Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

A bit unnerved

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

A bit unnerved

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-15, 11:39 AM
  #26  
Gramin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TobinH
? The comparison is completely valid. You don't stop driving because a driver dies, why stop cycling because a cyclist dies? The comparison doesn't rest on the similarities between cars and bikes.
Psh, your comparison is awful! This is more appropriate:

Each year approximately 34,000 people in the U.S. die from secondhand smoke. Does this mean I should become a hermit for fear that my next whiff of someone's cigarette could send me to the grave? Or perhaps I should invest in those surgical masks we so frequently see our friends in Asia wearing. And so much for my annual Vegas trips... can't walk into a casino without being greeted by a wall of carcinogens.

My suggestion:

Ride your bike. Pay attention. Don't be stupid.
Gramin is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 11:44 AM
  #27  
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
OP you are way out of line in both your attitude and the reasoning behind your arguments. First off everyone is trying to help. There is no reason for you to tell folks that they have to respond only along the lines that you expected.

Secondly, it is irrelevant what the differences are between pure automobile accident survival and bike-car accident survival are. What matters is the overall per capita statistics of cyclist deaths or serious injuries compared to the same for auto drivers and passengers. That is a composite of the chance of the accident in the first place AND the survival rate.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 11:45 AM
  #28  
scplus5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Eastern nc
Posts: 316

Bikes: 2009 caad 9

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TobinH
? I know you didn't...

You're really struggling to have an internet argument here.
Ummmm not really....

I'm not the one telling a guy that he's stupid for being scared to ride a bike now or for not being scared to drive a car, when in fact, nothing remotely similar was even said.
scplus5 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 11:49 AM
  #29  
DaveWC
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
Probability doesn't work that way. His risk of getting hit is exactly the same as it was before the other cyclist was hit. His potential event is not affected by the other.
I know. Hence the "irrationally". Much of the premise of this thread falls into the irrational category.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 11:53 AM
  #30  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,475

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Liked 894 Times in 458 Posts
Originally Posted by scplus5
No, and that's not a fair comparison. If things that were 20x the weight of my truck routinely zipped past me, within 3-4 ft of me, going 40 mph faster than I am, then we could use that example.
What's relevant is the relative degree of risk. If you look at the numbers on a per mile traveled basis, cycling is more dangerous than riding in a car. However, on a per hour of participation basis, the numbers flip around in favor of the bike.

So riding a bike in traffic (particularly if you obey the rules of the road, don't ride drunk, and aren't a ninja salmon) the risk is just not that high compared to driving.

And factor in the health benefits, and the mortality risk swings way in favor of cycling.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 11:53 AM
  #31  
Jarrett2
Senior Member
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
It's like diversionary psychology.

Now the OP is so mad, he's about to say F y'all and ride home with no fear at all
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 11:54 AM
  #32  
DaveWC
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by scplus5
And it's still not a valid comparison until you stand the same chance of survival in a car vs car wreck as you do in a car vs bike wreck. If you can't see that, you're either trying to argue or not great at logic yourself...
Of course it is. The point is you're looking at an accident involving a person doing an activity that you do. As a result of that accident you feel nervous doing the same activity. Whether that activity is driving a car, a bike or walking down the street the logic holds that it's ridiculous to be nervous doing something on the basis of someone in close proximity to you suffering an accident. The comparative risk of death in the various activities is meaningless to the the point that it's stupid to feel more at risk solely on the basis of another person's accident. I doubt you'll understand what I'm saying so I'll just leave you as I found you.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 11:55 AM
  #33  
Ben I.
Senior Member
 
Ben I.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Illinois
Posts: 261

Bikes: 2015 Ridley Fenix Ultegra, 2016 Ridley X-Trail

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've had a Lezyne Zecto Drive Taillight for several months now and really like it. Really nice build quality but not super expensive although not super cheap either ($25-30). It has 6 different modes, ranging 2 hrs 45 mins to 7 hrs and has a good battery indicator showing more levels than most so more useful.

Like you I wanted more lights to be more visible, especially since I've started doing more rides at night so I bought a Axiom Pulse 60 Taillight. I've only used it on a few rides but it is very nice and brighter. It has a quick release strap for seatposts and you can adjust the up/down angle so the light is actually pointing back. It was actually about the same price as the Lezyne ($25-30). It has 5 different modes, ranging from 2 1/2 hrs to 7 hrs.

