Any Clydes on Touring Bikes? (LHT, Soma Saga, etc)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Any Clydes on Touring Bikes? (LHT, Soma Saga, etc)
In general, I have read in quite a few places that touring bikes ride like a tank when unloaded. However, when weight is added with panniers, etc, etc, the bike seems to come into its own or ride less "tank-like".
WARNING - DUMB QUESTION AHEAD ...
I weight 325. So in general would touring bikes still ride "tank-like" when riding unloaded with only me on the bike? Or would it ride more like when it's weighted down with panniers, etc, etc? Does it take spreading the weight on front/rear racks for the bike to ride less "tank-like"?
WARNING - DUMB QUESTION AHEAD ...
I weight 325. So in general would touring bikes still ride "tank-like" when riding unloaded with only me on the bike? Or would it ride more like when it's weighted down with panniers, etc, etc? Does it take spreading the weight on front/rear racks for the bike to ride less "tank-like"?
#3
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,128
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Liked 312 Times
in
220 Posts
In general, I have read in quite a few places that touring bikes ride like a tank when unloaded. However, when weight is added with panniers, etc, etc, the bike seems to come into its own or ride less "tank-like".
WARNING - DUMB QUESTION AHEAD ...
I weight 325. So in general would touring bikes still ride "tank-like" when riding unloaded with only me on the bike? Or would it ride more like when it's weighted down with panniers, etc, etc? Does it take spreading the weight on front/rear racks for the bike to ride less "tank-like"?
WARNING - DUMB QUESTION AHEAD ...
I weight 325. So in general would touring bikes still ride "tank-like" when riding unloaded with only me on the bike? Or would it ride more like when it's weighted down with panniers, etc, etc? Does it take spreading the weight on front/rear racks for the bike to ride less "tank-like"?
Keep in mind, many people who would be lucky to be even 200lbs, say they don't find these bikes to be "tank like".
Now is that because they haven't tried more expensive bikes or is it because this feeling isn't a universal thing.
I think it stands to reason to expect the bike would comparatively feel better for someone weighing 320lbs, than 160lbs.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In general, I have read in quite a few places that touring bikes ride like a tank when unloaded. However, when weight is added with panniers, etc, etc, the bike seems to come into its own or ride less "tank-like".
WARNING - DUMB QUESTION AHEAD ...
I weight 325. So in general would touring bikes still ride "tank-like" when riding unloaded with only me on the bike? Or would it ride more like when it's weighted down with panniers, etc, etc? Does it take spreading the weight on front/rear racks for the bike to ride less "tank-like"?
WARNING - DUMB QUESTION AHEAD ...
I weight 325. So in general would touring bikes still ride "tank-like" when riding unloaded with only me on the bike? Or would it ride more like when it's weighted down with panniers, etc, etc? Does it take spreading the weight on front/rear racks for the bike to ride less "tank-like"?
When I was looking a few years ago, I test rode and fell in love with the Salsa Vaya. It was awesome and I really wanted one but couldn't come to spend $1500. I think it's the steel... so happy when I found the Coda was steel and half the price.
#5
Senior Member
I weight 325. So in general would touring bikes still ride "tank-like" when riding unloaded with only me on the bike? Or would it ride more like when it's weighted down with panniers, etc, etc? Does it take spreading the weight on front/rear racks for the bike to ride less "tank-like"?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,074
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Liked 2,014 Times
in
972 Posts
A (bare) touring bike is maybe 30 lbs. and a sport bike of equal value maybe 20 lbs., but a fair percentage of that is in the wheels and tires, and that's certainly noticeable in increased stability and decreased acceleration. And a touring bike will have a stiffer frame but usually softer tires, so there's that.
More than once I've described my bike as being "a Cadillac, not a sports car". It's not a tank. A Pugsley is a tank.
More than once I've described my bike as being "a Cadillac, not a sports car". It's not a tank. A Pugsley is a tank.
#7
Senior Member
This is my touring bike. Is this config (with light tires) its around 25 lbs and rides like a regular steel road bike. Super smooth.
This is the same bike loaded down for touring with heavy touring wheels and tires + full racks and bags. I think it weighs about 60 lbs here and feels like a tank:
Point being, you can dial in feel a bit.
This is the same bike loaded down for touring with heavy touring wheels and tires + full racks and bags. I think it weighs about 60 lbs here and feels like a tank:
Point being, you can dial in feel a bit.
#8
Senior Member
A (bare) touring bike is maybe 30 lbs. and a sport bike of equal value maybe 20 lbs., but a fair percentage of that is in the wheels and tires, and that's certainly noticeable in increased stability and decreased acceleration. And a touring bike will have a stiffer frame but usually softer tires, so there's that.
