Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

It's not about the bike. Wait a minute...yes, it is.

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

It's not about the bike. Wait a minute...yes, it is.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-13, 02:34 PM
  #26  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Liked 3,685 Times in 2,028 Posts
Originally Posted by thump55
But all else being equal, the guy with the lighter bike and aero wheels will be faster.
Talking to a triathlete here, so no argument. "It's not about the bike" is intended to mean that you aren't going to go from 18mph to 20mph by getting Di2 and Zipps, not that two hypothetically equal riders won't see different times from different equipment. Big gains - really big gains - are fitness-based, not bike-based. That's all.

I mean, I'm like a kid on December 24th waiting for my Rails to come.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 02:41 PM
  #27  
gsa103
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,400

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito (Celeste, of course)

Liked 104 Times in 77 Posts
Keep in mind 2 laps isn't really enough time to see much difference in aero. It took them a good chunk of the first lap just to get the bikes up to full speed. If you're trying to see an aero advantage you'd need more like 10 laps. They should have put a power meter in the hubs of both bikes. I'm guessing there's a 2x difference in Wattage
gsa103 is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 03:25 PM
  #28  
mr_pedro
Senior Member
 
mr_pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 645
Liked 75 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
and he wasn't even really trying.

He rode it in a position that people would typically ride a hybrid.

If he grabs the handlebars right at the stem, and does a deep tuck with bent elbows, I'm sure he could be faster.
Nah, I think this test was more about which of the 3 bikes had the longest gears. In the 1.5 minute race the pro could probably average >600W. That should be enough to spin out in the highest gears of these bikes on a flat surface, the rest doesn't matter then.
mr_pedro is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 03:38 PM
  #29  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,358

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Liked 769 Times in 396 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_pedro
Nah, I think this test was more about which of the 3 bikes had the longest gears. In the 1.5 minute race the pro could probably average >600W. That should be enough to spin out in the highest gears of these bikes on a flat surface, the rest doesn't matter then.
He wasn't limited by the gearing on the hybrid. He averaged right at 25mph. Say the hybrid had 46/14 for a high gear, which would be pretty low for such a bike, 120rpm still gets you 31+ mph.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 04:15 PM
  #30  
justkeepedaling
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 693

Bikes: CAAD 10, Cervelo P2 SL, Focus RG-700, Quintana Roo #101

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
and he wasn't even really trying.

He rode it in a position that people would typically ride a hybrid.

If he grabs the handlebars right at the stem, and does a deep tuck with bent elbows, I'm sure he could be faster.
Very easily. I used to do this on my Trek 7500FX, hands right on the sides of the stem, tucked all the way with chin on hands and rode through the police speed trap on the side of the road at 30 mph, flat road.
justkeepedaling is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 04:27 PM
  #31  
cmc0108
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Eagleville, PA
Posts: 67

Bikes: 2008 Trek 1.2 (Blah)

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure my little sister could have put out more power than that guy.

Including startup time, he averaged about 21 miles per hour over the course of 900 meters.
cmc0108 is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 04:38 PM
  #32  
Rowan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by gsa103
Keep in mind 2 laps isn't really enough time to see much difference in aero. It took them a good chunk of the first lap just to get the bikes up to full speed. If you're trying to see an aero advantage you'd need more like 10 laps. They should have put a power meter in the hubs of both bikes. I'm guessing there's a 2x difference in Wattage
Hell I hate it how power meters seem to be the answer to everything and have removed just about all the mystique from cycling.
Rowan is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 05:29 PM
  #33  
mr_pedro
Senior Member
 
mr_pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 645
Liked 75 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
He wasn't limited by the gearing on the hybrid. He averaged right at 25mph. Say the hybrid had 46/14 for a high gear, which would be pretty low for such a bike, 120rpm still gets you 31+ mph.
120, isn't that a bit high for 2 laps, maybe his sustainable cadence is in a more normal range of 90~100 rpm. Giving a speed of 25 mph.
mr_pedro is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 05:35 PM
  #34  
justkeepedaling
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 693

Bikes: CAAD 10, Cervelo P2 SL, Focus RG-700, Quintana Roo #101

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_pedro
120, isn't that a bit high for 2 laps, maybe his sustainable cadence is in a more normal range of 90~100 rpm. Giving a speed of 25 mph.
Not at all. I can push that for that distance no problem, especially when getting aero.
justkeepedaling is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:01 PM
  #35  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Liked 3,685 Times in 2,028 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
Hell I hate it how power meters seem to be the answer to everything and have removed just about all the mystique from cycling.
Interesting. I love exactly that about them.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:15 PM
  #36  
Rowan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
Interesting. I love exactly that about them.
Yes, you would because you compete. You want every last watt to count.

There are still millions of riders out there who wouldn't have a clue what a power meter is, though, and couldn't care less -- that lack of knowledge doesn't impinge on their enjoyment.

So maybe all hope isn't lost.
Rowan is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:17 PM
  #37  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Liked 3,685 Times in 2,028 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
Yes, you would because you compete. You want every last watt to count.

There are still millions of riders out there who wouldn't have a clue what a power meter is, though, and couldn't care less -- that lack of knowledge doesn't impinge on their enjoyment.

So maybe all hope isn't lost.
That's not the reason though... I really wish we'd produce the Grand Unified Theory while I'm alive, but I doubt we will. Or hell, just truly understand gravity.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:25 PM
  #38  
Dudelsack 
Senior Member
 
Dudelsack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: South Hutchinson Island
Posts: 6,647

Bikes: Lectric Xpedition.

