Grant Peterson and Riv bikes
#51
Mostly Harmless
I'm pretty sure his production models are now built in Taiwan. I also disagree with your comment about these being unaffordable except to those with lots of disposable income...it all depends on priorities. If you decide to bike more, saving on gas, they're very affordable. If you chose to scrimp on clothes, or eating out, or the bar...they're very affordable. If a nice bike is a priority to a middle class person, they can afford one without too much sacrifice. It all depends on what your priorities are. Can the average person afford to save for a year and buy a $3000 bike? Yes...if they prioritize it. They may not need one, they may decide a less expensive bike is fine and adequate, but they CAN do it. Compared to most other sports and hobbies, cycling is affordable.
Rootboy - I don't consider 90% of the old bikes here classic...it all depends on your view. I'd much rather look at a Rivendell than another <fill in the blank hi ten>. Age alone doesn't impart much to me. Quality does.
Rootboy - I don't consider 90% of the old bikes here classic...it all depends on your view. I'd much rather look at a Rivendell than another <fill in the blank hi ten>. Age alone doesn't impart much to me. Quality does.
That makes them a viable alternative to a Madone or CAAD 8/10 (popular bikes around here)...And probably a better investment for most recreational riders.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,478
Bikes: I hate bikes!
Liked 856 Times
in
274 Posts
I can say that my Riv is the best riding bike I have come across. I don't ride racing bikes so I can't & won't compare it to something of that type. It has the stability of my P-15 Paramount and the rigidity of my newer OX Platimnum framed Salsa La Cruz. As far as I know, the A. Homer (which I have ) is made of True Temper OX platinum and Reynolds 725 tubes. It is built by Waterford but is less expensive that the same frame spec'd directly from Waterford. I was able to fit 35mm tires and fenders with no special modifications.
A P-15 Paramount went for $575. Adjusted for inflation, today it would cost $2,456. A complete Riv. A. Homer Hilsen would cost about $3k in todays dollars or $700 in 1975 dollars. It just does not that seem that expensive relative to the fact that it is a small batch product and most times the manufacturing costs are higher as such. Schwinn made thousands of Paramounts so it makes sense that the cost was a bit lower.
https://www.schwinnbikeforum.com/SLDB...dtail_7579.htm
https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/
A P-15 Paramount went for $575. Adjusted for inflation, today it would cost $2,456. A complete Riv. A. Homer Hilsen would cost about $3k in todays dollars or $700 in 1975 dollars. It just does not that seem that expensive relative to the fact that it is a small batch product and most times the manufacturing costs are higher as such. Schwinn made thousands of Paramounts so it makes sense that the cost was a bit lower.
https://www.schwinnbikeforum.com/SLDB...dtail_7579.htm
https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/
#53
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Liked 2,813 Times
in
1,664 Posts
I'm pretty sure his production models are now built in Taiwan. I also disagree with your comment about these being unaffordable except to those with lots of disposable income...it all depends on priorities. If you decide to bike more, saving on gas, they're very affordable. If you chose to scrimp on clothes, or eating out, or the bar...they're very affordable. If a nice bike is a priority to a middle class person, they can afford one without too much sacrifice. It all depends on what your priorities are. Can the average person afford to save for a year and buy a $3000 bike? Yes...if they prioritize it. They may not need one, they may decide a less expensive bike is fine and adequate, but they CAN do it. Compared to most other sports and hobbies, cycling is affordable.
Rootboy - I don't consider 90% of the old bikes here classic...it all depends on your view. I'd much rather look at a Rivendell than another <fill in the blank hi ten>. Age alone doesn't impart much to me. Quality does.
Rootboy - I don't consider 90% of the old bikes here classic...it all depends on your view. I'd much rather look at a Rivendell than another <fill in the blank hi ten>. Age alone doesn't impart much to me. Quality does.
Riv also does custom jobbies, I think the price on those is $3500.00
I agree with your sentiment here, I see no reason why Rivs can't be part of C&V.
I just don't think the price of Rivs are that far out there; I don't think my Hillborne was. They are nicely made, lugged steel, nicely painted and designed frames that have a lot of really cool features if that is what you are into. If you are into light, italian, tubular sportin' stuff, Rivs probably aren't for you.
The Bombadil and somewhat the Hunqapillar is Riv's version of a mountain bike, so they do make one. Is it as nice as the older Bridgestones? I don't know, the people who own them seem to really love them.
