SRAM Apex 1
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 174
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
SRAM Apex 1
If you're looking to go 1x11 w/o spending a ton of dough, Apex 1 is definitely worth checking out. It shifts better than some pricier groups I've ridden. Zero dropped chains, and no ghost shifting if you have to backpedal. Full review here.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126
Bikes: Steel 1x's
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I've just installed it on two different bikes for people recently and I'm really impressed with what you get for the money with the Apex 1 stuff.
I've previously used Rival 22, Rival 1, Force, Dura Ace and 105 stuff, but I'd be fine using Apex 1 on my personal bikes as well.
I've previously used Rival 22, Rival 1, Force, Dura Ace and 105 stuff, but I'd be fine using Apex 1 on my personal bikes as well.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 174
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've just installed it on two different bikes for people recently and I'm really impressed with what you get for the money with the Apex 1 stuff.
I've previously used Rival 22, Rival 1, Force, Dura Ace and 105 stuff, but I'd be fine using Apex 1 on my personal bikes as well.
I've previously used Rival 22, Rival 1, Force, Dura Ace and 105 stuff, but I'd be fine using Apex 1 on my personal bikes as well.
#4
Senior Member
I have the SRAM Rival 1 (1x11) with a 40T chain ring. It feels very positive and I've never had a dropped chain or missed gear change. There is a noticeable "clunk" when it changes though, which is different to the Shimano gears I've tried with smaller gear steps.
Do you ever find you lack low enough gears when climbing (my lowest is 40-32) or spin out at higher speeds?
I can only get to about 50km/h with my bike, spinning at about 90-95rpm. It's fast enough, but I would be easily outpaced by bikes with higher gearing if I were riding in a group.
John
Do you ever find you lack low enough gears when climbing (my lowest is 40-32) or spin out at higher speeds?
I can only get to about 50km/h with my bike, spinning at about 90-95rpm. It's fast enough, but I would be easily outpaced by bikes with higher gearing if I were riding in a group.
John
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 174
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I set up my 1x bikes with low gears no greater than 1:1. On my "everything bike" I'm running 38 up front with 11-42 in the back. Works really well with 29.x2.35 road tires. For dedicated off-road use I swap out the 38 for a 28. A couple of weeks ago I didn't feel like changing back to the 38 so I commuted with a 28/11 high gear. It was, as they say, "a learning experience."
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The Apex 1 PG-1130 cassette does just that. The only offering is an 11-42 (weighing it at 538g!), so SRAM is taking a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Interestingly, the PG-1130 cassette appears to use the MTB approach of letting the big cog cantilever over the hub so it will fit a 9/10-speed freehub body on older wheels. This makes Apex 1 a really affordable option for people looking to switch from 2x10 to 1x11.
The down-side of that much range is big jumps between the gears. The 42t is a 17% jump and the 11t is an 18% jump so they're really granny/descent gears. The remaining 9 cogs average 13.6% between cogs (compared to the 8.6% average on the middle 9 of an 11-26). If you race (or ride like it) and need a wide gear range, riding 1x will put you at a disadvantage.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've done some really steep (paved) climbs with a 40/32 low gear but they were mercifully short. It's slightly worse than a compact with an 11-28 (33.4 GI vs. 32.3 GI). For gravel, long climbs, and/or larger riders, I could definitely see a need to go lower. But as you've discovered, you have to really widen the cassette range to get much lower without losing too much top end.
The Apex 1 PG-1130 cassette does just that. The only offering is an 11-42 (weighing it at 538g!), so SRAM is taking a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Interestingly, the PG-1130 cassette appears to use the MTB approach of letting the big cog cantilever over the hub so it will fit a 9/10-speed freehub body on older wheels. This makes Apex 1 a really affordable option for people looking to switch from 2x10 to 1x11.
The down-side of that much range is big jumps between the gears. The 42t is a 17% jump and the 11t is an 18% jump so they're really granny/descent gears. The remaining 9 cogs average 13.6% between cogs (compared to the 8.6% average on the middle 9 of an 11-26). If you race (or ride like it) and need a wide gear range, riding 1x will put you at a disadvantage.
The Apex 1 PG-1130 cassette does just that. The only offering is an 11-42 (weighing it at 538g!), so SRAM is taking a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Interestingly, the PG-1130 cassette appears to use the MTB approach of letting the big cog cantilever over the hub so it will fit a 9/10-speed freehub body on older wheels. This makes Apex 1 a really affordable option for people looking to switch from 2x10 to 1x11.
The down-side of that much range is big jumps between the gears. The 42t is a 17% jump and the 11t is an 18% jump so they're really granny/descent gears. The remaining 9 cogs average 13.6% between cogs (compared to the 8.6% average on the middle 9 of an 11-26). If you race (or ride like it) and need a wide gear range, riding 1x will put you at a disadvantage.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Cross (racing) and gravel are radically different things. You don't need a lot of range to race cross. Fast sections are not that fast, and short enough it's not a big deal to spin a high cadence on them. And if you hit sections that need a really low gear to ride, it's faster to get off and run. Combine that with the fact that an FD can fail in a bunch of unpleasant ways in the CX environment, and 1x makes a huge amount of sense. For gravel it's much more of a toss-up.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cross (racing) and gravel are radically different things. You don't need a lot of range to race cross. Fast sections are not that fast, and short enough it's not a big deal to spin a high cadence on them. And if you hit sections that need a really low gear to ride, it's faster to get off and run. Combine that with the fact that an FD can fail in a bunch of unpleasant ways in the CX environment, and 1x makes a huge amount of sense. For gravel it's much more of a toss-up.