BUI-The importance of lights
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland ME
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You are more likely to hurt yourself while drunk biking than while drunk driving - or at least that's what the Freakonomics guys say.
Regardless, I use my bike to get home from the bar/parties all the time because I won't be hurting OTHER people. That punishment seems incredibly draconian.
//accidentally bumped a cop car after drinking a fifth of Jack Daniels. They thanked me for not driving. <3 UMaine police.
Regardless, I use my bike to get home from the bar/parties all the time because I won't be hurting OTHER people. That punishment seems incredibly draconian.
//accidentally bumped a cop car after drinking a fifth of Jack Daniels. They thanked me for not driving. <3 UMaine police.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland ME
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Which interestingly enough is more dangerous for the individual than driving while drunk. I don't buy that tho. I usually cruise at around at about 17-18mph on my bike. Going as fast as I can I usually will run maybe 4-7 mph. The difference in speed alone makes it more dangerous. The only thing that I will say is that you are more likely to only kill yourself when riding a bike drunk as opposed to driving drunk. Granted that the name of the offense was driving while drunk, he was charged because he was operating a vehicle while intoxicated.
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flagler Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 1,959
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 2015 Bianchi Kuma 27.2 24 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#54
a.k.a. QUADZILLA
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,505
Bikes: Super Pista, Basso, Big Dummy
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If cyclist expect to be taken seriously while riding in traffic (I.e. have drivers show respect for you as another vehicle rather that cutting you off just because you're on a bike) then that means you have to follow the rules of the road. Drivers are not going to respect cyclist as vehicles when they constantly see people riding through lights and ****.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flagler Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 1,959
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 2015 Bianchi Kuma 27.2 24 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why shouldn't we be able to use our smaller, quicker, more nimble vehicles in a manner that utilizes these special traits, as opposed to lining up with the death machines? We are not equal in space on the road, speed, pollution, threat to others, size/weight, or survival in a car-vs-bike crash. We are not equals, nor will I be treated as an equal in a crash. The rules of the road do not apply to me. Rather, I use my skill as a rider, common sense and courtesy to dictate my road behavior. If I had to depend on the "rules of the road" or some driver's respect to keep me alive, I would have died a long time ago.
If I didn't link this story would you ever believe that it would've ever happened ?
https://www.care2.com/causes/civil-ri...staurant-rage/
https://www.wbtv.com/global/story.asp?s=12082651
Last edited by fuji86; 08-11-10 at 02:24 AM.
#56
Come on bros,.
Honestly, the laws in some states regarding drinking while mobile (indiscriminate of the vehicle) sound like they aren't exactly appropriate for keeping the public safe. Sure, bikes in many ways can be less dangerous to yourself and others than cars; however,there are also circumstances where bikes can be equally if not more dangerous. There are so many variables involved: how busy the streets are, how drunk one is, the skill of the rider, climate, physical road conditions, carelessness of other parties involved, etc; that creating a law flexible enough to accommodate any and all situations, would be easily beaten in a court room. It is far easier for the law to say, "if you are moving by any means, and have a BAC of >x% then you will be charged with y fines/time."
This is why the laws are made in this manner, legislators would much rather falsely incarcerate people than let guilty people of heinous crimes go. That is where they get in trouble in the media. The OP didn't kill anyone, but perhaps if the law did allow for more flexibility, an individual who did cause some harm to the public could get out of/lessen the charges because of the inability to "prove" all of the variables to be true, i.e. busy-ness of street, carelessness of the victim, or other conditions "observed" by a police officer or prosecutor. The more the law can rely on physical evidence: photos, speed guns, breathalysers, wire taps, etc; the more these pieces of evidence of guilt will hold up in a court.
Thus we see blanket charges for what are obviously a variety in severity of crimes. It isn't a perfect system, and this imperfection is not limited to "bicycle law". Regardless of whether you feel the laws, the punishments for violation of these laws, or the ways the laws are enforced are appropriate; many of us still know the law, and should be willing and ready to face the consequences should we violate them. Many people are falsely incarcerated or charged everyday and it is an injustice. Unfortunately, efforts to change the law are done in powerless ways, i.e. by the defendant in the case. If you disagree with ANY law, please write your legislator/lobbying group/protest/etc to correct what you feel are injustices. Many people like to blame the legislative system; however, it is the fault of a public which is not applying enough pressure to demand appropriate laws.
/rant
tl;dr The best time to challenge/change a law isn't while you are in cuffs or a court room, but rather surrounded by many supporters with political power/influence at an appropriate time in an appropriate place. Until the law has been changed, don't hope for a "BFSSFG v Oregon" precedent to be set.
Honestly, the laws in some states regarding drinking while mobile (indiscriminate of the vehicle) sound like they aren't exactly appropriate for keeping the public safe. Sure, bikes in many ways can be less dangerous to yourself and others than cars; however,there are also circumstances where bikes can be equally if not more dangerous. There are so many variables involved: how busy the streets are, how drunk one is, the skill of the rider, climate, physical road conditions, carelessness of other parties involved, etc; that creating a law flexible enough to accommodate any and all situations, would be easily beaten in a court room. It is far easier for the law to say, "if you are moving by any means, and have a BAC of >x% then you will be charged with y fines/time."