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,995
Bikes: old ones
Liked 10,458 Times
in
7,255 Posts
Warning: the link takes you to a thread in Road.......
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 1,152
Bikes: 1990 Burley Bossa Nova, 1992 Paramount PDG-70, 1993 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2005 Jamis Dakar XC Pro, 2007 Rivendell Bleriot
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
I'm pretty sure his production models are now built in Taiwan. I also disagree with your comment about these being unaffordable except to those with lots of disposable income...it all depends on priorities. If you decide to bike more, saving on gas, they're very affordable. If you chose to scrimp on clothes, or eating out, or the bar...they're very affordable. If a nice bike is a priority to a middle class person, they can afford one without too much sacrifice. It all depends on what your priorities are. Can the average person afford to save for a year and buy a $3000 bike? Yes...if they prioritize it. They may not need one, they may decide a less expensive bike is fine and adequate, but they CAN do it. Compared to most other sports and hobbies, cycling is affordable.
Rootboy - I don't consider 90% of the old bikes here classic...it all depends on your view. I'd much rather look at a Rivendell than another <fill in the blank hi ten>. Age alone doesn't impart much to me. Quality does.
Rootboy - I don't consider 90% of the old bikes here classic...it all depends on your view. I'd much rather look at a Rivendell than another <fill in the blank hi ten>. Age alone doesn't impart much to me. Quality does.
And you're right, a $1,200-3,500 frame is not impossible for a middle class person to buy, but given all the other options out there, you would have to be dead set on a Rivendell to spend that much when there are excellent if more utilitarian options for well under $1,000. Or you would have to be wealthy enough that you just buy what you want.
#56
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Liked 355 Times
in
178 Posts
I agree, and it probably wouldn't be what I bought, but I have spent Rivendell money on bikes, and maybe a little more.
One thing to consider is that Rivs actually hold their value a lot better than most others. You'll do a lot better buying and selling a Riv 20 years down the road than most other bikes out there. In terms of best value in bikes, I think it's a new custom Hetchins. They're surprisingly inexpensive, especially with the current exchange rate, and people haven't figured out that they're pretty cheap new - so they'll pay new prices + for a modernish Hetchins.
One thing to consider is that Rivs actually hold their value a lot better than most others. You'll do a lot better buying and selling a Riv 20 years down the road than most other bikes out there. In terms of best value in bikes, I think it's a new custom Hetchins. They're surprisingly inexpensive, especially with the current exchange rate, and people haven't figured out that they're pretty cheap new - so they'll pay new prices + for a modernish Hetchins.
#57
Senior Member
I think Grant has a specific business model that he follows while at the same time sharing a lot of good information, wisdom, and some strong opinions. He does it in an entertaining way that I generally enjoy. Whether you find particular Rivendell bike models appealing or not, they do fill a niche in the market and I believe they are quality products. It is difficult to fault one for delivering quality products and meeting market demand of a specific market segment - and actually working hard to develop or create that segment. Grant also seems to try to keep manufacturing in the U.S. when it is possible to do so. Like many quality off-the-shelf bikes, if the geometry of the bike and purpose is a good fit, I am sure just about any owner would love it.
I wanted a Saluki when they were making them, but could not afford one. Like a lot of C&Ver's, I have sought to quell my lust for bikes such as Rivendells and other similar bikes by reaching back to older, comparable models. A recent acquisition of mine that I consider to be a poor mans Riv is a 1983 Trek 850 I picked up with the help of fellow C&Ver facilitating. The steering geometry is identical to a Homer Hilson (650B model) or Surly Trucker Deluxe, but with much longer chain stays and a slacker ST angle than either of them.
I wanted a Saluki when they were making them, but could not afford one. Like a lot of C&Ver's, I have sought to quell my lust for bikes such as Rivendells and other similar bikes by reaching back to older, comparable models. A recent acquisition of mine that I consider to be a poor mans Riv is a 1983 Trek 850 I picked up with the help of fellow C&Ver facilitating. The steering geometry is identical to a Homer Hilson (650B model) or Surly Trucker Deluxe, but with much longer chain stays and a slacker ST angle than either of them.
Last edited by Ciufalon; 07-06-12 at 11:23 AM.
#59
Wookie Jesus inspires me.
These threads grow faster than I can read.
