind, especially on fast descents on roads I don't know. Folk have been riding crazy descents forever on tubulars. With good tubulars and good glue jobs, without issues. Now, I'd have second thoughts about light CF. That damage from a hard, high speed hit might be a fracture that could cut the tire. Or break, not leaving a (sorta) round "wheel". Old school shallow aluminum rims, even very light ones, stayed "wheel-like" through pretty amazing hits.
And last - flats. I'm 70. I've done my adventures. I try to keep "epic" in my past. So I ride with two Rally spares, a 2oz bottle of Stan's (to be refilled with Orange Seal) and a roll of rim tape. Belt and suspenders. (The Orlieb saddle bag 2 fits all that nicely.) Rode home twice on the Rally and on the old glue before I started using the sealant. I'm not recalling any flats since except blowing out a tired Veloflex. (Veloflez - too light to be a regular non-event tire and failed like a race tire subjected to regular use. The Vittorias don't have quite the "there's nothing there" ride but tolerate road abuse very well. Also considerably less exciting to ride flat. That Veloflex - shades of flatting silks back in the day. Not a whole lotta fabric or anything else between the rim and the road.)
I never had any desire to play the tubeless game so I do not offer this as a comparison. Just as my experience. And as a very happy camper.
I rode tubulars 25 years, took a 25 year break and went back 2 years ago. I'm loving being back. (Now, my life is currently considerably more comfortable than it was back then and riding high quality and not cheap tires is not a big deal for me. I'm also getting fewer flats than I have in ages on the same roads. I do add an ounce of Orange Seal per tire and top off about every 4 months or so. When I have collected enough flatted tires I will send them off to be patched by a pro. Yeah, I used to patch them myself but several of the steps take hand strength these arthritic hands no longer have and as I said above, I simply don't have to.)
Mountain descents and safety - if the tubulars are properly glued or taped, you can hit stuff and do real damage to the old, very light aluminum rims without the tires caring. I've bumped home on inch deep dents a few times without the tire flatting or caring. (Bottomless potholes on Boston's winter streets, hiding in puddles.) Went 2 feet airborne on a frost heave descending Vermont's Smuggler's Notch on 250g front and 290g rear rims at 50+ mph. Those tires/wheels came through unscathed. The tires were 250g Clement Setas. In those days, no one (that I knew) weighed wheels. We went by rim weight. Those wheels were not heavy despite being 36 spoke and regular Campy NR hubs or equivalent.
I went to tubulars for peace of mind, especially on fast descents on roads I don't know. Folk have been riding crazy descents forever on tubulars. With good tubulars and good glue jobs, without issues. Now, I'd have second thoughts about light CF. That damage from a hard, high speed hit might be a fracture that could cut the tire. Or break, not leaving a (sorta) round "wheel". Old school shallow aluminum rims, even very light ones, stayed "wheel-like" through pretty amazing hits.
And last - flats. I'm 70. I've done my adventures. I try to keep "epic" in my past. So I ride with two Rally spares, a 2oz bottle of Stan's (to be refilled with Orange Seal) and a roll of rim tape. Belt and suspenders. (The Orlieb saddle bag 2 fits all that nicely.) Rode home twice on the Rally and on the old glue before I started using the sealant. I'm not recalling any flats since except blowing out a tired Veloflex. (Veloflez - too light to be a regular non-event tire and failed like a race tire subjected to regular use. The Vittorias don't have quite the "there's nothing there" ride but tolerate road abuse very well. Also considerably less exciting to ride flat. That Veloflex - shades of flatting silks back in the day. Not a whole lotta fabric or anything else between the rim and the road.)
I never had any desire to play the tubeless game so I do not offer this as a comparison. Just as my experience. And as a very happy camper.
#12
If I were riding a sub-1000g wheelset, I'd be more worried about the wheels falling apart than about punctures.
Someone will say it, so it might as well be me: I can't imagine why you'd want such wheels if you're not even racing. Actually, I can't even imagine using them for racing.
With all that said: tubeless.
Someone will say it, so it might as well be me: I can't imagine why you'd want such wheels if you're not even racing. Actually, I can't even imagine using them for racing.
With all that said: tubeless.
Not worth the risk when descending mountains, especially when not even racing.