Hope all that helps narrow the search down for a taillight!
Ben I. is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 11:55 AM
  #34  
TobinH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 240

Bikes: Marinoni Piuma, Boulder All-Road

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
ozbuk.jpg (97.8 KB, 1 views)
TobinH is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 12:00 PM
  #35  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,475

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Liked 894 Times in 458 Posts
Additionally, the point about you don't quit driving is to point out the fallacy in most people's risk balancing. You're currently overestimating the risk because of an ad hoc personal experience.

And paradoxically, the fact that cycling fatalities are pretty rare is what makes hearing of one startling.

38,000 people die in car accidents every year. It's so common it gets very little attention, and we don't perceive it as a substantial risk.

700 cyclists die in vehicle accidents every year. They are relatively rare and thus get more attention, (particularly on BF) and we give them undue weight in our risk balancing.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 12:03 PM
  #36  
scplus5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Eastern nc
Posts: 316

Bikes: 2009 caad 9

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveWC
Of course it is. The point is you're looking at an accident involving a person doing an activity that you do. As a result of that accident you feel nervous doing the same activity. Whether that activity is driving a car, a bike or walking down the street the logic holds that it's ridiculous to be nervous doing something on the basis of someone in close proximity to you suffering an accident. The comparative risk of death in the various activities is meaningless to the the point that it's stupid to feel more at risk solely on the basis of another person's accident. I doubt you'll understand what I'm saying so I'll just leave you as I found you.
Im not an idiot and understood all this before I even posted here. Hence the reason I have still been riding my bike rather than putting it on Craigslist on a whim.
I'm sorry it's so unfathomable to you guys that someone hearing of a bad situation might cause the risks of the activity to be a little more conscious in their mind, at least for a day or so.
scplus5 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 12:06 PM
  #37  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,475

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Liked 894 Times in 458 Posts
Originally Posted by scplus5
Im not an idiot and understood all this before I even posted here. Hence the reason I have still been riding my bike rather than putting it on Craigslist on a whim.
I'm sorry it's so unfathomable to you guys that someone hearing of a bad situation might cause the risks of the activity to be a little more conscious in their mind, at least for a day or so.
I for one, didn't mean to imply that you're an idiot. And it's perfectly understandable that your personal experience can affect you.

Where I and I think others are coming from is trying to keep things in perspective.

Over the years there has been a lot of fear mongering on BF. Because a great percentage of Bike fatalities anywhere in the US, and to a lesser degree the World, get discussed here, there's a tendency to believe cyclists are dropping like flies and to distort the risks involved.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 12:09 PM
  #38  
scplus5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Eastern nc
Posts: 316

Bikes: 2009 caad 9

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
I for one, didn't mean to imply that you're an idiot. And it's perfectly understandable that your personal experience can affect you.

Where I and I think others are coming from is trying to keep things in perspective.

Over the years there has been a lot of fear mongering on BF. Because a great percentage of Bike fatalities anywhere in the US, and to a lesser degree the World, get discussed here, there's a tendency to believe cyclists are dropping like flies and to distort the risks involved.
i know you didn't, and I appreciate your comments...however, the guy above that apparently thought his comment was two samrt fer me was trying to imply I was stupid.
scplus5 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 12:33 PM
  #39  
WNCGoater
Senior Member
 
WNCGoater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 946

Bikes: Diamondback Century 3. Marin Four Corners

Liked 17 Times in 9 Posts
If I may interrupt for a moment...

On the other side of the coin, a bicyclist was killed in my town this week. She was in the left lane of a divided highway, 6:30am, no lights, no reflectors, no reflective clothing, no helmet.(not that a helmet would have made a difference). She was right where the speed limit goes from 45-50mph. The first vehicle that hit her, a pickup, never saw her until contact. It knocked her across the center turn lane and an oncoming car hit her again.
She was dead at the scene. The Fire Dept had to come wash down the road.

It's not always the motorists fault.

She was riding a bike (her only mode of transportation) to a job 10 miles away she had just gotten. Single mom, she left two small children behind.

Very sad but being unsafe on a bike will get you killed. The poor folks that hit her will have to live with it.

edit to add: Yes, it IS a bit unnerving to get these "wake up" calls as to the dynamics involved in a bike/car collision. The cyclist will lose every time. Comparing it to automobile fatalities or statistical analysis is irrelevant IMO. A cyclist gets killed, even if being unsafe, and it drives home just how vulnerable we are out there.

Last edited by WNCGoater; 09-11-15 at 12:37 PM.
WNCGoater is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 12:38 PM
  #40  
pressed001
glorified 5954
 
pressed001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 736
Liked 49 Times in 23 Posts
Originally Posted by scplus5
No, and that's not a fair comparison. If things that were 20x the weight of my truck routinely zipped past me, within 3-4 ft of me, going 40 mph faster than I am, then we could use that example.
I agree completely.
pressed001 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 12:38 PM
  #41  
scplus5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Eastern nc
Posts: 316

Bikes: 2009 caad 9

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ugh...so sad...
scplus5 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 12:40 PM
  #42  
pressed001
glorified 5954
 
pressed001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 736
Liked 49 Times in 23 Posts
Originally Posted by scplus5
And it's still not a valid comparison until you stand the same chance of survival in a car vs car wreck as you do in a car vs bike wreck. If you can't see that, you're either trying to argue or not great at logic yourself...
Well said!
pressed001 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 12:49 PM
  #43  
pressed001
glorified 5954
 
pressed001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 736
Liked 49 Times in 23 Posts
Originally Posted by scplus5
I have a thunderbolt...any other suggestions?
Maybe we should get back to the original question. It seems we may have strayed.
pressed001 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 01:09 PM
  #44  
DaveWC
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by scplus5
i know you didn't, and I appreciate your comments...however, the guy above that apparently thought his comment was two samrt fer me was trying to imply I was stupid.
I wasn't implying you were stupid. You went from saying this...

Originally Posted by scplus5
No, and that's not a fair comparison.
regarding the comparison of stopping driving your car because of a car accident, to this...

Originally Posted by scplus5
Im not an idiot and understood all this before I even posted here.
when I explained why the comparison was valid.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 01:20 PM
  #45  
scplus5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Eastern nc
Posts: 316

Bikes: 2009 caad 9

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveWC
I wasn't implying you were stupid. You went from saying this...



regarding the comparison of stopping driving your car because of a car accident, to this...



when I explained why the comparison was valid.
Mmmmmkay. So "I doubt you'll understand" must mean something different where I live.

And the comparison still is apples to oranges. Apples to apples would be car wrecks resulting in death vs bike wrecks with cars resulting in death. Not just straight bike vs car wreck deaths in America.

I totally understand this risks of having a wreck in the first place is very low...but if it DOES happen, you're screwed.
scplus5 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 01:22 PM
  #46  
scplus5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Eastern nc
Posts: 316

Bikes: 2009 caad 9

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Screw you guys, I'm going to ride my bike. Lol
scplus5 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 01:28 PM
  #47  
DaveWC
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by scplus5
Mmmmmkay. So "I doubt you'll understand" must mean something different where I live.
Ok, you got me there. Given that you're still clinging to the idea that it's apples & oranges I'd say that I was correct. (Drive safely)
DaveWC is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 01:43 PM
  #48  
RPK79
Custom User Title
 
RPK79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo

Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by scplus5
Until that cement mixer passes me at 100 mph in a 55 zone, it's apples to oranges.
Ever been stopped in a left turn lane at a light and had a semi drive past you at highway speed on the right? Yeah? Apples to apples. #lawyered

RPK79 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 02:18 PM
  #49  
silversx80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445

Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10

Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by scplus5
Don't you know that lacking confidence now is highly irrational and unlogical? After all, the odds are waaaaay on your side. HTFU.

Sarcasm aside, what happened?
Riding some residential roads first thing in the morning. Driver couldn't see me and I was struck. It was an accident, and he stuck around until the ambulance took me away, but it was still his fault and he was cited (he owned up to fault as well). I broke a collarbone along with some other medical trauma. Carbon fiber bike looked okay on the surface, but it was shot. I feel bad for the driver... I can't imagine how I'd feel if I ever struck a cyclist.
silversx80 is offline  
Old 09-11-15, 07:11 PM
  #50  
Giant Fuji
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Eastern NC, USA
Posts: 264

Bikes: 2015 Giant Talon 4, 2015 Fuji Roubaix 1.1, 2010 Fuji Newest 3.0

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That cyclist was hit from behind by a Nissan Titan pickup. No real details, but the cyclist was wearing a helmet and a reflective vest and had a light on his bike. Listed in serious condition. Charges are pending on the driver of the truck. The area where he was struck does have a wide shoulder, I have ridden there before and there is plenty of room to be out of the flow of traffic. Like I said, I haven't seen any details so who knows what really happened.
Giant Fuji is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.