What he says makes sense to me, but a lot of it is phrased in a pretentious way. It annoys me when he has to bash on things that others may like to promote his own products. This one is a litte much for me: https://www.rivbike.com/product-p/carbonomas.htm
I love Rivbikes. They are very classy and I would love to own one.
What he says makes sense to me, but a lot of it is phrased in a pretentious way. It annoys me when he has to bash on things that others may like to promote his own products. This one is a litte much for me: https://www.rivbike.com/product-p/carbonomas.htm
I love Rivbikes. They are very classy and I would love to own one.
#60
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,742
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Liked 277 Times
in
224 Posts
He also wouldn't discuss how much a bike weighed, which for touring use it doesn't really matter.
I don't think someone who is racing is going to think "Rivendell" as the first place to go to get a racing bike!
Overbuilt? The Atlantis wasn't overbuilt by any means of the imagination, the twin top tube models were, but people have been touring with heavy loads on regular bikes and on Atlantis's for years and never cried out for an extra top tube. And there are other bikes on the market that are built for more heavy touring then the Atlantis is built to handle. The Atlantis is more of a girly bike, or a metrosexual bike, sure it looks nice but don't use it on a 1 year expedition self contained tour.
I don't think Grant is using poor quality steel either, but he could be using mid level steel to boost profits.
He has a niche market place and more power to him for marketing to that segment of the population; but like I said before, I know there are better bikes for the same price range as an Atlantis.
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I recently bought myself a Sam Hillborne and wasn't even in the market! My son and daughter were in a swim meet at UC Berkley and my wife and I took a little side trip to Walnut Creek during some downtime. She was interested in their mixte; the Betty Foy. We didn't have a lot of time but the staff took the appropriate measurements and put her on the Betty and myself, just for kicks, on the A. Homer Hilsen. Wild horses couldn't drag me to a double top tubed Hillborne. Everything felt great. The service was terrific and there was absolutely zero pressure to buy. Unfortunately, we just didn't have enough time to fully test ride the bikes.
A little background on myself. I'm a C&V'r type. My three rides are a 1983 Nishiki Sport, a 1986 Bianchi Squadra and a 1996 Trek 950 MTB. All three have been upgraded and modified in the Rivendell fashion. I had absolutely no need for another bike, but for the last couple years I was seriously test riding bikes whenever the opportunity presented itself. And with my kids being swimers we were on the road a lot and had plenty of opportunities. I test rode a lot of bikes, but nothing fit better than what I already had.
Shortly thereafter we had a weekend where both kids were out of town at the same time! We jumped on this opportunity and made an appointment with Rivendell for an extended test ride. I left it up to them whether they set me up with a Hilsen or a Hillborne and told them right up front I wasn't in the market. We were there for the Betty Foy and I was just along for another test ride opportunity. When we arrived everything was set up and ready to go. Grant remeasured to be sure, but the previous measurements were right on.
To make a long story short, we went on a 4-hour test ride. At the end of it all we came home with a Betty Foy, a double top tube green Sam Hillborne, and a couple smiles ear-to-ear. I think what people seem to miss is that the value of product is sometimes greater than the sum of its parts. Yes, there are less expensive alternatives, but I had never felt more comfortable and confident on a bike. I couldn't let this opportunity pass.
Matt
A little background on myself. I'm a C&V'r type. My three rides are a 1983 Nishiki Sport, a 1986 Bianchi Squadra and a 1996 Trek 950 MTB. All three have been upgraded and modified in the Rivendell fashion. I had absolutely no need for another bike, but for the last couple years I was seriously test riding bikes whenever the opportunity presented itself. And with my kids being swimers we were on the road a lot and had plenty of opportunities. I test rode a lot of bikes, but nothing fit better than what I already had.
Shortly thereafter we had a weekend where both kids were out of town at the same time! We jumped on this opportunity and made an appointment with Rivendell for an extended test ride. I left it up to them whether they set me up with a Hilsen or a Hillborne and told them right up front I wasn't in the market. We were there for the Betty Foy and I was just along for another test ride opportunity. When we arrived everything was set up and ready to go. Grant remeasured to be sure, but the previous measurements were right on.
To make a long story short, we went on a 4-hour test ride. At the end of it all we came home with a Betty Foy, a double top tube green Sam Hillborne, and a couple smiles ear-to-ear. I think what people seem to miss is that the value of product is sometimes greater than the sum of its parts. Yes, there are less expensive alternatives, but I had never felt more comfortable and confident on a bike. I couldn't let this opportunity pass.
