rolliepollie

I can't find anything related to this, but is it legal to run a red on a T-intersection if I'm on the "straight" road? IE https://goo.gl/maps/uQfYd at the BART station. Does it make a difference if it has a bike lane or not? I see riders running it so I assumed it's fine.

Papa Tom

I don't know the area you're talking about, but you got me at "OK to run red light." No, it's NEVER OK to run a red light!

CommuteCommando

I often do. Watch for pedestrians.

bbbean 

What he said.

DiegoFrogs

Legal? I doubt it. Why would it be any different for you than it is for any other person? Why would it be any different in that situation than it is in any other?

Isaiahc72

In most cases, I really see no reason to do so. I wouldn't do it. I tend to like the practice of quick acceleration

Mr. Hairy Legs

Sometimes they are so pointless, you have to run them. Unless there are cops nearby.

fietsbob

Rural? no cross traffic?

vol

Every cyclist does that on the Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. I used to be the only dumb "odd ball" that stopped at every red light . Now I keep going except at the few intersections where it becomes a cross intersection with transverse roads. However, I do pay attention and slow down if there are pedestrians.

jeffmc511

Have any of you considered the possibility of this attitude contributing to the poor attitude drivers have towards cyclists? I've seen cyclists get into arguments with drivers over the fact that they have every right to ride on the road, after all, "it's the law!", and then proceed to break the law by running stop signs/red lights. I can count on one hand the number of times I've seen cyclists actually stop at red lights/stop signs, not counting one left hand turn on a very busy road frequented by cyclists, and I've even seen them run that one on occasion.

IMHO, along with the right to ride on the road, comes the responsibility to follow the rules of the road.

My opinion probably shouldn't count for much though, I just picked up my first bike in 15 years yesterday, and I only have, what, 3 posts...? I have more of a "driver" mindset than a cyclist one...

Papa Tom

>>>>IMHO, along with the right to ride on the road, comes the responsibility to follow the rules of the road. <<<<<<

Right on, Jeff.

capejohn

You know your area and you decide what is best.

the sci guy 

i don't get why cyclists want to be recognized as legal vehicles on the road with the right to be there then ignore the traffic laws.

stop at the frickin red light.

droy45

We are so few cyclists around here and I like to proclaim the "share the road" theme we have going on, so I always stop even when its pointless like no cars or peds around at all. I could easily just roll through and the cops wouldn't bother me but showing a good example to other drivers boosts our cycling perception. I never ride in a hurry and the lights are a resting point for me anyway. In the larger cities like VOL mentions above in Manhattan, I would follow his lead like he followed the others. That's a little different as there are many cyclists in that area. It only becomes an issue when you are of a minority and you stand out like a sore thumb when you ignore certain laws. Not saying its ok but more than likely its accepted in certain areas.

FenderTL5

If I understand the question; there's an intersection I pass every morning, early, that if there's no cars around I just roll through. It's a T intersection, I'm going straight through. The perpendicular road is on the opposite side of the road. I'm to the right. So even IF cars were turning into the route, I'd be clear in most cases.
Here's the spot I'm thinking of:
passing by the old convention center on the right, 6th Avenue to the left

It's NOT legal.
However at 6am, I'm often the only vehicle/person on the road other an a couple taxis parked along side the road waiting for someone to come out of the hotel(s).
The lights are timed just so, that if I'm stopped at 7th (behind the streetview link) this light will go red just as the light at 7th turns green - forcing a stop at both lights. Then If I stop at 6th, the same scenario repeats at 5th. If no one is around, I roll through 6th and it allows me to go from 7th through 5th without stopping. I always stop at 8th, 7th, 5th if red (I turn on 4th). It's only 6th that I give this treatment.
Again, not legal but otherwise I'm forced to stop at every block -with no one around.

droy45

Very impressive observation on your part. I like that

10 Wheels

If you are on the shoulder keep riding.

spdntrxi

stop sign or light… at least in CA it's not ok.. I was ticketed in college for that.

cooker

You know perfectly well it's illegal. Are you hoping we will give you our permission to break the law?

Sorry, you're on your own.

Solid_Spoke

I don't think running red lights at T intersections is legal where I live. That said, I will check to be absolutely sure there are no pedestrians crossing, and if it is safe to do so, will run the red light. I have been doing this for years with no problems.

Brennan

Motorists often criticize cyclists for breaking traffic laws. I don't buy it. First off, I'd be willing to wager that most motorists are serial lawbreakers themselves, most commonly in the form of exceeding the speed limit. You can test this yourself. Drive a car around at the exact speed limit and observe how many other cars pass or tailgate you. On some stretches of road, I've observed 100% of cars in violation. No, they just use the lawbreaking as a blunt tool to bash the entire cycling community with. If every cyclist obeyed every traffic law, the haters would still hate. Why? Because we "get in their way." This is why I sometimes violate the law for their benefit as well as mine. For example, on one of my regular routes, I have to leave the bike lane and cross two lanes of traffic to enter a left turn lane and make a left. The preceding intersection has a stoplight with very little cross traffic. So, I usually stop at the red, look carefully, then proceed through the intersection and make my way to the left lane to make the left turn at the next intersection. This means I am free and clear to do so while the rest of the traffic is stuck at the red light behind me. Were I to follow the law, I would wait until the light turns green, then merge into the moving traffic, annoying all the motorists by "getting in their way" and "slowing them down." Not to mention I simply feel safer crossing these lanes when they are not full of traffic. Bottom line is the traffic laws were written for motor vehicles, not bicycles, so following them as a cyclist doesn't always work so well. In general, I do follow traffic laws, but I believe certain violations can be justified depending on the circumstances.

wphamilton

On the straight of the T, with no pedestrians and no traffic turning left towards your direction, and staying on a bike lane or shoulder, I can't think of a single good reason not to run the red. Other than potentially getting a ticket.

There's no possibility of cross traffic, no way to disrupt or impede traffic as there would be at a regular intersection. Pedestrians have a right to expect the intersection will be clear when you have red and some will behave accordingly, unconsciously, but where there are no pedestrians or pedestrian crosswalk that's not even a factor. It's not legal, but it should be.

alan s 

If it's safe and no police around, go for it. No harm, no foul.

Telly

is it legal... no
do other cyclists do it... frequently
do they get away with it... almost always
and the ones that don't... end up injured or dead or if they are lucky, ticketed.

...we are all accountable for our actions, so... choose wisely and stay safe!

caloso

This.