Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

Why All The "Sky Is Falling" and Double Think About Bike Frame Fitting

Search
Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

Why All The "Sky Is Falling" and Double Think About Bike Frame Fitting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-15, 01:50 PM
  #51  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,672

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Liked 2,606 Times in 1,595 Posts
Originally Posted by Chare
Hi I am about 6ft and I am looking to do up a racer... Would this frame suit me?

L'eroica Vintage Raleigh Reynolds 531c Frame & Forks | eBay
Probably safer to start your own thread. There's a lot more to fitting a bike than your height, so...maybe.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 04-23-15, 06:07 PM
  #52  
Chare
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ah ok thank you!
Chare is offline  
Old 04-24-15, 09:40 AM
  #53  
Bandera
~>~
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: TX Hill Country
Posts: 5,931
Liked 184 Times in 123 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
4 cm frame difference, with the same geometry, less than an inch is needed to move the saddle back for the smaller frame. To have the exact same position relative to the pedal, and therefore imposing no compromise to pedaling efficiency, nor any other aspect to pedaling.
To be crystal clear: a 4cm variance from my 56cm properly fit frame either way is unacceptable.

On a 52cm Vitus seatposts were not long enough to set my correct seat height.
That certainly compromises pedaling efficiency.
Too small.

On a 60cm Vitus setting seat height correctly is not a problem, however saddle rails are too short to properly set my cleat to pedal axle position.
That certainly compromises pedaling efficiency.
Being unable to comfortably straddle a 60cm frameset presents another aspect that should be obvious as well.
Too tall.

A Goldilocks fit gets everything Just Right, anything else is a kludge.

-Bandera
Bandera is offline  
Old 04-24-15, 01:24 PM
  #54  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,672

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Liked 2,606 Times in 1,595 Posts
Originally Posted by Bandera
To be crystal clear: a 4cm variance from my 56cm properly fit frame either way is unacceptable.

On a 52cm Vitus seatposts were not long enough to set my correct seat height.
That certainly compromises pedaling efficiency.
Too small.

On a 60cm Vitus setting seat height correctly is not a problem, however saddle rails are too short to properly set my cleat to pedal axle position.
That certainly compromises pedaling efficiency.
Being unable to comfortably straddle a 60cm frameset presents another aspect that should be obvious as well.
Too tall.

A Goldilocks fit gets everything Just Right, anything else is a kludge.

-Bandera
Aren't those shortcomings of your parts, not the frames? It seems like longer or non-setback seatposts (much easier to find these days than in the past) could solve every issue except the standover on the larger frame.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 04-24-15, 02:06 PM
  #55  
Bandera
~>~
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: TX Hill Country
Posts: 5,931
Liked 184 Times in 123 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Aren't those shortcomings of your parts, not the frames? It seems like longer or non-setback seatposts (much easier to find these days than in the past) could solve every issue except the standover on the larger frame.
Nope, that's how the frame with it's non-sloping top tube and it's generation of components were designed to work for a Classic Road racing fit.
Too small and too large are what they are.





Converting to 'brifters, a CF saddle and a power tap would just be so wrong on this beauty as well.
Sometimes the Period Correct Police have it right.


If one desires a Modern Race fit, which I most certainly do not, select a modern frame in the proper size and contemporary component groups instead.



Buying the proper frame size as appropriate for French/Rando, Classic Race and Modern Race is just not that difficult, why kludge around if one is going to be doing high effort/long distance cycling.


-Bandera
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Vitus_1.jpg (96.9 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg
Dan_Martin_C3.jpg (109.6 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg
R-Velo-Bianchi_1940.jpg (78.8 KB, 16 views)

Last edited by Bandera; 04-24-15 at 03:49 PM.
Bandera is offline  
Old 04-25-15, 09:47 AM
  #56  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,985

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Liked 689 Times in 527 Posts
Originally Posted by tarwheel
I'll offer a contrasting viewpoint. Fit might not be so important for some individuals, particularly if they don't ride very often or very far. However, if you ride a lot of miles, fit becomes more and more important. I started developing all sorts of aches and pains when I went from being an occasional cyclist to riding 7,000+ miles a year. At that point, I had a professional fitting done and got a new bike that fit me much better, and the problems went away.

However, I will concede that a bike fitting is just a starting point. It will get you in the ballpark for what size frame to use, but it takes a certain amount of trial and error for a cyclist to find the right size stem, handlebar height and other fit parameters. And, of course, many cyclists can ride bikes within a certain size range by adjusting stem lengths and saddle heights. My bikes range from 56-58 cm according to manufacturers sizing, but I've got them set up very similar by using different stems, handlebar heights, etc.

Many new cyclists don't have a clue about what size bike to get, and fall prey to the fallacy that you fit a bike by standing over the top tube. That is where a good fitting can make a difference. In my opinion, the most important dimensions are top tube lengths and head tube lengths, and I can fit a range of bikes if those two measurements are within my zone. However, if a bike has a top tube that is too long or a head tube that is too short, I will never be comfortable riding it for very long. Standover is practically useless for fitting bikes, IMHO, yet many people rely on that almost solely.
I think some distinctions would be helpful and you are starting to make them. I think fitting is accomplishing what Hamilton described, to adjust the bike and its parts so that all your desired contact points and weight distribution are achieved. Sizing is to select a bike frame and its size, given its design, that lets you achieve that good fitting. Depending on design, a range of bike sizes could allow you to get an excellent fit.