Matt
#64
Port
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,851
Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro
Liked 2,235 Times
in
1,215 Posts
She already rides a 60cm 1990 RB-1...
__________________
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
#65
I'm a big fan of Rivendell and a bigger fan of Grant Petersen. At first, I was simply enthralled with the appearances of the bikes, particularly the A. Homer Hilsen. It didn't hurt that I'd been a fan of comfortable, upright steel bikes with wider tires since 1995. Over time, I began to have a stronger interest in frame geometry and materials in my quest for a "perfect" bike. I'm currently riding a mid-90's Trek that is at least 75% there and after much reading and experimentation, I've concluded that Rivendell's Hunqapillar may just be the sweet spot for me. I won't buy without riding and even then, the frameset's price of $1875 is prohibitive for me. There is a new budget fat tire heavy duty touring bike coming from Rivendell next Summer. This is supposed to be in the price range of the Hillborne and Betty Foy (around $1100). I may wait to see what results from this bike or I may just buy a Soma Saga, which is extremely close to the Hunqapillar in it's geometry, it not in it's looks.
Regardless of which bike I buy, I will continue to support Rivendell by purchasing from them if they have what I want.
Regardless of which bike I buy, I will continue to support Rivendell by purchasing from them if they have what I want.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,742
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Liked 277 Times
in
224 Posts
I'm a big fan of Rivendell and a bigger fan of Grant Petersen. At first, I was simply enthralled with the appearances of the bikes, particularly the A. Homer Hilsen. It didn't hurt that I'd been a fan of comfortable, upright steel bikes with wider tires since 1995. Over time, I began to have a stronger interest in frame geometry and materials in my quest for a "perfect" bike. I'm currently riding a mid-90's Trek that is at least 75% there and after much reading and experimentation, I've concluded that Rivendell's Hunqapillar may just be the sweet spot for me. I won't buy without riding and even then, the frameset's price of $1875 is prohibitive for me. There is a new budget fat tire heavy duty touring bike coming from Rivendell next Summer. This is supposed to be in the price range of the Hillborne and Betty Foy (around $1100). I may wait to see what results from this bike or I may just buy a Soma Saga, which is extremely close to the Hunqapillar in it's geometry, it not in it's looks.
Regardless of which bike I buy, I will continue to support Rivendell by purchasing from them if they have what I want.
Regardless of which bike I buy, I will continue to support Rivendell by purchasing from them if they have what I want.
#67
deleteme
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PNW lifer
Posts: 581
Bikes: deleteme
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
About the only thing I disagree with is his stance on clipless. Commute in urban heavy traffic with wet morning conditions 8 months out of the year sprinting from light to light...
I really really like what he stocks for clothes!! They just frekin work right for not much more than sweatshop stuff.
I really really like what he stocks for clothes!! They just frekin work right for not much more than sweatshop stuff.
#68
Senior Member
At one point, I thought I'd found my cycling guru - to the point where, in '95 I ordered a Road Standard built by Waterford of 753 tubing. I loved it (and still do). I bought the clothes too. Still have them and love them. I like his message that cycling doesn't have to be about racing. It can be about just getting around or going out into the country side with friends. We don't have to wear plastic clothes that glow in the dark. We don't always have to see who is fastest. His thoughts on friction shifting are just silly though.
I built the bike up as a sport touring bike but more toward the sport side with MA2 rims, Sachs New Success (rebranded Campy Chorus) 8sp Ergo group and such. I used it for riding and commuting in Seattle, then in Dublin Ireland and then back in Seattle. I did a 2 week tour in France/Belgium on it. In 2004, I got back into racing and it was my race bike - still with the Sachs Ergo shifters/derailleurs (and after something like 50,000 miles, I NEVER had an indexing problem where friction was needed!). It's not the reason I didn't win. However, i didn't want to crash it and ruin it so, I purchased a carbon Trek for racing and put it in the garage. It became my winter bike with fenders, lights etc. On a team ride during the winter, we ended up piling up in a slippery turn and I bent the fork. It hung on the wall in the garage for a few years and then i sent it back to Waterford to be straightened and painted. Here's a current picture. I'm sure Grant will love it.
