What?! Gates Belt Drive on a FS Bike with Tensioner
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SoCal
Posts: 734
Bikes: As my watts decline, I’m amping up!
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
What?! Gates Belt Drive on a FS Bike with Tensioner
I've always been told you can't run a tensioner with a Gates Belt Drive. Well this years Eurobike has just that!
This design was my thought all along, but it has been shot down for years as undoable. What's up with that?
This design was my thought all along, but it has been shot down for years as undoable. What's up with that?
#5
Senior Member
#6
Senior Member
#7
Banned
Not your bike ? why worry about it?
You need to know the engineering data as to the belts flexibility larger than a certain radius May be within safe limits..
#8
Senior Member
Three problems with a belt for me: most prominently, if it breaks, you're walking (I've had chains break a couple of times in 30+ years of riding up to 5000 miles off road a year and was able to repair them easily and make it home); also, initial set up can be difficult and you need a frame with some kind of "break point" in order to replace the continuous belt.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Likes: 0
Liked 56 Times
in
38 Posts
Trek runs a tensioner on the back end of their Link 5 commuter bike:
Lync 5 | Trek Bikes
So the idea has been around for a bit.
Lync 5 | Trek Bikes
So the idea has been around for a bit.
#10
Banned
Trek runs a tensioner on the back end of their Link 5 commuter bike:
Lync 5 | Trek Bikes
So the idea has been around for a bit.
Lync 5 | Trek Bikes
So the idea has been around for a bit.
...
#11
Senior Member
The only cogged belt (ie. where no slippage is permissible) on car engines is a timing belt between the crank and cam shafts which is a fixed distance. The question with suspended bike frames was whether such a cogged belt would work ok in situations where the distance varies. That question was not addressed in car engine applications.
#12
Senior Member
The only cogged belt (ie. where no slippage is permissible) on car engines is a timing belt between the crank and cam shafts which is a fixed distance. The question with suspended bike frames was whether such a cogged belt would work ok in situations where the distance varies. That question was not addressed in car engine applications.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SoCal
Posts: 734
Bikes: As my watts decline, I’m amping up!
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
In the past the only Full Suspension MTB's that would accept Gates Carbon Drive Belts were those like this Lenz Rohloff MTB with swingarm axis the same as the pedals.
I think it is great if this belt guide setup works. I'm in the middle of my first Gates CDX build right now. Hoping the Carbon Drive is all it's said to be.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
The only cogged belt (ie. where no slippage is permissible) on car engines is a timing belt between the crank and cam shafts which is a fixed distance. The question with suspended bike frames was whether such a cogged belt would work ok in situations where the distance varies. That question was not addressed in car engine applications.
#16
Banned
Where the rear pivot is is The significant Bit .. I'm more into The Bike Friday Folders, [Rohloff & Chains]
I have a Pocket Llama , they hinge behind the BB, so have a chain tensioner.
their Tikit, a fast fold folding bike , have the BB as part of the rear section , and so all work as a unit,
Belt stays at same tension setting..
they used that design on 2 additional models,, 'Silk' & new NorthWest Tour
Mechanical Logic,
I'm guessing , but the snubber roller by the crank , is big enough to stay within the belt design's flex range,
and compensates for minor axle to BB length changes as the rear end absorbs bumps..
Life span of belt in this design is unknown, perhaps less.. I'd have an extra belt on hand , in your truck at least..
...
I have a Pocket Llama , they hinge behind the BB, so have a chain tensioner.
their Tikit, a fast fold folding bike , have the BB as part of the rear section , and so all work as a unit,
Belt stays at same tension setting..
they used that design on 2 additional models,, 'Silk' & new NorthWest Tour
Mechanical Logic,
I'm guessing , but the snubber roller by the crank , is big enough to stay within the belt design's flex range,
and compensates for minor axle to BB length changes as the rear end absorbs bumps..
Life span of belt in this design is unknown, perhaps less.. I'd have an extra belt on hand , in your truck at least..
...
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SoCal
Posts: 734
Bikes: As my watts decline, I’m amping up!
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Soma B-Side V.2 Belt Drive Bafang BBS02B 750W/48V Hardtail:
https://www.bikeforums.net/electric-b...ion-bluid.html
If the guide setup works well, one might be able to add a Gates Carbon Drive Belt to a Raleigh Misceo iE by adding a frame break. It's a great electric shifting IGH Shimano STePS E-bike.
https://www.bikeforums.net/electric-b...ion-bluid.html
If the guide setup works well, one might be able to add a Gates Carbon Drive Belt to a Raleigh Misceo iE by adding a frame break. It's a great electric shifting IGH Shimano STePS E-bike.
#18
Senior Member
I'm well aware of the tensioner on car timing belts and have also had to change one. That isn't the point. The question regarding feasibility of a cogged belt on FS mountain bikes was whether they would work well in a situation where the distance between the two connected points is changing. This bike seems to answer that question affirmatively while previous car engine designs didn't address it.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
I'm well aware of the tensioner on car timing belts and have also had to change one. That isn't the point. The question regarding feasibility of a cogged belt on FS mountain bikes was whether they would work well in a situation where the distance between the two connected points is changing. This bike seems to answer that question affirmatively while previous car engine designs didn't address it.
#20
Junior Member
I have a Rohloff with CDX Gates on my Winter (brand) custom road bike commuter. I'm still happy with the choice of a Gates CDX belt over a chain. Eric Estlund the builder, had to get the frame tested to meet the Gates requirements but it didn't seem to be a big deal. I bought extra belts but they are still on the shelf.
#21
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Those look like really good cog pulleys. I've seen a posting before where the rider smack the front pulley against a curb and broke the composite cog pulley. Not a Gates brand, so no place to buy the replacement except in China. Smack a chain drive and you can smack it again to get home, then get a replacement anywhere.
#22
Ghost rider
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Montreal
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Chain drives are move convenient for E-bikes as chain is much more efficient than a belt system.
Chain drives are move convenient for E-bikes as chain is much more efficient than a belt system.
Chain drives are move convenient for E-bikes as chain is much more efficient than a belt system.
#23
Junior Member
I would not agree with chains being "much more efficient" at 3 watts for a chain vs 4 watts for a belt in relation to an e-bike discussion. I don't think it would count as a statistically significant difference.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SoCal
Posts: 734
Bikes: As my watts decline, I’m amping up!
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I agree. The long life, lack of maintenance and silence clearly outweigh such a small efficiency difference IMHO. That's why I went with a Gates Carbon Drive on my current hard-tail build. A year or two from now I should have some real world experience with it to report.
#25
Senior Member
I agree. The long life, lack of maintenance and silence clearly outweigh such a small efficiency difference IMHO. That's why I went with a Gates Carbon Drive on my current hard-tail build. A year or two from now I should have some real world experience with it to report.