Unless you are totally constrained to use a new bike exactly as you bought it, fitting and size selection are different steps in the process of getting a bike that fits well for you use.

Once you get helped with a fitting, you go out in the real world. There your body moves around as you deal with bumps, road gratings, cars, hills, live animals, dead animals, junk on the road surface, weather, fatigue, and lighting. You butt might not want to be in that perfect location all the time, or you might have a clothing malfunction that makes you change your position. Then you have adjustments to make. The fitting is just a starting point, even if it is perfect when you leave the store. But if you don't have a good sizing, the adjustments you can make to your fitting could be limited.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 04-25-15, 10:32 AM
  #57  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,985

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Liked 689 Times in 527 Posts
Originally Posted by Bandera
To be crystal clear: a 4cm variance from my 56cm properly fit frame either way is unacceptable.

On a 52cm Vitus seatposts were not long enough to set my correct seat height.
That certainly compromises pedaling efficiency.
Too small.

On a 60cm Vitus setting seat height correctly is not a problem, however saddle rails are too short to properly set my cleat to pedal axle position.
That certainly compromises pedaling efficiency.
Being unable to comfortably straddle a 60cm frameset presents another aspect that should be obvious as well.
Too tall.

A Goldilocks fit gets everything Just Right, anything else is a kludge.

-Bandera
As a math Goldilocks, something here is not Just Right, though far short of a kludge.

If you have a 52 cm frame with a 73 degree seat tube angle and a 56 cm frame with a 73 degree seat angle, and you set your saddle height the same on both, the horizontal distance from the saddle rail clamp to the BB will be the same. Same for a 60 cm frame with that same angle. Hence there is no need in those three cases to change the saddle position on the seatpost. It's just trigonometry. As long as your preferred height can be achieved on all three bikes (you might be too tall for a short post on the 52 or too short to achieve target height on the 60), you pedaling should be the same on all three bikes.

If the 60 cm Vitus has a different seat tube angle, you could run out of "slide range" on a saddle.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 04-25-15, 11:25 AM
  #58  
Bandera
~>~
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: TX Hill Country
Posts: 5,931
Liked 184 Times in 123 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
If you have a 52 cm frame with a 73 degree seat tube angle and a 56 cm frame with a 73 degree seat angle, and you set your saddle height the same on both
It's not just math, the realties of the hardware and the rider's personal requirements are in the real world and are Hard Constraints not academic abstracts.
Fitting a rider on bike properly assures that they are as comfortable, efficient and in control as possible.
Having the correct frame size matters in the process, which is tested on real hills for real hours by real riders on actual hardware not a spreadsheet.

Once more, the seatposts of the design era are Too Short to get the saddle height correct on a 52cm frame, it is simply Too Small.
Try finding a 25mm OD seatpost long enough for the suggested kludge ( good luck), if found the drop would be 9cm, not the 5cm required for a Classic Race fit as pictured.
That puts it into Modern Race fit, which I am not adapted to or interested in with decades on this very fine Guimard/LeMond system fit.

With the Classic Race fit I run DT controls, which is part of the fit design requirement for confident convenient shifting in a peloton of the era.
Try that with an extra 4cm of drop, no thanks that's Way below where I could operate. Too small, even if kludged.
Quill stems will not allow a taller position, it is what it is.

Control placement and operation is reflected in frame design for each generation of components.
The fit and sizing of the 1940', 1980's and 2000's takes into consideration control operation.



Modern Race fit relies on the 'brifter system ( with considerable seat time and adaptation),re-designed "cockpit" components and saddles to achieve the extremely aero position top riders use today.
If we still ran the Bianchi's '40's tech we'd still use a similar frame sizing from that era.
A 4cm frame size variance up/down today would be just as unacceptable as in my Classic Fit era. Ask in '33 if you are curious.

If the 60 cm Vitus has a different seat tube angle, you could run out of "slide range" on a saddle
It does, you will.
The Turbo on my 56 is slammed back to max to get the correct cleat to pedal spindle, a 25mm seat post did not come w/ set back: Too Big and a big wobbly pig as well.

Rule #1 in getting a proper fit for whatever high effort/long distance cycling one does has been to get the Proper Size frame and have the components selected correctly on it.
If you think that kluding around on framesets that Just Do Not Fit is worth the time, effort and $$$$ have at it.

I wear shoes that fit and ride bikes that do too, not so great for comfort or efficiency to cut holes in the toes or shove wadded up newspaper in one's sneakers.....

-Bandera
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
R-Velo-Bianchi_1940.jpg (78.8 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg
Vitus_1.jpg (96.9 KB, 17 views)
File Type: jpg
Dan_Martin_C3.jpg (109.6 KB, 17 views)

Last edited by Bandera; 04-25-15 at 03:52 PM.
Bandera is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SteelThisBike
General Cycling Discussion
12
01-01-19 05:09 AM
ValerieAnne
Fitting Your Bike
6
10-16-17 03:02 PM
MitchL
Road Cycling
6
08-18-10 12:54 PM
sbiker
Road Cycling
23
04-26-10 08:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.