I built the bike up as a sport touring bike but more toward the sport side with MA2 rims, Sachs New Success (rebranded Campy Chorus) 8sp Ergo group and such. I used it for riding and commuting in Seattle, then in Dublin Ireland and then back in Seattle. I did a 2 week tour in France/Belgium on it. In 2004, I got back into racing and it was my race bike - still with the Sachs Ergo shifters/derailleurs (and after something like 50,000 miles, I NEVER had an indexing problem where friction was needed!). It's not the reason I didn't win. However, i didn't want to crash it and ruin it so, I purchased a carbon Trek for racing and put it in the garage. It became my winter bike with fenders, lights etc. On a team ride during the winter, we ended up piling up in a slippery turn and I bent the fork. It hung on the wall in the garage for a few years and then i sent it back to Waterford to be straightened and painted. Here's a current picture. I'm sure Grant will love it.
#69
Senior Member
Grant's ideas about certain things are quirky and sometimes defy common sense like; blinky lights are dangerous because they attract drunks. Overall though, he believes in cycling for transportation and fun, not pretend racing. I think he is right, more people would enjoy the sport more, and more often, if they rode more comfortable and practical bikes.
How did a GP thread fall through the cracks for two months?.
Marc
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,742
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Liked 277 Times
in
224 Posts
I don't think anyone is arguing that. Personally I think their great bikes, but I also think their over priced. I got a Mercian for the price of an Atlantis, but the Mercian came with big selection of colors, huge variety of custom stuff including bosses, lugs, and tube sets, none of that Grant could do with the Atlantis, he could with the Rivendell except for the lugs and tube sets, but that would make the Rivendell about $1,000 more then the Mercian. You can get another custom bike called the Shamrock for about the same cost as the Atlantis and it too comes with a huge variety of custom stuff including custom lugs.
#71
Cisalpinist
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 5,557
Bikes: blue ones.
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
12 Posts
The mercian custom program is nice for people who like to design bikes themselves, who really take the time to research geo and put many many miles on all their bikes so they know what brazeons, tubing etc. they want. Grant takes all that work out of your hands - for a hefty sum, though. And yeah, bikes are like clothes, the label on it matters for most people.
Last edited by Italuminium; 09-10-12 at 12:51 AM.
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 378
Bikes: 1951 Armand Carlsen, 1969 DBS Deluxe, 1949 Diamant, 1978 DBS Winner Tandem, 1955 Herkules... to infinity and beyond!
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Threads like these remind me of Marxists chastising each other while the world marches on outside. Here we are, a small group of misfits that will never put a dent in the regular bike market, arguing about a guy who provides stuff that is very similar to what we want. BUT HE PUTS DOUBLE TOP TUBES ON HIS BIKES! And he probably belongs to The People's Front of Judea, too.
In all seriousness, can anybody explain to me the differences between Grant Peterson and Jan Heine's philosophy? As far as I've gathered
- Heine advocates low trail and luggage in the front
- Peterson favors higher trail and wider (mustache) bars
- Heine feels 650b tires are a value onto itself and that wide 700c will never get the same feel
- Peterson puts 650b on smaller sizes and 700c on larger
- Heine adheres to old-school aestethics, level top tubes and all
- Peterson will do anything to get the handlebars up
In sum Heine seems to be more "rules-driven" than Peterson, who is more pragmatic. Heine's rules do not seem to be dogmatic, but are a result of personal experience and testing (combined with a feeling that the old guys generally got it right). Chris from VeloOrange will then be closer to Heine than Peterson. What are your thoughts, gents?
In all seriousness, can anybody explain to me the differences between Grant Peterson and Jan Heine's philosophy? As far as I've gathered
- Heine advocates low trail and luggage in the front
- Peterson favors higher trail and wider (mustache) bars
- Heine feels 650b tires are a value onto itself and that wide 700c will never get the same feel
- Peterson puts 650b on smaller sizes and 700c on larger
- Heine adheres to old-school aestethics, level top tubes and all
- Peterson will do anything to get the handlebars up
In sum Heine seems to be more "rules-driven" than Peterson, who is more pragmatic. Heine's rules do not seem to be dogmatic, but are a result of personal experience and testing (combined with a feeling that the old guys generally got it right). Chris from VeloOrange will then be closer to Heine than Peterson. What are your thoughts, gents?
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,742
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Liked 277 Times
in
224 Posts
The mercian custom program is nice for people who like to design bikes themselves, who really take the time to research geo and put many many miles on all their bikes so they know what brazeons, tubing etc. they want. Grant takes all that work out of your hands - for a hefty sum, though. And yeah, bikes are like clothes, the label on it matters for most people.
