Bottom bracket length for specialized (flag emblem) touring crankset?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 22
Bikes: 1979(?) Centurion Super Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bottom bracket length for specialized (flag emblem) touring crankset?
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone can tell me the correct bottom bracket length for 80's specialized triple crankset. I think it's made by Sugino.
I checked velobase.com but couldnt' find it.
Thanks.
I was wondering if anyone can tell me the correct bottom bracket length for 80's specialized triple crankset. I think it's made by Sugino.
I checked velobase.com but couldnt' find it.
Thanks.
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,648
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3874 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,586 Posts
Is it this guy? https://www.velobase.com/ViewComponen...115&AbsPos=255
They don't list the BB spindle length, but given the resemblance to Sugino's other cranks from the era, you're probably looking at something in the low 120's.
They don't list the BB spindle length, but given the resemblance to Sugino's other cranks from the era, you're probably looking at something in the low 120's.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 22
Bikes: 1979(?) Centurion Super Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes that is correct.
By the way, I just found specialized catalog from 1984 and it lists the spindle length as 115mm. But this is for asymmetric spindle. So for newer BB's with symmetric spindle I guess I am looking for a longer spindle. Am I right? hmm maybe 118mm?
By the way, I just found specialized catalog from 1984 and it lists the spindle length as 115mm. But this is for asymmetric spindle. So for newer BB's with symmetric spindle I guess I am looking for a longer spindle. Am I right? hmm maybe 118mm?
Is it this guy? https://www.velobase.com/ViewComponen...115&AbsPos=255
They don't list the BB spindle length, but given the resemblance to Sugino's other cranks from the era, you're probably looking at something in the low 120's.
They don't list the BB spindle length, but given the resemblance to Sugino's other cranks from the era, you're probably looking at something in the low 120's.
#4
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,648
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3874 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,586 Posts
Hmm, interesting. I almost wonder if it's a typo, as a 115/116 ought to be symmetrical (32-52-32), and would be kind of short overall for a triple even if it were asymmetrical.
I'd probably buy a 118mm cartridge BB first (it'll be symmetrical), along with a 1-2mm BB spacer so that you can just scootch it over if you're in the ballpark but need a little more clearance on the drive-side. If it's still too short, you should be able to guesstimate and get it right with the next cartridge. Good luck!
I'd probably buy a 118mm cartridge BB first (it'll be symmetrical), along with a 1-2mm BB spacer so that you can just scootch it over if you're in the ballpark but need a little more clearance on the drive-side. If it's still too short, you should be able to guesstimate and get it right with the next cartridge. Good luck!
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 96
Bikes: Unknown 531 resto-mod
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just was about to post this...
Looks like you found the same info. Since you are only talking a couple mm you arent going to affect your chain line much. Worst case is you lose a couple bucks trying one and having to resell it. I say go for the 118 as well.
Looks like you found the same info. Since you are only talking a couple mm you arent going to affect your chain line much. Worst case is you lose a couple bucks trying one and having to resell it. I say go for the 118 as well.
#7
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,648
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3874 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,586 Posts
#8
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,556
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1247 Post(s)
Liked 1,004 Times
in
645 Posts
I usually get the exact same length spindle, and use a 2mm spacer on the drive side. This mimics the assymetric spacing.
#9
Fillet-Brazed Member
Spindle?
I have the double version of the "Flag" crankset (looks like the one on velobase but is a double) and want to put it on a 1972 Schwinn Super Sport, which has a 65mm BB shell ... should I get the 107mm or 110mm sealed cartridge?
specialized-cranks.jpg
According to the spec posted above, it seems to call for the 107mm (or possibly 112mm if the crankset is really a Sugino?) - but is expecting a 68mm shell. The conversion kit I'm using seems to have the same amount of lip as the original BB cups outer edge (not sure if this affects spacing) and also seems to only allow for spacers on the drive (R) side - to go between sealed cartridge lip and BB conversion adapter.
Is adding 3mm to the spindle (because of 65mm shell) OK? Necessary? Equivalent to using spacers?
More info on cranks. Mine do have Specialized dust caps, but not the Specialized stamp, has Flag instead.
specialized-cranks.jpg
According to the spec posted above, it seems to call for the 107mm (or possibly 112mm if the crankset is really a Sugino?) - but is expecting a 68mm shell. The conversion kit I'm using seems to have the same amount of lip as the original BB cups outer edge (not sure if this affects spacing) and also seems to only allow for spacers on the drive (R) side - to go between sealed cartridge lip and BB conversion adapter.
Is adding 3mm to the spindle (because of 65mm shell) OK? Necessary? Equivalent to using spacers?
More info on cranks. Mine do have Specialized dust caps, but not the Specialized stamp, has Flag instead.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,319
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3471 Post(s)
Liked 2,846 Times
in
2,007 Posts
Early on, were not the Specialized cranks essentially Avocet?
At least that is what many thought way back.
At least that is what many thought way back.
#11
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,450
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1171 Post(s)
Liked 999 Times
in
494 Posts
I rebuilt my wife's '85 Specialized Allez a few years back that came with a Specialized flag double crankset (144mm BCD). It came with a 107mm symmetric spindle and I replaced it with a Shimano UN55 107mm sealed BB. Other than having to paint the faces of the BB, it was an exact match.
I'm not familiar with 65mm BB's. If I were to guess, a 3mm DS spacer would be what I would do. I know some people really dig old fillet brazed Schwinns, but you're putting an expensive and somewhat rare item on a low end bike. Those Specialized flag cranksets go for good money.