#9
Senior Member
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Up
Posts: 4,695
Bikes: Masi, Giant TCR, Eisentraut (retired), Jamis Aurora Elite, Zullo, Cannondale, 84 & 93 Stumpjumpers, Waterford, Tern D8, Bianchi, Gunner Roadie, Serotta, Serotta Duette, was gifted a Diamond Back
Liked 2,038 Times
in
604 Posts
I think some of the tank like feel has to do with the wheelbase on the touring bikes, if you look at touring bikes there is a large gap between the rear tire and the seat tube and also the head tube angle is more relaxed. this makes the bike have a longer turning radius. Loading the bike with low rider front panniers will lower the center of gravity of the front fork making the ride more stable. The wider touring tires would also make the ride feel more plush.
My touring bike is in the is 24 lbs w/o racks or fenders, it feels like a tank to me because I normally ride road bikes that are below 20 lbs. An the gearing is very low on this bike so the fast is still slow. I changed the road triple out with a mountain triple, and have changed the cassette from a 11-28 to a 12-36. When I go touring, this is a fine bike.
I think at your weight that a touring bike would feel more stable than a 16 lb road bike.
I was just thinking, what do you mean by more tank like? slow and clumsy? or more like the difference between 2 seater roadster vs a caddy? I think of the roadster versus the caddy a better comparison. My road bikes with the very narrow tires are quick handling and have a harsh ride while the touring bikes isn't as sporty, it turns like a truck, takes some time to slow down and has a cushy ride that I can stay in the saddle all day, day after day.
My touring bike is in the is 24 lbs w/o racks or fenders, it feels like a tank to me because I normally ride road bikes that are below 20 lbs. An the gearing is very low on this bike so the fast is still slow. I changed the road triple out with a mountain triple, and have changed the cassette from a 11-28 to a 12-36. When I go touring, this is a fine bike.
I think at your weight that a touring bike would feel more stable than a 16 lb road bike.
I was just thinking, what do you mean by more tank like? slow and clumsy? or more like the difference between 2 seater roadster vs a caddy? I think of the roadster versus the caddy a better comparison. My road bikes with the very narrow tires are quick handling and have a harsh ride while the touring bikes isn't as sporty, it turns like a truck, takes some time to slow down and has a cushy ride that I can stay in the saddle all day, day after day.
Last edited by cyclist2000; 04-27-16 at 02:27 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 165
Bikes: 2014 Trek Shift 4, 2015 Surly Disc Trucker
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't have a lot of bicycle buying experience but I bought a Surly Disc Trucker last July when I was at 275#. I've got 2250 miles on it with no troubles at all. I'm at 220 now but it's carried me around very well so far.
#12
Senior Member
Yes. But I think the majority of the weight difference comes from the component selection (an Ultegra drive-train left-over from another bike) plus wheels and tires that were built for riding on roads near populated areas rather than riding around the world.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 9,171
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Liked 2,172 Times
in
1,335 Posts
I normally ride a touring bike, although I have a nice light road bike too.
Funny thing is, after 5 minutes on either one, the bike seems to disappear as I get used to handling and shifting. Back on the touring bike? Yeah, it handles a bit slow: for half a mile or so. Switch to the road bike? Wow, this thing is twitchy -- for the same half mile.
I've always tried to take a 3-4 mile test ride on a new bike. There are some things that stick up after that long, and lots of things that disappear. Steering and acceleration are usually in the latter category.
Funny thing is, after 5 minutes on either one, the bike seems to disappear as I get used to handling and shifting. Back on the touring bike? Yeah, it handles a bit slow: for half a mile or so. Switch to the road bike? Wow, this thing is twitchy -- for the same half mile.
I've always tried to take a 3-4 mile test ride on a new bike. There are some things that stick up after that long, and lots of things that disappear. Steering and acceleration are usually in the latter category.
#14
Spit out the back
I weight 325. So in general would touring bikes still ride "tank-like" when riding unloaded with only me on the bike? Or would it ride more like when it's weighted down with panniers, etc, etc? Does it take spreading the weight on front/rear racks for the bike to ride less "tank-like"?
If you need/want to haul something other than yourself, then a touring bike is great. The longer wheelbase makes it stable when lots of bags are strapped to it, and the heavier frame makes it less like a noodle under load.
If the bike is just for you, though, you don't need to go full touring to get a bike that is strong enough to support you. A decent steel cross bike would be a little snappier and still be tough as nails.
#15
Banned
Ive been using my touring bike touring before I hit 45 and the weight came to stay..
and continue to like that style of bike, now that I'm 68 & 220#..
Now my Panniers mostly get used for grocery trips.
Never did Drive a Tank,. But I met up with an M1 Abrams, on the Rhine River Levee top road , blocking my path, in 1988.
and continue to like that style of bike, now that I'm 68 & 220#..
Now my Panniers mostly get used for grocery trips.
Never did Drive a Tank,. But I met up with an M1 Abrams, on the Rhine River Levee top road , blocking my path, in 1988.
Last edited by fietsbob; 04-28-16 at 03:35 PM.