This is why the laws are made in this manner, legislators would much rather falsely incarcerate people than let guilty people of heinous crimes go. That is where they get in trouble in the media. The OP didn't kill anyone, but perhaps if the law did allow for more flexibility, an individual who did cause some harm to the public could get out of/lessen the charges because of the inability to "prove" all of the variables to be true, i.e. busy-ness of street, carelessness of the victim, or other conditions "observed" by a police officer or prosecutor. The more the law can rely on physical evidence: photos, speed guns, breathalysers, wire taps, etc; the more these pieces of evidence of guilt will hold up in a court.
Thus we see blanket charges for what are obviously a variety in severity of crimes. It isn't a perfect system, and this imperfection is not limited to "bicycle law". Regardless of whether you feel the laws, the punishments for violation of these laws, or the ways the laws are enforced are appropriate; many of us still know the law, and should be willing and ready to face the consequences should we violate them. Many people are falsely incarcerated or charged everyday and it is an injustice. Unfortunately, efforts to change the law are done in powerless ways, i.e. by the defendant in the case. If you disagree with ANY law, please write your legislator/lobbying group/protest/etc to correct what you feel are injustices. Many people like to blame the legislative system; however, it is the fault of a public which is not applying enough pressure to demand appropriate laws.
/rant
tl;dr The best time to challenge/change a law isn't while you are in cuffs or a court room, but rather surrounded by many supporters with political power/influence at an appropriate time in an appropriate place. Until the law has been changed, don't hope for a "BFSSFG v Oregon" precedent to be set.
#57
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I did my victim's panel meeting last night. I sat in an auditorium with 100 other people, watched a slideshow of smashed cars and dead people. Listened to people who have had family members die in car accidents scold us, guilt trip us etc. The ONLY mentioning of cycling was that "cyclists are killed by drunk drivers."
I raised my hand and said, "I ride my bicycle drunk because its safer than driving. Have you ever heard of a cyclist running over and killing a pedestrian?"
The guy speaking (who lost his son to a drunk driver) said, "yeah, it happens ALL THE TIME!" then proceeded to call me a menace and said I deserve to be in jail.
I started laughing and somehow, still got credit for the class.
I raised my hand and said, "I ride my bicycle drunk because its safer than driving. Have you ever heard of a cyclist running over and killing a pedestrian?"
The guy speaking (who lost his son to a drunk driver) said, "yeah, it happens ALL THE TIME!" then proceeded to call me a menace and said I deserve to be in jail.
I started laughing and somehow, still got credit for the class.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flagler Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 1,959
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 2015 Bianchi Kuma 27.2 24 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I did my victim's panel meeting last night. I sat in an auditorium with 100 other people, watched a slideshow of smashed cars and dead people. Listened to people who have had family members die in car accidents scold us, guilt trip us etc. The ONLY mentioning of cycling was that "cyclists are killed by drunk drivers."
I raised my hand and said, "I ride my bicycle drunk because its safer than driving. Have you ever heard of a cyclist running over and killing a pedestrian?"
The guy speaking (who lost his son to a drunk driver) said, "yeah, it happens ALL THE TIME!" then proceeded to call me a menace and said I deserve to be in jail.
I started laughing and somehow, still got credit for the class.
I raised my hand and said, "I ride my bicycle drunk because its safer than driving. Have you ever heard of a cyclist running over and killing a pedestrian?"
The guy speaking (who lost his son to a drunk driver) said, "yeah, it happens ALL THE TIME!" then proceeded to call me a menace and said I deserve to be in jail.
I started laughing and somehow, still got credit for the class.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bK-Dqj4fHmM
#60
a.k.a. QUADZILLA
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,505
Bikes: Super Pista, Basso, Big Dummy
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Because at the end of the day, there is always going to be one pedestrian, one cyclist or one motorist somewhere that simply doesn't have the mental capacity to realize there are small children, senior citizens and the handicapped at risk on the sidewalks & streets. It's a pecking order and the system only works if the weakest link is protected from harm, mentally or physically, real or perceived. It's where each of us fits into the pecking order, not of being first in line, but of vulnerability.
If I didn't link this story would you ever believe that it would've ever happened ?
https://www.care2.com/causes/civil-ri...staurant-rage/
https://www.wbtv.com/global/story.asp?s=12082651
If I didn't link this story would you ever believe that it would've ever happened ?
https://www.care2.com/causes/civil-ri...staurant-rage/
https://www.wbtv.com/global/story.asp?s=12082651
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flagler Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 1,959
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 2015 Bianchi Kuma 27.2 24 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why shouldn't we be able to use our smaller, quicker, more nimble vehicles in a manner that utilizes these special traits, as opposed to lining up with the death machines? We are not equal in space on the road, speed, pollution, threat to others, size/weight, or survival in a car-vs-bike crash. We are not equals, nor will I be treated as an equal in a crash. The rules of the road do not apply to me. Rather, I use my skill as a rider, common sense and courtesy to dictate my road behavior. If I had to depend on the "rules of the road" or some driver's respect to keep me alive, I would have died a long time ago.
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/../images/misc/quote_icon.png)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/../images/buttons/viewpost-right.png)
If cyclist expect to be taken seriously while riding in traffic (I.e. have drivers show respect for you as another vehicle rather that cutting you off just because you're on a bike) then that means you have to follow the rules of the road. Drivers are not going to respect cyclist as vehicles when they constantly see people riding through lights and ****.
Last edited by fuji86; 08-12-10 at 07:52 AM.