Liked 96 Times in 46 Posts
Here's a quote from the comment section after the Guardian video:

"But what amazes me still at tri events is 15 stone clydesdales with a michieman physique substantially augmented by beer and chippies avoirdupois but then having spent 4 megaquid on road eye candy saving 5 pounds of mass."

I have no idea what the hell he just said.
__________________
Momento mori, amor fati.




Dudelsack is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:29 PM
  #39  
Dudelsack 
Senior Member
 
Dudelsack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: South Hutchinson Island
Posts: 6,647

Bikes: Lectric Xpedition.

Liked 96 Times in 46 Posts
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
That's not the reason though... I really wish we'd produce the Grand Unified Theory while I'm alive, but I doubt we will. Or hell, just truly understand gravity.
Well, that's easy enough. Gravity is the result of the bending of spacetime. The tricky part is how it resulted from a random quantum fluctuation. I'll get back to you on that one.
__________________
Momento mori, amor fati.




Dudelsack is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:32 PM
  #40  
corrado33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sure, it IS about the bike.... TYPE, as people mentioned above. Give that pro ANY road bike (even a $150 wal-mart one) and he'd beat any amateur in any bike, baring any mechanical malfunctions.

The ONLY thing that mattered on that professional bike was the bearings, position, and tires. The gearing didn't matter, the electronic shifting didn't matter, the aero didn't matter. Why? He most likely stayed in one gear once he got up to speed which was what, probably 5 or 6 gear changes? He was going in a circle so any wind was negated on the other side (plus he wasn't going fast enough).

I still, and will always argue that it's the rider, not the bike. Unless you are racing, money spent on bikes should go toward longevity and good build quality, not speed.

Saying it's the bike is almost as bad as saying that it's the runner's SHOES that make him fast, not the runner himself.

Besides, IF it was the bike, the Tour de France announcers would be talking MUCH more about the bikes and not nearly as much about the riders. (Think rally racing vs. Nascar)
corrado33 is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:45 PM
  #41  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Liked 3,685 Times in 2,028 Posts
Originally Posted by Dudelsack
Here's a quote from the comment section after the Guardian video:

"But what amazes me still at tri events is 15 stone clydesdales with a michieman physique substantially augmented by beer and chippies avoirdupois but then having spent 4 megaquid on road eye candy saving 5 pounds of mass."

I have no idea what the hell he just said.
My only quibble is that he should have said kiloquid, not megaquid.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 06:45 PM
  #42  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Liked 3,685 Times in 2,028 Posts
Originally Posted by Dudelsack
Well, that's easy enough. Gravity is the result of the bending of spacetime. The tricky part is how it resulted from a random quantum fluctuation. I'll get back to you on that one.
I'll be waiting here until you do.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 07:22 PM
  #43  
gnome
shaken, not stirred.
 
gnome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Shaky Isles.
Posts: 5,263

Bikes: I've lost count.

Liked 999 Times in 399 Posts
Originally Posted by Dudelsack
Here's a quote from the comment section after the Guardian video:

"But what amazes me still at tri events is 15 stone clydesdales with a michieman physique substantially augmented by beer and chippies avoirdupois but then having spent 4 megaquid on road eye candy saving 5 pounds of mass."

I have no idea what the hell he just said.
Loose translation: Very heavy fat guys, fueled by beer and fast food, turning up at a Tri on a ultra-expensive bike to save a minimal amount of weight.
__________________
Get a bicycle. You will not regret it if you live. ~Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
vBulletin: snafu
gnome is offline  
Old 07-17-13, 07:42 PM
  #44  
Bob Dopolina 
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
9 world championship jerseys and 2 Tour Feminin.

Not too shabby. Hell I'd wear Lipstick if I could ride like that.
This needs to be said again. That woman can ride.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 07-18-13, 05:03 AM
  #45  
thump55
I got 99 problems....
 
thump55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Does anyone know where the love of God goes, when the waves turn the minutes to hours?
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by corrado33
unless you are racing, or care about speed, money spent on bikes should go toward longevity and good build quality, not speed.
ftfy.
thump55 is offline  
Old 07-18-13, 07:56 AM
  #46  
PatrickGSR94
Senior Member
 
PatrickGSR94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391

Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)

Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
My only quibble is that he should have said kiloquid, not megaquid.
Maybe he was being sarcastic, like saying someone spent $4M on a bike.
PatrickGSR94 is offline  
Old 07-18-13, 09:11 AM
  #47  
Jobiensis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by corrado33
He was going in a circle so any wind was negated on the other side (plus he wasn't going fast enough).
I don't disagree that the pro would curb stomp a reporter, but this part is wrong.
Jobiensis is offline  
Old 07-18-13, 09:25 AM
  #48  
Doohickie
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Posts: 14,729

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

Liked 90 Times in 54 Posts
Originally Posted by pallen
"That's a great photo - what kind of camera did you use?"
I usually get questions like that about pics taken with a crappy cellphone camera.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.


Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline  
Old 07-18-13, 09:26 AM
  #49  
License2Ill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Imagine if this dude was using EPO.
License2Ill is offline  
Old 07-18-13, 10:00 AM
  #50  
rousseau
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rousseau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 2,811
Liked 39 Times in 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Dudelsack
Here's a quote from the comment section after the Guardian video:

"But what amazes me still at tri events is 15 stone clydesdales with a michieman physique substantially augmented by beer and chippies avoirdupois but then having spent 4 megaquid on road eye candy saving 5 pounds of mass."

I have no idea what the hell he just said.
Either you're in an alternate universe, or that's an obscure comment/reference that flew over my head, but I don't get it. What's not to understand?
rousseau is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.