I would go tubeless and probably with liners for added safety, but that’s just a personal choice. Tubeless will be more future-proof with tyre choice if that matters to you.
#13
Low weight: tubulars obviously. It is not possible to build clinchers (tubeless or otherwise) that are lighter or stronger than tubulars using the same materials and designing for the same wheel strength. Look at the tubular rim profile: it is perfect; no fragile or heavy 'hooks' or protrusions required to hold the tire on. Smooth edges that avoid pinch flats.
You are going to save 100 grams per wheel with tubulars, again, all things being equal. Plus you won't get pinch flats, you can run your tires at pretty much any pressure, and you won't crush the fragile rim hooks when you run over something. But the biggest advantage to tubulars is that when you suddenly flat, tubulars are a hell of a lot less scary. I've had many blowouts on both, and the tubular blowouts have been calm and controlled, whereas the clincher blowouts have all been terrifying, and tested decades of bike handling skills, sometimes not successfully.
If you want sealant, then you can inject sealant in tubulars. Remove the valve cores and inject 20cc. There: as much flat resistance as tubeless.
You are going to save 100 grams per wheel with tubulars, again, all things being equal. Plus you won't get pinch flats, you can run your tires at pretty much any pressure, and you won't crush the fragile rim hooks when you run over something. But the biggest advantage to tubulars is that when you suddenly flat, tubulars are a hell of a lot less scary. I've had many blowouts on both, and the tubular blowouts have been calm and controlled, whereas the clincher blowouts have all been terrifying, and tested decades of bike handling skills, sometimes not successfully.
If you want sealant, then you can inject sealant in tubulars. Remove the valve cores and inject 20cc. There: as much flat resistance as tubeless.
Likes For Dave Mayer:
#14
Senior Member
When even the pro peloton is leaving tubulars behind, leave it to the bf Old Guard to advocate them...And advocate them to a recreational rider, which is even sillier.
Likes For Koyote:
#15
I think the tubular "safety" argument was more valid when everyone was running 100+ psi narrow tyres. Running modern tubeless at 60 psi on 24 mm internal rims with sealant and liners is safe enough. Whether people like it or not, tubulars are heading for extinction or at best a niche product with no further investment.
#16
Wheelman
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Putney, London UK
Posts: 1,025
Bikes: 1982 Holdsworth Avanti (531), 1961 Holdsworth Cyclone
Liked 851 Times
in
419 Posts
I'm another fan of tubulars (since 2 years back).
I've only had 3 flats that made me walk home (London riding so not an issue).
1st) After 150 miles front flat, did some research and decident sealant was what I needed so got some Orange Seal.
Tyre fixed in 10 mins.
2nd) After 1 year front and rear flats about 1 week apart - apparently 1oz of Orange Seal lasts about 1 year,
They say top it up every 3 months, which is what I'm doing now.
So 2,800 miles and walked home 3 times, but all my own fault.
Got white spray off the front wheel 2 weeks back, stopped and removed the glass shard, spun the wheel - fixed.
Using Vittoria Rubino 28mm which I think is roughly speaking the slightly cheaper butyl version of Corsa.
I've only had 3 flats that made me walk home (London riding so not an issue).
1st) After 150 miles front flat, did some research and decident sealant was what I needed so got some Orange Seal.
Tyre fixed in 10 mins.
2nd) After 1 year front and rear flats about 1 week apart - apparently 1oz of Orange Seal lasts about 1 year,
They say top it up every 3 months, which is what I'm doing now.
So 2,800 miles and walked home 3 times, but all my own fault.
Got white spray off the front wheel 2 weeks back, stopped and removed the glass shard, spun the wheel - fixed.
Using Vittoria Rubino 28mm which I think is roughly speaking the slightly cheaper butyl version of Corsa.
#17
Senior Member
I'm another fan of tubulars (since 2 years back).
I've only had 3 flats that made me walk home (London riding so not an issue).
1st) After 150 miles front flat, did some research and decident sealant was what I needed so got some Orange Seal.
Tyre fixed in 10 mins.
2nd) After 1 year front and rear flats about 1 week apart - apparently 1oz of Orange Seal lasts about 1 year,
They say top it up every 3 months, which is what I'm doing now.
So 2,800 miles and walked home 3 times, but all my own fault.