I'm not familiar with 65mm BB's. If I were to guess, a 3mm DS spacer would be what I would do. I know some people really dig old fillet brazed Schwinns, but you're putting an expensive and somewhat rare item on a low end bike. Those Specialized flag cranksets go for good money.
__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
#12
Fillet-Brazed Member
Spindle Size
I rebuilt my wife's '85 Specialized Allez a few years back that came with a Specialized flag double crankset (144mm BCD). It came with a 107mm symmetric spindle and I replaced it with a Shimano UN55 107mm sealed BB. Other than having to paint the faces of the BB, it was an exact match.
I'm not familiar with 65mm BB's. If I were to guess, a 3mm DS spacer would be what I would do. I know some people really dig old fillet brazed Schwinns, but you're putting an expensive and somewhat rare item on a low end bike. Those Specialized flag cranksets go for good money.
I'm not familiar with 65mm BB's. If I were to guess, a 3mm DS spacer would be what I would do. I know some people really dig old fillet brazed Schwinns, but you're putting an expensive and somewhat rare item on a low end bike. Those Specialized flag cranksets go for good money.
I initially bought a 107mm UN55 sealed cartridge with some 1.5mm spacers, but since I seemingly can only get spacers on the drive side, I thought maybe it would be better to get the 110mm sealed cartridge, though I imagine there could be exposed threading. Additionally, 2x 1.5mm spacers on the DS seem even uglier and more unstable than 1x -- I may look for a 3mm spacer as you suggest.
As for whether or not the frame warrants such a nice crankset ... I imagine some would happily debate. It has a reputation for riding comfortably, is a bit of a historic curiosity in that it was made here in Chicago, USA, and has attractive brazed joins.
In my case, I got a decent survivor condition '72 Kool Lemon Super Sport for a good price and am using the opportunity to lightly restore a bike from the ground up for the first time.
I'm hoping to make this Super Sport a daily commuter and the original crankset is a boat anchor.
I have experience with the later Specialized ST-4 triple, with very fond memories. I paid $70 on eBay for the double Flag version, and am OK with that. But you're right, it cost close to half of what I paid for the bike, I appreciate the disconnect you highlight.
#13
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,450
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1171 Post(s)
Liked 999 Times
in
494 Posts
To quote Lennon: "Whatever gets you through the night, it's alright, it's alright."
I'd give my left hub nut for a flag triple, but it'd probably cost more than what I paid for my wife's bike.
I'd give my left hub nut for a flag triple, but it'd probably cost more than what I paid for my wife's bike.
__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,484
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 808 Post(s)
Liked 763 Times
in
415 Posts
So, does anyone know what taper these guys are? I picked up a 112mm spindle and was wondering what cranks I'd be able to use it with.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,915
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 671 Times
in
512 Posts
1. Drive side chainset position for a triple, places the second chainring the same distance from the frame center plane as the distance from the center of the freewheel cluster to the frame center plane. Note this may imply the rear triangle needs to be made centered on teh BB shell.
2. The chainring bolts/nuts and the chainring teeth themselves do not touch the chainstays. One may need to change the bolts on the chainring attachment, as part of choosing the BB.
3. The clearance from the pedal end of the drive side crankarm and the chainstay is the same as for the non-drive side - symmetrical pedaling position. This inherently has nothing to do with acheiving a certain desired or promised value of Q factor. Some chainset/BB pairings are designed for excellent Q factor, such as a Campy Record double from the 1970s or the next generation, mid 1980s design. They tend to have harrow BB spindles and a crank arm design where the arm settles in close to the frame.
To me the goal has to do with fit, clearances, and lateral symmetry of the chainset and foot positionings. Not with BB symmetry, BB spindle length, or being labelled for a triple.
It's right if it works. If it doesn't work it isn't right.
Last edited by Road Fan; 04-26-23 at 07:24 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,994
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 471 Times
in
260 Posts
I’m using a 110mm Shimano UN-55 with a Specialized “flag” triple crankset, with 3.0 mm spacer under the DS “cup” to create asymmetry. I’m picky about my chainline - 43.5-45mm from frame centerline to middle ring - and I like a low Q Factor, which is 148mm for this setup. The pedals may not be exactly symmetrical here, but I’m not symmetrical, either.
FWIW, my Sugino AT on the other bike uses a 126mm SKF BB with 5.5 mm of spacers for the same chainline and Q-Factor
FWIW, my Sugino AT on the other bike uses a 126mm SKF BB with 5.5 mm of spacers for the same chainline and Q-Factor
Last edited by Dfrost; 04-26-23 at 11:59 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,484
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 808 Post(s)
Liked 763 Times
in
415 Posts
I’m using a 110mm Shimano UN-55 with a Specialized “flag” triple crankset, with 3.0 mm spacer under the DS “cup” to create asymmetry. I’m picky about my chainline - 43.5-45mm from frame centerline to middle ring - and I like a low Q Factor, which is 148mm for this setup. The pedals may not be exactly symmetrical here, but I’m not symmetrical, either.
FWIW, my Sugino AT on the other bike uses a 126mm SKF BB with 5.5 mm of spacers for the same chainline and Q-Factor
FWIW, my Sugino AT on the other bike uses a 126mm SKF BB with 5.5 mm of spacers for the same chainline and Q-Factor
Likes For Dfrost: