Ask your small, random, track-related questions here
#3276
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I used to ride a Felt TK2, which has traditional sprint geometry, and I actually hated how it responded sometimes. I wouldn't really be able to describe it - it's been a few years - but while I liked the nimbleness of a steep headtube there was something else I didn't like.
When I replaced the TK2 with a Langster Pro, the LP's 73deg headtube and 45mm fork struck me as "not right" - even though the trail measurement winds up being a totally reasonable number, like 56 or 57 IIRC.
When I replaced the TK2 with a Langster Pro, the LP's 73deg headtube and 45mm fork struck me as "not right" - even though the trail measurement winds up being a totally reasonable number, like 56 or 57 IIRC.
This is relevant to a project Colby Pearce and I are undertaking. We've been frustrated by the handling of certain frames and the relative dearth of definitive information on what works best for track. So, we're going to build a number of frames, for which we'll vary the geometry in a controlled fashion, set them up identically, and then go ride test and race them. Full disclosure, this is a commercial endeavor, but as an additional output I hope to be able to answer some of these questions in a data-based way soon.
#3277
VeloSIRraptor
now on that point - generally agree.
A bunch (eg, more than 3) early gen PlanetX track bikes at Marymoor just got "mushy" - noticible flex in the way they rode after a few years. No one had any good explaination for it- even the Boeing carbon guys out there - but it wasn't imaginary either. The later ones didn't seem to have that problem, but the conversation reminds me of it.
Yeah- unless medals and fancy-shirts are in the balance, |a currently functional track bike > a bike that isn't free|
A bunch (eg, more than 3) early gen PlanetX track bikes at Marymoor just got "mushy" - noticible flex in the way they rode after a few years. No one had any good explaination for it- even the Boeing carbon guys out there - but it wasn't imaginary either. The later ones didn't seem to have that problem, but the conversation reminds me of it.
Yeah- unless medals and fancy-shirts are in the balance, |a currently functional track bike > a bike that isn't free|
#3278
VeloSIRraptor
#3279
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 3,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
now on that point - generally agree.
A bunch (eg, more than 3) early gen PlanetX track bikes at Marymoor just got "mushy" - noticible flex in the way they rode after a few years. No one had any good explaination for it- even the Boeing carbon guys out there - but it wasn't imaginary either. The later ones didn't seem to have that problem, but the conversation reminds me of it.
Yeah- unless medals and fancy-shirts are in the balance, |a currently functional track bike > a bike that isn't free|
A bunch (eg, more than 3) early gen PlanetX track bikes at Marymoor just got "mushy" - noticible flex in the way they rode after a few years. No one had any good explaination for it- even the Boeing carbon guys out there - but it wasn't imaginary either. The later ones didn't seem to have that problem, but the conversation reminds me of it.
Yeah- unless medals and fancy-shirts are in the balance, |a currently functional track bike > a bike that isn't free|
#3280
VeloSIRraptor
Especially given that they are track bikes used on an outdoor track, that's just not a meaningful number of cycles to start talking about flex-based delam of materials.
#3281
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sure, happy to share to the extent I can do so based on the early R&D stage and the forum rules related to commercial advertising. Colby and I have known each other for a few years and we share a frustration with the available frame offerings out there - he from the perspective of a coach and fitter, I as a rider. We also realized that we were thinking along the same lines as to how we'd do stock frame sizing differently to fit more people and their event-specific needs, and what traditional wisdom about geometry we want to test.
Both the prototypes and production frames will be 7000 series aluminum. I've got tube sets on order for the first five prototypes and am having a custom dropout designed. The website isn't up yet, but when it is, there will be a lot more detail on the design philosophy, geo and sizing, and Colby's thoughts on fitting a track bike. The company is Fifty Point One Racing.
#3282
Senior Member
I do not know the process used for bike frames so they may not be as sophisticated as those used for aircraft parts. Some epoxies absorb moisture so that might be a reason for the bikes becoming "mushy". I also wonder if sunlight can cause deterioration in carbon frames.
#3283
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Wrexham, UK
Posts: 90
Bikes: Cannondale Caad8, Claud Butler Roubaix, Raleigh Equipe
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A key indicator is muscle fiber type. Generally, your muscle fiber type percentages does not change over time. So if you were predisposed to being an endurance athlete as a kid, you'll likely be the same as an adult. Same for sprinters.
High school athletics are a good testing ground for muscle fiber time because most schools have the students doing all kinds of sports that involve everything from short bursts of speed (100M dash) to long events (1 mile run). And the sample sizes are relatively large (LOTS of kids in the school doing the same things), so if you are above average in something there, this is good.
If you were in fair shape, your performance, likes, and dislikes of these events will lend a valuable clues to your muscle fiber type percentage. In layman's terms: TALENT
So...
If you were a "sprinter" in high school track and field or were above average in sports that use fast-twitch muscles or lots of power, then you will probably lean towards being better at sprint events because you have a higher percentage of "fast twitch" muscles.
If you were an "long distance" runner in high school track and field (events 1 mile /1,600m or longer) then you will likely be better at endurance events because you have a higher percentage of fatigue-resistance "slow twitch" muscles.
If you were best at "middle distance" events like the 800M or you didn't particularly excel in sprint or long events, then you may be an all-around racer or simply above-average across the board.
.
High school athletics are a good testing ground for muscle fiber time because most schools have the students doing all kinds of sports that involve everything from short bursts of speed (100M dash) to long events (1 mile run). And the sample sizes are relatively large (LOTS of kids in the school doing the same things), so if you are above average in something there, this is good.
If you were in fair shape, your performance, likes, and dislikes of these events will lend a valuable clues to your muscle fiber type percentage. In layman's terms: TALENT
So...
If you were a "sprinter" in high school track and field or were above average in sports that use fast-twitch muscles or lots of power, then you will probably lean towards being better at sprint events because you have a higher percentage of "fast twitch" muscles.
If you were an "long distance" runner in high school track and field (events 1 mile /1,600m or longer) then you will likely be better at endurance events because you have a higher percentage of fatigue-resistance "slow twitch" muscles.
If you were best at "middle distance" events like the 800M or you didn't particularly excel in sprint or long events, then you may be an all-around racer or simply above-average across the board.
.
I guess the only way to know is to go try all the events I can! I think the kilo can be a good one though.
There's plenty of scope in my track league. Actually- there's 2 which are both around an hours drive away. One tends to do more endurance races, and the other has sprint events too, so I can mix and match or alternate between a sprint week and an endurance week
#3285
Full Member
IIRC, it's just inches and it goes back to high wheel bikes where each rotation of the pedals produced X numbers of inches of travel. High wheel bikes had many different wheel diameters, so inches of travel was a good way to compare.
Here's the starting grid for a local high wheel race. Greg Lemond is the 4th rider from the front.
#3286
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Because it sounds way more awesome to say "ninety eight" than "forty eight thirteen". Helps weed out the roadies.
But for real, I think it stems from the early Penny Farthing-style bikes: the pedals were directly connected to the front wheel, so the "inches developed" was just the diameter of the front wheel. The manly men racing those bikes would compare dic er. . . wheel sizes in inches developed. It stuck.
TC
But for real, I think it stems from the early Penny Farthing-style bikes: the pedals were directly connected to the front wheel, so the "inches developed" was just the diameter of the front wheel. The manly men racing those bikes would compare dic er. . . wheel sizes in inches developed. It stuck.
TC
#3287
Full Member
Because it sounds way more awesome to say "ninety eight" than "forty eight thirteen". Helps weed out the roadies.
But for real, I think it stems from the early Penny Farthing-style bikes: the pedals were directly connected to the front wheel, so the "inches developed" was just the diameter of the front wheel. The manly men racing those bikes would compare dic er. . . wheel sizes in inches developed. It stuck.
TC
But for real, I think it stems from the early Penny Farthing-style bikes: the pedals were directly connected to the front wheel, so the "inches developed" was just the diameter of the front wheel. The manly men racing those bikes would compare dic er. . . wheel sizes in inches developed. It stuck.
TC
Your memory is better than mine, I think it was the wheel diameter.
#3288
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 152
Bikes: Planet X Pro Carbon, Dolan FXE, Fuji Transonic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for clearing that up for me guys. I was always confused as I'm only relatively new to bikes and I've only ever had to deal with 700c wheels and couldn't understand as to why literal ratios (52/16=3.25, 48/15= 3.87) weren't used as a measure of gear magnitude.
#3289
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 255
Bikes: Ritte 8055, Felt TK3, Cervelo S2 & P3, Giant TCR
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Carleton likes to do 650's
#3290
aka mattio
Sure, happy to share to the extent I can do so based on the early R&D stage and the forum rules related to commercial advertising. Colby and I have known each other for a few years and we share a frustration with the available frame offerings out there - he from the perspective of a coach and fitter, I as a rider. We also realized that we were thinking along the same lines as to how we'd do stock frame sizing differently to fit more people and their event-specific needs, and what traditional wisdom about geometry we want to test.
Both the prototypes and production frames will be 7000 series aluminum. I've got tube sets on order for the first five prototypes and am having a custom dropout designed. The website isn't up yet, but when it is, there will be a lot more detail on the design philosophy, geo and sizing, and Colby's thoughts on fitting a track bike. The company is Fifty Point One Racing.
Both the prototypes and production frames will be 7000 series aluminum. I've got tube sets on order for the first five prototypes and am having a custom dropout designed. The website isn't up yet, but when it is, there will be a lot more detail on the design philosophy, geo and sizing, and Colby's thoughts on fitting a track bike. The company is Fifty Point One Racing.
#3291
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm currently spending the most time on getting a custom dropout designed and manufactured to test on the prototypes, and working to set up frame production in the US. As we start prototype testing, we plan to post the latest to the website. That, however, has taken a backseat to getting the prototypes made.
If there are questions or asks for the product, I'm happy to take them here!
#3294
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 255
Bikes: Ritte 8055, Felt TK3, Cervelo S2 & P3, Giant TCR
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#3295
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a question about what I think is called "pulling a wheel".
I'm new to track, and am on a cheap "Pure Fix" track frame that I know is hardly good enough for the track, but I do have friends who race this frame in Cat 3 on the track and do fine. I do however have good components (Sram omnium, ultegra pedals, paul hubs, etc). Yesterday was my first time doing standing start sprints, and on the first go, when I put out my max power the drive side of the rear axle slipped and the wheel jammed in to the seat stays and I screeched to a stop. I thought perhaps I just didn't tighten the axle nut enough, so I realigned/tensioned the wheel and then cranked down the nut as hard as I reasonable could. Next go, I got about 100m into the sprint and then the same thing happened. I luckily was able to keep upright, but am now very hesitant to ride this bike again, as the thought of this happening again is always on my mind. I was told that chain tensioners would remedy this problem, but am still not sure if I possibly just have a POS bike. My main question is, can I rest easy if I install chain tensioners? Or could this be a wheel/frame problem?
I'm new to track, and am on a cheap "Pure Fix" track frame that I know is hardly good enough for the track, but I do have friends who race this frame in Cat 3 on the track and do fine. I do however have good components (Sram omnium, ultegra pedals, paul hubs, etc). Yesterday was my first time doing standing start sprints, and on the first go, when I put out my max power the drive side of the rear axle slipped and the wheel jammed in to the seat stays and I screeched to a stop. I thought perhaps I just didn't tighten the axle nut enough, so I realigned/tensioned the wheel and then cranked down the nut as hard as I reasonable could. Next go, I got about 100m into the sprint and then the same thing happened. I luckily was able to keep upright, but am now very hesitant to ride this bike again, as the thought of this happening again is always on my mind. I was told that chain tensioners would remedy this problem, but am still not sure if I possibly just have a POS bike. My main question is, can I rest easy if I install chain tensioners? Or could this be a wheel/frame problem?
#3296
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A chain tensioner on the drive side will keep the wheel from pulling forward, but the the add-on type is a bit of pain to deal with and may or may not fit your frame.
What kind of dropouts do you have, the ones with an insert bolted in? Those are notorious for slippage.
#3297
Elitist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
If you have allen-bolt hubs like these:
Then that's probably your problem.
Those don't apply as much torque as you would get with a15mm nut like these:
Paul hubs are nice looking, but some inexpensive Formula hubs would probably solve your slipping problem.
Can you borrow a wheel from a friend to test?
If you test and the standard track wheel still slips, then it's your dropouts as Koogar suggests.
Then that's probably your problem.
Those don't apply as much torque as you would get with a15mm nut like these:
Paul hubs are nice looking, but some inexpensive Formula hubs would probably solve your slipping problem.
Can you borrow a wheel from a friend to test?
If you test and the standard track wheel still slips, then it's your dropouts as Koogar suggests.
#3298
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the help guys. I think the dropouts are the insert type. And yea I have the allen bolt hubs. Don't really have anyone I can borrow a wheel from to test if it's slippery dropouts or the bolt. A chain tensioner seems to be the cheapest fix, would having chain tensioners on both sides of the dropout garauntee I won't pull a wheel? Really just looking for a fool-proof solution as I'm a bit hesitant to put out a full sprint due to fear of my wheel slipping again.
#3299
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the help guys. I think the dropouts are the insert type. And yea I have the allen bolt hubs. Don't really have anyone I can borrow a wheel from to test if it's slippery dropouts or the bolt. A chain tensioner seems to be the cheapest fix, would having chain tensioners on both sides of the dropout garauntee I won't pull a wheel? Really just looking for a fool-proof solution as I'm a bit hesitant to put out a full sprint due to fear of my wheel slipping again.
#3300
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 3,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the help guys. I think the dropouts are the insert type. And yea I have the allen bolt hubs. Don't really have anyone I can borrow a wheel from to test if it's slippery dropouts or the bolt. A chain tensioner seems to be the cheapest fix, would having chain tensioners on both sides of the dropout garauntee I won't pull a wheel? Really just looking for a fool-proof solution as I'm a bit hesitant to put out a full sprint due to fear of my wheel slipping again.