When I got my Mercian I happened to be in the UK on a business/personal trip and went to Derby and they custom measured me and then made my bike with the features that I wanted (the build process took 3 months so they had to send it to my house).
I am not saying the Atlantis is a bad bike, in fact just the opposite, but I think for the money one can spend an additional $200 to $500 and get a true custom built bike. Shamrock even has very nice Sachs Nervex lugs they can put on for a small up charge; Shamrock will also do ANYTHING you want, and they even say they won't judge your taste. I've actually been to the Shamrock shop in Indianapolis just to see it, and people there are very nice, like the Mercian people, and you and leave there knowing these folks know what their doing.
Shamrock by the way is such a good builder that Sachs recommends them on his website, I find it odd Sachs didn't recommend Rivendell...
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,742
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Liked 277 Times
in
224 Posts
Threads like these remind me of Marxists chastising each other while the world marches on outside. Here we are, a small group of misfits that will never put a dent in the regular bike market, arguing about a guy who provides stuff that is very similar to what we want. BUT HE PUTS DOUBLE TOP TUBES ON HIS BIKES! And he probably belongs to The People's Front of Judea, too.
In all seriousness, can anybody explain to me the differences between Grant Peterson and Jan Heine's philosophy? As far as I've gathered
- Heine advocates low trail and luggage in the front
- Peterson favors higher trail and wider (mustache) bars
- Heine feels 650b tires are a value onto itself and that wide 700c will never get the same feel
- Peterson puts 650b on smaller sizes and 700c on larger
- Heine adheres to old-school aestethics, level top tubes and all
- Peterson will do anything to get the handlebars up
In sum Heine seems to be more "rules-driven" than Peterson, who is more pragmatic. Heine's rules do not seem to be dogmatic, but are a result of personal experience and testing (combined with a feeling that the old guys generally got it right). Chris from VeloOrange will then be closer to Heine than Peterson. What are your thoughts, gents?
In all seriousness, can anybody explain to me the differences between Grant Peterson and Jan Heine's philosophy? As far as I've gathered
- Heine advocates low trail and luggage in the front
- Peterson favors higher trail and wider (mustache) bars
- Heine feels 650b tires are a value onto itself and that wide 700c will never get the same feel
- Peterson puts 650b on smaller sizes and 700c on larger
- Heine adheres to old-school aestethics, level top tubes and all
- Peterson will do anything to get the handlebars up
In sum Heine seems to be more "rules-driven" than Peterson, who is more pragmatic. Heine's rules do not seem to be dogmatic, but are a result of personal experience and testing (combined with a feeling that the old guys generally got it right). Chris from VeloOrange will then be closer to Heine than Peterson. What are your thoughts, gents?
A high trail bike is a bit more effective for touring due to it's better low speed behavior.
Please note, high vs low trail is not a radical handling change from one to the other, more subtle then anything.
BUT, everyone's idea of how a bike should handle is different, to say one is better then the other is just not right, I know people who tour on low and others ride on high and they both have no problems. Besides it's more about getting use to the bike anyway be it low or high, once you get use to the way it handles you're not going care if it's low or high.
The reason for the tire size differences is that on smaller frames the 650 allows a bit more clearance between your toes and the front wheel so in sharp slow speed turns your foot won't come in contact with the front wheel causing a potential problem.
Higher handlebars are better for touring, it puts less stress on your hands, neck and back, and it allows for better control of a loaded bike as does wider handlebars. Mustache bars are just weird in my opinion, perhaps quirky is more accurate, and Grant tends to be quirky. I've never tried Mustache bars but really have no desire to try them either, I have yet to see a mustache equipped touring bike on the road.
I thought both Heine and Peterson like old school aestethics? Grant has both but his non level top tubes are only slightly angled, not as severe as some I've seen. The sloped top tube is suppose to help one mount and dismount a fully loaded bike easier then a level tube, this may be important for someone who has some sort of limited mobility. Both of my touring bikes are level top tube styles and I don't have problems.
So in summary neither is right or wrong, just a difference in philosophy that while different either can be learned to be ridden by the rider without thought as to whether or not they have a Heine or a Peterson design philosophy.
#75
You gonna eat that?
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Posts: 14,888
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
Liked 438 Times
in
155 Posts