Got white spray off the front wheel 2 weeks back, stopped and removed the glass shard, spun the wheel - fixed.
Using Vittoria Rubino 28mm which I think is roughly speaking the slightly cheaper butyl version of Corsa.
I've only had 3 flats that made me walk home (London riding so not an issue).
1st) After 150 miles front flat, did some research and decident sealant was what I needed so got some Orange Seal.
Tyre fixed in 10 mins.
2nd) After 1 year front and rear flats about 1 week apart - apparently 1oz of Orange Seal lasts about 1 year,
They say top it up every 3 months, which is what I'm doing now.
So 2,800 miles and walked home 3 times, but all my own fault.
Got white spray off the front wheel 2 weeks back, stopped and removed the glass shard, spun the wheel - fixed.
Using Vittoria Rubino 28mm which I think is roughly speaking the slightly cheaper butyl version of Corsa.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,771
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Liked 1,848 Times
in
1,184 Posts
You can get really carried away stressing of weight. Some people have just got to have a lighter bike. My suggestion would be to concentrate on improving your ride and not just getting your weight down.
Do note that having two wheel sets for the same bike is like having two bikes in one. I used to love my tubular wheels and in comparison to my old road bikes what I ride now is ridiculous. But I do enjoy my rides and often even more now.
For me its much easier to cut a few pounds off my body then to cut a few grams off my bike...
Do note that having two wheel sets for the same bike is like having two bikes in one. I used to love my tubular wheels and in comparison to my old road bikes what I ride now is ridiculous. But I do enjoy my rides and often even more now.
For me its much easier to cut a few pounds off my body then to cut a few grams off my bike...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#20
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,536
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,078 Times
in
2,010 Posts
#21
A lot of the posters in this forum have no experience with tubulars or road riding, so some remedial education is required. And a lot come recently from mountain biking backgrounds, so think that inappropriate, heavy and slow bike features such as disc brakes, suspension elements and fat tires are desirable on road bikes. And that a 20 pound bike road is 'light'; it is not and a huge handicap with things get steep.
Again, the OP wants a bike that is light and climbs, and not for jumping curbs or riding gravel.
Here is a brief chronology of how the sorry bike industry arrived at tubeless and hookless for the road:
For those pros whose results matter and are not just disposable domestiques or riding for marketing, you’ll be on tubulars. Stealth relabeled to not piss off your sponsors.
Again, the OP wants a bike that is light and climbs, and not for jumping curbs or riding gravel.
Here is a brief chronology of how the sorry bike industry arrived at tubeless and hookless for the road:
- 20 years ago tubulars completely dominated all aspects of competitive cycling, even MTB.
- Tubulars are a hard sell to weekend warriors and platinum-card yuppies, due to the messy gluing thing.
- A concerted effect is made to lighten up clinchers, yet clinchers suffer due to an insurmountable weight, fragility and safety handicap. It is not the tires, but the rims; the clincher rim profile is simply inferior. Plus the sharp rim hooks cause pinch flats, requiring high inflation pressures.
- In order to make clinchers more pinch-flat resistant and comfortable, higher-volume tires become more common. Of course, larger tires are heavier, less aero, and feature higher rolling resistance.
- Pinch flats are still a problem: so tubeless is the next development. Makes sense on an MTB, but on road bikes on first-world pavement?
- Clincher rims are still too heavy to be competitive. So next development is reducing the size of the rim ‘hooks’, hence ‘hookless’. Of course the huge handicap here is that you are constrained to a very narrow range of tires and low pressures. Big bonus to the industry is that hookless is cheaper to manufacture.
- Safety: clinchers (tubeless or otherwise) are still terrifying in a sudden blowout, so the next plan is to install a foamy pool noodle inside the tire. Yes, I’m serious here. To overcome the inherent safety disadvantage of clinchers, you need to install lots of messy sealant that dries out every few months plus a pool noodle.
For those pros whose results matter and are not just disposable domestiques or riding for marketing, you’ll be on tubulars. Stealth relabeled to not piss off your sponsors.
#22
Dead but dreaming
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Bay Area, CA (East Bay - Contra Costa County)
Posts: 423
Bikes: 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, 2022 Cannondale Synapse
Liked 326 Times
in
186 Posts
It's not an either tubed or tubeless decision here imo. Just get a tubeless compatible hooked rim wheelset. You can still ride with tube if you want and also have the option to go tubeless. < 1,000g is something I would never do personally but we all need/want/have opinions on what will work for us.