#16
Still learning
Components, rims construction, frame material, and frame geometry account for major differences in bike handling, but don't overlook the tire geometry.
My touring bikes include: 1981 Schwinn Super Sport, 1984 Trek 520, 1986 Trek 620, 1986 Cannondale ST400. These are all triple crank bikes with 27" x 1 1/4" tires. The tires are equivalent to a 32mm wide 700c tire, so it is plush comfortable ride. I would never describe the ride performance tank like, as in riding a cruiser, 3 speed, or low end mountain bike.
I own a huge group of racing and sport bikes which include: 1987 Schwinn Super Sport, 1987 Schwinn Tempo, 1989 Schwinn Paramount, 1985 Trek 560, 1986 Trek 520 Cirrus. As a representative sample, these all run on 700c tires no wider than 28mm. Although none are harsh riders, I would not use the word plush in describing ride comfort.
My touring bikes include: 1981 Schwinn Super Sport, 1984 Trek 520, 1986 Trek 620, 1986 Cannondale ST400. These are all triple crank bikes with 27" x 1 1/4" tires. The tires are equivalent to a 32mm wide 700c tire, so it is plush comfortable ride. I would never describe the ride performance tank like, as in riding a cruiser, 3 speed, or low end mountain bike.
I own a huge group of racing and sport bikes which include: 1987 Schwinn Super Sport, 1987 Schwinn Tempo, 1989 Schwinn Paramount, 1985 Trek 560, 1986 Trek 520 Cirrus. As a representative sample, these all run on 700c tires no wider than 28mm. Although none are harsh riders, I would not use the word plush in describing ride comfort.
#17
Touring bikes are described as "tank-like" because they tend to be slow to maneuver. When you've got a bunch of weigh strapped to the front and rear of the bike, this is exactly what you want! Strap a handlebar bag or front panniers to a non-touring road bike and the front wheel wants to flop all over the place when it leans even a little past vertical. The slower, more stable handling of a touring bike helps to counteract the weight mounted at either end. With a heavier rider, the weight tends to be centered over the wheelbase, so chances are it will still won't feel like as maneuverable as a race- or endurance-geometry bike. That doesn't mean that a touring bike isn't a great option, however! If you're not trying to rip down tight, twisty descents at car-like speeds you'll probably find that a touring bike can work quite well...
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 527
Bikes: 2012 Surly LHT / 2024 Surly Karate Monkey / Surly Grappler
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride a LHT at weights from 310 to 350 plus a 15 ish lb bag of fix it all. I also have a crossbike that I feel is a bit twitchy. Get on a cross or road bike and if it feels a bit unstable to you, you're a perfect candidate for a touring bike. I lose maybe half a mph on my average speed over two hours, but I find the tour bike more enjoyable.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 592
Bikes: Soma Double Cross DC, Salsa Vaya, Redline D440, '87 Schwinn Super Sport
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I ride a Salsa Vaya with 35mm tires, leather saddle, rack, and flat peddles.and a Schwinn Super Sport with 25mm tires with clipless. I have never been able to prove the Schwinn is faster. Same course, same wind, same temp....same speed. Its the engine not the bike. Get a bike that will take wide tires and buy a good saddle and have fun. You won't ride if you are miserable and you will be on 25mm tires
#21
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 14
Bikes: 2014 Surly Ogre (hybrid) utility/tour bike, 2009 Mongoos full suspension mtn bike, 1999 LeMons Buenos Aires road bike, 1982 Nishiki Cresta road bike.
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Clydesdale on a Surly Ogre.
Consider a bike that'll accommodate wider tires. The Surly Ogre is a 29er frame that I built into a utility/touring road bike. I put some 2.0(@50mm wide) schwalbe marathon tires with some personally built wheels with beefier spokes. Not only does my ride look good, it rides beautifully.
Last edited by jcova58; 04-30-16 at 07:55 AM. Reason: Add info
#22
Senior Member
I have a steel Windsor Tourist (which is about the same as the steel Nashbar TR1 Touring and the Fuji Touring). It's about 10 lbs heavier than my CF Giant Defy Advanced.
I'm certainly slower on the Windsor by about 2 mph even on a flat ride without panniers. A lot of that is due to a more upright position. I rode the Windsor 3 times this week as (1) I have a 6-day tour coming up in June, and (2) I have the Giant torn down for maintenance.
On the other hand, the Windsor is a great riding bike. It's much more stable than the Giant. I wouldn't call the Windsor a tank at all.
I'm certainly slower on the Windsor by about 2 mph even on a flat ride without panniers. A lot of that is due to a more upright position. I rode the Windsor 3 times this week as (1) I have a 6-day tour coming up in June, and (2) I have the Giant torn down for maintenance.
On the other hand, the Windsor is a great riding bike. It's much more stable than the Giant. I wouldn't call the Windsor a tank at all.