I have two wheelsets from Lightbicycle, one based on the WR38 for my gravel bike and one based on the AR375 for my road bike. Both 24 spoked with DT Swiss 240 exp hubs in the ballpark of 1,400g in weight. I got tired of messing around with the higher pressures (only 60psi) for tubeless on my road bike and the psi drop overnight and as an experiment started using 28mm Grand Prix 5000 S TR's with latex tubes. That combo had a great ride feel though the pressure drop overnight was pretty much the same as running them tubeless so that was a wash.
The page for the AR25 rims even states: "The rims are designed tubeless-ready: compatible with both tubed and tubeless setups."
I have two wheelsets from Lightbicycle, one based on the WR38 for my gravel bike and one based on the AR375 for my road bike. Both 24 spoked with DT Swiss 240 exp hubs in the ballpark of 1,400g in weight. I got tired of messing around with the higher pressures (only 60psi) for tubeless on my road bike and the psi drop overnight and as an experiment started using 28mm Grand Prix 5000 S TR's with latex tubes. That combo had a great ride feel though the pressure drop overnight was pretty much the same as running them tubeless so that was a wash.
The page for the AR25 rims even states: "The rims are designed tubeless-ready: compatible with both tubed and tubeless setups."
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,502
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Liked 8,313 Times
in
3,301 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#24
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,536
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Liked 4,078 Times
in
2,010 Posts
I got tired of messing around with the higher pressures (only 60psi) for tubeless on my road bike and the psi drop overnight and as an experiment started using 28mm Grand Prix 5000 S TR's with latex tubes. That combo had a great ride feel though the pressure drop overnight was pretty much the same as running them tubeless so that was a wash.
Nonsense.
Last edited by terrymorse; 12-21-23 at 01:46 PM.
#25
Senior Member
A lot of the posters in this forum have no experience with tubulars or road riding, so some remedial education is required. And a lot come recently from mountain biking backgrounds, so think that inappropriate, heavy and slow bike features such as disc brakes, suspension elements and fat tires are desirable on road bikes. And that a 20 pound bike road is 'light'; it is not and a huge handicap with things get steep.
Again, the OP wants a bike that is light and climbs, and not for jumping curbs or riding gravel.
Here is a brief chronology of how the sorry bike industry arrived at tubeless and hookless for the road:
For those pros whose results matter and are not just disposable domestiques or riding for marketing, you’ll be on tubulars. Stealth relabeled to not piss off your sponsors.
Again, the OP wants a bike that is light and climbs, and not for jumping curbs or riding gravel.
Here is a brief chronology of how the sorry bike industry arrived at tubeless and hookless for the road:
- 20 years ago tubulars completely dominated all aspects of competitive cycling, even MTB.
- Tubulars are a hard sell to weekend warriors and platinum-card yuppies, due to the messy gluing thing.
- A concerted effect is made to lighten up clinchers, yet clinchers suffer due to an insurmountable weight, fragility and safety handicap. It is not the tires, but the rims; the clincher rim profile is simply inferior. Plus the sharp rim hooks cause pinch flats, requiring high inflation pressures.
- In order to make clinchers more pinch-flat resistant and comfortable, higher-volume tires become more common. Of course, larger tires are heavier, less aero, and feature higher rolling resistance.
- Pinch flats are still a problem: so tubeless is the next development. Makes sense on an MTB, but on road bikes on first-world pavement?
- Clincher rims are still too heavy to be competitive. So next development is reducing the size of the rim ‘hooks’, hence ‘hookless’. Of course the huge handicap here is that you are constrained to a very narrow range of tires and low pressures. Big bonus to the industry is that hookless is cheaper to manufacture.
- Safety: clinchers (tubeless or otherwise) are still terrifying in a sudden blowout, so the next plan is to install a foamy pool noodle inside the tire. Yes, I’m serious here. To overcome the inherent safety disadvantage of clinchers, you need to install lots of messy sealant that dries out every few months plus a pool noodle.
For those pros whose results matter and are not just disposable domestiques or riding for marketing, you’ll be on tubulars. Stealth relabeled to not piss off your sponsors.
Likes For Trakhak: